Article

2006-01-27 Science & Technology

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2006-01-27 08:35|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 "Official Alternatives"...un-****ing believable. I thought I would never see this day.

Posted by Besoeker 2006-01-27 09:01|| 2006-01-27 09:01|| Front Page Top

#2 I'm back, baby!

Posted by Billy Dee Williams 2006-01-27 09:06|| 2006-01-27 09:06|| Front Page Top

#3 DOD made a good call on this. I would expect it to move faster than it is eluded to here. The trend is troops, on the Army side, want what the SF guys are carrying and the SF guys want what the classified guy wear. You see this in discussions on body armor, long guns, aircraft, etc... If I were to bet I would bet on a clear winner by this summer.

Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan 2006-01-27 09:25|| 2006-01-27 09:25|| Front Page Top

#4 The M1911 .45 caliber pistol that the 9mm Beretta replaced in 1985, was, as its nomenclature implied, an old design. There are several modern designs out there for .45 caliber pistols that are lighter, carry more ammo and are easier to maintain than the pre-World War I M1911 (which is actually about a century old, as a design).

Well most of the 45s were M1911A1s, mod occurring in 1921. Though in our arms room in 1975 still had some straight M1911s mixed in with the A1s. Too many smoothbores cause of maintenance and repair parts budget cuts back in those post-Vietnam years. Personally, I procured a Colt Combat Commander, lighter, balanced in the hand better, shorter barrel. Nothing necessarily wrong with an old design. Browning's M2 50 cal is still a workhorse.

Posted by Sharong Ebbosing6626 2006-01-27 09:56|| 2006-01-27 09:56|| Front Page Top

#5 HooRay! Among all the old ~~farts~~ salts there was much rejoicing. I can think of at least 9 senior NCOs and Officers in my guard unit alone who will be delighted at the news.

Serously, all they need now is to get rid of the 5.56 mouse gun.

I wonder if they are going to manufacture new M-14s, or come up with a new 7.62 design.

Posted by N guard 2006-01-27 10:03|| 2006-01-27 10:03|| Front Page Top

#6 Long live John Browning's masterpiece, "Old Ugly!"

Posted by Mike 2006-01-27 10:10|| 2006-01-27 10:10|| Front Page Top

#7 That's kinda odd.
Will we be totally abandoning the 9mm NATO round and usage?

I hope the M11 winner is the Sig model.
*heart* P220.

Posted by Anon4021 2006-01-27 11:08|| 2006-01-27 11:08|| Front Page Top

#8 I carried the sig for three years, loved that weapon!

Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan 2006-01-27 11:10|| 2006-01-27 11:10|| Front Page Top

#9 US State Dept. lads used to carry Sigs in 9mm. Not sure wat they have now. I've been lusting after a P-229 for several years now. A man can never have too many knives or guns.

Posted by Besoeker 2006-01-27 11:15|| 2006-01-27 11:15|| Front Page Top

#10 The Specs sound suspiciously like the HK USP-SOCOM. Now that is "Big and Ugly". Emphasis on Big!

Posted by TomAnon 2006-01-27 11:27|| 2006-01-27 11:27|| Front Page Top

#11 **Let the Gun Bigot Wars Begin!**

H&K USP .45 Tactical
H&K USP Compact .45 Tactical

"In a World of Compromise, Some Don't"

Posted by psychohillbilly 2006-01-27 11:37|| 2006-01-27 11:37|| Front Page Top

#12 TA, lucky to say nope, it is not even in the running.

Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan 2006-01-27 11:37|| 2006-01-27 11:37|| Front Page Top

#13 Personally, I like my Colt 1917 45cal officers revolver..the one with the lanyard loop on the butt. More accurate than the 1911 automatic, unless it was fitted with the competition barrel.

However, if you want some combat fighting firepower, here's something coming down the pike... Click here: Auto Assault 12 Combat Shotgun

Posted by Inspector Clueso 2006-01-27 11:46|| 2006-01-27 11:46|| Front Page Top

#14 ooops...try this http://www.camo-store.com/auto_assault_12_combat_shotgun.htm

Posted by Inspector Clueso 2006-01-27 11:48|| 2006-01-27 11:48|| Front Page Top

#15 49 Pan,

The length, width, rail and silencer are pulled straight off the USP SOCOM spec page. I would think that would be rejected out of hand as they say "not to exceed". However, if I see the artic expedition glove requirement.....

Posted by TomAnon 2006-01-27 12:33|| 2006-01-27 12:33|| Front Page Top

#16 TA

The issue seems to be that SOCOM built that tank and the boys will not carry it, too large, heavy,slow to draw, etc... It was to be used for a one size fits all requirements, a failed idea. I would expect to see a standard sized .45 version that with minor modifications fit the CQB and other tactical requirements.

Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan 2006-01-27 12:58|| 2006-01-27 12:58|| Front Page Top

#17 Celebrate Diversity

Posted by .com 2006-01-27 13:25|| 2006-01-27 13:25|| Front Page Top

#18 The sooner the US military gets rid of that 5.56mm M-16 popgun, the better. I've got a .22 single-shot rifle that has more stopping power. Combat shotguns are good for close-in work, but to reach out and touch someone, you need at LEAST 7.62. The Ma-deuce will still be around for another hundred years, simply because it's a classic design that's easy to maintain and can take a beating and still work. Of course, I think the ultimate military weapon would be a pair of the gattling guns from an A-10 mounted on an M-1 chassis.

Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot 2006-01-27 14:34|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/] 2006-01-27 14:34|| Front Page Top

#19 49 Pan,

H&K does have a standard size .45 and a compact .45. I'm pretty sure the H&K SOCOM (or Mrk 23) was built to SOCOM specs and not intended for general issue.

If you'll indulge me...I think the H&K SOCOM specs read like this: Must be .45. Must have positive manual safety. Must be able to chop down trees, split trees into planks, nails planks together to make bridge, kill 12 bad guys silently without reloading and then use butt of gun to destory the aforementioned bridge. Must have a service life or 60,000 rounds.

The USP is it's country boy-strong cousin minus the steroids. It comes in standard double-stack and compact double-stack size. You could probably nail the planks together, but chopping down the trees with it voids the warranty. The bad guy stopping would be noisy as there is no silencer. Service life is approx 20,000 rounds before you have to replace the recoil spring so buy a couple of spare springs.

The USP Tactical comes in standard and compact size as well (don't know if the compact is commercially available). It's difference from the USP is a threaded barrel with O-ring for a silencer, match trigger and adjustable sights. So, no nailing or chopping if you don't want to be zeroing the sights constantly.

Problem with the USP? No standard rail. H&K has developed a new sidearm blending the USP and P2000 lines to create the H&K .45 w/ standard rails (so I've heard and seen one picture).

Yes, I am a H&K bigot and a H&Kaholic. Why do you ask?

Posted by psychohillbilly 2006-01-27 15:01|| 2006-01-27 15:01|| Front Page Top

#20 "Will we be totally abandoning the 9mm NATO round and usage?"

Dear God I hope so. As a lower recoil Law Enforcement round, a hollow point 9mm is useful. But as a NATO (FMJ) round it's only good for making small clean (accurate) holes in paper. This make you look good on the firing range, but dead in a combat situation when your target fails to stop even after having been hit many times.

Posted by Uluger Omenter7645 2006-01-27 15:06|| 2006-01-27 15:06|| Front Page Top

#21 Old Patriot
ultimate military weapon would be a pair of the gattling guns from an A-10 mounted on an M-1 chassis.
All I can say imagining that is DAYYYUM!!!

Posted by Yosemite Sam 2006-01-27 15:35|| 2006-01-27 15:35|| Front Page Top

#22 Food for thought: Better to have gone with the M9 than to have kept reusing the in-stock M1911s, but the move to make a NEW .45 is best. As the original post (OP) specifically states, there are better .45-caliber pistols than the M1911. My reason for that "blasphemous" sentence is physics -- at least the M9s were new, unlike old-ass M1911 frames, such as the originals mixed with A1's. The design may work, but the old frames themselves... at least we're both getting new frames/guns in 'fo-faive'.

**Let the Gun Bigot Wars Begin!**

Yep, that's what I think of some of you. :P The 7.62 fetishism... bleh. N guard and Old Patriot, I'd take the 5.56mm -- yes, in the M16 platform -- over any of the above.

Posted by Edward Yee 2006-01-27 15:55|| http://edwardyee.fanworks.net]">[http://edwardyee.fanworks.net] 2006-01-27 15:55|| Front Page Top

#23 .com--I have that shirt. My only complaint is there's no .357 on it!

OP--I like that! Kind of a new fangled M-16 AA/AP platform, although I think they should use a Bradley or Stryker chassis.

Posted by Dar">Dar 2006-01-27 15:57|| 2006-01-27 15:57|| Front Page Top

#24 I am wondering if S&W will have a 45ACP design in this fight? In any case I want the gun built here even if by license. I don't think we should support the welfare states of people to timid to fight this war and who are anti-US.

I am not biased heheheh. I have a reloading bench set up just for the 45ACP andf a Corbin swedge for squirting out my own soft lead.

Posted by Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-01-27 16:31|| 2006-01-27 16:31|| Front Page Top

#25 This is good news! The "smack" of the .45 c is impressive.

Long overdue, much welcomed.

Posted by Captain America 2006-01-27 16:47|| 2006-01-27 16:47|| Front Page Top

#26 Look. As long as you use that white phosphorous depleted uranium hollow point high explosive armor piercing napalm cluster bomb ammunition, you can use any gun you want.

Posted by tu3031 2006-01-27 16:53|| 2006-01-27 16:53|| Front Page Top

#27 LOL Tu!

I predict 50 posts, Macintosh is invoked and the Browning Automatic Rabbit is remembered fondly.

