Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 03/13/2010 View Fri 03/12/2010 View Thu 03/11/2010 View Wed 03/10/2010 View Tue 03/09/2010 View Mon 03/08/2010 View Sun 03/07/2010
1
2010-03-13 Home Front: Politix
Atty. Gen. Holder failed to disclose legal briefs to senators
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2010-03-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Atty Genl's assistant blows him self up at the white house gate. Nothing to see here...
Posted by M. Murcek 2010-03-13 01:29||   2010-03-13 01:29|| Front Page Top

#2 
Holder should discuss some of these very disturbing international laws with the Senators:

It is illegal to wear white shoes in Tibet.

In Equatorial Guinea, it is against the law to name your child Monica.

In Italy, public kissing is legal only at railroad stations.

False teeth are against the law in Switzerland



Posted by Shens Dark Lord of the Leprechauns6113 2010-03-13 07:40||   2010-03-13 07:40|| Front Page Top

#3 Keep firing the ammo that triggers the criticism coming: there's a movement afoot to impeach Holder--Judicial Watch, I believe.
Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2010-03-13 09:08||   2010-03-13 09:08|| Front Page Top

#4 Holder needs to resign, this is crooked as hell. Were it a Republican the MSM would be creating a shitstorm over this sort of thing - and they should regardless of party. Omitting important things like that brief is a serious breach of his legal duties.

Another failure of the MSM.
Posted by OldSpook 2010-03-13 09:15||   2010-03-13 09:15|| Front Page Top

#5 Are legal briefs underwear attorneys wear in court?
Posted by JohnQC 2010-03-13 09:32||   2010-03-13 09:32|| Front Page Top

#6 Are legal briefs underwear attorneys wear in court?

Yes and they are yellow (see below) to hide stains.


Posted by Ebbavins White8066 2010-03-13 11:19||   2010-03-13 11:19|| Front Page Top

#7 I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me that writing an amicus brief for the Supreme Court is not a minor event that one would forget.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia  2010-03-13 12:21||   2010-03-13 12:21|| Front Page Top

#8 #7 I am not a lawyer, but it seems to me that writing an amicus brief for the Supreme Court is not a minor event that one would forget. Posted by: Rambler

Unless of course, someone else penned it and you simply attached your name.
Posted by Besoeker 2010-03-13 12:36||   2010-03-13 12:36|| Front Page Top

23:51 trailing wife
23:48 Barbara Skolaut
23:46 Barbara Skolaut
23:42 Barbara Skolaut
23:19 Omoter Speaking for Boskone7794
23:17 badanov
23:09 CrazyFool
22:58 49 Pan
22:57 Rhodesiafever
22:38 Rhodesiafever
22:36 Unereng Bonaparte8619
22:34 badanov
22:32 Barbara Skolaut
22:23 Rhodesiafever
22:12 tu3031
22:09 gorb
22:03 Chief
22:03 Procopius2k
21:58 gorb
21:56 Rhodesiafever
21:54 Pappy
21:53 tu3031
21:53 gorb
21:52 tu3031









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com