Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 06/24/2022 View Thu 06/23/2022 View Wed 06/22/2022 View Tue 06/21/2022 View Mon 06/20/2022 View Sun 06/19/2022 View Sat 06/18/2022
2022-06-24 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Roe v Wade: Done deal.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by badanov 2022-06-24 10:23|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [10810 views ]  Top

#1 Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in landmark opinion
Posted by Skidmark 2022-06-24 10:27||   2022-06-24 10:27|| Front Page Top

#2 ...Gonna be a loooong weekend.

Posted by MikeKozlowski 2022-06-24 10:38||   2022-06-24 10:38|| Front Page Top

#3 Snowflake tears are flooding Washington DC streets.
Posted by Chris 2022-06-24 10:38||   2022-06-24 10:38|| Front Page Top

#4 Back to States' rules, as it should have been. Emanations and penumbras = bullshit
Posted by Frank G 2022-06-24 10:39||   2022-06-24 10:39|| Front Page Top

#5 Now let the abortion insurrection begin.
Posted by Glalet Slaiger2825 2022-06-24 10:43||   2022-06-24 10:43|| Front Page Top

#6 Will 'replacement people' still be needed ?
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-24 10:45||   2022-06-24 10:45|| Front Page Top

#7 Protests erupt outside Supreme Court in Washington DC as US braces for weekend of violence after justices struck down Roe v. Wade which guarantees women right to an abortion
Posted by Skidmark 2022-06-24 10:47||   2022-06-24 10:47|| Front Page Top

#8 Watching the protest on Fox right now. From the screamers I see on teevee, I have no problem with them NOT reproducing.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-24 10:51||   2022-06-24 10:51|| Front Page Top

#9 Good thing I ordered another 300 rounds. In case any rioting spills out of Downtown Houston. Really unlikely they'd make it far. Cops were very concerned about rioters vs citizens there:p (Would end poorly for rioters)
Posted by Silentbrick 2022-06-24 10:57||   2022-06-24 10:57|| Front Page Top

#10 Interesting it was 6 to 3. I figured it would be 5 to 4.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2022-06-24 11:03||   2022-06-24 11:03|| Front Page Top

#11 Interesting it was 6 to 3. I figured it would be 5 to 4.

Agreed. Roberts is a strange duck. Fine with Obamacare and stolen elections, then votes to overturn Roe. WTF?
Posted by Angstrom 2022-06-24 11:09||   2022-06-24 11:09|| Front Page Top

#12 Yeah, when's Roberts going to come back down to Earth and side with the socialist judges?
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-24 11:16||   2022-06-24 11:16|| Front Page Top

#13 Roberts is a grandstander. If he can't be the all powerful swing vote that stabs conservatives in the back, he hides behind Thomas while flaunting his pretend conservative credentials.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2022-06-24 11:38||   2022-06-24 11:38|| Front Page Top

#14 Texas Ban on Abortions from ‘Moment of Conception’ Set to Start in 30 Days
Posted by Skidmark 2022-06-24 11:46||   2022-06-24 11:46|| Front Page Top

#15 How long until the Court gets expanded to 13 justices? And how long until a civil rights case is filed that blacks have to travel too far from some states to get abortions?
Posted by Glenmore  2022-06-24 12:01||   2022-06-24 12:01|| Front Page Top

#16 Will 'replacement people' still be needed ?

Yes. No worries, people. Abortions will always be available in California, New York, Massachusetts, etc., etc. Call it abortion tourism if you will.

Catholic churches need to start posting armed guards ASAP.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2022-06-24 12:06||   2022-06-24 12:06|| Front Page Top

#17 18 USC 1507 (I know, I'm naïve.)
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-24 12:11||   2022-06-24 12:11|| Front Page Top

#18 Not to worry, in Democrat states abortion will still be legal, and they will keep aborting black babies at a tremendous rate.

