Hi there, !
Today Tue 09/14/2004 Mon 09/13/2004 Sun 09/12/2004 Sat 09/11/2004 Fri 09/10/2004 Thu 09/09/2004 Wed 09/08/2004 Archives
Rantburg
534030 articles and 1862936 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 87 articles and 476 comments as of 17:34.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
Blast, Mushroom Cloud Reported in N. Korea
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
4 00:00 Sock Puppet of Doom [2] 
14 00:00 UFO [5] 
2 00:00 Chris W. [3] 
3 00:00 anymouse [2] 
6 00:00 Pappy [1] 
2 00:00 Zenster [] 
8 00:00 UFO [5] 
15 00:00 Pappy [] 
6 00:00 badanov [3] 
3 00:00 Alaska Paul [1] 
22 00:00 B [7] 
4 00:00 Tom [3] 
0 [2] 
3 00:00 Alaska Paul [1] 
2 00:00 tu3031 [3] 
2 00:00 Frank G [2] 
0 [2] 
7 00:00 CrazyFool [1] 
4 00:00 frenchfregoli [2] 
0 [2] 
0 [1] 
4 00:00 Crikey [1] 
5 00:00 Zenster [1] 
0 [2] 
6 00:00 Steve White [1] 
8 00:00 Alaska Paul [4] 
0 [3] 
0 [2] 
15 00:00 Boris the Wonder Troll [9] 
6 00:00 Mrs. Davis [1] 
6 00:00 Crikey [] 
4 00:00 Alaska Paul [1] 
2 00:00 smn [1] 
12 00:00 Rafael [] 
9 00:00 Frank G [] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
4 00:00 Zenster [6]
1 00:00 Zenster []
2 00:00 anon [2]
0 [2]
0 [2]
14 00:00 UFO [5]
0 [2]
6 00:00 Zenster [1]
15 00:00 B [6]
3 00:00 98zulu []
4 00:00 trailing wife [2]
0 []
0 [4]
2 00:00 trailing wife [4]
0 [2]
27 00:00 Alaska Paul [3]
0 [3]
0 [5]
0 []
0 [1]
1 00:00 Mrs. Davis [2]
1 00:00 smn [1]
15 00:00 Alaska Paul [1]
Page 3: Non-WoT
9 00:00 anon [1]
8 00:00 Bryan [2]
1 00:00 Anonymoose [1]
0 []
4 00:00 PlanetDan [7]
1 00:00 Mrs. Davis [1]
11 00:00 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo) [2]
0 [1]
27 00:00 UFO [3]
7 00:00 Crowley [2]
0 [1]
1 00:00 CBS News [2]
21 00:00 john []
0 [1]
3 00:00 Pappy [1]
0 [1]
16 00:00 Mark Z. [2]
10 00:00 GreatestJeneration [2]
12 00:00 Steve85308 [6]
1 00:00 Bomb-a-rama [2]
1 00:00 Lucky [2]
5 00:00 anony mouse mouse [1]
14 00:00 Shipman [2]
7 00:00 GK [1]
Page 4: Opinion
19 00:00 UFO [5]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
3 00:00 Charles [1]
14 00:00 formerwaiter [4]
1 00:00 Don []
1 00:00 BigEd []
Arabia
Compare Moslem Reactions to Rushdie and to Bin Laden
From MEMRI, an article titled "We Are All Bin Laden" by Dr. Sa'd Bin Tefla, former Kuwaiti Minister of Information, now a journalist, originally published in the London daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat.
.... Does anyone among us remember Salman Rushdie? Salman Rushdie was an anonymous British author of Indian origin. In 1988 he won a prize for a vapid novel titled The Satanic Verses. .... We rattled and sharpened all of our rhetorical sabers, our religious legal rulings [fatwa], [alerted] our guards, our ports, our airports, and our border crossings in order to prevent his entering [our countries] and the distribution of his book, since it does damage to Islam. In all the capitals of the Islamic world protests set out for the British embassies, Salman Rushdie dolls were burnt, as were copies of his books. In one protest in Pakistan nine protestors were killed and [others] were injured by the Pakistani police


Religious legal rulings were disseminated one after another banning Salman Rushdie's book and calling for him to be killed. Iran earmarked a reward of one million dollars for whoever would implement Imam Khomeini's fatwa and kill Salman Rushdie. Our impoverished publishing houses reacted by printing books and pamphlets refuting the [book's] contents, despite the fact that it was banned in all the capitals of the Muslim world. There were those who read reactions, refutations, and rebuttals of the book without ever having read or familiarized themselves with its contents! There were those who lay in wait for Salman Rushdie in order to kill him, desiring in this way to get closer by [Rushdie's] blood to Allah [in heaven], or out of desire for the million dollars that Iran had earmarked at the time. The British authorities raised the level of security surrounding Salman Rushdie, who became very famous on account of the fact that an entire nation had decided to assassinate him.

Where are the Fatwas Against Bin Laden?

Despite the fact that bin Laden murdered thousands of innocents in the name of our religion and despite the damage that he has caused to Muslims everywhere, and especially to innocent Muslims in the West whose life is much better than the life of Muslims in Islamic lands, to this date not a single fatwa has been issued calling for the killing of Bin Laden ....

But let us put aside the [subject of the] fatwa. Have any protests been held condemning bin Laden's actions in any of the Islamic capital cities? Perhaps there were some that demonstrated in his favor. The [Muslim] satellite stations competed amongst themselves in broadcasting his sermons and fatwas, instead of preventing their dissemination as they did in the case of Rushdie's book. Have we earmarked a reward for anyone who kills bin Laden as we did for anyone who kills Rushdie on account of his book? ....
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 09/11/2004 10:18:53 PM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Why didnt he issue one. Fucking hippocrate.
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 22:27 Comments || Top||

#2  He's a journalist, he doesn't have the right to issue a fatwa.
Posted by: Mr Gray || 09/11/2004 23:11 Comments || Top||

#3  We gotta dig a little into history and check out what his (Dr. Sa’d Bin Tefla, former Kuwaiti Minister of Information) views were pre 9/11 when Israel bashing was in fashon. I mean my point is that all these attempts by these so called moderates are so hollow you can see right through them. with the Police state they run in Kwait and all the Arab countries I dont believe that they didnt know what was cooking but they stayed quiet. Now they are covering up mind you not accepting responsibility just covering up.
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 23:24 Comments || Top||

#4  How the hell do non clerics issue Fatwas.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom || 09/12/2004 0:06 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
Former soldier turns himself in to US base in Japan
A former US serviceman accused of deserting while serving in South Korea in 1965 turned himself in on Saturday to the US military at a base near Tokyo. Charles Jenkins, 64, departed from a hospital in Tokyo early morning and later arrived at the Camp Zama. He was accompanied by his Japanese wife Hitomi Soga and their two daughters, Kyodo News reported. Jenkins is expected to begin legal procedures at the base to avoid imprisonment by seeking a plea bargain for a dishonorable discharge from the US military in consultation with his military defense lawyer, Kyodo quoted sources as saying.
One condition for the plea bargain: he never set foot on American soil again, alive or dead.
Jenkins was charged by the US military with escaping to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea in 1965. He later married Soga who was one of the Japanese the DPRK admitted to abduct in late 1970s and early 1980s. Soga returned to Japan in 2002 after Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's visit to Pyongyang. Jenkins and his daughters arrived in Tokyo in July via Jakarta.
Posted by: Steve White || 09/11/2004 12:31:30 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Keep in mind there is a huge sympathy for this man and his wife in Japan. If he's treated harshly, it will make the Japanese very angry. The Japanese are not always rational about such things.
Posted by: gromky || 09/11/2004 1:48 Comments || Top||

#2  Tell them they can keep him...
Posted by: tu3031 || 09/11/2004 1:53 Comments || Top||

#3  The procedures for the Army in the 1980s was to retire 'deserter' records after 10 years unless the individual was an officer, those were kept indefinitely. He'll be treated like Vietnam period deserters, processed to an appropriate location, asked to sign for a punitive discharge under an appropriate chapter of the regulation covering separations, and then sent on his way. Just an administrative action.
Posted by: Don || 09/11/2004 8:02 Comments || Top||

#4  keep him out - he's not welcome in America
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 10:26 Comments || Top||

#5  Put him up with Bobby Fischer; they deserve each other.
Posted by: Raj || 09/11/2004 12:45 Comments || Top||

#6  He could get a spot in the Kerry campaign
Posted by: Crikey || 09/11/2004 14:25 Comments || Top||


Europe
Hand Over Chechen, Protesters Tell Blair
Angry Russians yesterday demanded Tony Blair hand over a Chechen granted asylum in Britain. Hundreds protested outside the British and US embassies in Moscow, accusing Blair and George Bush of double standards in the war on terrorism. Akhmed Zakayev, an envoy for Chechen rebel leader Aslan Maskhadov, has been granted refugee status in London.Maskhadov has been granted asylum in America.
He lives in Vermont, for now
The protests came in the wake of the Beslan school massacre carried out by Chechen separatists.
Posted by: TS(vice girl) || 09/11/2004 5:12:55 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Can anyone say why eitehr of these human scum were given refugee status? Where in Vermont does he live? Perhaps he needs a citizens deportation delegation to visit him.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom || 09/11/2004 17:17 Comments || Top||

#2  Time to deport both of these scumballs. If we fail to do so, both Britain and America can expect their own school massacres. What right will we have to bewail such atrocities should these maggots continue to be given asylum? While not on a par with Russia's facilitating Iranian nuclear aspirations, sheltering these sort of butchers takes the shine off of our claims to moral rectitude in the war on terrorism.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 18:06 Comments || Top||


Germany, Russia say agree anti-terrorism stance
Russian and German leaders said they agreed on Thursday on the importance of human rights and the central role of the United Nations in fighting terrorism, which they said reached new heights with last week's Russian school siege. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Russian President Vladimir Putin, who had been due to meet in Germany on Friday, issued a joint statement condemning the Beslan siege, in which at least 326 people died, half of them children. Putin postponed the meeting because of Beslan. "The monstrous terrorist attack against the innocent children in Beslan shows a new dimension of the danger which the whole of humanity faces from international terrorism," the statement, issued on Thursday, said. "We agree that terrorism everywhere must be fought where it takes place," it added. The leaders said their citizens required security, freedom and protection against terrorism, but acknowledged that the fight against terror had its boundaries. "We are aware of the fundamental importance to respect all human rights and basic freedoms and the dominance of laws, also in response to terrorism and the fear of terrorism," they said. International terrorism was the greatest threat to the security of both countries, along with proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, regional conflicts and organised crime, the statement said.

