Article

2005-01-04 Iraq-Jordan

Iraqi Minister Says Election Delay Might Be Needed

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2005-01-04 00:00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 What are they going to do? Blow people up and chop off some heads? Can't have that.

Put some panties on their heads.

Posted by beer_me 2005-01-04 12:52:02 AM|| 2005-01-04 12:52:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Iraqi Defense Minister Hazim Al-Shaalan said yesterday he favored delaying elections beyond Jan. 30 if Sunni Muslims are not planning to take part.

Geez, what's the damned problem? If they don't take part, they don't get any of the benefits. That's that, now get over it.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-01-04 1:28:29 AM|| 2005-01-04 1:28:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Hazim is obviously worried about job security and is already pandering for the Sunni vote in the rematch 4 years hence.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-01-04 7:13:32 AM|| 2005-01-04 7:13:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 BAR is right. In Huntington's historical survey of the 3rd wave of democratization, groups that didn't participate in elections when held lost out.

Posted by Sharon in NYC 2005-01-04 8:09:53 AM|| 2005-01-04 8:09:53 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Im not sure its that the majority of Sunni Arabs dont WANT to vote. I saw a poll indicating interest in voting was HIGH, among Sunni Arabs(MSM hasnt highlighted that) The question is CAN they vote - will Iraqi Police and ING be willing to risk their lives to protect polling places, etc.

Im NOT saying the vote should be postponed - plenty of disadvantages to that as well - but it would be better if security was better for the vote. Im not sure if another couple of weeks would make that much difference, but then Im not privy to coalition military plans. If say, they really were on the verge of some big breakthrough, capturing Zarqawi, lets say, I could see a good case for delaying the elections a couple of weeks for that.

Posted by Liberalhawk 2005-01-04 12:05:17 PM|| 2005-01-04 12:05:17 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 The majority of the violence stems from the Sunni community. It's Sunni sons and brothers who are running round attacking election officials, beheading people and setting IEDs. If the Sunnis can't be bothered reining in their murderous young men, and subsequently feel too afraid to vote, I call that something resembling poetic justice. They sowed the sectarian whirlwind which engulfs their communities - in harsh contrast to the restraint and civilised behaviour of the vast majority of Shiites and Kurds. Their unwillingness to excercise their block vote doesn't earn them any sympathy from me.

Posted by Bulldog 2005-01-04 12:25:57 PM|| 2005-01-04 12:25:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 SOME Sunnis have supported coalition forces, with intel tips, etc (some of which we've noted here) Some Sunni Arabs have given their lives, wearing the uniforms of the IP and ING. Rather more Sunni Arabs than Shias or Kurds, IIUC, since ING are usually, and IP always, assigned to their local area. While there seems to be widespread support for the insurgency among Sunni Arabs, im not sure it exceeds 50%. The rest are too scared to reign in the insurgents and their supporters. I for one, am not willing to judge the fears of people subject to terrorist violence every day, while sit at a keyboard in safety (more or less) thousands of miles away. It may be better for the election to go forward on time - but its no poetic justice for people to suffer for the deeds of those in the same group they are in.

Posted by Liberalhawk 2005-01-04 12:40:11 PM|| 2005-01-04 12:40:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 And if the head of intelligence services in Baghdad is right and the total number of insurgents is 200,000? A rough calculation would suggest that one in ten Sunni Arabs of suitable age is actively involved in the terrorism. That's an awfully big SOME.

Those who want an excuse not to vote, won't vote. The fact is there are a great many Sunnis who don't want democracy to succeed. The anti-Democratic Sunni arab minority shouldn't be allowed to succeed in delaying the elections which the Shiites and Kurds have patiently waited for. Nobody has to vote for the elections to be legitimate.

Posted by Bulldog 2005-01-04 12:56:33 PM|| 2005-01-04 12:56:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 the 200,000 figure is being tossed around by the left as more proof of "quagmire" Im not sure its news. We all know that there are several supporters for every insurgent. If we counted everyone who did anything for the Iraqi Govt or the coalition, wed get a much larger number than the number of folks actually serving in the IP, ING, and Iraqi Army.

There are IIUC, about 5 million Sunni Arabs in Iraq. Lets assume 40% want the insurgency to win. Thats 2 million people, of whom, assuming the 200,000 figure is correct, about 10% are actively involved. That still leaves a majority, 60% who dont want the insurgency to win.

