Hi there, !
Today Fri 04/16/2004 Thu 04/15/2004 Wed 04/14/2004 Tue 04/13/2004 Mon 04/12/2004 Sun 04/11/2004 Sat 04/10/2004 Archives
Rantburg
532920 articles and 1859661 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 96 articles and 463 comments as of 3:51.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Background                   
Zarqawi in Fallujah?
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 1: WoT Operations
0 [] 
6 00:00 B [] 
0 [1] 
0 [] 
10 00:00 tu3031 [1] 
2 00:00 Alaska Paul [1] 
7 00:00 Long Hair Republican [2] 
1 00:00 djohn66 [] 
2 00:00 B [] 
3 00:00 Desert Blondie [1] 
0 [] 
8 00:00 rkb [] 
4 00:00 smn [1] 
8 00:00 Super Hose [] 
0 [] 
0 [1] 
1 00:00 Super Hose [] 
1 00:00 B [2] 
0 [] 
0 [2] 
14 00:00 Super Hose [1] 
12 00:00 Dakotah [4] 
0 [] 
0 [1] 
0 [] 
0 [1] 
8 00:00 Not Mike Moore [] 
6 00:00 Jack Deth [1] 
11 00:00 B [4] 
1 00:00 Raj [1] 
8 00:00 Super Hose [] 
3 00:00 Shipman [] 
6 00:00 Jen [] 
14 00:00 Secret Master [] 
0 [] 
3 00:00 Misha I [] 
0 [] 
7 00:00 Anonymous4156 [1] 
1 00:00 Not Mike Moore [] 
0 [1] 
2 00:00 Zenster [2] 
4 00:00 Tresho [1] 
1 00:00 Dar [] 
0 [] 
0 [4] 
5 00:00 tu3031 [] 
4 00:00 Steve [4] 
2 00:00 muck4doo [] 
0 [] 
20 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [2] 
8 00:00 Not Mike Moore [] 
3 00:00 Anonymous4052 [] 
6 00:00 Zenster [1] 
13 00:00 Gromky [1] 
2 00:00 Bomb-a-rama [1] 
11 00:00 B [1] 
0 [1] 
39 00:00 Antiwar [1] 
Page 0: Non-WoT
0 [1]
Page 2: WoT Background
0 []
2 00:00 Raj [1]
2 00:00 BigEdLB []
2 00:00 john []
7 00:00 Super Hose []
3 00:00 Frank G []
6 00:00 tu3031 [6]
3 00:00 Not Mike Moore [3]
0 []
0 []
0 []
0 [3]
1 00:00 Not Mike Moore []
0 [2]
2 00:00 Phil B [2]
1 00:00 Frank G []
1 00:00 Not Mike Moore []
1 00:00 Frank G []
5 00:00 eLarson []
0 []
3 00:00 JAB []
7 00:00 Anonymous4052 []
33 00:00 Atropanthe []
30 00:00 muck4doo [4]
7 00:00 RWV [4]
2 00:00 Shipman []
5 00:00 Phil B []
11 00:00 mhw []
3 00:00 CrazyFool [1]
7 00:00 Rafael []
13 00:00 Barbara Skolaut []
14 00:00 mhw []
4 00:00 Sgt. Mom []
7 00:00 Old Patriot []
0 [1]
2 00:00 Chuck Simmins []
20 00:00 Dan []
Arabia
Another postponement in the Jar Allah Omr case
The Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal in Sana’a City has adjourned the Jarallah Omar murder case to 26 April 2004. The court hearing, presided over by Judge Mohamed Al-Akwa, was attended by the prosecution and defense lawyers of Ali Jarallah Al-Sawany, who is accused of killing the Assistant Secretary-General of the Yemen Socialist Party. Relatives of the deceased were also present. The postponement was approved in order to receive answers related to the appeal petition presented by the General Prosecution and to consider the demands concerning the personal rights of the accused and for the court to oblige the General Prosecution to provide the remaining investigation minutes, which include names of persons having relations with the accused.

Some lawyers are suspicious that the Prosecution is misleading the court, hiding documents and dropping some witnesses. Lawyer Mohamed Al-Saqqaf demanded that the court should question separately all of the suspects muzzled by the general prosecution. The case of the murder of Jarallah Omar remains a primary concern of political parties and continues to receive wide attention due to doubt concerning the concealment of names of important persons.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:43 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Saudi Arabian volunteer killed in Fallujah fighting
A Saudi volunteer has been killed fighting against US forces in the flashpoint Iraqi city of Fallujah, his father told AFP here yesterday.
Dead as a doorknob... Stiff as a brick... No longer with us...
Fahed Al Razni Al Shimmeri said that his son, Majed, a 25-year-old student, became "a martyr ... in resisting the American forces' aggression in Fallujah," on Thursday.
Fell mortally wounded... Titzup, assdown... Pushing up daisies...
He said he was notified of the death on Saturday by one of his son's companions in Fallujah.
Colder'n a mackerel... Thoroughly ventilated... Now resident in the boneyard...
The son "called from time to time" following his departure for Iraq one month after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime in April 2003, the father said. There, he took part in "jihad against the American occupation of an Arab-Muslim country," added the father, who claimed his son "had no connection with extremist groups and was not in Afghanistan."
Tell Sonny to pass on our regards to Himmler, Pop.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:30 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Just another civilian...caught in the crossfire.
Posted by: john || 04/13/2004 14:17 Comments || Top||

#2  well send another son to be bagged already!
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 14:21 Comments || Top||

#3  somehow I imagine he was informed by his son's companion as the companion raced south trying to get away from the marines.
Posted by: ruprecht || 04/13/2004 14:45 Comments || Top||

#4  Inspired by john, played by SRV:

Tooth for tooth eye for an eye
sell you soul just to buy, buy, buy
Beggin' a dollar stealin' a dime
Come on can't you see that I
(I am) stranded
Caught in the crossfire !


Not anymore!
Posted by: Raj || 04/13/2004 14:49 Comments || Top||

#5  You would think that Saudis after watching Gulf Wars I & II would know that playing "Jihad" with the marines is no fun at all and that "game over" means game over. No virgins for "matyred" fools.
Posted by: RWV || 04/13/2004 14:54 Comments || Top||

#6  Prolly overslept and died while Marines overran his hole. Bad habits are hard to break.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 15:42 Comments || Top||

#7  RWV:

Not really. Understand that the arab world lives in a world that is spun by its media, clerics and their governments that lead them to believe they are winning.
Posted by: Anonymous4150 || 04/13/2004 15:42 Comments || Top||

#8  Saudi Arabian volunteer killed in Fallujah fighting

Who's next? Anyone want to step up?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 15:56 Comments || Top||

#9  if you can get oil from pig manure...how much could you get from recycling dead Saoodis?
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 15:57 Comments || Top||

#10  E's shuffled off this mortal coil and joined the choir invisible.
Posted by: mojo || 04/13/2004 17:23 Comments || Top||

#11  So when are you stepping up to the plate, pops?
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 18:20 Comments || Top||

#12  Good. Spread the word to all his friends Dad. Maybe they'll begin to catch on.

Yeah, I know, I'm being overly optimistic.
Posted by: Dakotah || 04/13/2004 22:45 Comments || Top||


Saudi policemen die in checkpoint shooting
Militants opened fire on a Saudi Arabian checkpoint at dawn today, killing four policemen before fleeing in security agents’ vehicles. The gunmen were believed to be the same men who were involved in an exchange of gunfire yesterday that left one policeman dead. The men were ordered to stop as they approached the checkpoint in a Toyota Camry today and responded by opening fire on the officers, said a security official. The militants were chased and surrounded in a suburb of Unaizah, 250 miles north-east of the capital, Riyadh.

The US embassy in Riyadh today urged Americans in the kingdom to remain vigilant. “The US government continues to receive credible indication of terrorist threats aimed at American and Western interests in Saudi Arabia, including targeting of diplomatic and official facilities and residential compounds in Riyadh,” spokeswoman Carol Kalin said.
Plus breaking news that 2 cars bombs have been defused in Riyadh.
Posted by: Lux || 04/13/2004 9:57:02 AM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:


Security man, militant killed in Riyadh shootout
A member of the Saudi security forces was killed, a militant was gunned down and four security personnel were wounded during a clash in the eastern neighbourhood of Riyadh on Monday evening.
Just a average Monday night in the Magic Kingdom.

Gunfire and the thud of explosions were heard from the area where security forces had chased suspected militants. Residents said, "A confrontation between security patrols and a group of wanted militants began at 6:30pm after dozens of police cars sped to the area. "Heavy gunfire as well as blasts, apparently resulting from rocket-propelled grenades and hand-grenades were heard," residents of the Sley district said.
Where's the film crew from "Cops" when you need them?

A militant was gunned down and another was wounded in a gun battle between security forces and presumed extremists in the same area on April 5.
Must be a bad neighborhood, you should really do something about it. All that gunfire keeps the tourists awake, oh wait.........

Many suspects as well as security personnel have been killed in clashes in Riyadh, while Saudi authorities are continuing crackdown on suspected alkrunners sympathisers of the al-Qaeda in the country.
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 8:50:27 AM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  More exciting details from Arab News:
“Patrol police identified a car carrying two terror suspects and tracked it down to the Al-Faiha neighborhood, and the two opened fire on security officers as they stopped in front of a villa they were using as a hide-out,” the official said. “Meanwhile a group of militants came out and started firing arms including rocket propelled grenades.” “This resulted in an exchange of fire and the deaths of a militant and a security officer,” he added.
Eyewitnesses said the terrorists fled into a villa after being chased by security officials, leaving their jeep in front. “The terrorists blew up the vehicle and took cover,” they said. Dozens of police cars were seen speeding to the area.
Security forces blocked off access to the neighborhood, keeping crowds of curious onlookers at bay. Arab News saw dozens of bullet-ridden cars in the area where the shootout took place.
Floodlights mounted on Civil Defense vehicles lit the entire district, focusing on the terrorist hide-out. Security forces later in the night recovered a number of hand grenades left behind by the terrorists. The whole area smelled of the gasoline leaking from vehicles in the vicinity whose gas tanks were pierced by ricocheting bullets, witnesses said. Witnesses said the terrorists managed to escape the dragnet. They then forced the driver of a Caprice at gunpoint to part with his car and escaped to Al-Naseem district. The last in a series of gunbattles between security forces and suspected militants occurred in the capital a week ago, when security forces gunned down a militant and wounded another on April 5, also in the same district. Both were wanted on terror-related charges, but neither was on a list of 26 most-wanted suspects — since reduced to 22 after the death or capture of four of them — issued after the November 2003 bombings in Riyadh.


So once again, security forces trail bad guys to their lair. Bad guys see cops following them, open fire. More bad guys pour out of lair, join in the fun. Cops are outnumbered and outgunned, bad guys blow up jeep to cover escape. Police backup arrives too late, mill around aimlessly. Bad guys carjack getaway car, speed off into the night, never to be seen again.
I think they use the same script for each shootout and just change the date.
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 10:22 Comments || Top||

#2  do they tell the cop (that's going to die) what his part in the play is beforehand?
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 10:42 Comments || Top||

#3  Frank -- why not? He's dying for the jihad.

If, that is, anyone's dying at all.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 04/13/2004 10:58 Comments || Top||

#4  do they tell the cop (that's going to die) what his part in the play is beforehand?

I think it's the same as on Star Trek, if there's a new guy on the away team, he ain't beaming back up.
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 11:20 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
North Korean leader plans Beijing trip
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 14:07 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  getting his chain yanked by his Master after that inflammatory nuclear rhetoric last week?
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 15:27 Comments || Top||

#2  If Kim's flight crosses open water, blow his sorry tryannical @ss out of the d@mned sky. This one simple move could circumvent unimaginable heartbreak.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 21:43 Comments || Top||

#3  He's just going back for more orders from the puppet masters in Peking
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 22:30 Comments || Top||

#4  To the contrary. The 'Pot Bellied Pig' is going, to have his belly 'rubbed' by his masters before he pulls on the Skor 'chain'!
Posted by: smn || 04/13/2004 22:59 Comments || Top||


U.S. to pull out most forces from Korean DMZ this year
EFL - caught via Drudge
The U.S. military will withdraw most if its forces from the Demilitarized Zone separating North and South Korea this year, an official announced today. The withdrawal means the United States will no longer have combat troops anywhere on the DMZ except at Panmunjom, where a U.S.-Korean battalion, commanded by a U.S. army lieutenant colonel, remains on guard in what is known as the Joint Security Area. Therefore South Korea, which has a 600,000-member military, will face North Korea’s armed forces, the world’s fifth largest with 1.1 million soldiers, most of whom are concentrated near the DMZ.

The United States will turn over Observation Post Ouellette, which provides a view into North Korea, as part of a force reshuffle, the official said. U.S. forces will no longer guard the border, except except for the troops at the JSA in Panmunjom. South Korean forces will take over Ouelette, just as they have replaced U.S. forces everywhere else along the DMZ since the Korean War ended in 1953. South Korea officials, however, want the U.S. to keep its troops in the Joint Security Area as symbols of America’s commitment to defend the South.

The 2 1/2-mile wide, 151-mile long DMZ, is considered one of the last remaining symbols of the Cold War. However it is still an active war zone with mines, barbed wire and tank traps. U.S. troops guarding the inter-Korean border have served as a strategic "tripwire" because they are presumed to come under fire during a North Korean attack, thereby prompting U.S. intervention in South Korea’s defense. The United States has about 37,000 troops stationed in South Korea, but has long kept fewer than 200 soldiers along the DMZ, at Observation Post Ouellette and Panmunjom, said U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Deborah Bertrand, a spokeswoman for U.S. Forces Korea. Details on the timing of Ouellette’s turnover and the eventual troop level at Panmunjom are still being decided in consultation with South Korea, Bertrand said, adding: "It will be this year."
’bout friggin time we pulled back from tripwire status
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 12:53:16 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Wow...That is gonna be one weird feeling when these guys move out. Any indications where they're going?

BTW - look for some Olympic-class spittle from the Norks. In a lot of ways, we were protecting him as much as we were defending the ROKS...

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski || 04/13/2004 13:06 Comments || Top||

#2  Hurrah! Faster, please.

p.s. - don't forget old europe!
Posted by: docob || 04/13/2004 13:11 Comments || Top||

#3  The US forces aren't leaving Korea, they're just moving a few miles back from the DMZ. In the event of full-scale war with the Norks, it's better that the US forces not get wiped out by preplotted Nork artillery in the first five minutes of combat, and that's why they're moving away from ground zero. The US forces will have increased flexibility and be better able to respond to an invasion if they have some room to maneuver and some time to respond.
Posted by: Captain Pedantic || 04/13/2004 13:21 Comments || Top||

#4  This report has me confused. I thought the deMilitarized zone was actually deMilitarized (aka know troops). I thought the US was on the South Korean border of the DMZ, not in it. Maybe I'm reading too much into the wording, or the journalist is a bit sloppy. Anyone out there that can straighten me out?
Posted by: ruprecht || 04/13/2004 14:47 Comments || Top||

#5  Ruprecht, your understanding is correct. The DMZ is exactly that. There are some watchposts and such in the DMZ itself but the guards there can't even have automatic weapons, it's strictly demilitarized. The US troops were stationed at the edge of the DMZ, and are now being moved farther away.
Posted by: Captain Pedantic || 04/13/2004 14:51 Comments || Top||

#6  kinda what you call a reality check on the skors. beware you may get what you ask for.

but this should of been done years ago - Cpt Pedantic said it correctly.
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 15:11 Comments || Top||

#7  The US forces will have increased flexibility and be better able to respond to an invasion if they have some room to maneuver and some time to respond.

How about increasing our flexibility to the maximum, and removing our forces from S. Korea entirely? ;)
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 16:10 Comments || Top||

#8  OMG I agree with Bomb-a-rama Why should any of our soldiers protect this nation of ingrates?
Bring the boys home-- though--to Fort Bragg--not Iraq
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 22:40 Comments || Top||


Pakistani Tells of North Korean Nuclear Devices
Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani scientist who sold nuclear technology around the world, has told his interrogators that during a trip to North Korea five years ago he was taken to a secret underground nuclear plant and shown what he described as three nuclear devices, according to Asian and American officials who have been briefed by the Pakistanis.
5 years ago? Sounds fishy
If Dr. Khan’s report is true, it would be the first time that any foreigner has reported inspecting an actual North Korean nuclear weapon. Past C.I.A. assessments of North Korea’s nuclear capacity have been based on estimates of how much plutonium it could produce and assessments of its technical capability to turn that plutonium into weapons. Dr. Khan, known as the father of the Pakistani bomb, said he was allowed to inspect the weapons briefly, according to the account that Pakistan has begun to provide in classified briefings to nations within reach of North Korea’s missiles. American intelligence officials caution that they cannot say whether Dr. Khan had the time, expertise or equipment to verify the claims. But they note that the number of plutonium weapons roughly accords with previous C.I.A. estimates that North Korea had one or two weapons and the ability to produce more...

Posted by: Lux || 04/13/2004 5:26:00 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Not surprising, a nuclear device is anything that can go boom. A deliverable weapon is another thing, these may have been a prototype bomb for testing.
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 8:42 Comments || Top||

#2  It's hard to give North Korea a lot of credibility. There has yet to be a single underground test that would confirm the validity of their device design. The instant they detonate one of their weapons, our seismic systems would pinpoint it. Khan is about as trustworthy as Saddam Hussein and his black market prestige is only bolstered by making these claims. Due to this dire conflict of interest, it would be really nice to have independent verification.

North Korea needs to be starved out. Not a single penny of foreign aid from anyone until they dismantle their nuclear weapons program and surrender all inventories of fissile material.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 9:55 Comments || Top||

#3  If it were a Uranium gun bomb it wouldn't need to be tested. Little Boy was never tested.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 10:31 Comments || Top||

#4  One question, have they test detonated any nuclear weapons? Didn't think so. If they had one, they would test one...whether it needed to be tested or not. Simply to show that they do have one.
Posted by: AllahHateMe || 04/13/2004 10:38 Comments || Top||

#5  Maybe so, Shipman, but it's difficult to take North Korea seriously until they demonstrate actual possession of functional devices.

"One question, have they test detonated any nuclear weapons? Didn't think so. If they had one, they would test one...whether it needed to be tested or not. Simply to show that they do have one."

I think AHM's statement says it all.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 11:00 Comments || Top||

#6  One question, have they test detonated any nuclear weapons? Didn't think so. If they had one, they would test one...whether it needed to be tested or not. Simply to show that they do have one.

Zenster speaks wisdom. Let me point one other thing out - if you think aboout it, Dr Khan has a LOT of incentive to tell people that other people have nukes, and to imply that they will use them. Otherwise, is it possible that - gasp - he sold some folks a bill of goods?...

Ship - 'tis indeed true that Little Boy was never test fired, mainly because the laws of physics had already shown them that they were going to get a yield. OTOH, a gun bomb is not at all well suited for a missile application. It is reliable - but way too big and too heavy for most missiles, and especially anything the Norks could bolt it onto. They could indeed build an aircraft delivered weapon - but given what they have in their inventory, getting it across the border would be questionable, and it would be dead meat even for the ROK's 40-y/o F-4s and F-5s.
Where a gun weapon would be useful would be if they were going to sneak one in someplace, in which case we're talking about a whole 'nother kettle of fish...

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski || 04/13/2004 12:59 Comments || Top||

#7  Just a thought. Jimmy Carter and
Madeline Albright both go to North Korea and say that Kim Jung Il was such a nice guy and we could deter him from doing just this very thing? This was going on all this time? Carter should go back to building houses for poor people where he does some good, and keep his d*** nose out of international affairs where he is the lead incompetent bozo.
Posted by: Anonymous4052 || 04/13/2004 15:32 Comments || Top||

#8  But if the NORKs have a "big gun" deliverable nuclear weapon--isn't the distance involved to Seoul relatively short? How far did the German guns of WWI launch a projectile?
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 22:45 Comments || Top||


Europe
FBI questions Madrid al-Qaeda suspect
FBI agents have questioned an Algerian in Spanish custody suspected of belonging to the same al-Qaeda cell as Mohammed Atta, leader of the squad that carried out the September 11 attacks, it was reported Tuesday. Washington sent an official request to Spanish authorities to allow the US delegation to question Khaled Madani, judicial sources said. The suspect was arrested in Murcia, in south-east Spain, last February during an operation to dismantle an alleged al-Qaeda cell in Spain.