Schroeder and Putin added that the United Nations was a vital body in the battle. "Both countries stress the central and coordinating role of the United Nations in the global fight against terrorism and affirm that every measure to combat terrorism must accord with their duties of international law, in particular international human rights, refugee and humanitarian law."
Posted by: Fred || 09/11/2004 12:34:45 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Germany, of course, will fight terrorism with cheerleader pom-poms. Besides, with the German government now permitting homosexual couples to sleep together in miitary barracks, who has time to chase those nasty terrorists.
Posted by: Capt America || 09/11/2004 1:43 Comments || Top||

#2  Damn...If this isn't a case of the 'Pot calling the Kettle black', then I don't know what is!!
Posted by: smn || 09/11/2004 1:52 Comments || Top||

#3  And another thing...I saw how fast Putin "scurried" away from the United Nations after the school massacre toward what magic word?...Yep--"Preemption"!
Posted by: smn || 09/11/2004 2:01 Comments || Top||

#4  ...the central role of the United Nations in fighting terrorism...

This is bull s**t. The UN is full of terrorist nations. How can any rational thinking person believe that such a corrupt body can lead with moral authority to fight terrorism. A Pox upon the UN and their high ranking parasites! **rinses sour taste out of mouth**
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 09/11/2004 23:03 Comments || Top||


Schroeder Defends Stance on Iraq War
Posted by: Fred || 09/11/2004 12:00:00 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  No way I'm going to comment on Schroeder on that day.
No way.
Posted by: True German Ally || 09/11/2004 0:18 Comments || Top||

#2  Shameful TGA, very shameful. What a photo-op fake. This is what I was leading on about last week. Fake bullshit is getting old. Oh yeah, freedom, liberty, and freedom, and liberty and freedom and liberty too!
Posted by: Lucky || 09/11/2004 0:57 Comments || Top||

#3  Lucky, did I mention there is an election coming up in Saxony...

If his party is lucky it will finish third.
Posted by: True German Ally || 09/11/2004 1:38 Comments || Top||

#4  No sour kraut for me, thanks.
Posted by: Capt America || 09/11/2004 1:41 Comments || Top||

#5  You don't need sauerkraut to enjoy beer.
In Bavaria beer is classified as "staple food".
Come on, not everything is rotten here!
Posted by: True German Ally || 09/11/2004 1:44 Comments || Top||

#6  Well TGA I heard in heaven there is no beer, thats why we drink it here.
Posted by: Trolling for Allan || 09/11/2004 2:38 Comments || Top||

#7  And it IS Oktober, after all. Out with the old, in with the new...
Posted by: mojo || 09/11/2004 3:19 Comments || Top||

#8  In honor of 9/11 I'll restrain my self.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 09/11/2004 7:36 Comments || Top||

#9  Tell me, how is he shaking the hand of the NEW interim ruler, both of them beaming with good will? What was the cause of that?
Posted by: jules 2 || 09/11/2004 10:11 Comments || Top||

#10  It's always Oktober somewhere.
Posted by: Shipman || 09/11/2004 10:16 Comments || Top||

#11  TGA: “If his party is lucky it will finish third.”

Yes, but not because of Schroeder’s policy toward the US (which is very popular). Only because his relatively minor attempts to reform the Germany economy are so unpopular. (At least that is what this non-German reads.)
Posted by: Anonymous5032 || 09/11/2004 11:08 Comments || Top||

#12  "It does have to be possible to ask critical questions about a decision, or even reject it, without immediately being put under, as it were, a blanket suspicion," Schroeder said

Oh so that's what that was...they were asking critical questions, at the UNSC. Hell then, all is forgiven.
Posted by: Rafael || 09/11/2004 17:20 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
Steyn the Merciless: CBS falls for Kerry campaign's fake memo
HT to Instapundit
A few weeks ago, Thomas Oliphant of the Boston Globe was on PBS' ''Newshour'' explaining why the hundreds of swift boat veterans' allegations against John Kerry's conduct in Vietnam was unworthy of his attention. "The standard of clear and convincing evidence," he said, talking to Swiftvet John O'Neill as if he were a backward fourth-grader, ''is what keeps this story in the tabloids -- because it does not meet basic standards.''

Last week, we got a good idea of what Thomas Oliphant's ''basic standards'' are. Dan Rather and the elderly gentlemen at ''60 Minutes'' were all atwitter because they'd come into possession of some hitherto undiscovered memos relating to whether George W. Bush failed to show up for his physical in the War of 1812. The media had been flogging this dead horse all spring, but these newly ''discovered'' memos had jump-started the old nag just enough to get him on his knees long enough for the media to flog him all over again.

Unfortunately for CBS, Dan Rather's hairdresser sucks up so much of the budget that there was nothing left for any fact-checking, so the ''60 Minutes'' crew rushed on air with a damning National Guard memo conveniently called ''CYA'' that Bush's commanding officer had written to himself 32 years ago. ''This was too hot not to push,'' one producer told the American Spectator. Hundreds of living Swiftvets who've signed affidavits and are prepared to testify on camera -- that's way too cold to push; we'd want to fact-check that one thoroughly, till, say, midway through John Kerry's second term. But a handful of memos by one dead guy slipped to us by a Kerry campaign operative -- that meets ''basic standards'' and we gotta get it out there right away.

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 12:26:36 PM || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  ..This just in: Rather replaced at CBS...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1212338/posts

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski || 09/11/2004 12:38 Comments || Top||

#2  Should be, "What's the font, Kenneth?"
Posted by: Raj || 09/11/2004 12:50 Comments || Top||

#3  Dan Rather and his CBS cohorts were NOT duped. Rather and friends are willing participants in a massive fraud being perpetrated on a majority of the American people. I would have said on "all" American people, except that the LLL will still accept Rather's story even though it has been debunked beyond a reasonable doubt.

Recently someone else ( I forget who) wrote that the "real story" of the 2004 election will be the utter collapse of MSM. I concur most heartily with those sentitments. The blogosphere (sp ?) will crush CBS in this matter. Bank on it. Quite remarkable, don't you think?
Posted by: Mark Z. || 09/11/2004 13:03 Comments || Top||

#4  Well, I guess this sinks any possibility of Kenneth working for The National Enquirer, America's Newspaper of Record. Maybe the NYT will pick him up as a stringer.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 09/11/2004 13:14 Comments || Top||

#5  I wouldn't expect the other alphabets to hesitate to rip an tear on CBS's carcass, either. ABC's on it
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 13:52 Comments || Top||

#6  MZ: Dan Rather and his CBS cohorts were NOT duped. Rather and friends are willing participants in a massive fraud being perpetrated on a majority of the American people.

I have to agree. The media are now little more than liberalism's propaganda wing.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 09/11/2004 14:02 Comments || Top||

#7  Everybody is focusing on Dan Rather.

But as much of a "journalistic icon" as Dan Rather is, I have my doubts whether he himself has the pull needed to get CBS to stake its entire reputation-- and maybe even its operating license?-- on this story.

What about Les Moonves, the head honcho at CBS? Common sense would suggest he oughtta be ripping Dan Rather a brand-new asshole right about now-- but apparently he is not. Is he the one behind this? What are his politics? What are his ethics?
Posted by: Dave D. || 09/11/2004 14:15 Comments || Top||

#8  What are his ethics?

I'm not sure what you mean by this question. The guy works in network news -- it's obvious he has no ethics.
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 09/11/2004 14:50 Comments || Top||

#9  His ethics? He wouldn't steal a red hot stove. (Hat Tip: A. Lincoln.)
Posted by: Matt || 09/11/2004 15:01 Comments || Top||

#10  Les Moonves campaign contributions to 2000
Posted by: ed || 09/11/2004 15:01 Comments || Top||

#11  Steyn lays the smack down. I would dearly love to "A Clockwork Orange" Dan Rather and force him to hear these words over and over again until he understands who he has become and what his ilk has done to journalism as a whole.
Posted by: Chris W. || 09/11/2004 15:10 Comments || Top||

#12  Holy cow, ed; he's donated to practically every scumbag the Donks have got!
Posted by: Dave D. || 09/11/2004 15:15 Comments || Top||

#13  We of the holy council of CBS News declare all those charging fraud are part of the vast right-wing conspiracy. It is our feduciary duty to our stockholders to present forged documents as damaging evidence to try and unseat an un-elected president.

For justice must be achieved at any price. And, those who say that Dan Rather is "breathtakingly close" to forced retirement are nothing but a bunch of evil facists.
Posted by: CBS News || 09/11/2004 16:01 Comments || Top||

#14  We have the babes.
Posted by: Fox News || 09/11/2004 16:19 Comments || Top||

#15  Oh my, he's in rare form:

George W. Bush ought to wake up every morning and thank the Lord the media aren't on his side.

Remember the Hitler Diaries? They turned up in the '80s. Only problem is they weren't by Hitler. But by then various prestige publications had paid a fortune to serialize them. Among them was the Sunday Times of London, owned by Murdoch, who wasn't happy. He called the editor, Frank Giles, into his office, and said, ''Frank, I'm promoting you to editor emeritus.''

''I've always wondered,'' murmured Frank, ''what 'editor emeritus' means.''

