Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 06/17/2022 View Thu 06/16/2022 View Wed 06/15/2022 View Tue 06/14/2022 View Mon 06/13/2022 View Sun 06/12/2022 View Sat 06/11/2022
1
2022-06-17 Economy
Social Security Solvency: Lindsey Graham Thinks Seniors May ‘Have to' Take Less Money
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-17 02:24|| || Front Page|| [12 views ]  Top

#1 

HEY! DC DUMB$hits, retirees are barely making ends meet now.

Want to see the number of Bankruptcies sky rocket?
Want to see businesses and Financial institutions lose a few $100 BILLION quickly?


So how about LESS DC spending instead?
Posted by NN2N1 2022-06-17 05:16||   2022-06-17 05:16|| Front Page Top

#2 The politicians are ready to break that "promise" now that those generations of voters are about to die off. Time to make new promises to new generations of rubes.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-17 05:50||   2022-06-17 05:50|| Front Page Top

#3 The establishment is trying to feed the Social Security Ponzi scheme with immigration (legal and illegal). Scaring Seniors with a loss of $$$$ is part of the plan to get support for the establishment Dreamers and open border policies.
Posted by Airandee 2022-06-17 05:58||   2022-06-17 05:58|| Front Page Top

#4 It's all BS. Social Security was justified before SCOTUS as a tax. The 'tax' accounting was finally merged in the 1960s under Johnson and the Democrats. 'It' is a game of three card monte as much as all the governments bookkeeping. As long as they have a printing press, it won't run out of money. Whether that 'money' is worth anything is another matter.
Posted by Procopius2k 2022-06-17 06:37||   2022-06-17 06:37|| Front Page Top

#5  The politicians are ready to break that "promise" now that those generations of voters are about to die off. Time to make new promises to new generations of rubes.

With inflation pointing to a potential Social Security COLA increase of over 6 percent, nice time to redraw eligibility criteria.

'Needs based' is the key. 'The rich' (anyone making over $50,000 per year) will not be eligible for full benefits. See income offset at table 4b.

[sarc off, but not by much]
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-17 07:02||   2022-06-17 07:02|| Front Page Top

#6 And there is a huge steaming pile of 401K and IRA savings which can be used to further fund Social Security.
Politicians have been drooling over those for decades...
Posted by CrazyFool 2022-06-17 07:09||   2022-06-17 07:09|| Front Page Top

#7 As long as SCROTUS is at least 7-2 conservative, it won't happen, even with Roberts riding the fence. Any move to grab retirement funds not under the gummint's control would be injoined immediately because there would be no unwinding it later if gummint lost in court.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-17 07:14||   2022-06-17 07:14|| Front Page Top

#8 Lindsey, I might have politely listened to what you had to say.

But then you said “Let’s do something like Ted Kennedy would do".
Posted by Mullah Richard 2022-06-17 07:28||   2022-06-17 07:28|| Front Page Top

#9 He will be primared out of office with that statement
Posted by DarthVader 2022-06-17 08:04||   2022-06-17 08:04|| Front Page Top

#10 So Lindsay is fixin’ to take a drive in an Oldsmobile????
Posted by USN, Ret. 2022-06-17 08:10||   2022-06-17 08:10|| Front Page Top

#11 ^ We should be so lucky...
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-17 08:10||   2022-06-17 08:10|| Front Page Top

#12 The abject filth and nonsense that comes out of these politicians' gobs.

Graham is one reason (of several) why I'd never donate one thin dime to the GOP.
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-17 08:40||   2022-06-17 08:40|| Front Page Top

#13 I got a fundraising letter from the RNC; it has Lindsey's name on it. Opened it up, read the letter, laughed, then I threw it in the trash.
Posted by Raj 2022-06-17 09:08||   2022-06-17 09:08|| Front Page Top

#14 FWIW just started drawing social security at 64. Amazed the system was still solvent. Due military damage full medical coverage from the VA. At 65 I must sign up for Medicare A (free) and B (premium required). If I declined part B (due existing full coverage from the VA) then I forfeit my social security benefits. What a racket!
Posted by Cloluck Bourbon1058 2022-06-17 10:35||   2022-06-17 10:35|| Front Page Top