US officials are expected to interrogate another Algerian Tuesday implicated in Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network. Moussa Laoual was arrested the same day as Madani in Torrevieja, in Andalusia, southern Spain. Authorities allegedly found equipment used to produce false documents, bank statements showing movements of large sums of money and extremist propaganda in the suspects’ homes. The Interior Ministry has accused them of stealing, falsifying and producing all types of identification documents used by al-Qaeda members. Authorities say some of the documents may have been used to carry out the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington.

Earlier Monday, a Syrian national indicted in Spain for his alleged ties to al-Qaeda denied he had helped finance the Islamic fundamentalist terrorist network. Muhammed Galeb Kalaje Zouaydi testified before Judge Baltasar Garzon, who indicted him for allegedly financing others linked to Osama Bin Laden. Kalaje, a.k.a. "Abu Talha," was arrested in November 2001 during the so-called "Operation Date" to dismantle a suspected Al Qaeda cell in Spain, but he was released after being questioned by Garzon. The judge ordered him re-arrested in April 2002, and he has remained in custody. But his lawyer, Manuel Tuero, said the money his client sent abroad from Spain and which led to his arrest was destined for his family and works of charity.
"The ’Shaykh The Holy Land To Its Foundations’ Foundation, y’r Honor."
The lawyer also said that in his court appearance, his client had explained the contents of a book seized during a raid on his home.
"What book? Oh, that book."
He claimed authorities mistakenly believed was about nuclear weapons.
"I think it belongs to my wife’s cousin’s niece. Recipes or somthing."
"Cooking with Cesium"?
Tuero said the book in question was a religious work dealing with the sayings of a Muslim prophet written 900 years ago, "when the atom had not yet been discovered."
"Don’t be silly. We hadn’t even swiped and claimed credit for invented the concept of zero back then."
He said Kalaje had not been questioned about his knowledge of the suspects in the 11 March Madrid terrorist attack. According to Garzon’s indictment, between 1996 and 2001, Kalaje sent some EUR 712,500 from Spain to organizations and people linked to al-Qaeda in a number of countries.
Baby ducks need a lot of chow.
Among the suspect money transfers were "donations" totalling EUR 231,664 to Nabil Sayadi, a suspected Bin Laden operative in Belgium who heads the Global Relief Foundation in Europe.
"Alms for the poor! Alms for the poor jihadis!"
During the searches of Kalaje’s home and firm - Iso Projects and Promotions - authorities also found documents indicating that the suspect sent almost EUR 16,666 to two other suspected members of the al-Qaeda cell in Hamburg, Germany.
Lets hope the questioning will be...thorough.
Posted by: Seafarious || 04/13/2004 10:21:59 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Turk held in French probe of Casablanca bombings
A Turkish man who was one of 13 people picked up by French counter-espionage agents earlier this week in an investigation into the Casablanca bombings of May 2003 has been place under judicial investigation on terrorist charges. Attila Turk [that's gotta be an alias!] was detained on Sunday at Charles De Gaulle airport as he prepared to board a flight for Turkey. He faces possible charges of "criminal association in relation with a terrorist enterprise." Of the other 12 people arrested in round-ups Monday in and around Paris seven have now been set free, and the other five were to be presented to a magistrate Friday. The suspects are believed to belong to the the Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group - commonly known by its French acronym GICM - the organisation blamed for the Casablanca bombings on May 16, 2003 and the prime suspect in last month’s attacks in Madrid. Three were said by officials to have been named in international arrest warrants issued by Rabat. Investigators have said that the most important arrest was that of the cell’s alleged leader, Moustapha Baouchi, a Moroccan electrician born in 1975 who spent two periods in armed camps in Afghanistan, where he learned to handle weapons and explosives. The swoops were part of a French investigation into the Casablanca bombings, in which three French citizens were among the 45 people killed.
Posted by: Seafarious || 04/13/2004 9:59:48 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Anyone here notice the lack of terrorism on French soil since the St Michel metro bombings? The French Intelligence service has totally diffused that crap in their country through aggressive passport/random indetity card checks on the street and on the trains--maybe we could learn something? I don't think it has anything to do with appeasement--I've seen the French police in action--and they are not at all apologetic when demanding identification. And HELL yes they do racial profiling!
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 22:51 Comments || Top||


Three more 3/11 terror suspects arrested in Malaga
Three more suspects were arrested for alleged links to the 11 March massacre in Madrid, legal sources said Tuesday. The judge in charge of the case, Juan del Olmo, ordered the arrests which were carried out Monday night. The suspects were detained in the Carretera de Cádiz area of Málaga, where they all live in the same flat. No more details were released about the latest suspects.
Posted by: Seafarious || 04/13/2004 10:04:28 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Hungary Thwarts Plot to Kill Israeli President, AFP Reports
Hungarian authorities foiled a plot to kill Israeli President Moshe Katsav, who is visiting the Eastern European country, Agence France-Presse cited Hungary’s Inforadio as saying. Three people of Arab origin were arrested in connection with the plan, AFP said, citing an Inforadio report from unidentified intelligence officials. Hungarian authorities found out about the plot before Katsav arrived today, and the Israeli president’s schedule was changed four times for security reasons, AFP cited the radio station as saying. Katsav, who is a member of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s Likud party, is visiting Hungary for three days and will open a Holocaust museum in the capital, Budapest, AFP reported. A news conference on the arrests will be held at 4 p.m. Budapest time, Hungarian police said.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/13/2004 8:49:25 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Home Front: WoT
FBI’s Trilogy network completed
EFL

The FBI has completed the network for the long-awaited Trilogy modernization project.The $596 million network has been deployed to 591 sites and can expand as needed. The network links 22,000 desktop workstations and includes new scanners and printers and an enterprise operation center that manages it.
The virtual case file system, an application in Trilogy that modernizes workflow processes for FBI agents and provides for better information sharing, is expected to be finished by December.

"It’s a fairly complicated network," the FBI’s executive assistant director for administration, W. Wilson Lowery Jr., told reporters today at a briefing on Trilogy. He said the network was slated to be implemented by March 31, and even with about 70 sites and satellite and encryption capabilities added to the plan, it was right on schedule. Trilogy’s cost originally was $458 million, but later grew by $138 million. Lawmakers criticized the cost overruns, saying the project was poorly managed and on an unrealistic schedule. But Lowery said the increased costs accounted for items not initially planned in the project but necessary for its success, such as the enterprise operations center and satellite capabilities.

"It was not that we had blown the cost, it was that we added that much capability," Lowery said.The virtual case file system accounted for about $40 million of the additional funding, Lowery said. Once completed, the system will replace paper-based case files with one electronic file, allowing agents better access to case information and advanced search capabilities. The system is the first workflow re-engineering the bureau has seen since the 1950s, FBI officials said.

"We’re very good collectors of information," an FBI official said. "The problem is we haven’t had an information technology structure to support us."

I’m glad that we did this. It’s pretty visionary, but it should have been done much earlier in the Clinton Administration. At 9/11 we were still left with FBI offices that couldn’t attach pictures to e-mails. Based on the fact that the system was probably rushed after 9/11, I am doubtful that the Bush administration would have been able to have this in place prior to 9/11 even if they rushed. I’ll include a link with an edited chunk of testimony that applies. Based on what I saw here I beleive that Freeh was part of the solution, not part of the problem.

This system was described in the Testimony of Louis J Free, Director, FBI Before the House Committee on Appropraitiom March 17, 1999.
Information Collection and Analysis

The Information Collection and Analysis budget initiative focuses upon one of the most critical needs identified by FBI program managers, namely, the ability to collect, process, analyze, and disseminate information obtained during investigations, from other agencies, and from public sources. For fiscal year 2000, the FBI is requesting an increase of 56 positions and $48,917,000 for information collection and analysis activities in three areas: Information Sharing, Collection Management, and Investigative Information Services.

Information Sharing. Last year, the Committee supported funding for the Information Sharing program which is a critical cornerstone to all of the operational strategies identified by the FBI in its Strategic Plan, 1998 - 2003. What the FBI needs most is to move away from its current collection of "stove-pipe" databases and stand-alone case management systems that cannot talk to each other and implement an enterprise-wide case management system. The Information Sharing project will break down those information and case management stove-pipes.

We are taking a measured approach to implementing the Information Sharing project. This multi-year information technology investment is comprised of three sequential phases, each builds upon the preceding phase. The first phase would upgrade the existing information technology architecture to support electronic case management in all FBI locations. The second phase would introduce analytical tools that will allow FBI agents, analysts, and specialists to perform high-level analysis of the information contained in electronic case files. The third phase envisions the capability of securely sharing FBI electronic case information with other members of the law enforcement and intelligence communities.

Each major phase of the project represents a separate set of functionalities and capabilities so that if funding is not available for the subsequent phases, the investment provides benefit to the FBI. While the overall cost of all three phases will require a substantial investment over several years, our future requests will be dependent upon satisfactory progress being realized in the phases funded to date.

In response to the Committee’s direction, we have prepared a five-year plan for the Information Sharing project. That plan is being reviewed within the Administration for clearance and will be submitted to the Congress upon approval from the Office of Management and Budget. Until we receive your concurrence to this plan, the FBI is unable to expend any funding in 1999 to implement the Information Sharing project.

With funding made available for fiscal year 1999, including $20,000,000 of direct appropriation and $40,000,000 from the Department’s Working Capital Fund, the FBI would begin Phase I of the plan.

For fiscal year 2000, the FBI requests a total of $58,800,000 to continue implementation of the Information Sharing project, including a program increase of $38,800,000. This funding would allow us to complete Phase I, which permits electronic case file capabilities with access from all FBI locations. Additionally, work would begin on Phase II of the plan to provide a common set of analytical tools to all FBI locations that would provide the electronic capability to analyze case information on a single-case basis. The availability of these analytical tools would allow FBI agents, analysts, and specialists to perform link analysis, telephone toll analysis, visual investigative analysis, geographic analysis, and the ability to analyze large volumes of data related to a single case at a single location. The Phase II ability to perform analysis on investigative case information represents a significant first step toward achieving the type of analytical capabilities needed to support the operational objectives identified in the Strategic Plan for 1998 - 2003.

Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 11:14:15 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Wife and Children of Pakistani Razor-Blade Smuggler Might Be Deported
From an article in May 2003
... A former computer programmer with the civilian-aviation authority of Pakistan, [Fazal] Karim, 37, lived with his wife and three young children in Houston, where he ran three cellphone stores. Prosecutors say he returned to Texas from a four-week trip to Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates on March 5 and was waiting at D/FW [Dallas/Fort Worth] Airport for his connecting flight to Houston when security screeners discovered the razor blades. Government agents and prosecutors said Karim gave contradictory statements about why he was traveling with the razor blades ....

Federal officials say that Karim came to the attention of security screeners at D/FW because of his suspicious behavior and that lying to FBI agents and immigration officials, not his ethnicity or religious background, ultimately led to his arrest. Assistant U.S. Attorney Fred Schattman said the security screeners noticed that Karim appeared to dissociate himself from his carry-on bag. After he had placed it on the conveyor belt leading to an X-ray machine, Karim did not walk through the adjacent magnetometer but selected one farther away. Not only were the razor blades artfully concealed within the belt, but the screener also noticed that Karim did not have a razor in his luggage, Schattman said. ....

The Transportation Security Administration screeners initially confiscated the razor blades and let Karim proceed to the gate. However, after discussing Karim’s behavior, they called in airport police and FBI agents, the prosecutor said. When FBI agents questioned Karim about the razor blades, he offered three contradictory explanations, Schattman said. First, Karim told FBI agents that he used the razor blades to shave the bottom of his full beard. Then he said they were for a friend in Houston named Mahmoud. Finally, he said he did not know the razor blades were in his bag. ....

In addition, immigration inspectors discovered that Karim’s claim that he was a tourist visiting friends in Houston for a couple of weeks was a lie. Immigration authorities found out that Karim, a Pakistani national with Canadian citizenship, had lived in Houston for three years and did not have a residence in another country. He had a one-way, $3,069 ticket from Karachi, Pakistan, to Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, to Paris to D/FW and to Houston. ....

Karim’s youngest child was born in the United States. His wife and the two elder children might face deportation, Brown said. Figure out a way to deport the youngest brat too.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 9:50:03 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  From another article, in July 2003
Karim says he and his wife applied for an E-2 investor visa on Jan. 22 [2003], less than two weeks before his pilgrimage [to Mecca, Saudi Arabia], believing that this was enough to adjust their status in the United States.

His wife's immigration status is also in question, officials said. On the application form, he is listed as president and his wife, Asia Karim, as vice president of his cellphone business, Wintel Wireless. He wrote that he invested $145,000 in the business. He gave his Houston address and a second address in Edmonton, Alberta. Court documents show that Karim obtained a Texas sales and use tax permit for his business in March 2001.

E-visas are nonimmigrant visas typically issued for two years. Foreign nationals have to apply for e-visas abroad, and they are issued at a U.S. embassy or consulate, said Patricia Mancha, a spokeswoman for the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services in Dallas. "You can't apply for it from here; it won't protect your status in this country if you're here illegally," Mancha said. "And lying to an immigration officer is a federal offense."
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 22:00 Comments || Top||

#2  Then he said they were for a friend in Houston named Mahmoud.

LOL!! Indent the above quote and highlight it in yellow and you have a Fred humor comment!!!
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 04/13/2004 23:04 Comments || Top||


Alamoudi faces new charges
American Muslim leader of Yemeni origin, Abdurrahman Alamoudi, was arraigned on new charges last week before Judge Claude M. Hilton in the Alexandria Federal Courthouse. The new charges center on Mr. Alamoudi’s travels to Libya, and an alleged failure of disclosure by Mr. Alamoudi during his naturalization process. “This is still a classic case of selective prosecution and the government’s legal hair-splitting,” said Mahdi Bray, Executive Director of Freedom Foundation of the Muslim American Society, which is a Washington-based national grassroots religious, social, and educational organization.
That was run by Alamoudi...
“They want to vilify the defendant in the eyes of the court through legalistic terror-baiting,” said Bray. “It is reprehensible that the government would do this, but unfortunately, these are the signs of our times. Our community and the American public must not give in to the climate of prejudice and hysteria.”
Why not? I'm giving in. I hereby announce that I'm prejudiced against all people who're willing to have me killed.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:45 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Canadian gets 5 years in prison for carrying razor blades aboard U.S. flight
A Canadian has been sentenced to more than five years in prison for carrying 32 razor blades in his carry-on luggage to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. Prosecutors contend he was attempting to test airport security.
Guess airport security worked, huh?
Fazal Karim, 37, a naturalized Canadian from Pakistan, was sentenced Monday to 63 months in prison. U.S. District Judge Terry Means also ordered Karim to pay a $20,000 US fine and that he be turned over to immigration authorities for deportation after completing his sentence. Transportation Security Administration screeners on March 5, 2003, found 32 double-edged razor blades in Karim’s carry-on luggage, concealed in a box containing a coiled belt. Karim had attempted to enter a secure area of the airport to board a flight to Houston. FBI agents discovered that Karim was not a tourist as claimed but an immigrant without authorization to live in the U.S. A federal jury convicted Karim of carrying and attempting to carry concealed dangerous weapons in air transportation and of making false statements about his immigration status. Prosecutors contended that Karim had been attempting to evade and test airport security for potential terrorist aims. A federal agent testified during a November hearing that the names and phone numbers of the current directors of the civil aviation systems in Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates were found in Karim’s address book, 10 years after he worked as a computer programmer for the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority. Karim has denied he had any terrorist ties.
"No, no! Certainly not!"
Posted by: TS || 04/13/2004 11:31:59 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  well HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 12:08 Comments || Top||

#2  Five years - Enough time to get real friendly with lonely "Bubba". No 72 virgins in paradise. Just 72 convicts in Leavenworth.
Posted by: Anonymous4052 || 04/13/2004 13:17 Comments || Top||

#3  When his five years are up, collect his $20,000, fly him to Pakistan, and shove him out the door at 5,000 feet without a parachute -- preferably over the "tribal" areas.
Posted by: Tom || 04/13/2004 13:44 Comments || Top||

#4 
63 months in prison

Hooray!
And on the very next day put him in handcuffs on an airplane back to Pakistan. Let him find his own way back to Canada.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 14:09 Comments || Top||

#5  aacckkk!!! I keep a razor blade in my wallet for 1,000,000 different uses (none of them drugs BTW) and I forgot about it being there last time I went through security.

I won't forget next time!!!
Posted by: B || 04/13/2004 14:40 Comments || Top||

#6  None of you Freeper bastards can grow a beard. Parasitical US razor price gauging in Canada means he was trying to save a few dollars.

Jeezus. Study up on Gillette v. Wilkinson Sword and see what your happy ass capitalist system has wrought.

TOM TRESH HAD THE LONGER BEARD, IT'S PLAIN TO SEE.
Posted by: AntiGum || 04/13/2004 16:11 Comments || Top||

#7  Look sharp, feel sharp, eh, Fazal?
See you in about 4 years. If you live that long.
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 19:26 Comments || Top||

#8  Does anyone understand Antigum's last post? TOM TRESH HAD THE LONGER BEARD, IT'S PLAIN TO SEE must be lyrics to a song I don't know, but I have never listened to my YES albums backward.

BTW, is it possible that Karim was just stocking up for Halloween severl months early?
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 22:47 Comments || Top||


Charges Dismissed Against Marine Reservist
HOUSTON (AP) - Charges against a Marine reservist accused in the death of an Iraqi prisoner last year were thrown out, a defense attorney said Monday.

Lance Cpl. Christian Hernandez and his commanding officer, Maj. Mark A. Paulus, had been accused of negligent homicide in the death of Nagem Sadoon Hatab, a Baath Party member who prosecutors said was punched, karate-kicked and dragged by the throat while in the officers' custody in Iraq. Hatab, 52, had been left lying naked, covered in his own feces, for hours when he was found dead on June 6, 2003.

Col. William Gallo, the investigating officer who presided over an Article 32 hearing in February, recommended dismissal of charges against Hernandez. Article 32 hearings are the military equivalent of a civilian grand jury probe. Maj. Gen. William Bowdon, the commanding general at Camp Pendleton, the Marine base north of San Diego, made the final decision to drop the charges.

A memorandum on Bowden's decision, dated Friday, was released Monday by Hernandez's attorney, Jack Zimmermann. Zimmerman said Hernandez was back in New York City with his wife and children.

Administrative punishment, such as loss of pay or restriction to base, was recommended for Paulus.
No info in the article as to why charges were dropped, but doesn't sound like much of a case in the first place.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/13/2004 12:15:00 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  War is Hell--nothing new here. Why was he even charged in the first place?
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 1:19 Comments || Top||

#2  Why was he even charged in the first place?

Because our laws , principles, customs, and morality mean more to us than to you?
Posted by: badanov || 04/13/2004 1:43 Comments || Top||

#3  I remember reading that Hatab was captured in possession of an M-16 and personal effects taken from a soldier who had been killed in the 507th ambush.

This aspect of the story has practically vanished, but a couple of Marines (field grade officers) have recently repeated it to me.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 04/13/2004 3:24 Comments || Top||

#4  finally some level headed reasoning
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 10:47 Comments || Top||

#5  The Iraqi Baathist prefers kicking up on 'is back, covered in 'is own feces! 'e's probably pining for the fjords!
Posted by: BH || 04/13/2004 10:49 Comments || Top||

#6  IF, and that is a big if, this Iraqi was hurt it would not have been without good reason. I am not going to make a list but we treat are prisoners as good as they act. If you get mouthy and hostile the guard have a duty to do the same. Good order and dicipline works both ways. If somebody (say a former Iraqi Baath Party member) got lippy with the guards, I expect they would have to demonmstrate to the other prisoners that his behavior is counter productive. If said Baath Party member was found to be in possession of U.S. war trophies, he would probably get extra scrutiny from the MPs. I don't know but I suspect that is what happens.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 04/13/2004 11:09 Comments || Top||

#7  "Hatab, 52, had been left lying naked, covered in his own feces, for hours when he was found dead on June 6, 2003."