''The 'e-' means you've been given the elbow and the '-meritus' means you bloody deserve it,'' said Murdoch.

I have a feeling after November CBS News will be promoting Dan Rather to editor emeritus.
Posted by: mojo || 09/11/2004 16:21 Comments || Top||

#16  Ran Rather - Editor emeritus, or editor rigermortus?
Posted by: BigEd || 09/11/2004 18:26 Comments || Top||

#17  #10 Moonves looks pretty unbaised to me. He didn't donate to Dhimmicrats at the county level.

Ted Kennedy's middle name is Moore? Is he related to that other obese Moore-- Mikey?
Posted by: GK || 09/11/2004 19:34 Comments || Top||

#18  GK - Intersting question. Has anyone seen Ted and Mike together at the same time (and not on video)?
Posted by: CrazyFool || 09/11/2004 20:38 Comments || Top||

#19  Can't happen. They're too big to fit on the same stage (or on the same screen from any reasonable distance).
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 20:52 Comments || Top||

#20  Arrogance goes before the fall - Dan et al will fall a pretty good ways.

Posted by: JP || 09/11/2004 22:10 Comments || Top||

#21  I'll erply to lal hist tomooorrow, or whenevver I stpo drimking hevilay whutevr cums fisrt.
Posted by: anD Rathre || 09/11/2004 22:28 Comments || Top||

#22  The blogosphere (sp ?) will crush CBS in this matter

They are banking you are wrong. It's called "going for broke." I used to be pretty good at that myself, if I don't mind saying so.

Most people are sheep and they control the majority of the information flow. Don't be so sure they can't pull it off.
Posted by: B || 09/12/2004 4:17 Comments || Top||


Rice on Iraqi ties to al-Qaeda
The US administration restated its case on Friday that Iraq had strong links to al-Qaeda following Vice-President Dick Cheney's latest statement that Saddam Hussein's regime had given sanctuary to Osama bin Laden's group. The administration has persisted in saying that there were close links between Iraq and al-Qaeda even though the official investigation into the September 11, 2001 attacks said in its final report that there was "no collaborative operational relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda".

"You don't have to have a collaborative operational control in order to aid terrorists," US National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice told NBC television when questioned about Cheney's remarks. She said that it was a publicly known that Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, who Rice described as "the face of terror in Iraq today" had "operated freely in Baghdad" and probably ordered the assassination of a US government aid advisor in Jordan last year. "We know that there have been long-standing ties and long-standing contacts between al-Qaeda and Iraq. But of course, the way that Saddam Hussein was most dangerous was that he was a completely destabilising force in the Middle East." Rice is a specialist on Russia and when asked about the Beslan school tragedy, she said: "This was just a horrible event and it was one of the most brutal and barbaric events that we have ever seen.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 09/11/2004 2:12:00 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


If Kerry 'had way,' Bush says, Hussein would be in power
Campaigning with his highest-profile Democratic supporter, President Bush yesterday declared that Saddam Hussein would still be in power in Iraq if Democratic candidate John F. Kerry ''had his way."

''When it comes to Iraq, my opponent has had more different positions than all his colleagues in the Senate combined," Bush said at a rally for supporters in Huntington, W.Va., with Senator Zell Miller of Georgia at his side. ''One thing about Senator Kerry's position is clear: If he had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power, and would still be a threat to the security and to the world."

The Kerry campaign disputed that. Last month, Kerry said he would still have voted to hold the Iraqi leader accountable even if he had known that weapon stockpiles wouldn't be found, though he said he would have invaded only with ''a plan to win the peace."
And after Blixie had finished, and after he persuaded the French, Germans and Russians to help, and after he persuaded the Turks to let us go through the north, and after he got a UN vote, ...

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Steve White || 09/11/2004 2:07:19 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Home Front: WoT
WTC to sue Saudi Arabia over 9/11
The agency that owned the World Trade Center on Friday said it will file a lawsuit against Saudi Arabia for damages it suffered on Sept. 11, 2001, noting 84 of its employees were killed in the air attacks that toppled the twin towers. "We also have a responsibility to the millions of people who live and work in the region as well as to our bondholders to pursue every legal avenue to recover the losses we sustained on September 11," the Port Authority said in a statement.

Steve Coleman, a spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, declined to say why the agency sought to hold Saudi Arabia responsible or whether it would also sue other entities. The Port Authority, a bi-state agency which leased New York's trademark twin towers in July 2001 to developer Larry Silverstein, noted it was filing the lawsuit just one day before the three-year statute of limitations runs out. "Our proposed action is in line with similar suits filed by other injured parties," the Port Authority said. Its statement did not say how much money it was seeking. A spokesman for Silverstein declined to comment. Officials at the Saudi Embassy in Washington were not immediately available for comment.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 2:35:24 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Steve Coleman, a spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, declined to say why the agency sought to hold Saudi Arabia responsible or whether it would also sue other entities

"We only sue those who provide funding, members, and aid to those who committed the attacks...oh, and those crappy 'Saudi is America's friend' PR ads too"
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 11:02 Comments || Top||

#2  The equal rule of law can be as devastating a weapon as MOABs and nukes.

I know I don't have to wish them luck with the suit -- our lawyers are as skilled and as practiced as our soldiers. Perhaps the princelings will still own a few chamberpots and a confused expression when this is over.
Posted by: trailing wife || 09/11/2004 17:54 Comments || Top||

#3  If the plaintiffs' lawyers can show that the Saudis aided and abbetted these terrorist acts, through benign neglect, funding, etc, then this will put the Saudis on the defensive and will force them to overhaul or fall (who cares which?). Even if the plaintiffs get not one red cent, it will have shown the world in another way what a moral bankrupt group the Saudi Royals are.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 09/11/2004 23:10 Comments || Top||


Saudi visa screening called inadequate
Rachel L. Swarns - The New York Times
Saturday, September 11, 2004
A counterterrorism program intended to prevent terror suspects in Saudi Arabia from acquiring U.S. visas has been hindered by inadequate financing and training, leaving many homeland security officers in Saudi Arabia unable to speak Arabic and unfamiliar with how to conduct criminal investigations, according to a report by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The report, released Thursday and done by the department's inspector-general, found that nine of the 10 officers assigned to screen visa applications in Saudi Arabia did not speak or read Arabic. The program had no formal budget in the 2004 fiscal year, which ends in three weeks, and is relying on temporary officers because money was not provided to cover the costs of transferring employees to Saudi Arabia, the report said.

Officials at the inspector-general's office said the shortfalls in funding also meant that most of the officers had not received adequate training before they started working at the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh and the consulate in Jidda, and that they did not have cell phones or drivers assigned to them. The Department of Homeland Security plans to expand the counterterrorism program, which was intended to operate in all visa-issuing countries, to five other nations soon. But the inspector-general warned that the program, which was mandated by the Homeland Security Act of 2002, would continue to struggle if its problems were not swiftly addressed. It's imperative that these kinks be worked out in Saudi Arabia and this program be rolled out as soon as possible," said Clark Kent Ervin, the inspector-general, in an interview. "The officers have to be language-proficient," Ervin said. "They need to be versed in the culture and country conditions. They have to be trained in interview techniques and fraud detection. And generally this was not the case with the officers that were sent."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 3:38:06 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Exactly. Wouldn't want the Great Satan to corrupt the holy Saudis with our wicked ways.
Posted by: ed || 09/11/2004 10:16 Comments || Top||

#2  I'm Ok with that
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 10:49 Comments || Top||


Bush Backs Authority for Intel Director
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 02:57 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


New Passport Rules for Visitors from Civilized Countries
From The New York Times
.... By the end of September, tourists from 27 nations, including Britain, Germany, Japan and Australia, will for the first time be photographed and fingerprinted on arrival. And beginning at the end of October, passengers from 22 countries, mostly in Europe, must carry machine-readable passports in order to visit without visas. .... Tourists from Europe and other industrialized countries are not typically required to apply for visas to visit the United States, but they will have to do so if they do not have machine-readable passports by the Oct. 26 deadline. Officials at the Travel Industry Association of America, which represents the nation's largest airlines, hotels, cruise lines and car rental companies, say some people in Spain, Italy, France and Switzerland still lack such passports. ....

The new policy that requires tourists from 27 industrialized nations to be fingerprinted and photographed affects travelers from 22 European countries and Brunei, Singapore, Japan, Australia and New Zealand who can currently travel to the United States for up to 90 days without a visa. Because students and other visitors from those nations who stay for more than three months are required to carry visas, they have already been subjected to these new security measures, which took effect for all visa carriers in January regardless of country of origin. The policy that requires travelers to carry machine-readable passports will now affect 22 of those 27 nations. The remaining five - Andorra, Belgium, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and San Marino - adopted the American standard in 2003.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 09/11/2004 9:01:13 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  well, boo-frickin'-hoo. If they had tighter entry req'ts, didn't allow hook-boy-imams (sorry, Britain) and lowly algerian terrorists in with no controls in movement between friendly and not-so-friendly (that's you, France) countries, we'd be back to the good old days. Get a machine-readable passport! Hell, Syria's probably got a stack of French passports you can get on ebay
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 9:35 Comments || Top||

#2  Hey, they don't like it, they don't have to come here. It's just that simple.
Posted by: B || 09/11/2004 10:29 Comments || Top||

#3  AmEN, Frank.
Posted by: jules 2 || 09/11/2004 10:32 Comments || Top||

#4  I am french and totally understand and accept the screening procedures.
Actually, they make me feel safer.
Just hope i will never be "cavity" searched!!!
Posted by: frenchfregoli || 09/11/2004 12:04 Comments || Top||


9/11 Commission Noticed That US Border Controls Are a Joke
From National Review OnLine, an article by K. Lloyd Billingsley, editorial director of the Pacific Research Institute.
... 9/11 and Terrorist Travel: Staff Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States was released on August 21, a Saturday and the same day the 9/11 Commission disbanded. In a strange disclaimer, executive director Philip Zelikow says the report "does not necessarily reflect" the views of the commissioners. .... 9/11 and Terrorist Travel confirms that government ignorance, incompetence, and arrogance facilitated Islamic terrorists in their quest to murder Americans. ....