#15 #14 get a medicare advantage plan (MA), not a medicare advantage prescription drug plan (MA PD) with a part B give back, if you don’t need the prescription coverage, since you get it from the VA.
Posted by Beavis 2022-06-17 10:44||   2022-06-17 10:44|| Front Page Top

#16 Go with both CB. You did good, probably better than the remaining 97 percent. There really is no such thing as a bad retirement annuity, civilian or military, regardless of the amount.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-17 10:48||   2022-06-17 10:48|| Front Page Top

#17 Social Security is a pyramid/Ponzi scheme, but the only difference is that you can actually quit a Ponzi scheme...not so with Social Security.
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-17 10:58||   2022-06-17 10:58|| Front Page Top

#18 
#9 He will be primared out of office with that statement
Posted by: DarthVader 2022-06-17 08:04


...From your lips to Ol' Strom's ears, Brother. It's a pity Graham isn't running this year, because I would truly love to vote against him.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2022-06-17 11:54||   2022-06-17 11:54|| Front Page Top

#19 It was always the gummint's money. They just pretended to let you believe you had earned it.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-17 11:57||   2022-06-17 11:57|| Front Page Top

#20 So how about LESS DC spending instead?

Of course that's the obvious answer but don't count on Lindsey Graham to admit it. He'd rather keep sending billions, trillions, to places like Afghanistan and Ukraine.

Ultimately, Social Security should be phased out and replaced with something like a 401k with as little government involvement as possible. Oh, and this 401k should be strictly voluntary. You can contribute as much or as little as you want or you can opt out of it altogether. You are responsible for yourself. The folks who administer a 401k have a fiduciary responsibility to you, unlike Big Brother who is never responsible for anything.

Social Security is socialism. It is Big Brother at his very worst. He doesn't trust you with your own money and, besides, he wants it for his own nefarious purposes. So he takes your money with a flimsy promise to repay you when you get old, which is whatever his definition of old is. And if you croak one day after you reach that age, well, too bad. Your wife may keep receiving partial payments until she croaks but you cannot pass that money to your children. People who talk about how great Franklin Roosevelt was make me sick because, forget about Biden or any of the others, Roosevelt was the worst president ever.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2022-06-17 12:47||   2022-06-17 12:47|| Front Page Top

#21 You still have to pay Medicare out of your social security benefits. I had to get a job to suppliment my social security and now have to pay income tax on 85% of my social security as well as paying social security, medicare, and income tax on my paycheck. We don't have a government, we have an organization that takes money.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2022-06-17 14:52||   2022-06-17 14:52|| Front Page Top

#22 Got good service at Social Security office today. Was handled by a 40 year old white guy- didn’t know the government employed any of those anymore.
Doubt I will get any S.S. benefits in 2 years when I was planning to sign up.
Posted by Glenmore  2022-06-17 14:56||   2022-06-17 14:56|| Front Page Top

#23 Just FYI - make sure your "Fiduciary" is an actual Fiduciary. They need to have your interests vs commissions and payouts
Posted by Frank G 2022-06-17 19:49||   2022-06-17 19:49|| Front Page Top

#24 Everything is turning up roses for the GOP so this idiot decides to piss on their most solid voting block.

If Democrats had dirt on him I don't think he'd act any differently.
Posted by ruprecht 2022-06-17 21:38||   2022-06-17 21:38|| Front Page Top

#25 GOP, and that slob gentleman from South Carolina in particular, are simply out of touch.
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-06-17 21:42||   2022-06-17 21:42|| Front Page Top

23:55 swksvolFF
23:55 swksvolFF
23:55 swksvolFF
22:15 Rambler in Virginia
21:59 ruprecht
21:42 DooDahMan
21:41 ruprecht
21:38 ruprecht
21:32 DooDahMan
21:27 DooDahMan
20:57 ruprecht
20:56 ruprecht
20:52 Canuckistan sniper
20:39 Canuckistan sniper
20:13 Glenmore
19:56 magpie
19:49 Frank G
19:17 Mercutio
19:01 trailing wife
17:47 swksvolFF
17:36 ed in texas
17:35 ed in texas
17:32 ed in texas
17:20 SteveS









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com