Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/25/2013 View Tue 09/24/2013 View Mon 09/23/2013 View Sun 09/22/2013 View Sat 09/21/2013 View Fri 09/20/2013 View Thu 09/19/2013
1
2013-09-25 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Lerner's lawyers negotiating with Issa over immunity.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2013-09-25 03:41|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Coming soon.....

I'm just the dumb blonde with the jewelery!
- Evita Bezuidenhout
Posted by Besoeker 2013-09-25 08:09||   2013-09-25 08:09|| Front Page Top

#2 If she's convicted of a felony does she still get her pension? If so there might be some justice because even if she's convicted Obama will pardon her just before he leaves office.

It seems to me the problem with immunity would be making sure that her testimony would lead to convictions higher up in the food chain.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2013-09-25 11:37||   2013-09-25 11:37|| Front Page Top

#3 ...er, I mean, if her pension is revoked there might be some justice...
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2013-09-25 14:12||   2013-09-25 14:12|| Front Page Top

#4 She's a dem, they don't follow rules.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-09-25 14:53||   2013-09-25 14:53|| Front Page Top

#5 She's a dem, they don't follow rules.

Sure they do.
Rule#1: Loyalty to the Party.
Rule#2: Loyalty must be rewarded.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2013-09-25 15:44||   2013-09-25 15:44|| Front Page Top

#6 the problem with immunity would be making sure that her testimony would lead to convictions higher up in the food chain.

I suspect that is exactly what the 'negotiations' are about. "Who you gonna give up?"
Posted by SteveS 2013-09-25 17:00||   2013-09-25 17:00|| Front Page Top

#7 The assumption is that the 'negotiations' are anywhere near happening. If Issa 'leaked' the 'negotiations' it puts Lerner in a prisoner's dilemma situation. The White House can't be sure she isn't talking. Given the past record of the White House, Lerner can't be sure the White House believes her if she says she's not cooperating. Given Benghazi, who'd trust the people in the White House?
Posted by Procopius2k 2013-09-25 18:45||   2013-09-25 18:45|| Front Page Top

#8 And if they can't be sure she isn't talking she might want to watch her back.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2013-09-25 18:55||   2013-09-25 18:55|| Front Page Top

#9 She should definitely stay away from Ft Macy Park.
Posted by Elmerert Hupens2660 2013-09-25 19:33||   2013-09-25 19:33|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:54 JosephMendiola
23:20 gorb
23:11 gorb
22:36 One Eyed B. Hayes7065
22:26 OldSpook
21:56 OldSpook
21:22 Zenobia Floger6220
20:57 OldSpook
20:30 badanov
20:22 European Conservative
20:13 Barbara
20:05 Barbara
20:02 JosephMendiola
19:59 JosephMendiola
19:33 Elmerert Hupens2660
19:11 Mike Kozlowski
18:55 Ebbang Uluque6305
18:45 Procopius2k
18:21 swksvolFF
18:01 Pappy
17:56 M. Murcek
17:50 CrazyFool
17:45 Besoeker









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com