And even if 60% supported the insurgency? Does that make the remaining 40% culpable? We've had this argument in other contexts, again and again. Democratic values, the ones we want to impart to Iraqis, say youre culpable for what YOU do, not for what a member of your tribe, your ethnic group, or your religion does.

People who boycotts do so at their own cost, I agree. But its not unreasonable to ask for SOME security when you go vote. To the extent that folks dont vote cause theyre NOT secure (and I can already anticipate the post-election debate about causality) that reduces the legitimacy of the election.

Posted by Liberalhawk 2005-01-04 1:31:48 PM|| 2005-01-04 1:31:48 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 And even if 60% supported the insurgency? Does that make the remaining 40% culpable? We've had this argument in other contexts, again and again. Democratic values, the ones we want to impart to Iraqis, say youre culpable for what YOU do, not for what a member of your tribe, your ethnic group, or your religion does.

Then those that aren't interested in the rise of another Baathist state or even an Iran-style fundie regime need to look beyond the security situation at the bigger picture. Is concern over security really that big a deal to the point of forfeiting participation (and representation) in a new government that will no doubt be worlds better than what existed before? What about people that they know that are involved in terror? Is it worth staying silent about individuals that they know fall into that category?

These people need to understand that the days of relative privilege they enjoyed under the protection of a brutal dictator of their religious stripe are gone, and no one, not even their own Sunni kin (as evidenced by Fallujah before being taken apart), is going to necessarily bend over backwards to grant them any special favors.

It's time the Sunnis of Iraq took their future into their own hands, and do something for themselves for once. The problem is emanating largely from their own camp, and in the end, it is up to them to clean up their act.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-01-04 2:30:46 PM|| 2005-01-04 2:30:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 While there seems to be widespread support for the insurgency among Sunni Arabs, im not sure it exceeds 50%. The rest are too scared to reign in the insurgents and their supporters. I for one, am not willing to judge the fears of people subject to terrorist violence every day, while sit at a keyboard in safety (more or less) thousands of miles away.

But that's not the complete equation, is it? We would also have to include the fact that American soldiers are there risking their lives for the benefit of Iraqis, in the midst of the fear they rightly feel. The damaged pride and humiliation we always hear the Arab world suffers would be somewhat healed and self-empowerment will be realized if courage ends up trumping fear.

Posted by Jules 187 2005-01-04 2:41:24 PM|| 2005-01-04 2:41:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 I don't recall the defense minister making policy. If he doesn't publicly agree with Allawi (and the big guy standing behind him), maybe he should find new work

Posted by Frank G 2005-01-04 3:05:07 PM|| 2005-01-04 3:05:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Then those that aren't interested in the rise of another Baathist state or even an Iran-style fundie regime need to look beyond the security situation at the bigger picture.

I can guarantee you that if there were armed groups targeting polling places in the US, my wife wouldnt vote, no matter how important the issue. Not everyones brave.

Posted by Liberalhawk 2005-01-04 3:24:42 PM|| 2005-01-04 3:24:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 We would also have to include the fact that American soldiers are there risking their lives for the benefit of Iraqis, in the midst of the fear they rightly feel.

well yes, if some American soldier in Iraq posts here saying to hell with the Sunni Arabs who wont risk their lives to vote, Id sit and listen. Do we have any American soldiers posting here on this subject?

Posted by Liberalhawk 2005-01-04 3:26:06 PM|| 2005-01-04 3:26:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 I can guarantee you that if there were armed groups targeting polling places in the US, my wife wouldnt vote, no matter how important the issue.

What if it was a chance in God knows how long to actually have a say in who is to run the country and how, and to put into place something to replace a dictator with genocidal tendencies?

Pretty strong incentive to participate, I'd say.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-01-04 4:18:23 PM|| 2005-01-04 4:18:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 Do we have any American soldiers posting here on this subject?

I honestly don't know, LH, but I thought it important to include them in your equation of Iraqi fear and immobility in the face of the elections.

Posted by Jules 187 2005-01-04 4:22:58 PM|| 2005-01-04 4:22:58 PM|| Front Page Top

00:02 joeblow
23:43 lex
23:38 lex
23:30 tu3031
23:29 joeblow
23:12 Frank G
23:11 Frank G
23:09 tu3031
23:02 tu3031
23:00 Korora
23:00 tu3031
22:54 tu3031
22:52 tu3031
22:51 Captain America
22:47 Captain America
22:47 Seafarious
22:46 Captain America
22:44 SC88
22:42 Captain America
22:37 Frank G
22:37 Captain America
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:31 Frank G
22:27 Mrs. Davis