Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 08/02/2020 View Sat 08/01/2020 View Fri 07/31/2020 View Thu 07/30/2020 View Wed 07/29/2020 View Tue 07/28/2020 View Mon 07/27/2020
1
2020-08-02 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Does Anyone Have the Courage to Indict Obama?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-02 07:09|| || Front Page|| [336097 views ]  Top

#1 Does Anyone Have The Courage To Indict Obama?

Apparently not. We'll be lucky if he doesn't appear on Mount Rushmore.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-02 07:13||   2020-08-02 07:13|| Front Page Top

#2 No, and I suspect "they" have something on Trump. I don't know what else it can be. Clinton's & Obama ... nothing. Of course, all it might take is for the MSM to flip the switch, but that will never happen.
Posted by Clem 2020-08-02 07:34||   2020-08-02 07:34|| Front Page Top

#3 Does anyone have the courage to indict a leftist from the Obama administration?
Posted by Airandee 2020-08-02 07:55||   2020-08-02 07:55|| Front Page Top

#4 I'm just guessing that after the civil war there are going to be a number of tribunals that will merit out justice delayed, obstructed and unfinished previous to the conflict. Nuremberg set a precedent of a priori behavior being addressed and if history is precedent, maybe they can avoid the Soviet treatment of the Romanovs.
Posted by Procopius2k 2020-08-02 08:01||   2020-08-02 08:01|| Front Page Top

#5 It has been known for several years Bill Clinton was on Epstein's pedophile island with underage girls. If that doesn't get a former President charged, Obama has nothing to worry about for illegal spying on opponent campaigns.
Posted by Vespasian Ebbereng3110 2020-08-02 08:05||   2020-08-02 08:05|| Front Page Top

#6 It's simple extortion. No one wants to incur the wrath, boycotting, and rioting. The origins run rather deep. Page back if you will to LBJ's 'Great Society' (dem vote getting schemes) and move forward to the current day.

C/Net - These are the major brands donating to the Black Lives Matter movement
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-02 08:07||   2020-08-02 08:07|| Front Page Top

#7 No, and I suspect "they" have something on Trump.

Given their desperation to be rid of Trump and their outrageous actions to date, if they had anything at all on Trump it would have been used. Obama needs a military tribunal and a firing squad for his crimes against the State.
Posted by H-T-A 2020-08-02 08:35||   2020-08-02 08:35|| Front Page Top

#8 The reason they have nothing on Trump is that prior to 4 years ago he was elected to nothing and responsible for nothing of public trust. The swamp has no leverage which is why Trump must go get thrown out of Whitehouse. Trumps tactical mistake was trusting RINOs to help him transition. On the first day in office he should have been given a list of every fireable bureaucrat and then fired them all from the left and right.
Posted by Airandee 2020-08-02 08:56||   2020-08-02 08:56|| Front Page Top

#9 To get the former president would require an airtight case after all his lieutenants were convicted and some of them turned state’s evidence. Also a year of revelations trumpeted to the skies. and being caught in the act whipping little black boys or something.

We have a tradition here of not going after previous presidents for a reason: it allows all of them to peacefully turn over the reins of office when their term is over. If the threat of jail becomes a thing, they really will refuse to leave.
Posted by trailing wife 2020-08-02 10:26||   2020-08-02 10:26|| Front Page Top

#10 Suddenly, a light bulb went off. I realized this is exactly how to indict, convict and send former President Barack Obama to prison. I believe Obama is the biggest criminal in the history of the United States

True and Hussein is deserving, but I'd bet on no.
Posted by JohnQC 2020-08-02 10:40||   2020-08-02 10:40|| Front Page Top

#11 If nothing on Trump (duly noted), then what is it? Threats against him or his family? Or, if they did have something on him and used it, then Trump might retaliate/quid pro quo. It is all so frustrating 3.5 years into Trump's presidency and zero to show for it (Clinton/Obama). Trump said in the debates that Hillary should be in jail. Well?

One can only hope Obama faces justice. We may know more after November, but don't hold your breath.
Posted by Clem 2020-08-02 11:35||   2020-08-02 11:35|| Front Page Top

#12 We have a tradition here of not going after previous presidents

You do. Don't count on them.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-08-02 11:37||   2020-08-02 11:37|| Front Page Top

#13 Doing Obama would cause a firestorm that would make the current troubles seem like a walk in the park. But, doing a few white subordinates before the election and inching up to Brennan and Comey in October would be a start. After November start on a wider shot group. I doubt Champ ever faces prosecution but in time you can hope to soil his reputation. If they steal the election in November, God Help Us and I plan to bunker in place.
Posted by NoMoreBS 2020-08-02 11:59||   2020-08-02 11:59|| Front Page Top

#14 A Republic -- if you can keep it.

Seems to me that we as a species no longer possess the level of competence necessary to maintain the world in its current state.
Posted by Iblis 2020-08-02 12:00||   2020-08-02 12:00|| Front Page Top

#15 They can't even indict Strzok.
Posted by charger 2020-08-02 12:00||   2020-08-02 12:00|| Front Page Top

#16 We have a tradition here of not going after previous presidents

Not for long if Biden is elected. Its also traditional to not file impeachment without a shread of evidence. A tradition of not allowing heresy evidence. Biden's VP will go after Trump and his supports with a vengence right after she starts her reign.
Posted by CrazyFool 2020-08-02 13:09||   2020-08-02 13:09|| Front Page Top

#17 >We have a tradition here of not going after previous presidents

Obama STARTED to go after a FUTURE DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED president.

He upended tradition, turnabout time.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-08-02 16:02||   2020-08-02 16:02|| Front Page Top

#18 Traditions are fine things if they are adhered to by everyone and continue to benefit society.

If they are ignored by one side, while being used as a shackle (or cudgel) on the other side (the side that's actually trying to preserve as many norms as possible, no less), then what is their worth?
Posted by charger 2020-08-02 16:44||   2020-08-02 16:44|| Front Page Top

#19 @ #17 - See how forward-thinking Obama was?! /sarc
Posted by Clem 2020-08-02 18:25||   2020-08-02 18:25|| Front Page Top

21:49 gorb
20:57 Angealing Threth9186
20:00 trailing wife
19:51 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:37 SteveS
19:16 Canuckistan sniper
18:59 jpal
18:40 Blackbeard Munster7976
18:37 Blackbeard Munster7976
18:25 Clem
17:55 Bobby
17:52 Glenmore
17:40 swksvolFF
16:44 charger
16:36 Beavis
16:31 Dave D.
16:02 Bright Pebbles
15:52 jpal
15:52 JohnQC
15:47 Abu Uluque
15:41 Abu Uluque
15:05 746
14:55 Silentbrick
14:45 CrazyFool









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com