-sounds appropriate to me.
Posted by: Jarhead || 04/13/2004 13:04 Comments || Top||

#8  Hatab, 52, had been left lying naked, covered in his own feces, for hours when he was found dead on June 6, 2003.

That's a shitty way to die.
Posted by: Raj || 04/13/2004 13:12 Comments || Top||

#9  Hatab took the easy way out. The rumor I read somewhere was that he had Jessica Lynch's M-16 and personal effects. Does anyone have a source for what Hatab had on him?
Posted by: Tresho || 04/13/2004 17:45 Comments || Top||

#10  that's a shitty way to die.... lol!

If he did have Jessie's things, there is certainly more to the story and it was wrong and bad. and they should...oh..excuse me...yawn....it's all this rain...it' makes me so..yawn..tired...

I think I'm really more interested in who killed Jonbenet Ramsey, which isn't all that interested really....

It's not that I don't care...it's just that there are other things that I care more about.
Posted by: B || 04/13/2004 18:17 Comments || Top||

#11  sigh...I suppose I shouldn't lol.
note to self: must make self care - try harder.
Posted by: B || 04/14/2004 1:42 Comments || Top||


International-UN-NGOs
Arab League chief slams killing of civilians in Iraq
The Arab League chief on Sunday slammed battles between US marines and insurgents in which hundreds of Iraqi civilians had died as “unacceptable and extremely serious”.
"Nope. Nope. Can't have any of that."
“The meeting condemned the recent attacks that have killed more than 500 Iraqi civilians,” Amr Moussa was quoted as saying by the official MENA news agency, after chairing an Arab League delegates’ meeting on Iraq. He branded the fighting in the war-torn country, as “unacceptable and extremely serious,” stressing it would entail “negative repercussions”.
Like piles of dead turbans?
While Arab governments have shied away from publicly criticising recent US military operations in Iraq, Moussa has stood alone in the world of officialdom by strongly criticising the violence. Although a tentative ceasefire held in Fallujah on Sunday, a week of battles in the town have left more than 400 Iraqis dead and 1,000 wounded, officials with the Iraqi interim Governing Council said.
Things kinda tough for the boomers and snuffies, are they, Amr?
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 14:05 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  CAIRO: The Arab League chief on Sunday slammed battles between US marines and insurgents in which hundreds of Iraqi civilians had died as “unacceptable and extremely serious”.

“The meeting condemned the recent attacks that have killed more than 500 Iraqi civilians,” Amr Mussa was quoted as saying by the official MENA news agency, after chairing an Arab League delegates’ meeting on Iraq.


Since it's Iraqi bombers that are killing so many Iraqis on a regular basis, this whiner's blather about US caused Iraqi deaths is so much hot air. If the Americans were indiscriminate about who got killed, the Iraqi citizen death toll would be in the thousands. Instead, the Fallujah citizen death toll merely approaches the sort of numbers that Iraqi bombers have killed already.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 14:39 Comments || Top||

#2  The Arab League chief on Sunday slammed battles between US marines and insurgents in which hundreds of Iraqi civilians had died as “unacceptable and extremely serious”.

There simply is no way this guy can be serious.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 14:48 Comments || Top||

#3  If the Americans were indiscriminate about who got killed, the Iraqi citizen death toll would be in the thousands.

ITYM "hundreds of thousands", if not "millions".

And, guys, this is not surprising at all. Arabs don't care if Arabs kill other Arabs; they only care if non-Arabs kill Arabs. That's why Saddam was OK, and that's why the terrorists are OK.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 04/13/2004 15:11 Comments || Top||

#4  Arabs don't care if Arabs kill other Arabs; they only care if non-Arabs kill Arabs.

Or put a different way, Arabs have a problem only if they're not the ones doing the killing.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 16:03 Comments || Top||

#5  I think I understand some of where the civilian casualties are coming from. This was my response to a post at Healing Iraq, which, as I expected, is doing the usual Arab solidarity thing, now that the gloves are off (Zeyad asked for the gloves to come off early, but now that gloves are actually partially off, he's appalled. Typical):

Sa'ad: You people are beyond any help. You think the insurgents are shooting their own women and children just to blame the Americans??? Are you that brainwashed?

My response: The few thousand rebels definitely aren't shooting their own family members - there are a few hundred thousand non-rebel families to target. For example, say a non-rebel family balks at handing their food or ammunition over to the rebels. The rebels kill the entire family to serve as an example to the whole community.

It happened under Saddam, and Fallujans who served under Saddam are the people who carried out Saddam's orders. (Note that Fallujah was a key recruitment center for Saddam's henchmen). A few hundred dead Coalition "collaborators" (i.e. people who refused to help the rebels) would not be exceptional. The rebels assume that they are the sole and legitimate authority of Iraq - what is to prevent them from executing "collaborators", given that they have carried out similar massacres against Saddam's opponents in the past? When the rebels say that Iraqis should not kill their own, they mean that Iraqis allied with the coalition should not kill them - but the rebels arrogate to themselves the sole right to kill Iraqis allied with the coalition as "collaborators".
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 04/13/2004 16:16 Comments || Top||

#6  Well it's a little bit late, but I welcome the Arab Leagues denunciation of the four civilians killed by the people of Fallujah. I hope that the Fallujahans, however many may be left, will take the AL's words to heart and refrain from the willful targeting of civilian personnel.

Fallujah, I ask again: How funny is it now?
Posted by: BH || 04/13/2004 17:07 Comments || Top||

#7 
Arab League chief slams killing of civilians in Iraq
Then tell your Arab terrorist buddies in Iraq to stop killing civilians, asshole.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/13/2004 19:05 Comments || Top||

#8  Does he speak for the whole Arab League Membership? Did Somalia and the Sudan sign off on his condemnation of killing civilians? Has Somalia paid their dues recently?
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 22:28 Comments || Top||


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Syria Continues to Arrest Kurds; More Than a Thousand in Jail
Syrian authorities have arrested more than 1000 Kurds as part of a continuing campaign against the Kurdish minority, a Syrian human rights group claimed today. .... In a statement faxed to foreign news agencies in Damascus today, Aktham Naisse, the chairman of the Committees for the Defence of Democratic Liberties and Human Rights in Syria, said "arbitrary daily arrests" were still continuing against Kurdish women and men. More than 1000 Kurds have been arrested and many of them were tortured, he said. .... The statement claimed that a number of Kurds were dismissed from Syrian universities for participating in last month’s demonstrations. ....

Faisal al-Youssef, a member of the political bureau of the Kurdish Democratic Party, said that daily arrests of Kurds have been conducted since last month. .... On April 7, the Kurdish Yekiti Party claimed that Syrians authorities conducted raids in north-eastern Syria and arrested dozens of Kurds. ....
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 10:33:42 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Iranian Unemployment Has Doubled in the Past Four Years
Farshid Yazdani, director-general of the social and economic planning department at the Social Security Organization, said on 12 April that the number of unemployed in Iran has doubled in the past four years, Iran Daily reported on 13 April. Yazdani attributed this increase mainly to mismanagement, and he added that management shortcomings are ignored and problems are blamed on the workforce instead. Yazdani added that the government’s industrial-renovation plan will make another 30,000 people jobless.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 5:59:45 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  this just hope the same mismanagement hampers thier nuke devlopment..at least until we tear it apart!
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 18:28 Comments || Top||

#2  Sad, isn't it? All of those Baathists, secret police, professional violators of women, torturers, children’s jailors and builders of palaces, disco’s and race tracks are all on the dole. Sniff…just breaks my heart …
Posted by: B || 04/13/2004 18:30 Comments || Top||


Iran Disputes USA’s Definitions of the Words "Human" and "Rights"
[Iran’s] Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Assefi on 12 April said that U.S. criticism of the Iranian human rights record is "invalid" and its definition of the terms "human" and "rights" is at odds with that of the rest of the world, IRNA reported. He said the United States is not qualified to comment on human rights issues because its actions in Palestine, Iraq, and elsewhere cost lives and make people miserable and homeless. A 12 April commentary on Iranian state television said that while "American forces are busy mercilessly slaughtering the Iraqi people in front of the eyes of the world, and while the regime occupying Jerusalem [Israel] is also continuing its barbaric and inhumane crimes against defenseless civilians in the occupied Palestinian territories," the United States has published a "repetitive" report on human rights violations in Iran. These are presumably references to a U.S. State Department Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor and Bureau of Public Affairs fact sheet titled Iran: Voices Struggling To Be Heard. ....
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 5:57:50 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  He said the United States is not qualified to comment on human rights issues because its actions in Palestine, Iraq,

you may want to add iran to the list! raghead
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 18:15 Comments || Top||

#2  Don't be too hard on the Iranians, guys. They're free to dispute our definition of "human" just as much as we're free to dispute their definition of "holy land" when the ground around the mullahs consists largely of smoking craters . . .
Posted by: The Doctor || 04/13/2004 19:35 Comments || Top||

#3  Well, he's right. Silly Americans think "human" means a member of the species homo sapien, when everyone else clearly recognizes that term means "one who is a Muslim extremist or a supporter". IE. Rachel Corrie, that guy going nuts in Fallujah, and that Hamas leader that the Jews got last month are human. Jews, anyone with critical thought processes and people they flat out don't like aren't human.
"Rights" mean "the right to worship as we tell you to".
It's all very easy to understand once you stick your head up your ass.....
Posted by: Desert Blondie || 04/13/2004 20:26 Comments || Top||


Syrian Minister: US Intervention is a "Big Plot"
A Syrian official here on Monday seriously condemned the United States "so-called Greater Middle East Plan" calling it "A hat trick in favor of Israel against the Palestinians, and Washington, against the Iraqi nation." The Syrian Information Minister Ahmad al-Hassan said that the US-sponsored Greater Middle East Plan, like all other imposed plans by outsiders, is aimed at deviating the world public opinion from the Arab-Israeli crisis, and hiding the dark pages of the occupation of Iraq.

Al-Hassan who was speaking at a conference titled "Surveying the Dimensions of the US Greater Middle East Plan" held at Muridan Hotel of Damascus told IRNA on the sideline of the conference, "Holding such gatherings provide good opportunities for revealing the realities behind the facade of such treacherous plots, and the cunning methods aimed at accusing the regional governments of imaginary plots, while distorting the realities of the region..." The conference is sponsored by the Arabian Center for Strategic Studies... Dr. George Jabbour, from the University of Damascus, another speaker at the conference, warned, "If the Arab and Islamic countries would not move in time and harmoniously to confront this US plan, it would gradually be materialized, at high costs for the region`s nations and governments."
Unfortunately, "Arab and Islamic" countries have effectively killed the redevelopment plan for Iraq - if not self-government by June 30 - by indulging the kidnapping campaigns against foreign aid workers. Even relative pacification of the al-Sadr terrorists, could not restore the confidence of civilian workers. Certainly, President Bush will have to address certain failure, at Tuesday’s press conference. Time for Plan B.
Almost all speakers at the conference spoke about the urgent need to clarify the dimensions of the secret and extremely perilous US plan titled The Greater Middle East, that will have extremely negative political, security, economic, social and cultural aftermaths for the Islamic and Arab nations.
"Negative"? Their governments are not delivering in any of the mentioned service categories.
Posted by: Man Bites Dog || 04/13/2004 4:41:15 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  [SPAN CLASS=PeterLorre]"It's a conspeeeracy, I tell you, a conspeeracy!"[/SPAN]
Posted by: Mike || 04/13/2004 11:43 Comments || Top||

#2  A hat trick in favor of Israel against the Palestinians, and Washington, against the Iraqi nation."

Duh - you forgot syria and iran in this statement. These bastards are living in lala land. Thier time is coming.
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 12:10 Comments || Top||

#3  Big Plot Laid On Deep?
Damn I hope so.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 16:30 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Arafat Personally Approved Attack on US Embassy Convoy
Full article by subscription only, this is the free summary.
RAMALLAH [MENL] -- The United States has determined that Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat approved an attack on a U.S. embassy convoy in which three Americans were killed in 2003.

U.S. diplomatic sources said a U.S. investigation into the bombing of the embassy convoy in the Gaza Strip in October 2003 pointed to a clear role by Arafat. The sources said Arafat granted approval to a plan to strike U.S. interests in PA areas. Arafat, the sources said, did not draft or approve any details for a Palestinian attack. But they said Arafat agreed to a proposal relayed by a high-level aide for the Palestinians to "pass a message" to the United States.
We ought to "pass a message" to Yasser.
According to the sources, a senior Arafat aide and member of the Fatah Central Committee left Gaza City for Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah in September 2003 to seek approval for a Palestinian attack on U.S. interests in the area. The Fatah official, described as a liasion between Arafat and Palestinian insurgents in the Gaza Strip, complained of U.S. policy toward the PA and Arabs.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/13/2004 1:27:48 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Iraq-Jordan
May I ask a question? No link, I just so respect you folks here at Rantburg U....
and Fred, I know I’m out on a limb here, but with the resources available here, I know of no better place to gather thoughts aobut all that is happening in war.

Please delete if not appropriate to your wishes.

The big question that keeps coming up... so many folks say, more troops needed in Iraq. Why? What will they be doing that is not already being done? I know the statements that Rummy doesn’t want them, I know W keeps telling us, whatever is needed.

Realizing this is really a military question, I’m so curious. What else could more troops add? Considering all the support personnel that is needed, I just keep reading, more troops are needed. And no one tells me, what they will be doing.

Maybe answers in email is more appropriate. Thanks...
traveling_woman@yahoo.com
Posted by: Sherry || 04/13/2004 11:37:58 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The cry for "More troops" is often made by those who misunderstand our mission in Iraq and around the world. You first heard the term "boots on the ground" during the Afghanistan campaign, the theory being that since the British Empire and the Soviet Union had so much trouble subduing the Afghans, that we Americans would have an equal amount of trouble. A week later, Kabul fell, and with it, the Taliban.

There are several reasons why people insist on more troops. Some honestly believe that more troops automatically equates to greater safety. However, its my opinion that most people who cry out for more troops do so in hopes of slowing down American action and resolve overseas. By tying down more troops in one theatre of action, Americans would once again be forced to use diplomacy and thus would need to 'cut a deal' with the learned and experienced European powers, who of course know all about the excesses of empire that we find ourselves in.

These are the same people hoping and praying for a military draft. By having a military draft, it would slow our military power overseas and once again, turn America into a paper tiger that could be turned from its resolve.

I think we are likely to see more troops enter the Iraqi theater of operations, however the additional troops are more likely to come from places like South Korea and Germany than they are to come from an expanded US military.

Our mission in Iraq is not to subdue and control the Iraqis, but simply to provide enough security to see it get on its feet and become a free nation. We have no desire or mission to remain there for very long. Pouring in double the number of troops currently in theatre would cause a great deal of strain on the logistics train, and it would also remove the threat of possible military action elsewhere, which would have the effect of making it weaker everywhere.
Posted by: Frank Martin || 04/13/2004 23:55 Comments || Top||

#2  Sherry, I would like to see more troops in theater for a function that Old Spook thinks is a critical vulnerability. We need to tighten up the border with Iran. For quite a while, I thought the answer was to reactivate Iraqi troops, but I no longer think that's the case. We don't need border police who run, take bribes or join the other side.

Whatever we decide to do the plan has to be sustainable for several years. We had a larger military once and will again in several years. That doesn't really help us now. For the present, I trust that Rumsfeld and Myers are doing what they can to free up people to augment forces by reclassifying CONUS jobs that never should have been staffed with fighters. They are also slowly pulling troops out of countries where they are no legitimate security purpose for their presence. The process for that type of draw down is slow due to diplomatic realities.

Other than that I can't think of any productive ideas to get more boots on the ground. You could put a stop loss on all Naval forces and train all incoming swabbies as temporary security personnel, but those sailors wouldn't be Marines, who are a special bunch ... as you know better than I do.

What would be a sustainable rotation for military wives? I don't like to see rising military divorce rates; they are bad for everybody.


Posted by: Super Hose || 04/14/2004 0:20 Comments || Top||

#3  Sherry, the humorous answer would be to form press gangs and consider any illegal aliens to be new recruit material, but your question deserves a serious answer.
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/14/2004 0:24 Comments || Top||

#4  Border control. If we can stop Hamas and Hezbolla and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Wahabbi moneybags from entering the country, the Iraqis will do just fine on their own.
Posted by: OldSpook || 04/14/2004 1:35 Comments || Top||

#5  I would like to see the Iraqi's do more of their own work. What say we recruit them instead. They fought Iran before, let's let them do it again.
Posted by: B || 04/14/2004 10:02 Comments || Top||

#6  besides...we aren't so hot at border control anyway ;-)
Posted by: B || 04/14/2004 10:03 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Two US Soldiers in Afghanistan Embrace Islam and Now Support the Taliban
From Jihad Unspun
In Afghanistan, Taliban attacks resulted in deaths of a total of seven American soldiers and many more Afghan soldiers as the fighting continues to escalate. Many others are reported wounded and a report has been received that two US soldiers have embraced Islam. .... in Khost, a soldier told Pakistan’s Daily Ausaf on the condition of anonymity that two US soldiers embraced Islam. They both have started to show their support for Taliban and other Islamic scholars and have started to learn more about Islam. Alhamdulilah!
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 04/13/2004 10:16:10 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Can somebody explain this to me?
Posted by: ex-lib || 04/13/2004 22:34 Comments || Top||

#2  in Khost, a soldier told Pakistan’s Daily Ausaf on the condition of anonymity that two US soldiers embraced Islam.

Ummm, an unidentified "anonymous soldier" said this? Yawn.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 22:37 Comments || Top||

#3  In light of America's freedom of religion, they have every right to pursue study of Taleban doctrine.

Similarly, our Military has an identical right to identify, apprehend and subject these same people to courts-martial for collaborating with the enemy.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 22:51 Comments || Top||

#4  Based upon this story, the US government better make a contract with the University of California, Berkeley anthropology department and slap a study on the actions of these two soldiers and see why they went native. /smartassery
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 04/13/2004 22:59 Comments || Top||

#5  Hummmmmm..... special ops guys? Of all their attributes, maybe "acting" is another action item to add to that training matrix.
Posted by: Sherry || 04/13/2004 23:00 Comments || Top||

#6  Geez, the things some guys will do for a piece of *%%.
Posted by: Anonymous4155 || 04/13/2004 23:01 Comments || Top||

#7  Oops, that was my smart assed remark.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck || 04/13/2004 23:05 Comments || Top||

#8  Uh-huh. Suuuuurrrre they did.

