Article

2006-01-07 Home Front: Politix

Drudge: Democrap Plan to "Destroy" Alito

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2006-01-07 05:07|| || Front Page|| [11131 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Senate Democrats intend to zero in on Alitoâs alleged enthusiastic membership to an organization, they will charge, that was sexist and racist!

God damned Augusta National Country Club...

Posted by Martha Burk 2006-01-07 09:34|| 2006-01-07 09:34|| Front Page Top

#2 This plan already fell apart - go see Captain's Quarters...

Posted by M. Murcek">M. Murcek 2006-01-07 09:43|| 2006-01-07 09:43|| Front Page Top

#3 Judge Alito's assertion that he cannot recall anything about his controversial involvement in CAP, requires us to find other ways of fulfilling our constitutional responsibility to get at the facts.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-Ma)

Kennedy Constitutional responsibility = name calling, loose associations, crass innuendo, tired clichÃ©s, spiteful insinuations, broad intimations, and demagoguery

Posted by DepotGuy 2006-01-07 13:45|| 2006-01-07 13:45|| Front Page Top

#4 Senator Kennedy's assertion that he doesn't recall anything after Mary Jo Kopechne forced herself upon him ......

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-01-07 13:52|| 2006-01-07 13:52|| Front Page Top

#5 Lets follow this logic....

Sen. Byrd is a Democrat
Sen. Byrd once was (and some say still is) a member of the KKK.

Conclusion: All democrats are current active members of the KKK and support its racist and antisemitic view fully.

Posted by CrazyFool 2006-01-07 14:38|| 2006-01-07 14:38|| Front Page Top

#6 Last week one of the National Public Radio shows was all over the announcement by the non-partisan standing committee of lawyers to vet Supreme Court Justice candidates (sorry for that bit of linguistic awkwardness, but I am blanking on the actual name of this decades-old committee), which gave Alito its highest rating. So opponents to Alito cannot oppose him on any putative lack of professional ability (apparently he is a joy to argue cases in front of), and are stuck trying to argue that he would change the direction of the Court. However, in that same NPR program the reporter reminded listeners that the Supreme Court works very slowly, and even if Alito intended to change the direction of U.S. law, it would take multiple decades to achieve. Personally, it strikes me that legal conservatives are consideraby less likely to radically change things than so-called liberals, but it's quite possible that on this subject I don't actually know what I'm talking about. ;-)

Posted by trailing wife 2006-01-07 21:02|| 2006-01-07 21:02|| Front Page Top

#7 and even if Alito intended to change the direction of U.S. law, it would take multiple decades to achieve

wow, that's a great sign, TW. It says to me that they intend to milk the issue, but that they are preparing their listeners for the fact it is a battle that they don't expect to win.

Posted by 2b 2006-01-07 21:06|| 2006-01-07 21:06|| Front Page Top

#8 Got a blurb from Wisconsin Planned Parenthood whinnying about the terrible threat Alito poses. PPWI must be sending this to every woman in the state; I can't tell how else I would have gotten on their mailing list. Shall I count stridency in a mailing as a measure of panic?

Posted by mom">mom 2006-01-07 22:18|| http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com]">[http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com] 2006-01-07 22:18|| Front Page Top

21:58 Vince Watkins
21:44 Vince Watkins
21:20 Vince Watkins
22:13 Vince Watkins
23:32 Steve White
23:28 .com
23:23 .com
23:17 xbalanke
22:56 2b
22:55 2b
22:42 Fred
22:34 Pappy
22:24 2b
22:22 mom
22:21 TomAnon
22:19 Rafael
22:18 mom
22:17 Qwerty
22:14 Paul Moloney
22:13 49 Pan
22:11 mom
22:09 Rafael
22:08 mom (Chicago expat)
22:06 Frank G