All 19 of the hijacker applications were incomplete in some way, with data fields left blank and questions not fully answered. Every application should have been round-filed. Yet U.S. officials approved 22 of the 23 hijacker visa applications. Of the 15 Saudis, four got their visas after the creation of the Visa Express Program in June 2001. Eight other conspirators tried to get visas during the course of the plot. Three succeeded, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11. Mushabib al Hamlan, one of the other two, did not participate. Mohamed al Kahtani, the other, ran into an inspector with Army experience, who thought Kahtani acted like a "hit man" and refused him entry. This unnamed inspector is one of the rare heroes of this report, but readers will get the feeling that many others would have waved Kahtani through.

The 9/11 crew knew how to work the ropes and beat a system so porous it doubtless reinforced their conviction that they operated under divine guidance. They received assistance from three illegal Salvadorans, who helped four 9/11 operatives use fraudulent documentation to obtain Virginia identification documents. That vignette should help dispel the notion that massive illegal immigration carries no negative consequences.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 09/11/2004 12:13:25 AM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The question is, is GWB going to actually DO something about this problem? Or is cheap labor in the form of illegal aliens more important than national security?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 09/11/2004 1:05 Comments || Top||

#2  This is just stupid....
Posted by: Long Hair Republican || 09/11/2004 1:09 Comments || Top||

#3  I believe the answers are "no" and "yes," respectively.

See the links here.

The first link discusses chatter about al Qaeda coming over the border, and another link has an interview with our "border czar." The border czar basically admits that the Bush administration is allowing illegal immigration to happen.
Posted by: The Lonewacko Blog || 09/11/2004 1:12 Comments || Top||

#4  BAR: The question is, is GWB going to actually DO something about this problem? Or is cheap labor in the form of illegal aliens more important than national security?

Lone Wacko is on a rant about how Bush deserves to lose because of his stance on immigration issues. I just don't see that. Would Kerry do better? Is there an illegal immigrant Kerry doesn't want to reward with welfare and Medicare benefits, not to mention the vote? Note also that although Bush got a bump in the polls during the convention, if he makes an issue of illegal immigration, the media will paint him as a racist, and votes will shift in the other direction. Does he really need for that to happen, at a time when the race is so close, and he's susceptible to any changes in the tempo of war in Iraq? Kerry has to be stopped. Whatever Bush's policies on immigration, Kerry's would be worse. And there is no third candidate running for office with any chance of winning who would do anything about illegal immigration, and also fight the war on terror with conviction.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 09/11/2004 1:38 Comments || Top||

#5  My understanding was that the borders were getting so tight that Illegal immigrants and smugglers were attacking border guards in hopes of getting through. I also thought that the Navy was now involved in some way.

Maybe I heard completely wrong...
Posted by: Charles || 09/11/2004 6:19 Comments || Top||

#6  Whatever Bush's policies on immigration, Kerry's would be worse.

I'm not so sure of that ZF. Bush gets pretty much a pass on border control for exactly the reason you propose. Bush's supine policy toward Mexico is so bad that we might be better off on this issue with a Kerry administration that could be attacked publicly and harshly by pro sovereigntists.

Nonetheless, this is not yet an issue so critical that one ought to vote for Kerry because of it. After the next domestic terorist event turns out to have been sourced in Mexico, we may think differently. On the preponderance of the issues Bush should get the vote. But on borders, as on fiscal policy, he should be severly criticized for having done nothing or worse.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 09/11/2004 9:47 Comments || Top||

#7  Neither Bush nor Kerry will propose arresting and deporting illegal immigrants.

The PC media and elites would tar Bush as a racist if he proposed such policy. (Given Bush’s Texas background and his Hispanic sister-in-law, Bush probably favors a soft approach.) There is little hope that an effort led from the top will succeed.

Alternate approaches could work.

Focus on securing the borders. In some places that means fences. In others it means sensors or air surveillance. Back up the detection with rapid response teams to apprehend trespassers. Provide information databases so that field agents can quickly verify identities or match known offenders. Provide legal resources to support the field agents. Homeland Security could do this without triggering screams of “racism”.

Focus on the worst illegal immigrant abuses. Make certain that illegal aliens convicted of crimes in the US are deported after serving their sentences. Actively deport illegals that are gangbangers. The blogosphere could play an active role by highlighting situations where the failure to enforce existing immigration laws is insane.

Build grass roots support in communities that are harmed by illegal immigration.

Spread the word that illegals lower the wages for US workers. Gardeners, hairdressers, painters, construction workers, etc. are making less because of illegal competition.

With sufficient grass roots support make illegal immigration a local and state political issue.
Posted by: Anonymous5032 || 09/11/2004 15:45 Comments || Top||

#8  What we need is a non-profit organization with a rich sugar daddy that attacks both parties for their open-borders stands on immigration. Unfortunately, all the rich sugar daddies are working on behalf of one of the two political parties.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 09/11/2004 16:30 Comments || Top||

#9  San Diego area has few illegals sneaking through, especially compared to the sieve before Operation Gatekeeper. I still would like to see reforms made, but should another attack occur, and they come across from Mexico, the military will be used to shut it down completely and for a looooooong time. Mexico needs to quit using us as a pressure relief valve, and make major reforms at home.
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 16:53 Comments || Top||


International-UN-NGOs
United Nations nuclear chief seeking third term
Posted by: Fred || 09/11/2004 00:44 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "..the director general is available for a further term of office,” code for saying he is a candidate, a diplomat told AFP in reading the text.

Yep, he's a candidate all right. Doesn't mean that he's a good choice; his record pretty much speaks for itself.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 09/11/2004 1:09 Comments || Top||

#2  After the way he has further imperiled our world, el Baradei should be out on a street corner begging with a tin cup. His inability to enforce anything at all ought to be tattooed into his flesh. I doubt he could find a trace of his own @ss in a Turkish prison even if he had a roadmap, flashlight and used both hands, much less any evidence of Iran's nuclear weapons program. If Iran's mullahs ever launch even a single nuclear bomb, el Baradei should be held responsible as an accessory to the fact. That he seeks a third opportunity to continue such an appalling track record of complete and total incompetence is the height of conceit upon his own part.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 1:30 Comments || Top||

#3  Hey there! I'm not doing much these days. Should I send in a resume?
Posted by: Hans Blix || 09/11/2004 1:33 Comments || Top||

#4  Sounds good to me. Just move his office to Busheir.
Posted by: True German Ally || 09/11/2004 1:41 Comments || Top||

#5  "Hey ElBaradei...first, go get a hyphen for your last name; second, You're Fired®!"
Posted by: Donald Trump || 09/11/2004 1:45 Comments || Top||

#6  Sounds like they need term limits at the UN.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 09/11/2004 8:50 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
Southeast Asian hard boyz align with Chechen Killer Korps
MILITANTS in South-east Asia have identified themselves with armed separatists in Chechnya in a development counter-terrorism experts describe as 'chilling'. They say the 200-year struggle in the breakaway Russian republic, the latest chapter of which has raged for 10 years, has captivated disgruntled Muslims here. Amid the chanting of anti-US slogans for America's battle against terrorism and the war in Iraq, bitter condemnation of Israel and mounting local grievances, jihadis are adding a fight for Chechnya in their campaigns and discourse.

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Dan Darling || 09/11/2004 2:03:05 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Any group that declares solidarity with the Chechen butchers should rocket straight to the top of the Christmas list. Regardless of prior activity or other declared intent, any willing alliance with those who could take so much innocent life must regarded as an instant threat of significant magnitude.

I advocate imposing an immediate shoot-to-kill policy on any groups that publicly proclaim solidarity with the Chechen terrorists.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 2:20 Comments || Top||

#2  Malaysia is sheltering Mashkadov's son.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 09/11/2004 11:43 Comments || Top||

#3  From this (cached) Google link:

Last year prime minister Mahathir Mohamad said that Russia and Israel were guilty of state terrorism. "Russia ... is a terrorist state as it has killed thousands of Chechens," he was quoted as saying on January 29 last year when calling for a new definition of terrorism which includes state terrorism. Now panicky Malaysia is forced into a state of denial after reports that the family of Chechen leader Aslan Maskhadov lives in Kuala Lumpur with his son, having established a business or business links in the country. The Russian media, however, could not help linking his son’s business activities with ‘terrorism’, claiming that his profits are used to fund ‘guerrillas’ in Chechnya and hinting that Putin should ask Malaysia to curb his activities.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 09/11/2004 11:46 Comments || Top||

#4  It appears that Mashkadov's son majored in a subject with real practical use - Islamic studies:

The Shaykh then turned to more serious matters. He introduced the son of Chechen President His Excellency Aslan Maskhadov, Anzor, a student in Islamic studies at a Malaysian university. He then introduced the representative of Chechnya, who spoke on the disastrous situation in his country in detail.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 09/11/2004 11:55 Comments || Top||

#5  I wonder if we'll see another Qatar Qrater™ excavated for Maskhadov's son, courtesy of Russia. So convenient too! Just backfill the hole and you've buried the fragments remains.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 11:57 Comments || Top||


Second JI cell poised for Indonesia attack
Militants responsible for a deadly car bomb blast outside Australia's Jakarta embassy have a second group poised for attack, Australia's top policeman said on Saturday as Australians heard a fresh warning to avoid Indonesia. "There is intelligence suggesting that there is a second group active in the area," Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty told Australian Broadcasting Corp.

