Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 02/25/2009 View Tue 02/24/2009 View Mon 02/23/2009 View Sun 02/22/2009 View Sat 02/21/2009 View Fri 02/20/2009 View Thu 02/19/2009
1
2009-02-25 Home Front: Politix
Obama to crack down on costly military programmes
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2009-02-25 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ]  Top

#1 It begins...
Posted by gromky 2009-02-25 02:36||   2009-02-25 02:36|| Front Page Top

#2 ...Well, clearly the man ain't stupid - he's picked a program that was going to run ELEVEN BILLION DOLLARS to deliver just six helicopters. People will see that and figure whatever comes next was just as bad.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2009-02-25 05:24||   2009-02-25 05:24|| Front Page Top

#3 And yet President Obama promised to up-size the Armed Forces during his term in office.
Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife  2009-02-25 05:52||   2009-02-25 05:52|| Front Page Top

#4 Ridiculously costly weapons programs are at least as effective a stimulus for the economy as virtually anything in the so-called stimulus bill, and in the end usually have at least some redeeming value.
Posted by Glenmore 2009-02-25 08:04||   2009-02-25 08:04|| Front Page Top

#5 ..And yet President Obama promised to up-size the Armed Forces during his term in office.

Draft. Slaves are cheaper than freemen.

or [Don't count on it]

Like the Swiss, issue each able bodied member of the unorganized militia, without a criminal record, a standard M16/4 and two hundred rounds of ammo, then count them towards the increase.
Posted by Procopius2k 2009-02-25 08:59||   2009-02-25 08:59|| Front Page Top

#6 Pro, can I just have 500 rounds for my current weapons and they can keep the M16?
Posted by Glenmore 2009-02-25 09:12||   2009-02-25 09:12|| Front Page Top

#7 #5 ..And yet President Obama promised to up-size the Armed Forces during his term in office.

Everyone is a member of the Obama Corps and our numbers will grow! A "People's Army" of unpaid volunteers, liberted political victims, convicts, illegals like auntie Zeituni, tax cheats, and ........ "veterans."
Posted by Besoeker 2009-02-25 09:15||   2009-02-25 09:15|| Front Page Top

#8 “…candidate Senator John McCain told a summit convened to look at ways of curbing the United States…”

What pathetic display of political Vaudeville that exchange was. [Que up the laugh track] Johnny Mac played Bambi’s straight man like fucking Abbot and Costesello routine. [Que up the talking heads and bold headlines with that end with a question mark] The media stooges then (predictably) furrowed their collective brow and wondered aloud if McCain was simply a sore loser taking a childish potshot. [Que up the Breaking News headline] With a stern look and his trademark glasses at the end of his nose, Levin declares this will be a “Top Priority”.
Tune in next week folks for the Juggling Act from The Amazing Geitner and Summers followed by Hillary the Dancing She-Bear.
Posted by DepotGuy 2009-02-25 10:08||   2009-02-25 10:08|| Front Page Top

#9 Like bullets?
Posted by Hellfish 2009-02-25 12:16||   2009-02-25 12:16|| Front Page Top

#10 To be fair it is 28 Presidential helicopters for $11.2 billion or only $400 million each. Blame it on Bush scratching Tony Blair's back.

The Marines already fly VIP Blackhawks. Is it really necessary for the White House to stuff more than a dozen staffers in with the president?
Posted by ed 2009-02-25 12:35||   2009-02-25 12:35|| Front Page Top

#11 BTW, the Army is buying the latest and greatest Blackhawks for $12 million each. Hopefully the VIP mods can be kept under $388 million for each helicopter.
Posted by ed 2009-02-25 12:39||   2009-02-25 12:39|| Front Page Top

#12 There is a whole lot that can be done to improve the procurement process. This helicopter example is a very good one. My guess is that there was an incredible amount of requirment creep during the process. My guess is also that a lot of the requirements were just friggin nuts...too far reaching/all encompassing to be effectively achievable. This can and should be improved.
Posted by remoteman 2009-02-25 13:53||   2009-02-25 13:53|| Front Page Top

#13 would have never thought it, and yall can say what you want where is a good sniper when needed and no thats not a threat
Posted by rabid whitetail 2009-02-25 17:20||   2009-02-25 17:20|| Front Page Top

#14 Yeah, everyone wants to cut defense spending...until it hits in their back yard. See traditional attempts at base closings and the current let's-buy-some-of-each tanker debacle for examples.
Posted by SteveS 2009-02-25 20:55||   2009-02-25 20:55|| Front Page Top

23:44 abu do you love
23:24 Thing From Snowy Mountain
23:17 Omerenter Henbane5221
23:13 Formerly Dan
23:06 Skunky Glins 5***
23:01 trailing wife
22:58 ryuge
22:58 Skunky Glins 5***
22:05 Rambler in Virginia
22:05 Mike
22:01 JosephMendiola
21:32 Eric Jablow
21:30 lotp
21:24 tu3031
21:18 3dc
21:15 Rambler in Virginia
21:14 Pappy
21:11 Pappy
21:10 Angeans Turkeyneck1374
21:02 3dc
21:01 tu3031
20:55 SteveS
20:52 tu3031
20:50 rammer









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com