Article

2010-01-02 Science & Technology

No Rise of Atmospheric CO2 Fraction in Past 160 Years

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2010-01-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 very timely as the EPA is preparing for a power grab over CO2 if Cap and Tax dies its' well-earned death. Suck it, Carol Browner!

Posted by Frank G 2010-01-02 07:35|| 2010-01-02 07:35|| Front Page Top

#2 This research doesn't sound very sound, so lets not get our hopes up.

Is there a difference between Anthropomorphic CO2 and "natural" CO2? Nope.

AGW is still a scam. But using bad science to prove it is shooting yourself in the foot.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2010-01-02 09:55|| 2010-01-02 09:55|| Front Page Top

#3 This research doesn't sound very sound,

But, but...it's peer reviewed.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2010-01-02 10:08|| 2010-01-02 10:08|| Front Page Top

#4 Geophysical Research Letters has been intended as an outlet for rapid publication of new areas of research, and peer review has tended to be less rigorous in order to speed up publication.
This article does not prove or disprove AGW; it DOES point out the complexity of the system, and how much we still don't know.

Posted by Glenmore 2010-01-02 20:10|| 2010-01-02 20:10|| Front Page Top

00:00 3dc
23:58 crosspatch
23:53 tipper
23:39 Redneck Jim
23:20 Redneck Jim
23:11 AzCat
23:07 AzCat
23:03 CrazyFool
22:32 James
22:11 AlmostAnonymous5839
22:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
21:56 CrazyFool
21:52 BigEd
21:36 Mike Hunt
21:25 ed
21:24 Cheaderhead
21:05 ed
20:50 Redneck Jim
20:38 ed
20:36 ed
20:28 ed
20:22 3dc
20:10 Glenmore
20:05 Gomez Omaique2346