Oh, yes, I believe that. After all, an "anonymous source" said it was so.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/13/2004 23:07 Comments || Top||

#9  azzam.com used to say the same thing back during the Chechen war, about Russian soldiers converting. It's pure fantasy but it shows more about what the enemy is thinking. In the Chechen story, the Russian soldier converts were given suicide missions and performed them, thus earning a place among the honored dead.
Posted by: Gromky || 04/13/2004 23:16 Comments || Top||

#10  Coming up next... Mullah Omar picks the pennant races.
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 23:23 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
Watchdog: Probe Needed Into U.S. Action in Falluja
Right on time. Appears our "watchdog" is blind in one eye.
A U.S. military offensive in Falluja last week in which 600 Iraqis may have died has raised concerns about excessive use of force and needs immediate investigation, a leading human rights group said Tuesday. Civilians who fled the fighting described the streets of Falluja as being littered with bodies, including women and children, and Iraqi politicians have accused U.S. forces of meting out collective punishment on the city’s residents.
No mention of the puppies or little bunny rabbits...
"The questions being asked are very legitimate. When you cordon off a town and hear many stories that are very worrisome about civilians being killed it needs to be examined," said Hania Mufti, a senior researcher for Human Rights Watch, a New York-based rights group.
How about mutilated, charcoled, corpses hanging from bridges? What? Where?
"There is enough from the footage we’ve seen and from what has been said about what went on in Falluja to warrant a very serious investigation. We are deeply concerned about the consistent reports we are getting about women, children and unarmed civilians being killed," Mufti told Reuters.
Hope this isn’t as horrific as the infamous Jenin Massacre...
She stressed that most of the information received so far was anecdotal and said no conclusions could be drawn until a full investigation could be conducted.
You know... bullshit.
"I can’t say whether any crimes have been committed ... but we’ll certainly be looking into whether there was excessive use of force and whether the methods used by the military were acceptable," she said. "We would call on the U.S. military to be as cooperative as possible with our investigation."
And I would tell Ms. Mufti to fuck off and die.
U.S. Marines launched an offensive against Falluja, a city of about 300,000 people 30 miles west of Baghdad, eight days ago to crack down on guerrillas and find those responsible for killing and burning four U.S. security guards March 31. The fighting was some of the fiercest Iraq has seen since U.S.-led forces launched the war that overthrew Saddam Hussein a year ago. For the past three days, Falluja has been under a tenuous truce.
The director of Falluja’s general hospital has said more than 600 Iraqis were killed and some 1,200 were wounded in the battle. U.S. forces also suffered a heavy toll, with at least 70 soldiers killed in the past 12 days, many in Falluja.
The U.S. military has rejected allegations that its soldiers fired indiscriminately or used excessive force.
...but who believes them, right? Certainly not HRW.
"I could see many bodies in the streets. Hundreds were lying in the street. Relatives were too scared to get them," said Samir Rabee, who escaped with relatives and eight other families in the back of a refrigeration truck.
Hundreds? Thousands? Millions? Billions? Trillions?
Mufti said it would probably be another few days before investigators could travel to the city, and then only if the U.S. offensive had not resumed.
Take your time, hon. We’ll still be there.
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 8:21:08 PM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Hey, I welcome this probe. But I predict that when the outcome doesn't show the Marines are to blame, we'll never hear about this again. Same thing if it is discovered the militants used civilians as shields, hid in schools, mosques, houses, and so on.
Posted by: Rafael || 04/13/2004 20:33 Comments || Top||

#2  The trick here is to send the human rights watch investigators into Fallujah ahead of the Marines, so they can show the Marines how to do things the right way, and also help in locating any unexploded IED's.
Posted by: Matt || 04/13/2004 20:45 Comments || Top||

#3 
Probe Needed Into U.S. Action in Falluja
It certainly is - as to why the Marines haven't killed more terrorists, both foreign and domestic.

Yes, HRW, you go into Fallujah and show us how to properly and politely deal with murdering terrorist scum. Make sure your wills are up to date first. And don't expect us to come rescue you; we know you wouldn't approve of our actions.

Wankers.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/13/2004 21:18 Comments || Top||

#4  Sure HRW, Right after you investigate slavery in Sudan, Female mutilation in Saudi Arabia / Pakistan / Iran / Africa /etc... , the murder of newborn babies in North Korea (because they might be of 'inpure' North Korean / Chinese blood), Political prisoners in China and North Korea, all the mass graves in Iraq (and probably Iran now as well).

Once you investigate all those offenses which are already on your plate then you will be more then welcome to visit Falluja.

Until then SHUT THE FUCK UP! (pardon my 'french').
Posted by: CrazyFool || 04/13/2004 21:40 Comments || Top||

#5  Prediction: reporting on HRW will invariably have to mention atrocities committed against the 4 Americans killed by the Fallujahans.

Most Americans will think we were justified regardless of collateral damage and some Arabs might even understand the cause/effect cycle at least for a bit.
Posted by: JAB || 04/13/2004 23:10 Comments || Top||

#6  Has anyone done research into the salaries these professional complainers human rights types draw? It bothers me immensely to think they could pay off a decent mortgage on such.

WTF? Ms. Mufti? I can barely put into words my disgust with such obvious bias self-righteous assholes who completely ignore the fact that 1MEF would not be there were it not for the ambush of four of our citizens.
Posted by: Raj || 04/13/2004 23:18 Comments || Top||

#7  Just 600 dead...damn I was hoping for at least 100 times that!! For every one of ours I was thinking 100 of them, but that's just me.
Posted by: Long Hair Republican || 04/14/2004 0:06 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Sources: Arafat approved convoy attack
RAMALLAH, Fla., April 13 (UPI) -- Yasser Arafat reportedly approved, in concept, an attack on a U.S. convoy in the Gaza Strip last year that took the lives of three Americans.

Middle East Newsline said Tuesday it was told by "U.S. diplomatic sources" a U.S. investigation into the attack on the convoy in October revealed a clear role by the Palestinian Authority chairman.

The sources told MENL Arafat had approved a plan to hit U.S. interests in Palestinian areas. They said Arafat did not draft or approve any details for an attack, but agreed to a proposal to "pass a message" to the United States.

The sources said a senior Arafat aide and a member of the Fatah Central Committee had sought approval for a Palestinian attack.

The Fatah official had complained about U.S. policy toward Palestinians.
Posted by: tipper || 04/13/2004 7:41:42 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  So why isn't yasshole dead yet.
Posted by: djohn66 || 04/13/2004 22:29 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
CPA Briefing 4-13-2004
  • In Baghdad, the 1st Cavalry Division continues offensive operations against Sadr’s militia and other extremist forces. The division conducted two intelligence-based raids to destroy and capture enemy targets within the battlespace, capturing 16 suspects. This morning coalition forces detained an additional 29 individuals and confiscated numerous arms and ammunition.

  • Today at 11:05, Hazim al-Araji (ph), a spokesman for Muqtada al- Sadr, was detained for questioning by coalition forces. After questioning, al-Araji (ph) was determined to have no direct involvement in violent acts in Iraq, and is not viewed as an imminent threat to security. He was released at 5:50 p.m. today.

  • In the western zone of operations, the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force continued offensive operations throughout the Al Anbar province, except in Fallujah. In Fallujah the current situation remains stable. During the past 24 hours, there heave been a number of provocative attacks on coalition forces. Early this morning a helicopter made an emergency landing due to ground fire. The attack resulted in three wounded and a quick-reaction force secured the crew, and the helicopter was later destroyed to prevent it from falling into enemy hands.

  • But before we suggest that all the forces just walked away from the fight, in fact there have been numerous forces that when mustered went to where they needed to be, and have performed brilliantly. In Fallujah, we have two battalions of Iraqi Civil Defense Corps that are fighting alongside coalition forces. In many towns the Iraqi police service has come back to man their stations. But, in truth, there were a number of troops, there were a number of police that didn’t stand up when their country called. We’re going to take a very hard look at those.

  • Anecdotally, though, which we have been meeting with leaders from Iraq who are very much in touch with the local scene in Fallujah, and while there are frustrations along the lines you have described, I would also say that there is a sense of frustration we are hearing among the silent majority of Fallujans about the foreign fighters and international terrorists that are hanging their hats in Fallujah right now, and consequently imposing enormous burden, and misery, and death in some cases by virtue of their location. A number of Fallajans have spoken out on this. Our -- the problem here is not with the Fallujans, the problem here is not with the coalition. The problem here is with foreign fighters, international terrorists, people like Zarqawi, who we believe to be in Fallujah or nearby, and those Iraqis who would support the operations of the foreign fighters and the terrorists. That is not something the majority of Fallujans support. The Fallujans we are hearing from would love to rid themselves of this burden, and put this sad past few days behind them.

  • We would not consider the lines of communication and the major roads coming out of Baghdad from East to West or from North to South completely secure at this time. We think we’ve made a significant improvement. We would still rate them in the military lexicon as "amber" -- not exactly green. And we would advise anyone traveling on those roads to take reasonable force protection measures, as you have been over the past few days, if needing to travel along those.

  • Just a couple of examples of some of the irresponsible and clearly incorrect reporting that has occurred on al Jazeera over the last few days. Saturday, for instance: Baghdad students, according to al Jazeera, gathered at Mustansiriyah University to prepare relief supplies for people in Fallujah. And al Jazeera reported that U.S. troops surrounded the university and demanded via loud speakers that the students leave the university. The report is accompanied by a clip of an armored vehicle driving around Mustansiriyah. And we of course looked right into this when the report as concerning as this one came out, and we learned that approximately 20 students from Mustansiriyah University came to a coalition force compound complaining of an armed militia on their campus. Coalition forces and Iraqi Civil Defense Corps responded to the college, responded to the university and searched 14 buildings, confiscated nine AK-47s, one pistol, pro-al-Sadr banners, and one al-Sadr uniform. The armed militias subsequently departed the area. I’ll give you another example. On Saturday in Kut, al Jazeera reported that large numbers of British soldiers were killed, their vehicles destroyed in an attack on their camp in the governorate of Maysan. And we confirmed this with our officials in Maysan, who confirmed no casualties of any kind, after nine mortar rounds fired at an Iraqi Civil Defense Corps base. Also on Saturday al Jazeera reported that they themselves were being targeted, and that they were being targeted by coalition tanks twice, but they escaped, they reported, but the U.S. wants them out of Fallujah. "But we will stay," the reporter said -- they were reporting that we wanted them out of Fallujah so badly that we sent tanks after them.

  • Of particular interest, some of the weapons that we found in Ar Ramadi, which we have not seen in any large numbers that are Dragunov sniper rifles, which isn’t your typical garden variety buy-it-off-the street AK-47. These are fairly accurate long-range, well-telescoped weapons that have a significant range and a significant lethal capability. So I think those are the weapons that probably are a little bit different than what we’ve seen over the past few months, and ones that no doubt gave the Marines some measure of concern.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 04/13/2004 4:48:50 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Fallujah update from Debka
  • Fallujah: Notwithstanding reports of intermittent ceasefires, massed US armored units cut through town from end to end shelling targets while US air force dropped “noise bombs” that were harmless except for their shock impact. Swarms of snipers equipped with night vision instruments kept traffic off the streets while negotiations continued on surrender of Iraqi guerrillas and foreign fighters.

  • Najef: US troops massed outside Shiite town are held back as bargaining chip in talks ongoing with Shiite leaders headed by Ayatollah Sistani. Moderate militias control town having pushed Sadr’s Mehdi Army militia out of center and off streets. Most Arbain pilgrims have departed.
    Gone back to Iran?
  • Karbala and al Kufa: moderate militia leaders ask US troops to stay out and let them wind up negotiations with Moqtada Sadr.

  • Earlier, Shiite radical leader Sadr told Lebanese Hizballah al Manar TV he is ready to die to drive Americans out of Iraq. US authorities released top Sadr aide Sheikh Hajem al-Araji shortly after detaining him at news conference he was giving at Baghdad hotel.

  • France and Portugal tell citizens to leave Iraq immediately. Al Jazeera shows video of 4 Italian security workers held hostage against Italian withdrawal from Iraq. They join 3 Japanese hostages and one American civilian whose fate is unknown. Eight employees of Russian engineering firm released after Chinese. US official reports 40 hostages from 12 countries in insurgent hands
Posted by: Yosemite Sam || 04/13/2004 3:57:46 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  US air force dropped “noise bombs” that were harmless except for their shock impact.

In Arabic: "I am a thirty-second bomb! I am a twenty-nine second bomb! I am a..."
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 04/13/2004 16:06 Comments || Top||

#2  "Swarms of snipers equipped with night vision instruments kept traffic off the streets while negotiations continued on surrender of Iraqi guerrillas and foreign fighters."

I liked this part more.
Posted by: Evert Visser in NL || 04/13/2004 16:11 Comments || Top||

#3  It's still Debka. If it concerns Israeli security matters I cut down salt by 80%.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 16:14 Comments || Top||

#4  Robert, nice Henlein reference.
Posted by: Baltic Blog || 04/13/2004 16:17 Comments || Top||

#5  Saw some footage on CNN I think....
The Marines had a nice position and were laying down some withering fire. Not to diminish their sacrifices and the danger they face but they looked like they were having a ball. A US sniper looked like he was pumping out rounds at near top speed for a bit and with all the tracers it made for fucken good T.V.

Belmont's latest analysis that they are dealing with Al Sadr first and pausing at Fallujah to accomplish this seems to ring true. There has got to be a reason for the delay and as usual you won't learn shit from the media. The media are good for only two things;
1. As soon as they start telling us the situation is now totally lost you know we just won.

2. The ridiculously scarce glimpses of Jihadi's like those who killed and mutilated the contractors getting blown away.

No one is going anyware in Fallujah.


Posted by: Haggis || 04/13/2004 16:58 Comments || Top||

#6  It's gonna be bloody, it's gonna be ugly, but above all, it's gonna be right.

Bastard (nutcase) Iranians are next, no two ways 'bout it.
Posted by: geezer || 04/13/2004 18:41 Comments || Top||

#7  I had the privilege very recently of listening to MajGEN Odierno (commander, 4th Infantry Division) talk about the 4th ID's work in Iraq. He compared the Fallujah situation today with what his units faced in Samarra last Fall.

Bottom line: force is very important, but at a critical point you get the friendly / responsible Iraqi leaders involved before you go mop up.

This is particularly true if a) there are foreigners responsible for attacks on you or b) the locals THINK there are. In Samarrah, they fired every Iraqi policeman then worked with the local sheiks and other leaders to appoint new ones. The locals fingered some of the out of towners and ex-Ba'athists involved in the convoy ambush & things got much better there as soon as the 4th wiped up the insurgents hard for 3 weeks.

Then, Odierno poured $25 million into city projects immediately, from his commander's funds.

Result: Samarrah is peaceful, prospering and stable today.

It's really important that the governing council & city leaders in Fallujah have (some) time to try negotiations. It's also important to have a credible, demonstrated willingness and ability to kick ass if that doesn't produce the desired results quickly.
Posted by: rkb || 04/13/2004 18:54 Comments || Top||

#8  I had the privilege very recently of listening to MajGEN Odierno (commander, 4th Infantry Division) talk about the 4th ID's work in Iraq. He compared the Fallujah situation today with what his units faced in Samarra last Fall.

Bottom line: force is very important, but at a critical point you get the friendly / responsible Iraqi leaders involved before you go mop up.

This is particularly true if a) there are foreigners responsible for attacks on you or b) the locals THINK there are. In Samarrah, they fired every Iraqi policeman then worked with the local sheiks and other leaders to appoint new ones. The locals fingered some of the out of towners and ex-Ba'athists involved in the convoy ambush & things got much better there as soon as the 4th wiped up the insurgents hard for 3 weeks.

Then, Odierno poured $25 million into city projects immediately, from his commander's funds.

Result: Samarrah is peaceful, prospering and stable today.

It's really important that the governing council & city leaders in Fallujah have (some) time to try negotiations. It's also important to have a credible, demonstrated willingness and ability to kick ass if that doesn't produce the desired results quickly.
Posted by: rkb || 04/13/2004 18:57 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Jirga meets wanted tribesmen
"Tribesmen, jirga. Jirga, tribesmen."
"How d'ye do?"

The all-tribes jirga has met local supporters of Al Qaeda in South Waziristan Agency to ask them to surrender to the government, a tribal elder told Daily Times on Monday. “We will discuss the jirga’s demand to surrender to the government,” Pir Muhammad Burki, representative of the wanted tribesmen, told jirga members. However, he said the government would have to meet two demands before the wanted men surrendered.
"What demands?"
"First, you must answer three questions. If you answer wrongly, you will be killed! Then, you must bring us the collar of the fire-breathing Dragon of Wana..."
"Wait a minute! That's four things! Three questions and a quest. That's four things."
"Is not. It's only two things."
The demands included the release of arrested tribesmen during operations and compensation for the loss of property. The tribal elder said the wanted men had agreed to resolve the problem under tribal traditions provided the government first met their demands. “The wanted men first rejected the government’s surrender demand,” the elder said. The elder said the meeting between the wanted men and jirga took place at a mosque in Dhana area, which was said to be in Kaloosha. “There were eight people representing the wanted men and armed tribesmen stood guard around the mosque,” the elder added. The jirga is scheduled to meet the wanted men today (Tuesday) after discussing their demand with top government officials and military commanders in Wana. Meanwhile, military engineers were busy upgrading Wana airport, giving rise to speculation that attack helicopters would be used in a future operation against Al Qaeda and its local supporters, a source in Peshawar said.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 14:01 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Africa: Horn
Government and rebels agree 45-day ceasefire
The Sudanese government and two rebel movements in the country’s western Darfur region have agreed to a 45-day ceasefire to allow humanitarian assistance to reach several hundred thousand people affected by the fighting.
Killed enough of them, have they?
The ceasefire is due to come into force on Sunday. It was agreed on Thursday night after two days of talks in N’djamena, the capital of neighbouring Chad. The ceasefire was signed in the presence of Chadian President Idriss Deby and was immediately welcomed by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. He had warned only a day earlier that international intervention might be necessary if the two sides could not settle their differences.
"Yeah! Youse guys are really gonna get it if you don't knock it off! Don't make me come over there!"
A spokesman for Annan said in New York: “He trusts this agreement will result in an immediate cessation of hostilities and an end to attacks against civilians, as well as full humanitarian access to all people in need of assistance and protection.” The ceasefire agreement represents a breakthrough for Chadian government mediators who spent a week trying to persuade the Sudanese government delegation and representatives of the rebel Sudan Liberation Army (SLA) and Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) to meet face-to-face.
"No! I don't wanna look at 'im!"
The delegations finally agreed to sit down together on Tuesday night after the Chadian mediators proposed discussing humanitarian issues before moving on to the political agenda.
"Okay, I'll talk to 'im. But I ain't gonna look!"
Rapid progress then followed. The ceasefire agreement was signed after just two days of intensive negotiations.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:53 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Africa: Subsaharan
LIBERIA: UN confirms disarmament will restart on 15 April
The United Nations has confirmed that the delayed disarmament programme in Liberia will restart on Thursday after a four-month delay.
Doesn't that mean the bad guys have been running around waving shootin' irons for the past four months?
Jacques Klein, the head of the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL), made the announcement on Saturday at a joint press conference with Gyude Bryant, the Chairman of Liberia’s transitional government, in the capital Monrovia. Earlier this month, Bryant had set 15 April as the target date for restarting a disarmament, demobilisation, rehabilitation and reintegration (DDRR) programme for an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 former combatants in Liberia’s civil war. However, until Saturday’s announcement by Klein, UNMIL had declined to confirm the date.
"We were still processing the paperwork..."
One reason for this is the fact that the three armed factions in Liberia have still not fulfilled one of the pre-conditions set by UNMIL for resuming the disarmament process. They have not yet provided a full list of their combatants, the locations where they are based and the weapons in their possession.
The UN assumes the bad guys have this information?
Klein referred to this on Saturday. According to a press statement issued by UNMIL he “urged the factions to submit comprehensive lists of their combatants locations and weapons,” saying these were “vital to support implementation of the programme.” General Daniel Opande, the commander of the UN peacekeeping force in Liberia, said earlier in the week that the other pre-conditions for starting disarmament had all been met. The Kenyan general said UNMIL now had adequate troops on the ground to ensure security and they had been deployed throughout the country. Opande said UNMIL had nearly 14,000 troops in Liberia and these had established positions in 13 of the country’s 15 counties. He also noted that a campaign to make former combatants aware of how the DDRR programme would work had been conducted satisfactorily and that the four cantonment sites where the fighters will hand in their weapons and undergo a two to three-week screening exercise had been completed.
Oh, an Outreach™ program. How sweet.
Bryant said on Saturday that the DDRR programme would start on Thursday at Gbargna, a former stronghold of the Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy (LURD) rebel movement, 150 km northeast of Monrovia, and would be extended gradually to the three other centres. The second cantonment site would open at Buchanan, a port city formerly held by the Movement for Democracy in Liberia (MODEL) rebel group, on 20 April, while the third would open at Tubmanburg, a LURD military base 60 km north of Monrovia, on 25 April, he added. Bryant said the fourth and final cantonment site would open at VOA on the outskirts of the capital on 30 April. This site is aimed mainly at disarming fighters loyal to former president Charles Taylor. UNMIL made a first attempt to start disarmament on 7 December, when it had only 5,000 troops on the ground and only one cantonment site in operation on the outskirts of Monrovia. However the exercise was ill-prepared and led to bloodshed and confusion. It was suspended after just 10 days.
Most things in Liberia seem to lead to bloodshed and confusion, to include breakfast...
At least nine people were killed as pro-Taylor gunmen rioted in Monrovia demanding cash for handing in their weapons. UNMIL eventually agreed to pay each former combatant US$75 in cash as he handed in his gun, but then found itself overwhelmed by fighters clamouring for the bounty. This payment was presented at the time as the first tranche of a $300 resettlement allowance. UNMIL was therefore determined to be fully prepared before it attempted to re-launch the disarmament exercise. Bryant said on Saturday that this was why it had taken four months to resume the DDRR programme.
“We had some hurdles, it took some time, but that was to ensure that when we begin this time, we don’t run into the kinds of problems we ran into when we began on 7 December,” he said. UN officials in Liberia have made clear that UNMIL will not pay former combatants any money as they hand in their weapons this time round.
Do they have to turn in their bustiers, too?
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:51 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I hope they have a better business model for the payouts this time. AK47's are a fungible commodity in that part of the world. They were paying well over the market value and could have seriously cut into the windfall profits they took in through Oil-For-Food. You know how investors’ attitudes change so quickly; it is always "what have you done for me lately." If Kofi doesn't meet market revenue expectations the whole UN board might be out of a job.
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 22:34 Comments || Top||