A trend that Democrats refuse to acknowledge is blacks being out-populated by immigrants. They're becoming less and less important as time passes.
Posted by Albemarle Snerert7268 2022-06-24 12:23||   2022-06-24 12:23|| Front Page Top

#19 How long until the Court gets expanded to 13 justices?

That would require a constitutional amendment. Really will not happen.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 12:40||   2022-06-24 12:40|| Front Page Top

#20 “Protest” concerns:

Posted by trailing wife 2022-06-24 12:44||   2022-06-24 12:44|| Front Page Top

Likely to be over overturned the next time the LSD's stack the SCOTUS.

Remember despite always playing the race card for votes,the LSD's have a long history of demeaning, enslaving and killing Black Americans. An abortion has eliminated over 14 million black births.
Posted by NN2N1 2022-06-24 12:44||   2022-06-24 12:44|| Front Page Top

#22 Begs the question. If you and your crazed brother-in-law travel from Georgia to California and you murder him there, will you be charged with murder in Georgia ?
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-24 12:52||   2022-06-24 12:52|| Front Page Top

#23 As a strict constructionist, the charge must happen in the jurisdiction it occurred, but that's just me.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,...
Posted by Procopius2k 2022-06-24 13:10||   2022-06-24 13:10|| Front Page Top

#24 Trump filled as many court vacancies as possible with conservative judges during his 4 years as POTUS. Now the judicial community has a very conservative mindset that lives even after the big WH steal.
Posted by Black Charlie Slairt1430 2022-06-24 13:11||   2022-06-24 13:11|| Front Page Top

#25 M Murcek, no, I don’t believe it does require a Constitutional amendment , Congress is given the authority to establish the structure of the Court, and I think has previously expanded the number of justices, though not in a very long time.
Posted by Glenmore  2022-06-24 13:17||   2022-06-24 13:17|| Front Page Top

#26 Ask Michael Flynn (and ask Sussman).
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-24 13:18||   2022-06-24 13:18|| Front Page Top

#27 Besoeker, I think what MM meant is that, yes, there is no "set" number for the amount of judges on SCOTUS, but that it would take something to etch a particular number in Constitutional stone. The current nine is just a arbitrary as seven or thirteen.
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-24 13:20||   2022-06-24 13:20|| Front Page Top

#28 If they pack the court, next we just bump it up to 287. Play their game to the max.
Posted by Silentbrick 2022-06-24 13:46||   2022-06-24 13:46|| Front Page Top

#29 "Packing" is really watering down, just as "choice" is actually killing.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 13:47||   2022-06-24 13:47|| Front Page Top

#30 And, to clarify, I did think that 7 was specified in the Constitution. So I was wrong.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 13:52||   2022-06-24 13:52|| Front Page Top

#31 In fact, I'm not even sure these hearings for justice nominees are "required".
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-24 13:52||   2022-06-24 13:52|| Front Page Top

#32 You only need to "fix 3-4 states to rig a Presidential election. They will not be able to rig all 50 states in November. What they will do is target some of the newcomers for co-option. Unfortunately, some state GOP organizations are sending people who will be ripe to be blackmailed outright or manipulated because they are weak.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 13:55||   2022-06-24 13:55|| Front Page Top

#33 ^ Dammit, I am the "oops, wrong thread" guy this week. Sorry.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 13:55||   2022-06-24 13:55|| Front Page Top

#34 Some wag at Last Refuge. We can hope this is correct: The greatest downstream benefit of today's supreme court decision will be to keep the most annoying leftists from moving to red states and regions.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 14:39||   2022-06-24 14:39|| Front Page Top

#35 Could anyone forsee the lies and misinformaton from the leftists and media in the wake of this and the 2nd amendment decision? (sarc)
Posted by Deacon Blues 2022-06-24 14:57||   2022-06-24 14:57|| Front Page Top

#36 They are lying, but much more, they are spotlighting their own ignorance of the document itself and its ramifications.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 15:06||   2022-06-24 15:06|| Front Page Top