"Intelligence comes through all the time about threats and possible threats and there's further intelligence in the last 24 to 48 hours of a second group," said Keelty, who flew to Jakarta to investigate the blast. Indonesian police have launched a nationwide hunt for al Qaeda-linked Jemaah Islamiah militants blamed for the suicide car bomb attack that killed nine people and injured 182 outside the Australian embassy on Thursday. Keelty's warning came as Australian government ministers broke off campaigning for an Oct. 9 election to gather in Sydney for a cabinet security committee meeting. Opposition Labor leaders were also meeting to discuss security issues.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Dan Darling || 09/11/2004 1:43:50 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran planning ‘first nuke next year’
Exiled Iranian opposition officials claimed Friday that the Tehran regime plans to have its first nuclear bomb built by the middle of next year. The National Council of Resistance of Iran, speaking ahead of a meeting next week of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to discuss Iran's nuclear capability, said Tehran has allocated some 16 billion dollars to the programme. "The Iranian regime is trying every means to avoid a decision by the IAEA's Board of Governors next week to refer Iran's case to UN Security Council," the group said, citing "accurate information" from opposition inside Iran. Khamenei "has ordered the relevant apparatus of the regime to produce the first nuclear bomb by mid 2005," it added.

Iran is using numerous front companies to buy materials for its secret nuclear weapons programme, a group of Iranian exiles that has reported accurately about Tehran's atomic programme said on Friday. The NCRI listed four such front companies: Rah-e Kar New Industry company, Pishgam Development Industrial Energy, Iran Pars Terash Company and Rah-e Kar-e Sanayea Novin. EU trio: France, Britain and Germany have toughened their stance on Iran's nuclear programme, demanding that Tehran halt all parts of the atomic fuel cycle that can be used to make a bomb, Western diplomats said on Friday. Western diplomats said that unless Iran satisfies the European Union's "big three" and verifiably halts its uranium conversion and enrichment programmes, it would probably be reported to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions. Talks between Iranian officials and the UN nuclear watchdog ahead of Monday's key meeting at the agency's Vienna headquarters had produced no agreement by Friday afternoon.
Posted by: Fred || 09/11/2004 12:44:19 AM || Comments || Link || [9 views] Top|| File under:

#1  By whatever fluke, Israel delays in destroying the Iranian nuclear threat, the question won't be; will they test their first detonation yield above ground or below? But how hard Sharon's shorts hit the ground with the load it's carrying!!
Posted by: smn || 09/11/2004 0:55 Comments || Top||

#2  Mushroom season coming.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 09/11/2004 2:27 Comments || Top||

#3  smn - You certainly have an unhealty fascination with the contents of other people's shorts. I think we should define smn as Skid Mark Nitwit. Now fuck off.
Posted by: .com || 09/11/2004 2:46 Comments || Top||

#4  i tried to find a spot where I could be a suicide bomb for the Isralies an they said no,go figure, if i had volutnterd for for the Paleo I think they woulda agrreed
lol
Posted by: SCpatriot || 09/11/2004 3:24 Comments || Top||

#5  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Boris the Wonder Troll TROLL || 09/11/2004 10:23 Comments || Top||

#6  1. France, Britain and Germany have toughened their stance on Iran’s nuclear programme

2. ...it would probably be reported to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions

BWAAAAAAAHHAaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaa
Multilateralism defined
More groveling from the useless limpdicks
Posted by: Crikey || 09/11/2004 14:20 Comments || Top||

#7  boys, oh boys...
Economic sanctions indeed !!
The mullahs are playing dilly dally games with the Euroshitheads. Bush is trying to get reelected and does not have time to deal with trifles like an Iranian nuke or two (around July 2005)....
I can tell you one thing, I hope we get to them first, but if we don't and someone nukes in Tel Aviv, the rest of the middle east is going to have a lot of glowing new craters soon !

have you read the bible ???

Remember Samson ???

If the western world leaves us alone to face the fucking arabs, dont cry when warheads start flying around...
Believe me we will use nuclear weapons because they were precisely meant to be used in a situation where everybody plays ostrich and we get zapped with a blow that jeopardizes our national survival.
I hope I would never have to face such a situation
but all signs are pointing in this way.
Have a nice day everybody
Posted by: Elder of zion || 09/11/2004 16:13 Comments || Top||

#8  Relax, Elder. Bush can take out those facilities anytime between now and mid-January. It's just politically safer after our November 2 election. Bush is Commander-In-Chief for two and a half months after the election, even if John Fraud Kerry wins. I expect to see mushroom clouds over Iranian nuclear and military facilities well before the middle of next year. I just hope some of the "clerics" are visiting them at the time. And maybe a few mushroom clouds will make North Korea willing to bargain. Beats nuking Kimmie so close to Seoul.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 17:11 Comments || Top||

#9  I can tell you one thing, I hope we get to them first, but if we don't and someone nukes in Tel Aviv, the rest of the middle east is going to have a lot of glowing new craters soon !

Which is as it should be, although perish the thought that such a thing might happen.

Europe's ostrich-like stance is simply indefensible. Iran represents a clear and present danger that extends well beyond Israel. Any American dithering over how it is hypocritical to deny Iran nuclear weapons while Israel possesses them is a steaming heap of 100% pure USDA inspected ranch style horseshit.

Israel does not have the declared goal of annihilating any other Middle Eastern nation. Iran has repeatedly avowed their intent to destroy Israel. This single and staggeringly obvious difference is what justifies bombing the living crap out of every last nuclear facility within Iran's borders.

Europe routinely has financed Israel's enemies, and richly deserves the danger it has bred up. America's inability to clearly delineate and act upon Iran's role in "the axis of evil" is morally reprehensible. I'm sick to death of Iran's mullahs being swaddled in the robes of ostensible religious significance when they are nothing more than a bunch of power-mad thugs out to eliminate a tiny nation which has consistently disgraced them for their lack of freedom, functional industry or military prowess.

The mullahs seek to displace all blame for their own shortcomings upon Israel at the risk of immolating the entire Middle East region. Should Israel take even a single nuclear hit, I would not blame them for then reducing all other Arab nations to glowing rubble. Such would be the just and fitting reward for centuries of Islamic intransigence and genocide. Pakistan, Yemen, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Lybia and the Palestinian Territories would be reduced to smoking ruins, all because they too cheered Iran on in their insane vendetta against Israel.

How none of these other Arab countries realize the enormous collective risk they are taking by not applying pressure upon Iran to curb their nuclear obsession goes beyond me. If a devastated Israel does lash out and annihilate all of these despicable anti-Semetic tyrants, I shall not shed a single tear save for the Jews.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 17:39 Comments || Top||

#10  #8 I expect to see mushroom clouds over Iranian nuclear and military facilities well before the middle of next year.

Tom, using nuclear weapons to destroy Iran's weapons program would be absurd. Such an imprudent act would automatically invite a terorist nuclear attack against the United States. We can accomplish the exact same ends using conventional weaponry. I'd toss in a few daisy cutters to suck the lungs out of every facility's entire staff, but that's just me. The first strike use of nuclear weapons against Iran would be like hunting rabbits with a Howitzer.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 17:48 Comments || Top||

#11  Zenster, I disagree. There are large facilities that need to be wiped out beyond all recognition - suddenly, simultaneously, and without warning. Iran must lose the ability for military retaliation (e.g., attacks on oil fields in neighboring countries and such). And when we're done, the whole world needs to be very afraid of us.

What makes you think that a conventional attack wouldn't invite a terrorist nuclear attack? If the terrorists have a nuke, they're going to use it the first chance they get, no matter what we do from this point forward. They'd be stupid not to use it right away and risk losing it. And the Iranian leadership has pretty much already said that it would nuke us if it could.

Our ace in the hole is that we have plenty of nukes to spare. They won't respect us. Let them fear us. Motivate the Middle Eastern totalitarians to crack down on their islamofanatics.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 20:22 Comments || Top||

#12  We have already fought one nuclear war. If the Iranians and NK's want to play that game so be it.

Every year we pay billions for nuclear deterence - missilies, subs... It may be time to put the deterence to work. Better over there than here.
Posted by: JP || 09/11/2004 22:04 Comments || Top||

#13  As far as I know Arabs have had a lot of fighting with Israel but never Iran. Why are the fucking mullahs there getting nukes. Hopefully if we can persuade one of the Arabs to attack Iran they will use it against them
Kill two birds with one stone
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 22:22 Comments || Top||

#14  Taking out the Bushehr reactor and related facilities will take out their potential plutonium production capabilities. So unless they get some plut from someone else, they will not be able to arm their missiles with Nukes.

The toughter nut to crack is how to take out the U235 concentration facilities, which are deep underground. Taking out their electrical generation capability wil cripple them but not stop them. Attacking underground processing plants may require nukes or boots on the ground.

Same thing goes for the Norks. Everything there is deep underground.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 09/11/2004 23:28 Comments || Top||

#15  Hear Hear smn!
BTW is The Mossad following you with little bitty air planes. For one I am getting damn tired of those hundreds of little .49 engines screaming at me all the time.
Posted by: Boris the Wonder Troll || 09/11/2004 10:23 Comments || Top||


Terror Networks
The battle for the soul of Islam
If there remain any doubts about what 9/11 means on this, its third anniversary, they should be quelled by the horror perpetrated in Beslan. Here children, the most vulnerable in society, totally innocent of any responsibility for history's wrongs, were slaughtered by killers in the service of an ideology, Islamism, that has perverted a noble faith into a cult of death. The meaning of 9/11 in its Chechen variation was spelled out by the killers of Beslan's children.