25 hacked to death in DRC
The bodies of at least 25 people hacked to death by unidentified assailants have so far been discovered in Lutwegi, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the public information officer for the UN mission in the eastern town of Goma, Jacqueline Chernard, told IRIN on Sunday. "We anticipate that the figure of those dead during the attack could rise," she said.
"We haven't finished gluing all the pieces back together yet..."
Quoting a local administrator of the affected area, in North Kivu Province, she said the dead were mostly women and children. She said 150 homes were completely burnt down by the unidentified attackers. In addition, a bridge connecting Lutwegi and neigbouring Goma has been severed, making it difficult for MONUC and humanitarian agencies to reach the displaced population. "We can only fly to a spot near the area and still have to walk for over fifteen kilometres along a muddy road to access the scene of the killings," she said. However, Chernard said, MONUC was preparing to inspect the scene mid-week. Meanwhile, she said, most of the villagers were still in the hiding within the surrounding the forests.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:47 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  la,la,la,la,la...I can't hear you...stop...stop...STOP! I just can't stand this stuff. What is wrong with these people? Is this hell that we are living in????
Posted by: B || 04/13/2004 17:14 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
Firm cheers loss of robot in Iraq
All sorts of new systems are being pressed into use & evaluated
A U.S. robot manufacturer Monday hailed the destruction of one of its units in Iraq and said it showed how valuable the machines have become for the U.S. military. iRobot Corporation learned last week from the Pentagon that one of its units, called a PackBot, was "destroyed in action" for the first time. Its destruction meant the life of a U.S. soldier may well have been saved, the company said. "It was a special moment -- a robot got blown up instead of a person," said iRobot CEO Colin Angle. The company, based in Burlington, Massachusetts, declined to provide further details on how the PackBot was destroyed in Iraq. "The U.S. military is ... concerned that if they release too many details, insurgents will be able to take action (against the robots)," said Osa Fitch, program executive at iRobot’s Government and Industrial Robotics division.
Gee ... ya think?
Between 50 and 100 PackBots are now being used in Iraq and Afghanistan for battlefield reconnaissance, search-and-destroy missions of explosives and ordnance disposal, while the soldiers who control them keep out of harm’s way. The 42-pound base unit, known as the PackBot Scout, costs around $50,000 and operates in adverse conditions such as navigating steep terrain, exploring mountain caves, falling off cliffs and fording streams. When fitted with a special arm, a PackBot can reach and disrupt booby traps that have emerged as a weapon of choice among Iraqi insurgents. On Monday, iRobot signed a contract worth an estimated $32 million to develop a smaller, more advanced form of the PackBot for the U.S. military. The company will develop the robot as part of the U.S. Army’s Future Combat Systems program.
Lots of robotic systems under study, development and now use. In 3 or 4 years, these will really change the possibilities for surveillance, reconnaisance and other activities.
Posted by: rkb || 04/13/2004 1:03:34 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  oh i thought this going be about chainey but it not. my bad.
Posted by: muck4doo || 04/13/2004 13:38 Comments || Top||

#2  How long until someone calls the use of robots a "war crime"?
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 04/13/2004 13:49 Comments || Top||

#3  "How long until someone calls the use of robots a "war crime"?"

Whenever that happens, it will be quickly followed by cry to "End the robot slavery!", and then we'll get into the law suits for reparations...
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats || 04/13/2004 13:54 Comments || Top||

#4  Robbie the Robot, Robot B-3, and Mr. Data, starring in:

"They Were Expendable!"
Posted by: Mike || 04/13/2004 14:13 Comments || Top||

#5  Not until the artificial intelligence software in these things passes the Turing test (can pass as human in a remote conversation). We have a few years for that.

Right now these things are mostly tele-operated, as are our UAVs. However, a LOT of work has been and is being done on autonomous robots, ones that can find their way around obstacles, identify mines, etc.

A different area of research are swarms of smart mini-missiles. Imagine sending off 25 or 30 missiles, each with its target but also in communication with each other. As a missile is lost - or a target is otherwise destroyed - the missiles negotiate with each other, agree on a different assignment of targets and as needed, change course.

Project on that is already underway ...
Posted by: rkb || 04/13/2004 14:15 Comments || Top||

#6  People for the Ethical Treatment of Robots
Posted by: john || 04/13/2004 14:16 Comments || Top||

#7  I'm with rkb: these things are not "robots", they are remotely operated machines. Big difference. (I was always bugged by the portrayal of Comedy Central's "BattleBots" program as a match between robots, too.)
Posted by: Carl in N.H || 04/13/2004 15:18 Comments || Top||

#8  Man... don't go pissing off Spirit.


Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 16:16 Comments || Top||

#9  PETR LOL! Way funny John.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 16:17 Comments || Top||

#10  swarms are a research area of mine. Very interesting concepts. Basically a distributed ai system where each element is relatively dumb but follows certain open ended behavioural rules. By amassing a significant number of these you get what is called emergent behavior. This emergent behavior shows characteristics that are greater than the sum of the parts.

Brave new world indeed. We are approaching Ray Kurzweil's singularity. The rate of change of rate of change of new technology will enable the US to fight absolutely ridiculous odds.
Posted by: Capt Joe || 04/13/2004 16:30 Comments || Top||

#11  here's the link to Kurzweil's article
Posted by: Ptah || 04/13/2004 18:45 Comments || Top||

#12  rkb I agree with you that these things are remotely operated vehicles, and real robots require autonomous action. However, the Turing test and AI are largely irrelevant to the problem of developing robots. I consider AI a particularly meaningless term as we don't know what real intelligence is. So talking about an artificial variant is not very helpful. The robots we have seen to date and will continue to see are task specific and over time the number and range of tasks performed will gradually increase. There aint no 'Silver Bullet'. Otherwise CJ identifies an important issue, which is how you distribute the problem is key to how you solve it.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/13/2004 19:45 Comments || Top||

#13  Well, although my research area is intelligent software agents making decisions, and although I've been briefed on a number of military robots, I'll certainly defer to those who have more direct experience on these issues. [smile]
Posted by: rkb || 04/13/2004 20:51 Comments || Top||

#14  I think the criteria for being a robot should include the ability to swear like Winston Churchill's parrot and the ability to flip people off like the orangutan in Every Which Way but Loose. The grandmother in that flick was pretty good at swearing also.
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 22:37 Comments || Top||


Caucasus
At least seven Russian servicemen killed in two Chechnya attacks
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:24 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Afghanistan/South Asia
Lanka mulls offering refuge to renegade Tamil leader
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:23 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Pak police arrest six bad guys, seize weapons
Pakistani police have arrested six militants in the city of Karachi and seized weapons from them, including grenades, officials said on Tuesday. The arrests were carried out on Monday evening during a raid in a southern neighbourhood of the city, Fayyaz Leghari, a deputy inspector general of police, told Reuters. Police seized hand grenades, automatic weapons and some bomb-making material, he said. “These six men were the newly recruited volunteers,” Leghari said, adding the militants belong to the shadowy Harkat-ul Mujahideen al-Alami network, which is blamed by police for a number of high-profile terror attacks in Karachi. These attacks include a failed assassination bid on President Pervez Musharraf, a suicide attack outside the U.S. Consulate in Karachi that killed 12 Pakistanis and a similar suicide assault killing 11 French nationals -- all in 2002.

Earlier this month, police arrested nine other al-Alami militants, including three of its top operatives, and seized a huge cache of weapons. Al-Alami is a splinter faction of the radical Harkat-ul Mujahideen, which is fighting Indian rule in Kashmir. But since Islamabad joined hands with the U.S.-led war on terror following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, a major faction broke ranks with the mainstream group to target Westerners, top government officials and religious minorities in Pakistan. Police have arrested more than 30 members of al-Alami since early 2002, but the group remains active, recruiting fresh members as well as hitting at new targets.
"Wanna join up, Mahmoud?"
"What's it get me?"
"Prob'ly arrested or killed in a shootout with the cops. Maybe a death penalty."
"Uhhh... I dunno. Can I have a turban?"
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:21 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Renegade Tamil Tiger Rebels in Disarray
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 13:18 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Iraq-Jordan
U.S. Deploys for Showdown With Tater
A 2,500-strong U.S. force, backed by tanks and artillery, pushed to the outskirts of the Shiite holy city of Najaf on Tuesday for a showdown with a radical cleric. The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, said their mission was to "capture or kill" radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. American units set up a cordon on approaches to the city, barring militiamen from leaving. Some 2,500 U.S. troops were massed outside of the city and commanders met Tuesday to review battle plans. "We have consolidated north of Najaf and are preparing for combat operations," said Maj. Gen. John R. S. Batiste, commander of the 1st Infantry Division.

Clashes took place Tuesday when a U.S. unit on the edges of the city pursued armed supporters of al-Sadr into Najaf and killed several militiamen, Batiste said. "Treat the people of Najaf with dignity and respect," Batiste said. "Only bite off the head of the poised rattlesnake." Iraqi leaders launched hurried negotiations aimed at averting a U.S. assault on the city, site of the holiest Shiite site, the Imam Ali Shrine. Al-Sadr was photographed by Associated Press Television News leaving the shrine Tuesday. The sons of Iraq's three grand ayatollahs _ including the most powerful one, Ali al-Husseini al-Sistani — met al-Sadr Monday night in his Najaf office and assured him of their opposition to any U.S. strike. "They agreed not to allow any hostile act against Sayyed Moqtada al-Sadr and the city of Najaf," said a person at the meeting, speaking on condition of anonymity. The delegation also was reportedly trying to work out a compromise to prevent a U.S. attack.

Col. Dana J.H. Pittard, the commander of the force, said his troops were aware that a "single shot in Najaf" by U.S. soldiers could outrage Iraq's powerful Shiite majority. "Look at this as the Shiite Vatican," Pittard said before the deployment. The grand ayatollahs — older, moderate leaders with immense influence among Shiites — have long kept the young, fiercely anti-American al-Sadr at arm's length. The dispatch of the delegation reflected the eagerness to avoid bloodshed in Najaf and the new influence that the uprising by the al-Mahdi Army's militia has brought al-Sadr. In a concession to American demands, al-Sadr ordered his militiamen out of police stations and government buildings in Najaf and the nearby cities of Karbala and Kufa. Police were back in their stations and on patrols, while al-Sadr's black-garbed gunmen largely stayed out of sight. But the militia rebuffed a U.S. demand to disband.
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 12:39 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  About time we did something about Tater and his tater-tots. And if they dont want us to fight in their 'holy city' they should leave it.

We learned that lesson before.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 04/13/2004 12:55 Comments || Top||

#2  "You want those taters baked, bioled, fried, or mashed?"

"Mashed. Really, really mashed."
Posted by: Mike || 04/13/2004 13:00 Comments || Top||

#3  I'm thinking "vaporized"
Posted by: TomAnon || 04/13/2004 13:01 Comments || Top||

#4  lol Tater...Fred you crack me up.
Posted by: TS || 04/13/2004 13:02 Comments || Top||

#5  "I am ready to sacrifice myself for the Iraqi people."

That's the sweetest thing I've heard all day (sniff, wipe a tear)...
Posted by: Hyper || 04/13/2004 13:08 Comments || Top||

#6  'Vaporized' is good, Tom. Though we haven't really done 'Fused' in awhile. And we do need to Field Test the new, improved and upgraded MOAB!
Posted by: Jack Deth || 04/13/2004 13:24 Comments || Top||


Alleged al-Qaeda Iraq chief spotted
THE alleged mastermind of the al-Qaeda operations in Iraq, Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, is believed to be in the city of Fallujah, which is under US marine siege, a senior coalition spokesman said today. "Zarqawi is believed to be in Fallujah or nearby," said Dan Senor. Zarqawi has a $US10 million ($13.07 million) bounty on his head.
Posted by: Lux || 04/13/2004 12:20:06 PM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I better start doing my voice exercises. Been a while since I've ululated with gusto.
Posted by: BH || 04/13/2004 12:25 Comments || Top||

#2  Feh. After that damp squib in the Pakistan tribal areas, I'll believe it when they convene a press conference and toss his severed head onto the podium.
Posted by: Mitch H. || 04/13/2004 12:27 Comments || Top||

#3  Time to fold the tent on these negotiations and get the 2nd half underway. I believe Mr Morrison has issued the orders for the day: "Noone here gets out alive"
Posted by: Rex Mundi || 04/13/2004 12:29 Comments || Top||

#4  Shoot any one-legged guy where he teeters. Don't give him the chance to hobble away.

Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 12:39 Comments || Top||

#5  The "cordon" around Fallujah seems pretty porous, judging from accounts I have read, so if Pegleg Pete is really there, I give him at least even odds on getting away.
Posted by: Carl in N.H || 04/13/2004 13:15 Comments || Top||

#6  "Prosthesis, don't fail me now!"
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 04/13/2004 16:56 Comments || Top||

#7  What is this with these guys and missing body parts? Mullah Omar-One Eye, BinLaden-One Kidney, Zarqawi-One Leg? Then there are all those wheelchair bound and/or blind Sheikhs! Anybody not eligible for a blue parking spot need not apply.

Posted by: Anonymous4153 || 04/13/2004 17:35 Comments || Top||

#8  Anonymous4153: Don't forget ol' Capt. Hook at the Finsbury Moskkk.! It's an occupational hazard; terrorism's hard on the body. And if Ramzi Binalshibh is any indication, the dental plan sucks too.
Posted by: BH || 04/13/2004 17:42 Comments || Top||

#9  zawahari...let's see...it was how long ago before he "escaped" from the wild, wild W???

Just about time for him to reappear looking unshaven and confused.
snicker.
Posted by: B || 04/13/2004 17:44 Comments || Top||

#10  good point anon im never notice that before.
Posted by: muck4doo || 04/13/2004 17:46 Comments || Top||

#11  Duh..I guess we are talking about zarqawi.
Posted by: B || 04/14/2004 1:44 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Tigers retake Sri Lanka east, residents return home
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 11:53 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  And they're still on top in the AL Central!
Posted by: Raj || 04/13/2004 12:45 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
Muktada al-Sadr arrested in Baghdad
The U.S. troops arrested radical Shiite Imam Muktada al-Sadr in Baghdad on Tuesday. The report came from Hazem al-Araj, his closest associate, who is the head of the Baghdad bureau of the “Mahdi army” group.
Article is from Tass. I'd wait to see if there's any verification. One of Tater's deputies was arrested in Baghdad this morning, after a news conference.
Posted by: TS || 04/13/2004 10:45:38 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Tater...I like it!
Posted by: Seafarious || 04/13/2004 11:07 Comments || Top||

#2  I think Tass got their turbans mixed up, I'll bet it was this guy:
US forces have released Shia leader Muqtada al-Sadr's top aide Hazim al-Araji, few hours after arresting him for interrogation, Aljazeera TV has reported. US occupation forces detained al-Aaraji on Tuesday during a tribal conference in Iraq at the Palestine hotel in Baghdad. Tribal leaders negotiated his release with the US troops. "He was leaving the hotel and then was stopped by US troops. They have taken him to the 13th floor of the hotel and are questioning him," Lilli Gruber, a correspondent for Italy's RAI Uno television channel who interviewed al-Aaraji, told Reuters.

Did they hang him over the edge and do a "good cop/bad cop" on him?
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 11:28 Comments || Top||

#3  The guy Tass is quoting, is the guy that was arrested at his news conference this morning. He has since been released (not sure why), so this story isn't completely unbelievable. But it's more probable that Sadr is still in Najaf.

Another newsflash/rumour is that al-Zarqawi (boss type for al qaeda) is believed to be in Fallujah...
Posted by: Lux || 04/13/2004 11:51 Comments || Top||

#4  "Tater." Is that like in "mashed," or "baked?"
Posted by: Mike || 04/13/2004 11:57 Comments || Top||

#5  Ah, a baked al-Tatr with sour cream, butter and bacon bits?!
Posted by: Atropanthe || 04/13/2004 13:05 Comments || Top||

#6  Could I have Steak Ta-ter please?
With chopped egg and onions.
Posted by: Jen || 04/13/2004 13:09 Comments || Top||


Iraqi officers ’refused to fight’
Many newly-trained Iraqi police and army personnel refused to fight Shia and Sunni rebels in the recent unrest, the head of US Central Command says. Gen John Abizaid said this was a "great disappointment" - and announced the coalition would draw top officers from the disbanded army of Saddam Hussein.
General Abizaid probably thought all Arabs are like him, and will shoot their own kin.
Posted by: Murat || 04/13/2004 7:06:12 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Kurdistan!
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 11:03 Comments || Top||

#2  You mean they refused to do their duty, Murat?
Posted by: Fred || 04/13/2004 11:04 Comments || Top||

#3  Most Arabs are upright, cleanliving, citizens of the world. Can't you tell by the quality of their nations? By the quality of their lifestyles?

(sarcasm off)

Oh, wait, the medication's cutting in....
Posted by: Bubblehead || 04/13/2004 11:14 Comments || Top||

#4  You're saying he should feel some sort of familial loyalty to the insurgents backed by the same Syria that invaded and conquered the country his family came from?

That's a (explicitive explicitive explicitive deleted) of a double-standard you've got there, Murat.
Posted by: Phil Fraering || 04/13/2004 11:16 Comments || Top||

#5  While I'm at it, the insurgents have over the past year managed to kill a lot more of their "arab brethren" than they have Americans. You don't seem to have any problems with that.
Posted by: Phil Fraering || 04/13/2004 11:29 Comments || Top||

#6  Does Murat follow the fake religion of peace? Does he know where Moh slay the dragon?

Those top officers from saddam's crack divisions, the ones who rolled over the great menace Kuwait, know how to handle the pious brotherhood. They know where Moh slayed the dragon and pumped the virgins.
Posted by: Lucky || 04/13/2004 11:58 Comments || Top||

#7  Murat: General Abizaid probably thought all Arabs are like him, and will shoot their own kin.

Actually, Abizaid probably thought that all Muslims are like Christians, and will shoot the bad guys regardless of religion. The US killed millions of German Christians in WWII and thousands of Serb Christians in defense of Muslims during Bosnian and Kosovo crises. Arabs think that Abizaid is Arab first and Christian second. They're wrong. Abizaid is American first, Christian second, and then - and only then - Arab third.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 04/13/2004 11:59 Comments || Top||

#8  Hey, Murat -- I'm still waiting for your evidence that I'm a Kurd. It's been months, and you still haven't ponied up?

