Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 11/10/2018 View Fri 11/09/2018 View Thu 11/08/2018 View Wed 11/07/2018 View Tue 11/06/2018 View Mon 11/05/2018 View Sun 11/04/2018
1
2018-11-10 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
President Trump threatens to withhold federal payments over California fires
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2018-11-10 06:32|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [6470 views ]  Top

#1 Obean withheld funds over the Texas drought. Man, they hate it when they're treated like they treated other people.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-11-10 07:54||   2018-11-10 07:54|| Front Page Top

#2 It is not as easy as that.
Posted by newc 2018-11-10 10:25||   2018-11-10 10:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Looks like mother nature is doing just fine using a big hammer to "manage" the forests. I don't think fires will be a concern in these areas for another 100 or so years...
Posted by Yosemite Sam 2018-11-10 11:14||   2018-11-10 11:14|| Front Page Top

#4 Jerry Brown would much rather blame the fires on global warming.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2018-11-10 13:35||   2018-11-10 13:35|| Front Page Top

#5 It is┬ánot as easy as that.

It used to be. Problems were minimal.

Then the ignoramii took over. "Natural is best." "Save the spotted owl." "You'll kill Bambi." Now even they are they were wrong. But are too proud to admit it. Maybe because all their other drug induced beliefs are put at risk as well?

Either way, the celebrities houses are starting to go up in smoke so things will have to change, but not in a way that threatens their other deeply held absurd beliefs. It's going to take some thinking to pull that off. In the meanwhile, Cali burns.
Posted by gorb 2018-11-10 15:38||   2018-11-10 15:38|| Front Page Top

#6 The big problem with managed burns is that the managing entity effectively assumes the liability for damages, and no burn can be perfectly controlled. Damage from natural burns confers no liability.
Posted by Glenmore 2018-11-10 16:44||   2018-11-10 16:44|| Front Page Top

#7 Beetle tree loss was not removed until recently - last couple years. Years of Tahoe trips have seen the difference. Old diseased/dead wood has only recently been logged out
Posted by Frank G 2018-11-10 18:34||   2018-11-10 18:34|| Front Page Top

#8 and no burn can be perfectly controlled

Some years back, the Michigan Dept of Natural Resources tried to do a controlled burn to create some habit for the endangered Kirtland's Warbler and ended up burning down a goodly portion of the state. No idea if the warblers appreciated the gesture.

If you decide to do a burn after suppressing natural fires for decades, you have a whole lot of accumulated fuel that wouldn't be there if natural fires were allowed to take their course.

Just thinking out loud, I wonder if a low-yield nuke could be used to blow out a forest fire. They do something similar with oil well fires.

Further thinking out loud, why isn't JTOL (just thinking out loud) a standard interweb acronym?
Posted by SteveS 2018-11-10 19:07||   2018-11-10 19:07|| Front Page Top

#9 Controlled Burn - See Los Alamos NM.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-11-10 19:53||   2018-11-10 19:53|| Front Page Top

22:46 Slolumble Spaiter1695
22:38 crazyhorse
22:35 rammer
22:32 crazyhorse
22:15 JohnQC
22:08 JohnQC
21:29 M. Murcek
21:19 M. Murcek
21:01 Woodrow
21:01 Woodrow
20:58 Woodrow
20:20 crazyhorse
20:16 Zenobia Floger6220
19:54 Procopius2k
19:53 Procopius2k
19:13 SteveS
19:07 SteveS
18:49 gorb
18:47 gorb
18:34 Frank G
18:34 Frank G
18:33 Mullah Richard
17:21 Glenmore
17:08 Glenmore
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com