Here is how the Washington Post described that motivation on Sept. 7, quoting from an apperance on Russian state television by one of the captured Chechen terrorists:
"'We gathered in the forest and the Colonel -- it's his nickname -- and they said we must seize the school in Beslan,' said the man, who had short, dark hair and no beard. He said the orders came from (Shamil) Basayev and another Chechen commander, Aslan Maskhadov, and that his group included Arabs and Uzbeks as well as Chechens and people of other nationalities. When we asked the Colonel why we must do it, he said, 'Because we need to start war in the entire territory of the North Caucasus.'"
The children of Beslan -- like the victims of 9/11 in New York, Washington, Pennsylvania and casualties in other cities (Bali, Jakarta, Karachi, Istanbul, Casablanca, Madrid, Jerusalem, Moscow) -- were merely quarry in a larger design of Islamists, according to their ideology, to precipitate a war between dar al-Islam (abode of Muslims) and dar al-harb (abode of infidels). Islamists are brazen about their goals. They seek power irrespective of cost, like their totalitarian counterparts of the previous century, to transform existing Muslim countries into Islamist societies.

How would such an Islamist society appear in our time? The Taliban regime in Afghanistan provided the world with a glimpse of an Islamist utopia. The Islamist agenda, now a global monstrosity, cannot be traced to some root cause located in poverty or some wrongs done in history; nor can Islamists be appeased through negotiation. Islamist terrorism is a calculated means to achieve absolutist ends. What is least understood and hotly denied by many Muslims, is that Islamism was embedded in Muslim history from its beginning. While Muslim civilization flourished and remained healthy, Islamism, as an absolutist politics of violence, was contained. Once decadence extinguished the creative dynamism of Muslim societies and internal rot laid waste to them, Islamism in its various guises -- Wahhabi sectarianism in Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and beyond, Jamaat-i-Islami in Pakistan, Khomeinism in Iran, Jemaah Islamiya in Indonesia -- became the most visible face of Islam.

In contemporary times, during a past half-century financed in large part by rising oil revenues, Islamists steered the politics of the Muslim world and of many Muslims immigrating to the West. Osama bin Laden and his followers are merely Islamists in a bloody-minded hurry relative to Wahhabi ideologues, impatiently pummelling history to move in the direction of their desired goal. This explains why the West does not often hear from so-called "moderate" Muslims contending with Islamists for the soul of Islam. There is no organized body of moderate Muslims. Islamists have intimidated, coerced and silenced Muslims who might otherwise have organized opposition to Islamism.

Many individual Muslims occasionally break through this silence, often risking their personal safety and security, and bravely contend with the Islamists to expose their hate-filled politics. But individual Muslims operating without any organized public support in their own communities, despised for breaking the tribal code of honour-shame and frequently ostracized by fellow Muslims, cannot be a substitute for a political party or movement, which is required to isolate Islamists, reclaim Islam and revive the comatose civilizational impulse that flows throughout Muslim history. Such a turnaround might still be possible. It will only happen, however, when Muslims in sufficiently large numbers repudiate Islamism for what it is -- an ideology of killers. The first task, along with making the world safe for children everywhere, is eliminating Islamists by winning the war on terror.
Posted by: Fred || 09/11/2004 8:11:36 PM || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It will only happen, however, when Muslims in sufficiently large numbers repudiate Islamism for what it is ...

This is just one way of doing it. If moderate Muslims refuse to participate in the salvaging of their faith, others will halt the inroads that Islamists are making by killing them. What moderate Muslims need to remember is that outsiders, bereft of more finely tuned discriminative and insightful powers that Islam's faithful might have, will probably be a lot less sensitive about distinguishing between those who truly are fanatical and other Muslims who are merely reticent to criticize those same fanatics. Can you say c o l l a t e r a l - c a s u a l t i e s ? Very good, I knew you could.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 20:39 Comments || Top||

#2  Well, Zenster, that pretty much supports my suggestion to nuke Iranian nuclear and military facilities to make the Islamic world at least fear us if they won't respect us.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 20:47 Comments || Top||

#3  I just wannah say Muslims clean your bathroom because it is stinking the neighborhood or we will demolish your house. I mean who has the fucking time to decide that this is a good Indian and this is a bad Indian. The only Good indian is a dead one.
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 20:49 Comments || Top||

#4  Well Tom,
The guys really needing a lesson in fear and respect are the Saudis they thing they have the whole world fooled.
We should make an example out of them.
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 20:54 Comments || Top||

#5  Iran is our greatest current threat. The Saudi royals will think twice about letting their fanatics mess with us - once they see a mushroom cloud or two off to their northeast. Right now they are only cracking down gingerly to avoid upsetting their internal status quo. When they truly have to choose between the rich, pampered, oil-financed life and the Taliban-style life, I'm betting they'll opt for oil.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 21:14 Comments || Top||

#6  Tom, I fully comprehend the import of providing the Iranians, and the entire Middle East in general, with the sort of mindless violence object lesson they have come to love and respect.

I trust that you completely understand why I oppose first use of nuclear weapons. Once the atomic genie is out of the bottle, any terrorist group on earth will feel as though they have been given license to counterattack America with nuclear weapons as well.

I know that glassing and Windexing Iran would provide a lasting impression for other Arab rogue nations and terrorism sponsors. Fortunately, we have conventional weapons that can achieve the exact same ends without making the conflict no-holds-barred.

What I have advocated here at Rantburg is a retaliation-in-kind protocol. Whereby, if America is attacked with chemical weapons, we then dust Medina or Mecca with the same toxin. Bio-attacks = same spores or virus, right before the haj. Nuclear attack = glass Medina then Mecca next. I feel this would be much more productive than rushing the gate with a needless nuclear attack upon Iran as opposed to a conventional one.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 21:33 Comments || Top||

#7  "...without making the conflict no-holds-barred"??? No terrorist with a nuke is going to hesitate to use it. And any delay would risk losing it before using it. Terrorists have no "no first use" doctrine. Take your gloves off.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 21:37 Comments || Top||

#8  In the event of a suitcase nuclear attack on the USA I've been given to understand we may never know the source of the attack. Perhaps it might be wise to discreetly advise each Muslim country on earth that should such an attack take place on US soil they should consider themselves ripe for retaliation. At the very least it would give said countries an incentive to thrwart such an attack if they had prior knowledge of the plan to hit the USA. I for one am not convinced that NO Muslim gov't on earth had prior knowledge of 9-11.
Posted by: Mark Z. || 09/11/2004 21:50 Comments || Top||

#9  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: UFO TROLL || 09/11/2004 21:52 Comments || Top||

#10  Tom, without wishing to be unnecessarily pedantic, are you aware of the "retaliation in kind" doctrine? I am concerned that you do not fully appreciate what America "taking the gloves off" would entail in terms of inviting the very worst sort of terrorist attacks.

Retaliation in kind is a sagacious policy implemented by the United States armed forces for some half a century. Our military is committed to avoiding first use of NBC (Nuclear, Biological or Chemical) weapons without having had them deployed against us already.

This policy is in place for all the right reasons and I concur with its basic tenets. Be reminded that if America is attacked with any portion of the NBC arsenal, we have the option of going nuclear in response.

#8 In the event of a suitcase nuclear attack on the USA I've been given to understand we may never know the source of the attack.

This is a very mistaken notion, Mark Z. Through a sophisticated isotopic identification method known as "signature analysis," scientists are able to identify a majority of fissile material, right down to the particular reactor the enriched transuranics came from. Any given reactor imparts a unique ratio of such exotic elements as Americium, Francium et al to the weapons grade material it breeds. Through nonproliferation pacts, a large majority of reactors have been profiled.

Significantly, Pakistan, North Korea and (presumably) Iran refuse to submit samples of highly enriched weapons grade material for signature analysis. All this means is that if America is hit with a nuclear device which cannot be traced back to a unique source, we may well be obliged to destroy all of the noncompliant states mentioned above. No big shakes with the arsenal remaining in our silos.

The technology to manufacture a "suitcase" atomic bomb is not trivial. Compact form factor lensing and fail-safe mechanisms are more than a little difficult to fabricate reliably. The close proximity of the non-critical assembly to other components in the suitcase package causes them to undergo accelerated deterioration. The radioactive material emits sufficient heat to thermally cycle ancillary circuitry and promote corrosion of the mechanical parts as well. Suitcase devices have a projected shelf life of only a few years if not serviced on a regular schedule by skilled maintenance personnel.

I'm also pretty confident that diplomatic back-channels have already been used to make clear how rogue nations will appear at the top of our Christmas list in the even of a terrorist nuclear attack.

As mentioned in my preceding post, I feel we should also have a credible deterrent in place to discourage all Islamic states from sponsoring international terrorism. A specific calculated price should exist for a given transgression according to a graduated scale of response.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 23:24 Comments || Top||

#11  A couple of things I'll comment on from the article and from some of the response.

First, Islam has NEVER been a nobel faith. The way they view women alone screws that deal.

Second, as far as not provoking any "NBC" type attacks I agree we should show some restraint, but I also have to believe that the freaking second these monsters have the ability combined with the opportunity to unleash something hellish in one or more of our cities THEY WILL! Of that I have absolutely no doubt!

Just my 2 cents.
Posted by: RJB in JC MO || 09/11/2004 23:54 Comments || Top||

#12  Just a couple of hints about who is at the throat of Islam.

"We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own." - Maurice Samuel 'You Gentiles', P. l55 Harcourt, Brace. 1924

"You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war, but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone." - Marclis Eli Ravage, Century Magazine February, 1926
Posted by: UFO || 09/11/2004 20:57 Comments || Top||

#13  Just a couple of hints about who is at the throat of Islam.

