#1
Among the organizations mentioned, Al-Haramain, Islamic Relief, Taiba, Al-IGAS, Assembly of Muslim Youth, Revival of Islamic Heritage, Social Reform Society, Qatar Charitable Society.
But, but ... the names are so innocuous!
Posted by: Bobby ||
12/14/2010 7:21 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Funny, corrupt culture as a defense. Reminds me of the stories of Soviet Agents in the US who disappeared because the US corrupted them.
WaPo publishes an opinion piece by the Attorney General and Sec of HHS.
Their legal argument seems to be that since one schoolteacher in NH was unable to obtain health care insurance to her liking, that Obamacare must therefore be constitutional.
If this is a legal argument, so is most Kindergarten crying.
Posted by: Lord Garth ||
12/14/2010 11:15 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[4 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
It's not surprising that opponents, having lost in Congress, have taken to the courts. We saw similar challenges to laws that created Social Security and established new civil rights protections. Those challenges ultimately failed, and so will this one.
Posted by: Redneck Jim ||
12/14/2010 15:32 Comments ||
Top||
#3
So, Holder and Sebelius think lawsuits are "troubling". As Daffy Duck would say, "Dispicable!"
Daffy Duck has at least as much credibility as the WaPo.
#4
Roughly 20 cases question the new law's individual responsibility provision, which says that Americans who can afford to must maintain basic health coverage.
The individual responsibility provision says that as participants in the health-care market, Americans should pay for insurance if they can afford it.
Gee Mr. Attorny General, I'm confused. I ain't no high fallutin lawyer er nuttin so maybe you can help me out. Is it called an "Individual Mandate" or is it an "Individual Option"? And maybe next week you can explain the difference between the words shall and will.
#8
"Have you thought this is just a trap to raise taxes and expand Medicare and raiseeliminate individual insurance choice?"
FTFY, BP.
It's a trap, all right - a trap to make us serfs of the federal government self-appointed "elite."
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
12/14/2010 18:49 Comments ||
Top||
#9
I suspect health insurance, whether private, employer-based, or government-based, is a root cause of our skyrocketing health care costs. When the buyer of something (e.g. health care) is not the one directly paying for it, and does not have the ability to price shop, it should be expected that prices - and costs - would rise.
#10
There is no single root cause of our increasing health care costs. Insurance is one and in a certain sense the most important. Because everybody thinks insurance should pay for their health care. When I started working, I paid all my medical bills my self and then submitted them to the insurance company for reimbursement. Just getting a medical plan "credit card" and co-pays has been a big mistake. The customer (patient) no longer knows what things are costing and cxan't make decisions to control costs. That has been laid off on the evil insurance companies.
But there are others, government subsidization increases demand, growing elderly population that lives longer and requires more care, advanced technology and drugs, bad lifestyles that lead to costly to treat chronic conditions and inability to increase productivity (a nurse can't take care of more patients than she could 20 years ago. Caring for people takes time, but nurses need more training and get paid more.) I saw a study I can't find that found 9 major causes of increased medical care costs and none accounted for more than 15% of the increase in cost.
Putting the patient and doctor in control will do the most to reduce costs, but that means patients pay.
#11
I can tell you for a fact that's true, Glenmore. Back in the 1980's I had a job that gave me paid-by-the-company 100% coverage for just about anything I desired. No networks, no primary care physician, just go to the doctor of my choice for whatever I wanted.
It was great (from my standpoint); I saw a neurologist about long-standing shoulder pains; an allergist for full-panel allergy testing; a plastic surgeon for some needed (but not strictly medically necessary) reconstructive surgery (no, not a boob job or such); and god knows what else.
Now I have health insurance like we had when I was growing up - insurance for actual hospitalization, but I pay for routine doctor's visits, medications, etc. (Insurance with a very high deductible, plus a medical savings account for regular medical costs.)
The firm I presently work for splits the insurance cost with me; I pay into the medical savings account myself. My initial goal was to get enough into the savings account to cover the very large deductible should I need hospitalization. I have that now, but still just pay for any medical stuff myself. (It involves having enough discipline to put aside money each paycheck in case of small medical costs.)
Too many people for too long have gotten the idea that somehow the cost of their health care is somebody else's responsibility. It ain't - and the bill is coming due.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
12/14/2010 19:37 Comments ||
Top||
#12
Here's why medical costs are going up: Medicare reimburses @ 75% of cost and Medicaid @ 50% of cost, so physicians and hospitals make up the difference from reimbursements from private insurance.
When congress announces they are "reducing" Medicare payments, they are in fact levying a tax on everyone else's medical services.
Obamacare further codifies this cost shift by mandating a medical loss ratio of 15%, creating a fixed percentage insurance companies' take for administration, marketing and profit while the other 85% goes to medical expenses. This means the only way insurers can increase profits is by increasing medical reimbursements -- a perverse yet compelling disincentive not to control medical costs.
Eventually everyone gravitates from artificially high private insurance to a public option, and half the physician population retires.
Aren't you glad you asked?
Posted by: regular joe ||
12/14/2010 22:27 Comments ||
Top||
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