#37 Notice they released the concealed carry decision before this one.
Posted by Procopius2k 2022-06-24 15:15||   2022-06-24 15:15|| Front Page Top

#38 now if we can just get some of those GOP politicians who enjoy gracefully losing to realize that gracefully winning is a far better option.
Posted by ruprecht 2022-06-24 15:28||   2022-06-24 15:28|| Front Page Top

#39 For information, from badanov’s WSJ liveblog link:

Four Important Supreme Court Opinions Still to Come

Kennedy v. Bremerton School District

A school district in Washington state says a high-school football coach was improperly using his public employment to promote his religion by kneeling in silent prayer on the 50-yard line after games, with some players coming over to join him. The former coach, Joe Kennedy, said his actions amounted to a protected act of private speech because he played no favorites with the students who participated in the prayer circle.

Biden v. Texas

In this case, the Supreme Court will rule on whether the Biden administration can be compelled to maintain the Trump administration’s Remain in Mexico program, which denied entry to asylum applicants from Central America while their cases were being processed. The Biden administration said the law exposed asylum applicants to unsafe conditions, and that it was pursuing other measures to ease the burden on the immigration system; Missouri and Texas said the government was obliged either to deny entry to these applicants or imprison them within the U.S. until their claims were resolved.

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency

A coalition of Republican-leaning states and small coal producers argue that EPA’s power to combat greenhouse gases is limited to measures within the fence lines of specific power plants, excluding broader measures the agency says are more effective. The case, argued in February, could lead to new limits on the executive branch’s regulatory power.

Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta

Oklahoma argues it retains concurrent authority on Indian reservations with the federal government to prosecute nontribal citizens even when a crime’s victim is Native American, seeking to reverse one consequence of the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision recognizing nearly half of the state as Indian country. That decision transferred many criminal cases from state courts to federal jurisdiction. Should the court agree with Oklahoma, other states with Indian reservations could find themselves with authority for prosecuting crimes over swaths of territory that for generations have been the U.S. Justice Department’s sole responsibility.
Posted by trailing wife 2022-06-24 15:39||   2022-06-24 15:39|| Front Page Top

#40 Sounding like some teefer types may self-abort (with a little help) in DC tonight.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 15:56||   2022-06-24 15:56|| Front Page Top

#41 Tonight, a lot of people who can't even get pregnant are in a funk, thinking "my life is ruined." Those are the people we have to out-vote.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 16:42||   2022-06-24 16:42|| Front Page Top

#42 I'm always astonished that they can, with a straight face, call the murder of an unborn child 'reproductive rights'.
Posted by CrazyFool 2022-06-24 18:34||   2022-06-24 18:34|| Front Page Top

#43 If "Roberts is being blackmailed by the left" and "Kalorama Kompound" actually runs the country, how did this happen?

Sober up.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-24 19:10||   2022-06-24 19:10|| Front Page Top

#44 Protesting at the homes of Justices recently didn't help the Dem's causes.
Posted by Cletle Shinese1880 2022-06-24 21:14||   2022-06-24 21:14|| Front Page Top

#45 I predict Biden will blame Putin for this, too.
Posted by Omump Grusoque5444 2022-06-24 23:32||   2022-06-24 23:32|| Front Page Top

23:32 Omump Grusoque5444
21:24 DarthVader
21:14 Cletle Shinese1880
21:12 Silentbrick
20:26 Matt
20:25 Mercutio
20:25 Mercutio
20:24 Mercutio
19:52 CrazyFool
19:44 Matt
19:39 Frank G
19:37 Frank G
19:10 M. Murcek
18:34 swksvolFF
18:34 M. Murcek
18:34 CrazyFool
18:33 swksvolFF
18:19 swksvolFF
18:00 M. Murcek
17:58 DarthVader
17:46 Bugs Bonaparte8101
17:44 DarthVader
17:36 Warthog
17:17 Andy Spolutle4942

Search WWW Search