"We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own." - Maurice Samuel 'You Gentiles', P. l55 Harcourt, Brace. 1924

"You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war, but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone." - Marclis Eli Ravage, Century Magazine February, 1926
Posted by: UFO || 09/11/2004 20:57 Comments || Top||

#14  'Neoconservatives' are spilling American blood

See documentary video clip at URL below.

www.A D LUSA.com [censored link, delete spaces]
Posted by: UFO || 09/11/2004 21:52 Comments || Top||


Arabs and Muslims see US victory, own defeat on 9/11 anniversary
"I fear that we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve".
Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto

The Sept. 11 attacks gave Washington a pretext for American expansionism around the world and were a defeat for Arabs, according to Arab and Muslim commentators on the third anniversary of the suicide hijackings. "The events of Sept. 11 were a minor crisis that the Americans have turned into a global crisis," according to conservative Iranian Mahmoud Mohammadi, vice president of the parliamentary foreign affairs committee.
We're sensitive that way. Iran can bump off 3000 of its people at a shot and nobody blinks an eye. In the U.S. it's not a common occurrence.
State television here accused the United States of using the attacks, in which nearly 3,000 people were killed, as a pretext to wage war on others. "After Sept. 11, the White House declared a state of war (and), under the pretext of cleansing the world of terrorism, they attacked Afghanistan and then Iraq. They threatened other countries under the pretext that they were supporting terrorism and making weapons of mass destruction," its commentary said.
Seems to me that a stateless army, sheltered by Afghanistan, declared war on us. That was in 1998. We did nothing until we were attacked.
In Cairo, editorials said the Arabs in general were paying for the attacks, while Egypt's own place on the world stage had been diminished. And Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit told a conference on regional security: "I can say that the greatest challenge threatening our security is the world's narrow vision in dealing with our region. This vision is the real threat facing our region, and recognising it is the real challenge facing our partners."
There is no slight possibility, anywhere, anyhow, that the Arab world has a peculiarly narrow vision of the world and of its place in the world. Nope. None.

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: TS(vice girl) || 09/11/2004 7:11:30 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "I can say that the greatest challenge threatening our security is the world’s narrow vision in dealing with our region. "This vision is the real threat facing our region, and recognising it is the real challenge facing our partners."

"[T]he world's narrow vision." Yeah, riiiiiight. And Wahhabism is sheer broad-mindedness by comparison, right Ahmed? And the globe's narrow "vision is the real threat facing our region." Sure thing, Ahmed, whatever way you like it, but until you cure yourself of looking through your telescope the wrong way this "narrow vision" problem is all your own.

The only genuine threat to your "region" is a failure to rein in your fanatics that allows them to go ahead and do something so obscenely horrific we just hit the Big Red Button™ and have done with it for once and all. I'd be much more concerned about that right now than anyone else's eyesight correction.

It added that, after Iraq, "Sudan, Lebanon, Syria and Iran are on the list" of countries that should be worried.

At least the article got one thing right.

Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 20:00 Comments || Top||

#2  …Afghanistan and then Iraq. They threatened other countries under the pretext that they were supporting terrorism and making weapons of mass destruction,"…
How perseptive, but they are not mere pretexts they were warnings. Warnings which in a typical 4th century world outlook you muslims didnt not heed. Now it's your ass on the line which way do you go? As usual you got the answer incorrect. Your satanic death cult can't avail you. I hear the gnashing of your teeth and can see the cold breath of death coming down on your backs. Why do you people continue to get the answers to the question of life wrong. Soon it will be to late. Don't set fires which will consume yourself only to be put out before it ever harms anyone else.

Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom || 09/11/2004 20:22 Comments || Top||

#3  "The liberal newspaper Nahdat Misr daily ran a headline: "Arabs are the only people in the world paying the bill for Sept. 11.' "

Wow. Does Congress know this? Can we get a rebate? Maybe that is why Kerry voted against the 87b? He had a coffee klatsch with Nahdat Misr because, you know, the Arab world tells him things they won't tell Bush, he's so tight with them. They cleared it all up-it's their sons who are sacrificing in the WoT.

Add this newspaper's editorial staff to the list of other ingrates in the world. America sheds blood and empties its pockets to better the world, and the morons at Nahdat Misr don't realize how lucky they are.
Posted by: jules 2 || 09/11/2004 21:33 Comments || Top||

#4  "The liberal newspaper Nahdat Misr daily ran a headline: "Arabs are the only people in the world paying the bill for Sept. 11."

Every family of the victims of Sept 11 pays dearly every day for Sept 11.

Every person who has to wait interminably at airport security check points pays the bill for Sept 11.

Every taxpayer pays.

Every westerner pays.

I knew the recent spate of articles in which muslims seem to be starting to do some self reflection was too good to be true. This is the (very predictable) backlash -- the establishment trying to maintain the status quo.


Posted by: PlanetDan || 09/11/2004 22:43 Comments || Top||

#5  I am curious, How do the fucking Arabs pay, by paying for the sweets to celebrate? I mean if they wannah pay accept responsibility AT LEAST. It is just a cycle of blaming the victim and making the perpetrator look like a victim. Why are they not disbanding the madresas and having a secular government in Saudia.
Posted by: anon || 09/11/2004 22:49 Comments || Top||

#6  "I can say that the greatest challenge threatening our security is the world’s narrow vision in dealing with our region.

It's more accurately called "being in the crosshairs"...
Posted by: Pappy || 09/11/2004 23:49 Comments || Top||


The Intriguing Silence of Osama
From South Asia Analysis Group, an article by B.Raman, Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai, and Distinguished Fellow and Convenor, Observer Research Foundation.
Since the terrorist strikes of September 11, 2001, in the USA, at least ten taped messages attributed to Osama bin Laden have been telecast by the Al Jazeera TV channel. These were disseminated on November 3, 2001, December 28, 2001,September 10, 2002, October 6, 2002, November 12, 2002, February 11, 2003, September 10, 2003, October 18, 2003, January 4, 2004, and April 15, 2004. Thus, there were two messages in 2001, three each in 2002 and 2003 and two so far this year. In 2002 as well as 2003, there were two messages disseminated on September 10,coinciding with the first and second anniversaries of the terrorist strikes in the US.

In the message attributed to him to mark the first anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist strikes, he said:" When you talk about the New York and Washington raids, you talk about those men who changed the course of history and cleansed the chapters of the nation from the filth of the treasonous rulers."

In the message to mark the second anniversary, he said: "The confusion caused to the enemy was sufficient to make people wake up from their slumber and rise for jihad for the sake of God. I had the honour of knowing these men. One is honoured by knowing such men."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 09/11/2004 4:04:40 PM || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It's called "the silence of the grave".
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 09/11/2004 17:32 Comments || Top||

#2  No he has finally succumbed to AIDS. Got from those pretty little boys he and the Taliban were so fond of passing around.

Allan be praised.
Posted by: Trolling for Allan || 09/11/2004 17:40 Comments || Top||

#3  Why doesnt some one raid Aljazera offices. They are acting as the spokesperson for this scumbag openly.
Posted by: anon || 09/11/2004 18:32 Comments || Top||

#4  I still think he's a stain on a cave wall in Tora Bora. Yes we have audio tapes supposedly of him. But he has not appeared in a video that is what leads me to the reasoning. As far as raiding al-jisms offices I think it would be great. Of course the amount of spittle flying would be enough to put the fires out. And hit the Suadi princes funding these assholes.
Posted by: Cheaderhead || 09/11/2004 18:50 Comments || Top||

#5  TFA...hey, bud. it's allan...no capital letter. a capital letter implies some sort of deity.

allan ahkbar (that's arabic for "allan's buying a round of JD for the bar)!!!!
Posted by: anymouse || 09/11/2004 19:30 Comments || Top||

#6  He's dead, Jim.
Posted by: doc || 09/11/2004 19:31 Comments || Top||

#7  "Dead men tell no tales."
Posted by: Zarathustra || 09/11/2004 19:36 Comments || Top||

#8  No anymouse isn't. Allan is a strange vegan who rides around Bakersfield California on his bike and collects SSI for a living. No deity there. Bakersferield is well know as the bleeding rectum of the world. I should know I was born and raised there.

Allan be praised
Posted by: Trolling for Allan || 09/11/2004 19:44 Comments || Top||

#9  LOL, doc!!!
Posted by: Rafael || 09/11/2004 19:51 Comments || Top||

#10  (Allah Akbar).. Means God is the greatest, Even Christian Arab call god so (Allah), I repeat that What (Bin Laden) did has nothing to do with Islam and its true instructions, Please! Don't anybody try to insult any religious icons from any religion cos it`s against american values and god is yours and mine! Let's prey that Allah shall help destroys all enemies of freedom and humanity.
Amin!
Posted by: Simply Muslim || 09/11/2004 20:12 Comments || Top||

#11  Hahahaha Dr. Geobels will be proud of you. I just wish to say one thing, every muslim is not a terrorist but every terrorist is a muslim, so one must lead to other.
Posted by: anon || 09/11/2004 20:24 Comments || Top||

#12  "Don't anybody try to insult any religious icons from any religion cos it`s against american values" -- Simply Muslim

I think not. We have freedom of religion and freedom of speech. I am free to speak my opinion of any religion or icon, just not free to threaten or terrorize or incite violence on the subject. And that restriction does not apply in regard to foreign enemies on the United States.

Simply Muslim, I suggest that you and your associates find another name for your religion of peace -- the terrorists have hijacked the name you are using.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 21:31 Comments || Top||

#13  Well Mr.Muslim,given what you have just said.Why don't you give us the names and addresses of some of these people who are"all enemies of freedom and humanity"?

Put-up or shut-up,Babba.
Posted by: Raptor || 09/11/2004 22:00 Comments || Top||

#14  Osama is just another cave drawing in toro Bora. I never believed he made it out of there alive.
Posted by: Douglas De Bono || 09/11/2004 23:25 Comments || Top||

#15  Let's prey that Allah shall help destroys all enemies of freedom and humanity.


We are 'preying'; G-d helps those who help themselves.
Posted by: Pappy || 09/11/2004 23:57 Comments || Top||


The Islamic Verdict On Killing Women and Children
From Jihad Unspun, an article by Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
.... Killing children never was and nor will be part of Islam. It is considered a great aggression and elsewhere in the Qur'an .... Having said this, one must distinguish between killing women and children and the Mujahideen fighting the Kuffar enemies wherever they find them, whether that be in a school or hospital or elsewhere.