Why?
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 04/13/2004 13:15 Comments || Top||

#9  RC, I would take that as a compliment.
Posted by: Evert Visser in NL || 04/13/2004 14:15 Comments || Top||

#10  I'm not saying I was insulted. Murat said it as an attempt to weasel out of an idiotic position, and want to keep reminding him and everyone else what a weasel he is.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 04/13/2004 14:23 Comments || Top||

#11  General Abizaid probably thought all Arabs are like him, and will shoot their own kin.

Actually, they will. It's just that while the IP might not feel like shooting "their own kin", Sadr and his followers would have no qualms whatsoever shooting anyone that opposes them. Anyone, including their own kin.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 14:27 Comments || Top||

#12  I didn't know there were French immigrants in Iraq.
Posted by: Unmutual || 04/13/2004 14:38 Comments || Top||

#13  Bet they'll be a fighting mood when they don't get paid.
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 19:31 Comments || Top||

#14  When you're an American you're an American first. If you aren't then you aren't one. Wax nostalgic for your grandad's country all you want, but remember who you are when the rubber hits the road.

Abizaid knows who he is.
Posted by: Secret Master || 04/13/2004 20:14 Comments || Top||


U.S. Troops Deploy Outside of Najaf
Posted by: Karma || 04/13/2004 07:58 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Fierce Firefight in Fallujah; Helicopter Crashes
EFL, mainly to illustrate the Arab-standard "cheat and retreat" approach to truces, etc
U.S. Marines took part in a fierce overnight firefight in Fallujah, the city where a tenuous cease-fire was in place and near where an American helicopter crashed in flames on Tuesday. Marines defended their position in a school at the northern edge of the city when they came under mortar fire. The U.S. forces responded with rifle and machine-gun fire. Officials told Fox News that some Marines were wounded in the engagement but no further information was available. Near Fallujah, witnesses said insurgents fired a rocket to bring down a U.S. military H-53 Sikorski helicopter. U.S. troops trying to get to the wreckage were forced back after coming under heavy fire from gunmen. The two sides were in a standoff, each some distance from the downed copter. The wreckage was burning in a field 12 miles east of Fallujah near the village of Zawbaa. Television pictures showed the main body of the craft charred, little but tangled pieces of metal. No bodies could be seen.
At some point, we better quit with this "nickle-and-dime" approach to Iraq. This whole "Oh no, the truce only applies to that neighborhood over there... we haven’t agreed to anything" act is getting old.
Posted by: snellenr || 04/13/2004 9:35:37 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Truces got us screwed over in Vietnam. We rested while the enemy re-grouped, re-armed, strategized, and re-deployed. It time get serious. Warm up BUF and schedule a week of serious, Zero-Dark Thirty Arc Light Raids on Fallujah!
Posted by: Jack Deth || 04/13/2004 13:32 Comments || Top||

#2  Need to reconstitute this batallion around Bradley's.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 13:47 Comments || Top||

#3  Well, somebody wake me up when our C.-in-C. decides to stop fucking around and fighting this as a WAR instead of a polo match, please.
Posted by: Misha I || 04/13/2004 14:49 Comments || Top||


General Abizaid: Iran and Syria Meddling
Syria and Iran are involved in Iraq, and their involvement is not meant to assist the US-led Coalition there, Gen. John Abizaid, head of U.S. Central Command said Monday.
Yes General, but we are hearing about "10,000 pilgrims" arriving from Iran each day. Is that wise? Do you need more interdiction resources?
Speaking to reporters in Washington via video-link from Baghdad, Abizaid said there were signs that Iran’s involvement is not designed to assist US efforts in Iraq. Abizaid made the same claim against Syrian involvement in Iraq.
Major diplomatic contacts have been made between Iran and Syria, for months. They are co-ordinating Sunni-Shiite intervention, and it is somewhat effective.
"We know the Iranians have been meddling, and it’s unhelpful to have neighboring countries meddling in the affairs of Iraq," US Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said last Wednesday.
"Unhelpful"? I prefer "unacceptable" from a General. However, do what you have to do to win.
Try linking to "Persian Journal." Members are either secular or liberal-Muslim, and informative.
Posted by: Man Bites Dog || 04/13/2004 2:51:01 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Right now there are concerns on both sides that the US and Iran will fight each other. Isn't it nice that Iran is sending the worst of its rats into Iraq for us to kill, so that we don't have to cross their border to do it?
As small a minority as the Iran mullahs are in their own country, with so few stormtroopers to support them that they have to import Palestinian thugs to attack their own people, you would think that they would use them more judiciously.
I look forward to the day when Tehran is illuminated by streetlights--from each of which dangles a mullah.
Posted by: Anonymous || 04/13/2004 11:25 Comments || Top||

#2  If GWB and his minions have a plan with regard to Iran and Syria, now is the time to put it into play. They better have one, as no one in their right mind would think that Assad and the Mad Mullahs would stand idly by while we carry out our Iraq plans.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 12:22 Comments || Top||

#3  "Isn't it nice that Iran is sending the worst of its rats into Iraq for us to kill, so that we don't have to cross their border to do it? "

This isn't chess, where there are a finite amount of "rats", of pawns to kill, each one very valuable for the game's result.

This game seems more like Go. The players have an infinite supply of pawns to put into the game -- and the way to win is not by killing enemy pawns but by taking hold of territory. Overextend, waste time to take territory that can't be actually used, or even use an inordinate amount of power for little gains, and your many pawns are actually a liability as the opponent takes hold of the territory even as you kill off his pawns by the dozens.

"They better have one"

If I thought they had one, then my opinion of their intelligence would be higher than it currently is.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/13/2004 13:46 Comments || Top||

#4  I would love to see regime change in Iran, but the US doesn't have the troops to invade and deal with the occupation afterwards, and crossing our fingers and hoping the student unrest will topple the government hasn't panned out. Anyone have a third option?
Posted by: ruprecht || 04/13/2004 14:56 Comments || Top||

#5  If I thought they had one, then my opinion of their intelligence would be higher than it currently is.

Well the fact of the matter is that neither you nor I know for sure, although I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. They are either going to run a scripted play, improvise, or be tackled for a loss.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 15:05 Comments || Top||

#6  Aris:
What he said. Actually, it is pretty much impossible that there are NO contingency plan for Iran and Syria. There are well-funded departments within the U.S. government that do nothing but get plans ready for pretty much every conceivable foreign policy problem. Now, how good those plans actually are is another mattter.
Posted by: Secret Master || 04/13/2004 16:27 Comments || Top||

#7  Here is an interesting plan for Iran: a rapid cross-border incursion that temporarily neutralizes their AAA, then anything and everything to do with nuclear is blown to smithereens. Then we leave. Right now, even little Israel is considering the same option.

I can just see the Mullahs trying to order the Iranian army to invade Iraq to get back at the Americans. "You want us to attack four battle hardened American Divisions? Are you out of your ******* mind?"
Posted by: Anonymous4156 || 04/13/2004 23:38 Comments || Top||


Africa: Subsaharan
Nigeria: Islamists torch 10 churches
Posted by: Mark Espinola || 04/13/2004 03:25 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Usual "Religion of Peace" crap. The mentally retarded kid still had more brains than all these clowns put together.
Posted by: Infidel Bob || 04/13/2004 10:26 Comments || Top||

#2  "Islamic terrorists hiding under the cover of religion have invaded the state and are now unleashing terror on Christians over stupid reasons."

This is the most succint summary of the entire problem. We are seeing an example of religious genocide in Northern Nigeria. The recent spate of polio outbreaks caused by lack of Moslem cooperation is reason enough to quash this nascent power grab.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 10:48 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
French Spin on Fallujah Terrorists
The insurgents who have been resisting a weeklong onslaught by the US war machine in this Sunni bastion are for the most part young, deeply religious, proud of their tribal heritage and highly suspicious of foreigners. "We are above all free men," said one of them who would not give his name. "We accept only God’s authority," another said.
Don’t believe it. They hardly kept RPGs in their back yards during the Saddam dictatorship. They are being supplied from Arab Islamofascists. I have to add: the attribution to Baathist-Fedayen, is equally false. This is jihad, folks; al-Qaeda at the neighborhood level.
Fallujah’s residents are known to be stronged-willed and united by deep tribal ties. Even ex-dictator Saddam Hussein had trouble controling the Dulaimi tribe in Al-Anbar Province around Fallujah. After he ordered the 1995 execution of Mohammed Mazloum Dulaimi, a local man and an air force officer, the area’s people revolted, burning a police station and other government buildings. To put down the rebellion, Saddam chose subtlety over force, according to an older rebel, who said Saddam deployed soldiers from the same Dulaimi tribe as the officer, and the rebels agreed to lay down their arms and turned them over to their cousins...
Relative freedom of the press, has permitted a year of Salafi indoctrination. Forget the "tribal" angle.
In the showdown with US Marines, many residents have joined the guerrillas. Most of the insurgents are aged between 18 and 35 and some sport beards and salt-and-pepper mustaches. They wear civilian clothes, carry Kalashnikov assault rifles, anti-tank rockets and even Russian-made Strela ground-to-air missiles. "We are defending our district, our city. Everybody is mobilized. No able-bodied man can refuse to take up arms," said an elderly man. "I am defending my city. I am from the Golan district and I have had no news from my family for a week. We are in the hands of God," said a resident in his 40s. The guerrillas have asked families to leave town because of the fierce fighting. "Who would have imagined that a small city like ours could resist the mightiest power on earth," a local fighter stated proudly.
Fred: Baath-redux or al-Qaeda-lite?
Both. From yesterday's article, they're yearning for the good old days of a dictator to tell them what to do. And the Bad Guys, we know, have swarmed in under Qaeda auspices. Now Moqtada's widened it yet further, making common cause with Hezbollah and Hamas. It just reinforces my opinion that all of terrorism is a common cloth, with no real distinction between Sheikh Yassin and Binny.
Posted by: Man Bites Dog || 04/13/2004 2:24:03 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Re french media : I stopped (for now) watching tv news starting from the early beginning of the insurrection, relying instead on Rb and the internet to get some more balanced info - even though you are stone-hearted warmonging republicans(Tm) ; the chattering class is in full hysteria mode, same as during the Us invasion of Irak. Viet nam/Lebanon comparisons are the norm, we hear that the "iraqi trap has closed on the private Bush", it is "chaos" this, "quagmire "that", we hear repeatedly how a mosque was hit by bombs, one weekly has "The fault! The failure!" splatterd all over his frontpage to make well understand that going to Iraq was "the worst geopolitical mistake since the soviet invasion of Afghanistan", etc, etc... In short : anti-Us bias at their worst since last year...
Some links (in french, use babelfish or else) about the anti-Us tone of the public service channel, France 2 :
http://www.upjf.org/documents/showthread.php?threadid=6388
http://www.upjf.org/documents/showthread.php?threadid=6382
http://www.upjf.org/documents/showthread.php?threadid=6391
Posted by: Anonymous4134 || 04/13/2004 12:35 Comments || Top||

#2  I wonder how the full destruction of Fallujah would go over in the world right now, especially the Muslim world. We could take it out - total destruction, non-nuclear, in about 18 hours of unremitting high-level bombing, building an impenetrable cordon of tough, mean, NASTY Marines around the city to stop all evacuations, and literally level the city down six stories below-ground. I'd hate to do that, but it may be a lesson we'll eventually need to impress upon these idiots: WE are the meanest, baddest, nastiest warriors on the earth, and we can crush you and your ancestors back six generations if you don't behave yourselves. It's either that or continue this slow grind for the next thirty years. I'm not sure Americans are up to a thirty-years war.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 04/13/2004 13:03 Comments || Top||

#3  I don't see a 30 year war. I see a decade at the most if we keep it up.

During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan the Saudi's sent their rabid wackos up there to Jihad. Afghanistan was the first fly-paper war. It got the radicals out of Arabia and hopefully killed. This took pressure off of the kingdom.

Right now there is heat on all of the Arabic leaders from the US and the radicals. I think many of them are choosing the secret third option of sending radicals off to Jihad and die again. This allows the US to kill the radicals, and allows the Arabic states to moderate their ways with less of a threat from the radical side.

Why send the US military to country after country if they can send their hard boys into the line of fire while reforming themselves.

Perhaps I'm overly optimistic.
Posted by: ruprecht || 04/13/2004 15:03 Comments || Top||

#4  I see a 50-year war, like the Cold War. Time enough to raise 2 generations of Arabs (a few at least) who have lived under a rule of law (not Shari'a) and who have learned to like governing themselves. Time enough for the fifth columnists to either die off or grow up and wise up.
Posted by: Tresho || 04/13/2004 17:56 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
The victims of Arab-Islamic terror (PHOTOS)
Posted by: Mark Espinola || 04/13/2004 03:51 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Meanwhile, moonbats write an opera celebrating Rachel Corrie. Sickening...
Posted by: Dar || 04/13/2004 10:28 Comments || Top||


Caucasus
Three policemen killed in Chechnya
The chief of the Nozhai-Yurt district police and two more police officers were killed in Chechnya on Monday, a law enforcement source told Interfax on Tuesday. "Lt. Aslambek Ilyasov along with Aliman Ozdiyev and Imran Khakimov were ambushed Monday evening on the Meskety-Ishkhoi-Yurt highway," the source said. A team of detectives and investigators is working at the scene.
Source is Interefax
Posted by: Mark Espinola || 04/13/2004 3:09:38 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:


Iraq-Jordan
French Advised to Leave Iraq.
Looks like appeasement isn’t working. Whoduhthunkit?

France tells its citizens to leave Iraq

PARIS, April 13 (Reuters) - France is strongly advising its citizens to leave Iraq and warning people not to travel there, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said on Tuesday following a spate of kidnappings in the country.
How about a betting pool on how long it will take jihadis to force the same warning to be issued about Paris? I’ll take 5 years.


"I draw your attention to the fact that, since the end of last week, we are strongly advising all French in Iraq to leave and all those who want to go there, to postpone their trip," the spokesman told a news briefing.

He said the situation in Iraq was "worrying" and said about 100 French people were in Iraq at the moment. Does this include jihadis who might hold French citizenship? France opposed the war in Iraq and has no troops there serving with U.S-led forces.

There are only a few remaining questions about the future of France:

Will there be a single, unified Republique Islamique Francais or a series of small Islamic fiefdoms, "sub-caliphates" perhaps?

Will the surviving kufrs have their own rump state in an unoccupied area, possibly centered on Vichy?

Will a future DeGaulle step forward to lead an exiled liberation movement from, say, French Guyana? Will he or she be as difficult as that heroic but cranky leader?

Will the wine industry be closed down in accordance with Sharia law or allowed to continue for export, like that of Algeria?

Could we lease Devil’s Island from these New Free French to replace Guantanamo?

Will the former Notre Dame’s new minarets have elevators, given that they have to be the tallest part of the structure?


Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 04/13/2004 9:37:45 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  well, at least the hygiene standards won't change
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 10:22 Comments || Top||

#2  Don't let the door hit you in the ass . . .
Posted by: spiffo || 04/13/2004 10:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Run away!
Posted by: Rex Mundi || 04/13/2004 11:51 Comments || Top||

#4  1) Minarets in the new Notre Khomeni mosque? (can't be called Notre Dame) Poor Quasimoto. No more bells. Has to learn Islamic chants.

2) Don't forget. No more pork in French cooking.
Maintenant nous pouvons mettre l'agneau où le porc a utilisé pour être. From http://freetranslation.imtranslator.com/
Now we can put lamb where the pork used to be.

3) How can you have a Paris fashion show where all the models wear burkas? Powder puff blue or black tent with a peep-hole.
Posted by: Anonymous4052 || 04/13/2004 12:50 Comments || Top||

#5  How long before the French are advised to leave France?
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 19:13 Comments || Top||


Russian, Ukrainian hostages freed in Iraq
The five Ukrainian and three Russian employees of a Russian energy company who were kidnapped in Baghdad have been released, the energy ministry in Moscow said Tuesday, a foreign news agency reported. "I can only tell you one thing, that they have been freed," said Yury Nogotkov, a spokesman for the industry and energy ministry. "I cannot provide any other details."
"You work for our friends in Moscow? Sorry, we thought you were somebody else. You're free to go, no hard feelings."
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 8:47:19 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Remember what happened to the kidnappers in Beruit.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins || 04/13/2004 9:12 Comments || Top||

#2  hey chuck i check out your blog and im realy liking pictures.
Posted by: muck4doo || 04/13/2004 9:47 Comments || Top||


Iraqi clerics say coalition ’must pay’ for crisis
...In a statement issued Monday after a meeting with radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, the clerics and members of the country’s religious authority also cautioned the coalition against doing battle in the holy city of Najaf -- and warned against any attempt to kill al-Sadr.
"The current crisis in Iraq has risen to a level that is beyond any political groups, including the Governing Council, and it is now an issue that is between the religious authority and the coalition forces," the statement said. "Those who have brought on this crisis must pay for what they have done."
I agree. So what should be done about Sadr? Arrest him? Or kill him?
Participating in the meeting was the son of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the recognized leader of the country’s majority Shia Muslims; Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Ishaq al-Fayadh, Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Sayid al-Hakim, Grand Ayatollah Bashir Hussein al-Najafi, Mohammed Sayid Redha al-Sistani and Sayid Ali al-Sibzwari.
Al-Sistani is known to keep Sadr at arm’s length, but the concerns voiced by the clerics Monday reflected a deeper desire to avoid the kind of conflict in Najaf that was recently seen in Fallujah, where several U.S. troops and many more Iraqis died in recent fighting.
Yeah I bet. It ain’t fun getting the crap kicked out of you.
Posted by: Rafael || 04/13/2004 5:34:32 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I know CNN titled their story that way, but the body of the message says "those who have brought on this crisis......"

Surely they mean the radicals and Sadr. If tghey truely believe America is at fault for Fallujah and Al-sadr's crap they have lost their minds. Bush is now walking on very thin ice with me. If allows this to go on, they will be blaming us for everyone of our soldiers deaths. What is it with these people in the middle east? do they ever take responsibility for what they allow to happen, or is everything bad easily blamed on the US? Bush had better set them straight or I will be voting against him. It is safer to have a POTUS that is clearly an appeasing wimp, and who nuances his position accordingly, rather then a President who talks tough and but is all hat and no cattle.
Posted by: kbr || 04/13/2004 7:45 Comments || Top||

#2  I agree, kbr. Bush all but had my vote wrapped up, but the longer this "negotiate with the terrorists" crap goes on, the more disastrously whatever credibility we have garnered is squandered.

It's MUCH more dangerous to start the job and then falter.

I'm holding out hope that this is just a strategic pause to appear reasonable and to gather resources for the next advance, but this appears less likely by the hour to be the case.
Posted by: docob || 04/13/2004 8:20 Comments || Top||

#3  what credibility ? There's not that much credibility the US has garnered..
Posted by: lyot || 04/13/2004 8:24 Comments || Top||

#4  ...And in related news, chicken little says, "Look, I saw it falling. So I'm telling you, make with the flailing, already!"...
Posted by: Hyper || 04/13/2004 8:45 Comments || Top||

#5  The difference in mental capabilities between the terrorists, their supporters, and NMM, is not spacious.
Posted by: Ptah || 04/13/2004 9:00 Comments || Top||

#6  "Those who have brought on this crisis must pay for what they have done."

What is this horseradish? The only reason there's a "crisis" is because of naked power grabs by religious sects seeking to impose political and theological control in advance of any constitutional legislature.

The Iraqi religious heads have everything to answer for in this. As is so common in the Middle East, whatever religious leadership there is has remained far too quiet while their more belligerent subsets go about creating mayhem. Where are the fatwas against Sadr for his attempted derailing of Iraq's peace plans?

Now that the religious festivities are over, there should be a concerted effort to neutralize all Iraqi resistance and apprehend or kill Sadr. This ongoing "truce" or cease fire is a major black eye regarding any reputation for effectiveness that our military might possess.

