Article

2005-01-03 Home Front: Culture Wars

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous2U 2005-01-03 01:54|| || Front Page|| [11130 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 "â¦that neither CBS News nor Rather had a vendetta against the White Houseâ¦â

How do you tell CBS News and Rather are lying? their lips are moving.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2005-01-03 2:39:47 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com] 2005-01-03 2:39:47 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 The White House isn't who's been shredding them.

Posted by Dishman 2005-01-03 3:48:59 AM|| 2005-01-03 3:48:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 An incentive for making nice is the impending report from the two-member panel investigating CBS's use of now-infamous documents for the 60 Minutes piece.

"Impending"?? Sooo....how long until the report's release? Wasn't it supposed to be "weeks, not months"???

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-01-03 4:00:40 AM|| 2005-01-03 4:00:40 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 CBS hasn't figgered it out yet, but the beef is with conservatives who have been pointing out CBS' leftist bias for decades.

It would take more than a sit down and a coffee to convince me they don't have it in for Dubya.

How about firing that carpet-munching producer who was involved? That would go some distance in convincing me CBS wants to be fair and balanced.

Posted by badanov 2005-01-03 7:02:50 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org/title-boris.gif] 2005-01-03 7:02:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 They spend 3 years on a story and the best they can come up with is fake documents. Any journalist with integrety would have realized there was no story there and quit long ago. Dan Rather definitly had it in for President Bush. More CBS horsepukey.

Posted by Deacon Blues 2005-01-03 7:33:27 AM|| 2005-01-03 7:33:27 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Heyward was âworking overtime to convince Bartlett that neither CBS News nor Rather had a vendetta against the White House,â our source says, âand from here on out would do everything it could to be fair and balanced.â

Well if they didn't have a vendetta they wouldn't have to 'do everything.. to be fair and balanced.'

Posted by mhw 2005-01-03 8:43:08 AM|| 2005-01-03 8:43:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Yawn, CBS? CBS? Didn't they used to be a newstation back before broadband? Who remembers? Who cares?

Posted by 2b 2005-01-03 9:03:34 AM|| 2005-01-03 9:03:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 ...from here on out would do everything it could to be fair and balanced.

Sorry, see BS, someone else is already doing that.

Getting your credibility back can be a real bitch once you've pissed it away.

Posted by Darth VAda 2005-01-03 9:17:49 AM|| 2005-01-03 9:17:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 They had ample time after the election to moderate their tone.

Posted by anonymous2U 2005-01-03 1:06:53 PM|| 2005-01-03 1:06:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 ..."fair and balanced" isn't that what they thought they were? Sounds like a back-handed admission of guilt to me!

Posted by Maggie 2005-01-03 1:55:06 PM|| 2005-01-03 1:55:06 PM|| Front Page Top

17:23 Liberalhawk
17:23 Liberalhawk
00:07 joeblow
23:58 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:45 lex
23:43 tipper
23:41 Asedwich
23:39 Zenster
23:35 Zenster
23:26 Zenster
23:20 lex
23:17 lex
23:16 lex
23:14 lex
23:13 Mark Z.
22:41 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:16 Frank G
22:12 Seafarious
22:09 2b
22:05 Aris Katsaris
22:02 Frank G
21:59 2b
21:58 2b
21:58 Frank G