Posted by 6 2006-01-27 17:09|| 2006-01-27 17:09|| Front Page Top

#28 The question is: Will the new gun work wirth Linux?

Posted by JFM"> JFM 2006-01-27 17:19|| 2006-01-27 17:19|| Front Page Top

#29 It doesn't seem to have feeding problems with Linux.

Posted by Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-01-27 17:50|| 2006-01-27 17:50|| Front Page Top

#30 Psycohillbilly-

If your a hillbilly from KY I've got a deck that needs building and some trees to facilitate it! H&K makes great weapons and I'm glad we have FINALLY gotten back to a .45 and your two sizes fits the mark. I certainly hope they enter and I could care less where it is built, we will stand up a facility to manage it just like we do for every other foreign gun we buy and out troops won't go without repair parts.

Last thought- I heard that when they go to field testing they will bring in operators, not engineers to do the testing. This will be interesting as the best engineered weapon is not always the best one for combat.

Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan 2006-01-27 17:59|| 2006-01-27 17:59|| Front Page Top

#31 49 Pan,

I live in TN, so sorry about helping you with the deck. It would have been a glorious deck...not a square angle to be found on it, mind you, but glorious all the same. :)

As I understand it, H&K actually broke ground on a new manufacturing plant some where in GA, but halted building when the XM-8 deal starting falling apart. They are also making a limited number of receivers for the M4 series. No civie sales of that though.

Posted by psychohillbilly 2006-01-27 18:12|| 2006-01-27 18:12|| Front Page Top

#32 Howdy, psyco, how you doin'? Edward Yee, I have used both the M-14 and M-16. I prefer the M-14. The M-16 is a good weapon but when I hit someone with an M-14 he goes down. First hit. with the M-16 it might take more than one round, also, in heavy undervrush a small twig can deflect an M-16 round but not an M-14. If you have an Army of draftees where marksmanship is not a priority for the draftee then the light weight and rapid fire of the M-16 is preferable. In a volunteer Army where you have dedicated people the 7.62 round is preferable. Note this is only my opinion.

Posted by Grolugum Flitch4501 2006-01-27 18:34|| 2006-01-27 18:34|| Front Page Top

#33 The previous comment was me. and, by the way, I carry a .45 Springfield for concealed carry.

Posted by Deacon Blues 2006-01-27 18:35|| 2006-01-27 18:35|| Front Page Top

#34 Doing great, Deacon. Thanks for asking. I would ask you how things are up there in God's Country, but we all know it's never a bad day in East TN. Had an opportunity to shoot a Spingfield .45 last week. Not bad. Quite accurate, in fact.

Posted by psychohillbilly 2006-01-27 19:03|| 2006-01-27 19:03|| Front Page Top

#35 For the new battle rifle, I hope that we go with the SOCOM-developed 6.8 SPC. It has the major advantages of the 5.56 -- more ammo per grunt than 7.62 NATO, lower recoil, fully auto if needed; and the range and knockdown improvements.

Posted by Shieldwolf 2006-01-27 19:57|| 2006-01-27 19:57|| Front Page Top

#36 Bretta has a 45ACP BTW.

Posted by Sock Puppet O´ Doom 2006-01-27 20:00|| 2006-01-27 20:00|| Front Page Top

#37 The 9mm only succeeds in making who ever you shoot very angry.

The .45 will send even a large person to the ground even with a flesh wound and it will kick the snot out of someone in body armor and put them down.

I shot two guys with a .45 in a saper raid in I-Corps and one of them went about 5 feet through the air.

I think the 30/06 is a fine round and now that we are through with our fixation over jungle warfare and have to reach out to 200 and 300 meters to engage the bad guys, it warrants a large caliber weapon.

I liked the .45 because it made a lot of noise in a closed space and it was really a neat weapon with lots of stopping power.

Posted by SOG475 2006-01-27 20:08|| 2006-01-27 20:08|| Front Page Top

#38 SOG475, I have never had to shoot a person with my .45 but I did shoot a groundhog at about 20 feet. I hit him between the shoulders in the back and there was nothing left from the shoulders foreward. I would not like to be hit by a .45.

Posted by Deacon Blues 2006-01-27 20:18|| 2006-01-27 20:18|| Front Page Top

23:47 Shieldwolf
23:43 Shieldwolf
23:42 Frank G
23:39 11A5S
23:36 Pappy
23:33 Bomb-a-rama
23:31 D. Adams
23:19 .com
23:18 .com
23:17 Rafael
23:16 Frank G
23:08 Frank G
23:00 Angie Schultz
22:59 Rafael
22:55 Hupomoger Clans9827
22:54 RD
22:46 Hupomoger Clans9827
22:41 D. Adams
22:31 Hupomoger Clans9827
22:30 Alaska Paul
22:27 Asymmetrical Triangulation
22:21 Alaska Paul
22:20 3dc
22:14 Sock Puppet O´ Doom