Giving these violent thugs any breathing room is a huge mistake.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 10:18 Comments || Top||

#7  ... the clerics and members of the country’s religious authority also cautioned the coalition against doing battle in the holy city of Najaf -- and warned against any attempt to kill al-Sadr.

Oh, and as to this banana oil; So long as these radicals continue to mobilize in or fight from mosques, there should not be a single target kept off of the hit list.

These vermin attempt to cloak their military activity in religious garb and then have the audacity to whinge about the sanctity of their Holy sites. If they want those places kept in one piece, they'd better rally their materiel and troops elsewhere. Otherwise, such locations should be treated like any other military headquarters or barracks.

Taking hostages and mutilating casulties is a strong indicator of no quarter being given to coalition forces. To turn around and demand that respect be shown for their own morally corrupt organizations is the height of arrogance.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 10:30 Comments || Top||

#8  lyot -

I was speaking of the only credibility that matters -- the belief that the US will use adequate and appropriate force when neccessary, and continue until the job is finished.
Posted by: docob || 04/13/2004 10:37 Comments || Top||

#9  necessary, that is ...
Posted by: docob || 04/13/2004 10:39 Comments || Top||

#10  Religious Clerics: "Those who have brought on this crisis must pay for what they have done."

General Sanchez: "We agree! And with that in mind, we are expanding Sadr hunting season to all Anti-Coalition Jihadis(tm). No size limit! No bag limit!"
Posted by: Sean || 04/13/2004 11:16 Comments || Top||

#11  #1 kbr: "What is it with these people in the middle east? do they ever take responsibility for what they allow to happen?" NO. "or is everything bad easily blamed on the US?" YES.

The problem with listening to the insurgents and "negotiating" with them, is that it is interpreted by them as proof of weakness--and proof to the rest of the world that we have self-doubt. (Heck--maybe we're wrong, and we know it, right? We are reconsidering, after all. Ding-ding!) If Bush doesn't stop it, he will be playing into the hands of the "evil doers" --and I'm not just talking about the terrorists. Hope this isn't his version of "no new taxes," or much will be lost. I think most people in the West simply do not realize that the "bitch and moan" we see in the Middle East is part of their culture--they do it all the time, regardless of what's going on--peace, war--it doesn't matter. Emotions, not reason and logic, rule the day in that culture. They just love it that we stop and listen, because it makes them feel more worthwhile. (Has anybody sat ever down to talk with a bunch of Middle Easterners? They all talk at once, and the one who can talk the loudest is "the best." For Middle Easterners, if you STOP to listen, you have just admitted that you're wrong and that they're better, that they're right. ) As I've said before--ethnocentrism could be our downfall in this war. We should not listen, not stop, not negotiate. They will jabber-jabber-jabber (as they always do), but we will have achieve our ends.

#8 docob said it: "the only credibility that matters -- the belief that the US will use adequate and appropriate force when neccessary, and continue until the job is finished"
Posted by: ex-lib || 04/13/2004 12:43 Comments || Top||

#12  I kinda favor the negotiation tactics displayed bt Bruce Willis in "The Fifth Element"...

BANG!

"Anybody else wanna negotiate?"
Posted by: mojo || 04/13/2004 13:07 Comments || Top||

#13  Clint eastwood said it best (as Dirty Harry)
Although it isn't exact, it sure is parallel.

I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky?

Of course a 50 mm shell from a Blackhawk would have a comenserate effect as a "44". Maybe even more profound. What is it, Negotiations?
Posted by: Anonymous4052 || 04/13/2004 13:45 Comments || Top||

#14  The "negotiations" are essentially a kabuki dance that will end when the Shiite holy days end and the Marines and other forces can get back to rat killing without fear of killing pilgrims (Iranians who come for the festivals and leave are pilgrims, those that come and stay will just be dead). I have no fear of either the command authority or the CPA going wobbly.
Posted by: RWV || 04/13/2004 14:28 Comments || Top||

#15  RWV #14 - I agree.

We've used the time to almost double the number of Marines around Fallujah, clear Mahdi Army control of major roads, and cordon Najaf.

Really effective action takes place at a time and in a manner of our own choosing
Posted by: rkb || 04/13/2004 14:38 Comments || Top||

#16  "What is it with these people in the middle east? do they ever take responsibility for what they allow to happen?" - Kbr

You have bottom-lined the root cause of nearly every problem with the middle east with that one question.
Posted by: ruprecht || 04/13/2004 15:09 Comments || Top||

#17  I have to point out that when the war started last March, the Shiites were friendly to us. Why have they started to fight all the sudden? Or is it sudden? Recall after World War One when the Brits controlled Iraq, Shiites started to fight the British forces. Then the Sunnis started to fight the British forces. Then they started to fight together against the British forces. Then the British decided that after a good five or six years to give Iraq independence by brining in an outsider to rule Iraq. It didn't take too long for the Shiites and Sunnis to start fighting amongst each other, and it didn't take long for the British-imposed monarchy to be deposed by some government. Did you realize that until Saddam Hussein took power in the 70s that Iraq never had a stable government? Remember that Saddam supressed the Shiites? Remember how when we came in and got rid of the Hussein regime how greatful the Shiites were? Well, it's been a year. What are the Shiites doing? Starting to arm up against coalition forces. Gee...I'm sensing a pattern here...I guess we must have forgotten some history over the last 100 years.
Posted by: ScandalousAffairs || 04/13/2004 20:07 Comments || Top||

#18  Good post, ScandalousAffairs. Thanks for the info.
Posted by: ex-lib || 04/13/2004 22:49 Comments || Top||

#19  I thought Congress signed the supplemental budget. He can't want too much more than we're already paying at the pump.
Posted by: Super Hose || 04/13/2004 22:55 Comments || Top||

#20 
Iraqi clerics say coalition ’must pay’ for crisis
Hokey-dokey. Here's a penny. Keep the change.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 04/13/2004 23:18 Comments || Top||


Al Sadr aide arrested
US troops have arrested Shi’ite Muslim radical leader Moqtada al Sadr’s top aide, according to reports. Hazem al Araji, a cleric and aide to al Sadr for a northern Baghdad district, was seized as he was leaving the Palestine Hotel after being interviewed by Italian journalists.
One last question Mr Araji, care to comment on the group of soldiers pointing guns at you?
It follows news that the week-long revolt in Iraq has forced the commander of US forces in the Middle East to call for 10,000 more troops to restore order...
Posted by: Lux || 04/13/2004 5:06:29 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Moqtada should be looking for the fastest route to the Iranian border.
Posted by: john || 04/13/2004 10:16 Comments || Top||

#2  apparently the road from Najaf to Iran has a couple speed bumps - armored and armed and a might pissed off too
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 11:09 Comments || Top||

#3  We should be aware of disguises worn in an escape attempt. But, I think our guys can spot a portly burka-wearing person, with stray beard hairs poking through the fabric. (Falsetto voice in broken English) But I am a simple Persian woman, a pilgrim returning from Najaf with (grabbing the nearest male-a 16 year old boy with only 'peach-fuzz' on his face)my husband.
Posted by: Anonymous4052 || 04/13/2004 13:12 Comments || Top||


U.S. retakes main Iraq roads
Several interesting things in this article. U.S. forces used heavy firepower Monday to regain control of strategic roads around Iraq (No speicifcs on what the ’heavy firepower’ did) as about 3,000 American soldiers massed outside this southern city in an attempt to force the surrender of a Shiite cleric and his militias.

Despite sporadic fighting in the south and west of the country, U.S. officials said they were giving negotiations a chance before moving against Sunni militiamen in Fallujah, where a tense cease-fire held for a second day, and Shiite fighters who are loyal to cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. But top U.S. commanders made it clear that time was running out for a negotiated settlement with the cleric. No indication that they are backing off on Fallujah, which is good.

"The mission of U.S. forces is to kill or capture Muqtada Sadr," said Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of ground forces in Iraq. The threat came as the anti-American Shiite cleric ordered his followers Monday to leave the government offices they had been occupying in several cities.

Coalition forces have gradually isolated the militias. But they had been wary of launching a broader campaign for fear of further antagonizing the country’s majority Shiite Muslim population during last weekend’s Arbaeen religious festival. With tens of thousands of pilgrims now leaving the region, American military officials indicated U.S. troops would apply more pressure to the 30-year-old al-Sadr and his followers.

Al-Sadr is controlling his militias -- with as many as 6,000 fighters -- from Najaf, Iraq’s holiest city. American military commanders said they would not hesitate to enter Najaf and Karbala in their efforts to capture al-Sadr, but they realized how sensitive such a move would be. "My intent is to destroy Sadr’s militia, absolutely destroy it," said Col. Dana Pittard, commander of the 3rd Brigade Combat Team of the 1st Infantry Division, which is leading the operation dubbed Operation Duke Fortitude. "And then to capture or kill Sadr. That is our mission. We’re just waiting to be unleashed." Also good news!

The turmoil to the north in Fallujah calmed a bit more Monday as negotiators backed by the Iraqi Governing Council sought a peaceful remedy to the fighting that began 13 days ago when four American contractors were ambushed and their bodies mutilated. U.S. officials described the insurgents as a mix of Saddam Hussein loyalists and foreign Islamic fighters. Coalition authorities said the bloodshed would not deter the Bush administration from transferring power to an independent Iraqi government on June 30, as scheduled. Also good news! I am sure that some of this is posturing to convince various people in Iraq that the US is serious about Fallujah and Sadr, but at the same time I am reasonably confident that Fallujah will be taken by force and all the jihadis and saddamites killed or captured. The risks of letting them good are far too great.
Posted by: Phil B || 04/13/2004 4:32:13 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Duke Fortidtude"? Who comes up with these names anyway?
Posted by: LaBud || 04/13/2004 6:01 Comments || Top||

#2  Depends on what mood the PR people are in. Often they're semi-random combinations involving the unit's nickname, like all those "Ivy" operations for the 4th Infantry, and the "Iron" operations for 1st Armored. One of the Marines' nicknames is "Devil Dogs". Start finding high ground if word of operations called "Stone Devil" or "Rabid Dog" comes round, though. That'll be hell or high water for sure.
Posted by: Mitch H. || 04/13/2004 7:31 Comments || Top||

#3  Winston Churchill said he didn't want to inform any mother or father of their child's death in Operation Bunny Jump
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 8:02 Comments || Top||

#4  A 2,500-strong U.S. force, backed by tanks and artillery, pushed to the outskirts of the Shiite holy city of Najaf on Tuesday for a showdown with a radical cleric. On the way to Najaf, the U.S. force's 80-vehicle convoy was ambushed Monday night by gunmen firing small arms and setting of roadside bombs north of the city. One soldier was killed and an American civilian contractor was wounded, officers in the convoy said. The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, said their mission was to "capture or kill" radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Units set up a cordon on approaches to the city, barring militiamen from leaving.

Showtime.
Posted by: Steve || 04/13/2004 10:06 Comments || Top||

#5  Duke Fortidtude

I expect they didn't want to use Duke Nukem since it might give the wrong impression. ;)
Posted by: eLarson || 04/13/2004 10:40 Comments || Top||

#6  Oh come now!

Duke Fortitude = D.F.

D.F.= Destroy Fallujah

End of story.
Posted by: Zenster || 04/13/2004 12:33 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Interview with Mullah Omar
Through the auspices of an influential jihadi leader, Mohammad Shehzad spoke with the Taliban supremo over the phone from Kabul. Shehzad, who had met Omar in a cave near Kandahar in October 2002, positively identified the voice.
Where are you? How is your health? What are you doing for food?
I cannot disclose my location due to security reasons. I change it very frequently. But I can tell you I am in Afghanistan. I am perfectly fine. Food should not be an issue for a true Muslim. God feeds me like he feeds other Muslims.

What is your strength? Who provides you arms and ammunition?
We are so many in numbers that our strength cannot be counted. Before vacating the country, we had dumped the arms and ammunition in huge quantities at various secret locations. We have enough to fight for decades. Moreover, we snatch arms and ammunition from the coalition forces just like we seized it from the Soviet forces.

What is your strategy?
We carry out guerilla activities. We recently carried out some suicide attacks that have been very fruitful by the grace of God. We have set up a special suicide squad that consists of 2,000 Taliban. This squad will make life hell for the US and its allies and force them out of Afghanistan. Insha Allah!

How did you manage to escape the US troops in Afghanistan? Are stories of your under-the-moonlight motorcycle getaway fact or myth?
This does not matter how I managed to escape. What really matters is God’s mercy, kindness and greatness. He has been protecting Osama bin Laden and myself when the US warplanes were intensively bombarding the Tora Bora caves. It was almost impossible to escape this attack. But by the grace of God, we did not receive a single scratch.

Did you flee to Pakistan?
I am not sure. Perhaps! The border between the two countries is so contiguous that it is extremely difficult to judge whether one is physically in Pakistan or Afghanistan. We don’t stay at one place and keep moving.

When was the last time you met or heard from Osama? Is he alive?
I met him months ago and we are in contact with each other. He is very much alive and kicking.

Where is he?
You think I will tell you! All I can says is, he is not in your (Pakistan) tribal areas!

Do you regret lending support to Osama and hosting him in your country?
Not at all. Osama is the greatest mujahid of the present times. He is not a terrorist as propagated by the US. He fought for Afghanistan. He saved Afghans. How could we regret hosting him? I asked the world to provide evidence again him. He was innocent. Therefore, nobody -- even Saudi Arabia -- could prove anything against him. We had tremendous pressure to expel him -- even from our friends like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Your [former Pakistan] interior minister Moinuddin Haider and even General Pervez Musharraf met me personally to seek Osama’s extradition. But I refused. We paid a very heavy price for this decision. But we proved that the Taliban were independent people. They were nobody’s product as portrayed by the media.

The Taliban could have escaped the US wrath had they expelled Osama

We don’t care for the US wrath! We are only afraid of God’s wrath. The US was hell-bent to topple our legitimate government. It would have still done so even had Osama been expelled.

Don’t you think you unnecessarily antagonised the international community? After all, what was the rationale behind destroying the Bamiyan Buddha?
I did not want to destroy the Bamiyan Buddha. In fact, some foreigners came to me and said they would like to conduct the repair work of the Bamiyan Buddha that had been slightly damaged due to rains. This shocked me. I thought, these callous people have no regard for thousands of living human beings -- the Afghans who are dying of hunger, but they are so concerned about non-living objects like the Buddha. This was extremely deplorable. That is why I ordered its destruction. Had they come for humanitarian work, I would have never ordered the Buddha’s destruction.

What is your opinion about General Musharraf?
General Musharraf was used by the US to topple our legitimate government. Thus he has committed a major sin. We will not forgive him! He is not loyal to Pakistan. He has betrayed the people of Pakistan as well as the Muslim nationhood. Like Bush, he too is a threat to the Muslim unity. I urge the people of Pakistan to wage jihad against Musharraf, remove him from power and punish him severely.

Afghans have chosen a constitution. They will be electing their president soon. Don’t you think the country is moving toward stability?
All the delegates of the Loya Jirga were criminals as rightly pointed out by a young lady [Malalai Joya]. She showed the courage of telling the delegates that they were murderers of innocent people of Afghanistan and they should be dragged to the national and international courts of justice. The Loya Jirga is a US ploy to derive legitimacy for the Karzai government. We denounce it. Our position is clear: we will kill all those who will register themselves as voters or cast votes in the forthcoming election. We will kill all those who support the US and its allies in any manner. America is the greatest evil on earth. It is the enemy of Islam. Whoever is the US friend is the enemy of Islam. Killing the enemies of Islam is jihad. We have already consigned to hell more than 1,000 infidels that include the Americans, their allies and their Afghan flunkies.

Have you issued a religious ruling to kill women that are working with aid agencies in Afghanistan?
Yes. As I said, whoever sides with the US or its allies deserves death. I am giving such women the last warning. If they do not dissociate themselves from these agencies within 30 days and confine themselves to the boundary wall of their houses, death will be their destiny. These agencies are preaching Christianity under the cover of development. Most of the Afghans have become apostate. They also deserve death. We will kill them.

Your former foreign minister Mullah Wakil Ahmed Muttawakil has turned renegade after striking a deal with the US. Another colleague Mullah Siddiqullah has deserted you. Does not it indicate ’demoralisation’ among the Taliban?
The Taliban are not demoralised. Despair is a sin. The Taliban are united. We are giving the US and the coalition forces a tough time. We are hunting them down like pigs. We are very happy to learn that the US is dispatching an additional contingent of more than 2,000 soldiers. This will be a huge herd of pigs for us to hunt down. We are waiting anxiously for their arrival!
Posted by: Paul Moloney || 04/13/2004 2:42:10 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  We are hunting them down like pigs

Hehe..Sure Omar! You boys always claim that!
Posted by: CobraCommander || 04/13/2004 3:08 Comments || Top||

#2  "Mullah Omar - your recommendation for the Motorcycle Of Doom™? Yamaha or Honda?"

"Anything that outruns a humvee"

Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 8:37 Comments || Top||

#3  FrankG : lol!
Posted by: Anonymous3973 || 04/13/2004 9:14 Comments || Top||

#4  Maybe it's just me, but... this thing looks like total bullshit.
Posted by: tu3031 || 04/13/2004 10:05 Comments || Top||

#5  tu3031: I agree. It's pretty easy to make up an interview with someone on the lam. (Did Jayson Blair write it? maybe the NYTimes will pick it up;)
Posted by: Spot || 04/13/2004 11:08 Comments || Top||

#6  He's gonna have to get a new chopper - something that'll outrun an Apache Longbow and a Hellfire. It's either that or experience hellfire - for real!
Posted by: Old Patriot || 04/13/2004 11:16 Comments || Top||

#7  You know, I'm just an opinionated VRWC blogger, but I think Mullah Omar's been dead for almost 3 years...
Posted by: Jen || 04/13/2004 11:25 Comments || Top||

#8  Mullah Omar's interview should be turned into methane or crude oil, so it serves some useful purpose.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 04/13/2004 11:30 Comments || Top||

#9  Actually I heard something like this on the Art Bell show late one night. A man claimed to have a telephone that let him communicate with the dead.
Posted by: RWV || 04/13/2004 14:44 Comments || Top||

#10  Been around for years RWV. Dial central ask for Heyzeus.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 15:38 Comments || Top||

#11  Well if Nancy Reagan were still in charge--she'd have Mullah Omar's charts read by her Beverly Hills gynecologist astrologist--and then when we'd know for sure!
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 22:11 Comments || Top||

#12  YAAAAWWWWNNNNN.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck || 04/13/2004 23:04 Comments || Top||

#13  Man, NNM's trolls have really gone downhill. Posted at 10pm? What happened, your EverQuest account get cancelled?
Posted by: Gromky || 04/13/2004 23:27 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Sharon: Israel Keeping 5 West Bank Settlement Blocs
MAALEH ADUMIM, West Bank (AP) - Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on Monday named five large West Bank settlement blocs he wants to keep as part of his final peace plan - then flew to Washington win President Bush's support for the "disengagement" effort.

Sharon appeared to confirm Palestinian fears that Israel plans to withdraw from the Gaza Strip and four smaller West Bank settlements in order to strengthen its hold over other parts of the West Bank. Sharon's wants to "strengthen and develop" the five blocs, putting his plan at odds with the U.S.-backed "road map" peace plan which calls for an Israeli settlement freeze ahead of negotiations on a final peace deal.
And these might not be the only blocks of the West Bank Sharon will work to keep.
Bush said Monday that he would welcome a Gaza withdrawal as a "positive development," but it appears unlikely the U.S. president will meet Israel's request - a U.S. declaration that Israel can keep part of the West Bank in a final peace deal with the Palestinians.

According to senior Israeli government officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Sharon and Bush will exchange letters at their Wednesday meeting, outlining commitments to the withdrawal plan and to the road map. Sharon's letter will say that Israel will pull out of all 21 Gaza Strip settlements and four isolated West Bank enclaves, the officials said. In exchange, Bush will say Israel has a right to "pursue terrorists," including in areas from which it has pulled out, the officials said.

Sharon visited Maaleh Adumim, the West Bank's largest settlement with 30,000 residents. Sharon was attending celebrations marking the end of the weeklong Jewish holiday of Passover. Sharon told about 500 people gathered in a Bedouin-style tent that in giving up Gaza and parts of the West Bank, Israel would gain security and be able to keep large settlement blocs. "Only an Israeli initiative will assure the future of the large settlement blocs and the security zones, like a strong Maaleh Adumim, a strong Ariel, a strong Givat Zeev, a strong Etzion bloc - places that will remain under Israeli control, will continue to be strengthened and developed, and I also add a strong Hebron and Kiryat Arba," he said.
Those screws tight enough, Yasser?
It marked the first time Sharon detailed which settlements he wants to keep in a final peace deal. Asked what would happen to the other West Bank settlements - there are 140 altogether - Sharon aide Raanan Gissin said their fate would be determined in peace talks. Givat Zeev, Maaleh Adumim and the Etzion bloc are north, east and south of Jerusalem, respectively. Ariel, Kiryat Arba and the tiny settler enclaves in Hebron are deep in the West Bank, and their annexation by Israel would make it difficult to create a Palestinian state with contiguous territory.

Palestinian Cabinet minister Saeb Erekat said that "settlements in the West Bank are just as illegal as those in Gaza." If Israel tries to annex part of the West Bank, "we will not get to peace and not to security," Erekat said.
Not that you'll give the Israelis peace and security anyways. Thanks for playing.
Sharon portrayed his disengagement plan as a "mortal blow" for the Palestinians, and said he hoped it would spur them into action, including restraining militants. "When they see it as the end of their dreams, then perhaps they will take the necessary steps," he said.
Warts and all, Sharon's got it figured out.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/13/2004 12:23:29 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  particularly in incorporating the land east of Jerusalem - it kills forever the idea of a Palestine state with an East Jerusalem capital.
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 8:33 Comments || Top||

#2  "we will not get to peace and not to security," Erekat said.

They're not anywhere close to that now, so why should Sharon or even GWB give a rat's ass?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 22:40 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
Denmark Pulls Aid Workers Out of Iraq
COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) - Two Danish relief groups said on Monday that they had pulled their workers out of Iraq because of increasing violence there. Five employees with the Danish Refugee Council left the southern Iraqi city of Basra over the weekend "because we fear the random violence," said Arne Vaagen, a spokesman for the Copenhagen-based group.

Another Danish non-governmental organization, Dan Church Aid, said it had halted its mine-clearing program. The group employed 20 foreigners, including citizens from Sweden, Denmark, Britain, the Netherlands and Canada. They left Iraq late Sunday. Dan Church Aid said a separate water and sewage treatment program in southern Iraq wasn't affected because it is staffed by Iraqis.

In a statement posted on its Web site, the Danish Foreign Ministry urged all civilian Danes to leave Iraq. "Terror attacks are not only directed at the coalition forces but also increasingly against civilian targets," a ministry statement said. "There is an increased risk for terror and for kidnappings of Westerners all over the country."

Denmark, which backed the U.S.-led war to oust Saddam Hussein, has 410 troops in Basra and nearby Qurnah, 250 miles southeast of Baghdad.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/13/2004 12:11:22 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Abizaid seeks more combat troops for Iraq
General John Abizaid, the commander of US forces in the Middle East, has asked the Pentagon for two additional combat brigades in response to the widespread rebellion in Iraq, reversing a year-long trend of reducing the US military presence there. The request for new troops highlights how the week-long revolt is forcing the US to rethink its security strategy.

Pentagon officials had been aiming to hand over an increasing share of security to Iraqi units and cut troop levels to 115,000 after the recent rotation of US forces. There are currently 135,000 American troops in Iraq. But Gen Abizaid on Monday acknowledged that US-trained Iraqi security forces - including police, civil defence units and the new Iraqi army - had performed poorly. "That was a great disappointment to us," he said.
They weren't willing to shoot their own people even if their own were acting uncivilized. That shouldn't surprise us.
Amid the growing concerns over the US strategy in Iraq, as well as criticism of the White House over its posture on terrorism before the September 11 attacks, President George W. Bush said on Monday he would hold a press conference Tuesday evening to answer the questions now inundating his administration.

Gen Abizaid declined to comment on how many troops there would be in the new deployment, saying the details are still being discussed with the joint staff, the senior military leadership. But he said the new forces he sought would have a "strong mobile combat arms capability" amounting to "two brigades of combat power, if not more".

There have been repeated calls in Washington by critics of the the Bush administration for additional troops in light of the unrest. The failure of indigenous Iraqi forces during the revolt could further complicate US efforts to reduce its presence, which the Pentagon's civilian leadership originally hoped would be in the tens of thousands by now. "It's still going to take a significant amount of time to ensure that they are properly equipped, properly trained and credible and capable," said Lt Gen Ricardo Sanchez, head of coalition ground forces in Iraq. US commanders plan to embed US special forces with some Iraqi security units.

Gen Abizaid said there has been a push for senior officers from the old Iraqi military, disbanded last year, to take command positions. The move appeared to reverse elements of the US de-Baathification policy. "In the next couple of days, you'll see a large number of senior officers being appointed to key positions in the ministry of defence and in the Iraqi joint staff and in Iraqi field commands," Gen Abizaid said. "I can tell you the competition for these positions has been fierce."
Chief Wiggles wrote about these generals at some length last year. He found some (not all) of them to be good people and thought they should be restored to their jobs. I hope he and Abizaid are right, 'cause I don't want the fox to get into the henhouse.
Posted by: Steve White || 04/13/2004 12:07:31 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Here is what happens tomorrow:

Shouts of QUAGMIRE from the left.

And the senate and houe will dither and abdicate their responsibilities towards the national defense.

There should have been a holy uproar over defeatist comments made by Ted Kennedy, and the outrageous innuendo advanced, not to mention the treatment of Ms. Rice, by Ben-Veniste.

Goddammitt, this nation is at war and the left thinks absolutely NOTHING of their own personal obligations towards the national defense to STFU and give the military everything they need to fight and win.

Condaleeza Rice by her simple grace and her own personal display of decency and intelligence under this haranging,, showed to the world what a pencil dicked, shiveled cajoned little girl-armed cockroach Ben-Veniste is.

Okay.

Sorry, I had a little Misha moment there for a sec, and had to vent.
Posted by: badanov || 04/13/2004 0:38 Comments || Top||

#2  Well all and good! If Abizaid gets them, that means an increased capability to actually carry out "Operation Whack the Mullahs of Tehran" ...
Posted by: Edward Yee || 04/13/2004 1:00 Comments || Top||

#3  Oh Badanov-just because fried Rice was served up at the hearing--as she spun and lied her ass off--no reason to blame Teddy!
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 1:26 Comments || Top||

#4  Anmd BTW Badanov--it was Rummy who didn't want more troops
Posted by: Not Mike Moore || 04/13/2004 1:28 Comments || Top||

#5  Dr. Rice didn't lie--she didn't have to and wouldn't.
And Rummy is right--we don't need more troops; the ones we have there are doing just fine, no thanks to you, NMM.
Posted by: Jen || 04/13/2004 1:53 Comments || Top||

#6  Watch this one. The same leftists who said "we didn't have enough troops!" will now say, "See, quagmire. Why else would we need more troops!"

Now let's see, how about a little Harper's Index fun, NMM?

Number of people viewing Rice favorably to unfavorably: 2-to-1

Number of people viewing Clarke unfavorably to favorably: 2-to-1.

Number of smoking guns found in August 6 memo: Zero.

Clarke to Gorton on chances of stopping 9/11 in advance:
Zero.

Probability that the left would have supported a preemptive attack on Afghanistan pre-9/11:

Zero

Probability that the left would support ANY defense of the United States:

Zero.
Posted by: RMcLeod || 04/13/2004 4:21 Comments || Top||

#7  Jen, if Rummy is right...then you mean that Abizaid is wrong. I know who is more qualified in conducting military operations.
Posted by: Igs || 04/13/2004 9:52 Comments || Top||

#8  Abizaid has asked for 2 combat brigades that can be used as a quick reaction force to move around the country quelling uprisings quickly. It appears that currently most of the Army has locked down to guard duty (you know, guard the Museum, guard the pipe lines, guard the hospital, etc). Now go back and read what Rummy is trying to transform much of the military into and tell me how wrong he is.

Secondly, notice how effecive the other coalition partners have been. I stated in the beginning we didn't want that many other countries in their because we would be spending all our time protecting them. Notice they all (except the british) got run out of their areas. The 1st armored is going back down their to re-take their areas of operations for them. The bottom line is without air assets the coalition partners are nearly useless.
Posted by: Patrick || 04/13/2004 10:53 Comments || Top||

#9  ..just because fried Rice was served up at the hearing--as she spun and lied her ass off..

Got any proof of that other than "she had to be lying" or "someone else told me she was"?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 04/13/2004 10:57 Comments || Top||

#10  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL || 04/13/2004 11:59 Comments || Top||

#11  Antiwar - what a potty mouth. Idiot
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 12:05 Comments || Top||

#12  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL || 04/13/2004 12:09 Comments || Top||

#13  so if I leave out "war" and "invasion" I can call you a wanker cunt and you won't be offended? LOL
Posted by: Frank G || 04/13/2004 12:12 Comments || Top||

#14  I'm with Frank--there's no need for such a foul mouth, Antiwar.
The majority of the "thousands of Iraqis" killed were males of military age in that "Madhi's Army."
President Bush is one of our best Presidents and so far, hasn't been found wanking in the Oval Office with an intern young enough to be his granddaughter like your idol Clinton.
Sick or wounded Iraqi children are treated in hospitals that have been vastly improved and staffed since we liberated Iraq with lots of American dollars and personnel.

Does your lengthy armpit hair catch fire, fueled by your French-like B.O., with rage while you drive your SUV, nicknamed the Lezbo Mobile, to your PETA/Global Warming/ "Bush is Hitler" meeting?
Posted by: Jen || 04/13/2004 12:13 Comments || Top||

#15  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL || 04/13/2004 12:15 Comments || Top||

#16  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL || 04/13/2004 12:24 Comments || Top||

#17  Anti, you've *got* to stop watching Al-Jazeera!
It's curdling what's left of your brain.

And where's your pity for the little girl that was killed on the plane that crashed into the WTC on 9/11 along with her mother and her mother's best friend?
Or the dozens of Israeli babies and toddlers that the Paleos have blown up?
This is war.
I hope no little children are killed, but sometimes they are.
And these Islamist killers have no scruples about putting babies in front of bullets.
Posted by: Jen || 04/13/2004 12:28 Comments || Top||

#18  Antiwar isn't antiwar. Only passive. Once her ass (eek) is threatened she'll be right there demanding something be done to protect her way of life helping the homeless. It's that "where is a cop when you need one" thing.

Antiwar. Should sadr's leetle army be in charge. Should sunnie mafia be in charge? Should Iranian mullahs be in charge? Who should be in charge, how?

Posted by: Lucky || 04/13/2004 12:34 Comments || Top||

#19  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL || 04/13/2004 12:36 Comments || Top||

#20  I know what Al-Jizz is saying: they try to make the U.S. look like "baby killers" (just like John Kerry says) and themselves look like innocent victims, while just the opposite is true:
The Islamists are the ones who slaughter men, women, children and the elderly without mercy or warning or pity.

And I resent you calling me a KKK member and demand you apologize: I'm from the South and we don't joke about that kind of thing and I respect people of all colors and races, thank you very much.
I AM SICK TO DEATH OF THE LEFT CALLING CONSERVATIVES NAMES.
Posted by: Jen || 04/13/2004 12:47 Comments || Top||

#21  C'mon. Antiwar is a troll. He's probably some smug 16 year old laughing his ass off at all the grown ups getting peeved at him.
Posted by: 11A5S || 04/13/2004 12:54 Comments || Top||

#22  Heck, I thought the article was about more troops in Iraq. For what it's worth; if Abizaid think's he needs them then send in more - really not a big deal. Another Regiment of Marines would prolly fit the bill real nice. Move them on up to Najaf.

"the Coalition forces are doing well killing thousands of Iraqis."

>efficiency is a beautiful thing :)
Posted by: Jarhead || 04/13/2004 13:02 Comments || Top||

#23  Jen, Dont let that asshat antiwar get under your skin -- that is what she wants and gets her jollies from. Its not worth the effort. She is probably some pimple-faced kid who gets her jollies from getting people worked up -- just want to drag everyone else down to her own level.

Just consider the source.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 04/13/2004 13:09 Comments || Top||

#24  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Antiwar TROLL || 04/13/2004 13:41 Comments || Top||

#25  You're right Lucky. She's not antiwar she's just on the other side.
Posted by: Shipman || 04/13/2004 13:52 Comments || Top||

#26  # 22 Jarhead: Yeah. And the situation changes all the time. Gotta go with what's needed as things change. I agree. No big. And lol! Look out, Najaf!

To Operative Antiwar , I mean Antipeace:

It's telling that you don't live up to your own "name."
I think you should change it to "Anti-US/Coalition-WAR. Or better yet, PRO-Islamic-jihad-anywhere-on-the-face-of-the-globe-WAR. We're patient. We'll wait for you.

I think it's telling how you make your own little "war" as you address Jen as "Jennie" --in an attempt to diminutize her. How aggressive of you.

I think it's telling that you do not seem as equally offended by the words "war" and "invasion" when applied to Arabs.

I think it's telling that you refuse to acknowledge and denounce the barbarism (the war) perpetrated against women and little girls as a matter of course in Arab countries, by Arabs.

I think it's telling that you refuse to acknowledge and denounce the acts of terror (i.e., murder, i.e, killing, i.e., war) perpetrated by the Islamofacists against men, women, and children around the world. Everyone bleeds the same, Antipeace.

I think it's telling that you refuse to acknowledge that the US military goes out of their way NOT to endanger civilians as standard policy, while the Iraqi terrorists conveniently use their wives, sisters, mothers and children as human shields. How many of them are in "ill-equipped Iraqi hospitals?" And how many supplies were stolen out of Iraqi hospitals by Iraqis, thus making them ill-equipped? You never complain about those acts of war either.

I think it's telling that you never address issues of substance.

I think it's telling that you never have answered a single of my questions over the course of many weeks.

When are you going to get serious? Your charade is up. You love war. You want war. You just don't want the right side to win.

Note: Pimply-faced kid, smug 16-year-old, confused Aussie with a mid-life crisis dating an Arab, or pro-Arab operative--it doesn't matter. Your posts just give a chance to organize our arguments, strengthen our resolve, and practice our typing skills. Think about it--in a small way (peck, peck, shift, peck) you've made the "other side" (the real anti-war contingeny at Rantburg) a little stronger.
Bet that sucks.

Cheers!
Posted by: ex-lib || 04/13/2004 13:56 Comments || Top||

#27  It is always amazing to me to watch the left (Antiwar) - as soon as they are faced with indisputable facts, they revert to name calling. We as conservatives view people like you, Antiwar, as misguided or misinformed whereas you see us as Evil. If your views are so pious and righteous (of course in a secular sort of way – wouldn’t want to offend you) why don’t you back up your name calling with some fact or perhaps start your own blog we could all visit to become better informed? As far as speculation on Antiwar’s age – my guess is that he or she (wait, is gender identification PC?) is college educated, perhaps with a post grad work, not a 16 year old boy. The 16 year old boy would have a much wittier vocabulary.
Posted by: Topanga Hippy || 04/13/2004 13:56 Comments || Top||

#28  just why do we reply to miss anti-war. she never has any intelligent points to debate. just rubbish.
Posted by: Dan || 04/13/2004 14:17 Comments || Top||

#29  PS: antiwar is supposed to be a 30-something Aussie female.

1. Have you ever noticed what time (s)he posts at? In the middle of the night Aussie time.

2. Has antiwar ever once used a British spelling or Aussie slang?

(S)he's a troll. Put antiwar on ignore and save Fred's bandwidth.
Posted by: 11A5S || 04/13/2004 14:55 Comments || Top||

#30  11A5S...best and fastest way to get rid of a troll is to ignore them....they reason they ARE trolls is because being annoying is the only way that anyone ever pays attention to them. I guess it's better than being invisible.

Kinda sad if you think about how desperate that is from their life's standpoint - but best to ignore them and let them pathetically seek attention elsewhere.
Posted by: B || 04/13/2004 15:09 Comments || Top||

#31  11A5S, not to defend Antiwar, but posting in the middle of the night is not conclusive. I also often post in the middle of the night Greece-time and end up waking up around noon -- being a CS grad student I can choose to work (or surf) on my hours of choice.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 04/13/2004 18:23 Comments || Top||

#32  " but posting in the middle of the night"

ah..but it does explain the lack of your coherent thought process.
Posted by: anon4u || 04/13/2004 18:35 Comments || Top||

#33  Agreed, Aris. But she _always_ posts at godawful hours for an Australian. With the exception of "dog's breakfast," (which has become standard RB slang and could have been learned here) I have never witnessed her use a Briticism, Aussie-ism, or British spelling.

At any rate, as much as I sometimes disagree with you and others here, I do respect your opinions. Antiwar doesn't seem to have any opinions. She just writes provocative one liners and wastes bandwidth.
Posted by: 11A5S || 04/13/2004 18:39 Comments || Top||

#34  Yes Jennie the Coalition forces are doing well killing thousands of Iraqis. Cuntaleeza lied like your favourite leader George Wanker Bush.Maybe as you are driving to your KKK meeting you can spare a thought for the mutilated children in ill equipped Iraqi hospitals.
Posted by: Antiwar || 04/13/2004 11:59 Comments || Top||

#35  I haven't OFFENDED you have I Frank? I'ts funny isn't it how words like WANKER and CUNT can offend you but words like war and invasion which represent evil acts do not.
Posted by: Antiwar || 04/13/2004 12:09 Comments || Top||

#36  Not in the least offended Frank. The reason is because it would be bullshit sorry I meant Bullpoopie(don't want you to get offended lol)
Posted by: Antiwar || 04/13/2004 12:15 Comments || Top||

#37  Jennie you need to take off your Jackboots once in a while they are cutting off the circulation to your brain. I didn't know Mahdi's Army had two year olds in it. Maybe that 2 year old Iraqi boy I saw being carried by his distraught father was a soldier(sarcasm)
Posted by: Antiwar || 04/13/2004 12:24 Comments || Top||

#38  Jen I can't actually get Al-Jazeera on tv but I do read their website and find it informative. I feel sad when ALL little children are slaughtered.Maybe if you read the Al-Jazeera website once in a while you would receive news untainted by US propaganda
Posted by: Antiwar || 04/13/2004 12:36 Comments || Top||

#39  Good Lord Jennie if you are not a KKK member you certainly talk like one at times.No way will you get an apology from me,never ever ever.
Posted by: Antiwar || 04/13/2004 13:41 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
96[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Tue 2004-04-13
  Zarqawi in Fallujah?
Mon 2004-04-12
  Rafsanjani to al-Sadr: Fight America, the "Wounded Monster"
Sun 2004-04-11
  Khatami backs off from Sadr
Sat 2004-04-10
  IGC calls for immediate ceasefire
Fri 2004-04-09
  Rafsanjani Butts In
Thu 2004-04-08
  8 Koreans, 3 Japanese Kidnapped in Iraq
Wed 2004-04-07
  House to house, roof to roof
Tue 2004-04-06
  Al-Sadr threat comes to a head; Marines in Fallujah
Mon 2004-04-05
  Fallujah surrounded; Sadr "outlaw", Mahdi army thumped
Sun 2004-04-04
  4 Salvadoran, 14 thugs dead in Sadr festivities
Sat 2004-04-03
  Sharon Says Israel Will Leave Gaza Strip
Fri 2004-04-02
  The trains in Spain are mined with bombs again
Thu 2004-04-01
  Hit on Jamali thwarted?
Wed 2004-03-31
  Savagery in Fallujah
Tue 2004-03-30
  Major al-Qaeda bombing foiled in the UK
Mon 2004-03-29
  Mullah Omar wounded in airstrike?


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.224.38.3
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Background (37)    (0)    (0)    (0)    (0)