.... the Messenger Muhammad (saw) rejected that women and children be killed and he forbade it categorically and unequivocally. ... the Messenger Muhammad (saw) said, when he was preparing an army for Jihad: 'Fight for the sake of Allah (SWT), in the way of Allah (SWT) and fight the kaafir who do not believe in Allah (SWT) and do not steal the booty and do not betray the Covenant of Security and do not mutilate and do not kill the mothers or any children'. ...

.... I came to visit the Messenger Muhammad (saw) when we went on an expedition and we killed a lot of people and even some Zuriyyah (i.e. women and children) had been killed. When it reached Rasoul Allah (the Messenger of Allah (SWT)), he said: 'Dare those people who exceed the limit on killing until they kill women and children' to which one man said 'They are nothing but the children of the Mushrikeen (i.e. idolaters)' and the Messenger Muhammad (saw) said: 'The best among you were sons of Mushriks' then the Messenger Muhammad (saw) said (three times thus confirming its decisiveness) 'Don't kill the children!' .... wherever Rasoul Allah (saw) sent an army he would say 'Do not kill women and do not kill children — go in the way of Allah (SWT)' and this is summarises the aforementioned quotes.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 09/11/2004 9:32:03 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  So, where are the death fatwas against bin Laden, the Madrid bombers and the Chechen butchers? According to what appears above, each of them has desecrated the sacred name of Islam. Where is all the outrage, the seething, the Dire Revenge™ against those who usurp the Religion of Peace?
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 9:54 Comments || Top||

#2  "Having said this, one must distinguish between killing women and children and the Mujahideen fighting the Kuffar enemies wherever they find them, whether that be in a school or hospital or elsewhere."

"Infidel Zurriyah? Easiest targets - they don't fight back" - Islamic Heroes™

Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 10:49 Comments || Top||

#3  Well the Great Islamic Khalifa Yazeed killed the 6 month old son of Hussain Bin Ali Bin Abitalib. Killing children is a most cherished tradition of the Muslims.
I never see any one acknowledge the very roots of terror in muslim tradition.
Posted by: Anonymous6396 || 09/11/2004 15:25 Comments || Top||

#4  Maybe Mohamed was "Rasoul Allah"
but Bin Laden is certainly "Ass-Ul-Allah"
Posted by: Elder of zion || 09/11/2004 16:26 Comments || Top||

#5  ...And the punishment for murdering (killing to the sons of mohammad) women and children?
Just as I thought, Nothing, nada, nichts, goose egg.
" Do not kill women and children lest it bring bad PR to the GeeHodd". Do not do this or else you will get a stern warning from You know who...
Posted by: an dalusian dog || 09/11/2004 23:30 Comments || Top||

#6  Actually reward not punishment. The military commander who did it Omer Bin Saad was made the governer of Eastern part of Iran by Yazeed. Another funny thing is that a character called Khalid Bin Waleed raped a muslim woman during one of his excursions and was not even questioned by Khaleefa Abu Bakar. Precedents lot of them. It is a culture of barbarism
Posted by: anon || 09/11/2004 23:39 Comments || Top||

#7  The only reason Mohamed said not to kill the woman and children was so he could have first dibs on the women and children to rape and sell as slaves.

Dead women and children wouldn't give him the same 'satisfaction' or the wealth as the living ones.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 09/12/2004 0:14 Comments || Top||


Al-Qaeda planning chemical bomb attacks
A U.S. government surveillance tape obtained by ABC News shows suspected al Qaeda operatives delivering a chemical bomb to the U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, this past March. The attempted bombing — which was thwarted by an alert security guard — would have been the terror network's first chemical bomb attack.

A U.S. government surveillance tape obtained by ABC News shows suspected al Qaeda operatives delivering a chemical bomb to the U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, this past March. The attempted bombing — which was thwarted by an alert security guard — would have been the terror network's first chemical bomb attack.

In early April, authorities in Jordan disrupted what would have been an even bigger chemical attack. Officials said that terrorists linked to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi managed to smuggle three cars — packed with explosives, a chemical bomb and poisonous gas — into the capital city, Amman. Authorities in Jordan estimate that 80,000 people would have been killed if the chemical bomb had gone off at its intended targets — the Jordanian intelligence headquarters, the U.S. Embassy in Amman, and the Jordanian prime minister's office.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Dan Darling || 09/11/2004 1:39:00 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Bring it on, thats all I have to say, I am tired of the same old rhetoric, if U as a people can "Bring It" then
then lets "See IT" No More will i take a side, as a bystander
You, people,(And mean that as a curtesty) have asked for the final solution, :::as a Southern American who had relatives that that were killed for "the greater good" I.E. dragged out of thier house, and had it torched,while they died of "Natural Causes", will Give Our troops everyything they need to stop the surge of Islamic-anti-americnism that I have to deal with, Breslan, will not be forgotten,,,I hope You Hear That........../...............................

To the American and Coalition forces that have given us the utmost that one can give " Salute You"
Posted by: SCpatriot || 09/11/2004 3:05 Comments || Top||

#2  Bring it on, thats all I have to say, I am tired of the same old rhetoric, if U as a people can "Bring It" then
then lets "See IT" No More will i take a side, as a bystander
You, people,(And mean that as a curtesty) have asked for the final solution, :::as a Southern American who had relatives that that were killed for "the greater good" I.E. dragged out of thier house, and had it torched,while they died of "Natural Causes", will Give Our troops everyything they need to stop the surge of Islamic-anti-americnism that I have to deal with, Breslan, will not be forgotten,,,I hope You Hear That........../...............................

To the American and Coalition forces that have given us the utmost that one can give " Salute You"
Posted by: SCpatriot || 09/11/2004 3:11 Comments || Top||

#3  sorry for the double post but i mean what i say
Posted by: SCpatriot || 09/11/2004 3:16 Comments || Top||

#4  Is there an echo in here ?
Is there an echo in here ?
Posted by: Crikey || 09/11/2004 14:21 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Why I love Nascar: Rumsfeld led the pledge of allegiance at Richmond
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 19:39 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  and, of course, he said "under God"
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 19:40 Comments || Top||

#2  Is it considered bad form to spit tobacco juice in between reciting lines of the Pledge if under the auspices of a NASCAR event?
Posted by: Chris W. || 09/11/2004 22:55 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Another Mullah Harps his tune
US manipulated 9/11 tragedy as pretext for global invasions
Senator Professor Ghafoor Ahmed, central leader of the MMA, termed the September 11 incident a pre-planned drama staged by the United States itself to manipulate an excuse for invading Muslim countries. He accused Israel and its Intelligence agency, the Mossad, of being involved in the twin towers incident in New York. He was addressing a protest demonstration held at the Empress Market on Saturday. The countrywide protest call was given by the MMA to mark the third anniversary of the twin towers incident as a protest day. The demonstration was held in connection with the continued intervention, aggression and invasion by the US in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine and what they referred to as the unnecessary interference in Pakistan's internal affairs.

The demonstrators carrying placards and banners inscribed with slogans like, "War against terrorism, or blood for oil?" and "Twin Towers blast a drama", said that it was the US which was a global terrorist, not Islam. However, the venue chosen for the protest itself is a place which is terribly crowded with all kinds of traffic going helter-skelter and the already narrow roads and lanes constricted further by purveyors of all kinds of eatables and other items who have encroached upon the thoroughfares. This deprived the occasion of its exclusivity.

Condemning attack on Wana, he said government of Pakistan had crossed the limits of genocide at the behest of US for which the nation will never ever forgive the rulers, he said Innocent women and children were attacked. These tribal people, he said, had sacrificed their lives for the sake of the country. He said they are being punished for their loyalty. The army was targeting these innocent people who have defended the boundaries of Pakistan. The patriotic people of tribal areas had always sacrificed their lives for the sake and integrity of Pakistan, he said.

Taking a swipe at General Musharaf, he said that the general was constantly announcing that he would not doff his uniform till 2007 and would continue to hold both the offices. However, he said, time would come when he would have to part with both the uniform and the office of the president when he no longer is in power after 2010.

Others who spoke on the occasion included Moulana Abdul Karim Abid, Hafiz Muhammed Taqi, Dr Mairaj-ul-Huda Siddiqui, Muhammed Aslam Ghori, Shabbir Abu Talib, Shaikh Rafiq Ahmed. Member, National Assembly, Muhammad Hussain Mehnti, said the September 11 incident had sent a message to the entire Muslim Ummah to stand against Zionist and Imperialist forces
Posted by: anon || 09/11/2004 7:10:23 PM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  A JDAM should have been on the way for this gathering, would have bagged many birds.
Posted by: anon || 09/11/2004 20:05 Comments || Top||

#2  Man these motherfuckers are worse than Nazis. And even worse is the fact that the Student wing of Jamat Islami holds its programs here in USA as well. Any doubts visit their website.
http://www.jamiat.org.pk/
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 21:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Is there some sort of mass hallucigenic, or stupid pill these people take to worship allan? It's twits like "senator professor" (whetever the hell that means) leading these Satan-worshipers that lets me know the cult is rotten to core.
Posted by: anymouse || 09/11/2004 22:27 Comments || Top||


Pakistan & Saudia to "Fight" terror jointly (why dont I believe it)
Saudi Ambassador Ali Awadh Asseri said here on Friday that the leadership of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are absolutely determined to eliminate terrorism and in this regard their security agencies and interior ministries are working in close cooperation. Ambassador Asseri said this at a special news briefing on the recent visit of Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz to Saudi Arabia. Referring to prime minister's meetings with the Saudi leadership, he said: "The two leadership showed absolute determination to continue cooperating to eliminate the curse of terrorism from the two countries. They reiterated their resolve to do everything possible to ensure that the germs of terrorism are uprooted without any loss of time." When asked to specify the mechanism for counter-terrorism cooperation, the Saudi ambassador said: "Our security agencies and interior ministries are working very closely."

He side stepped a question regarding exchange of intelligence between the two countries but said as a consequence of the Prime Minister's visit the cooperation would increase. Asked if the Saudi Kingdom would extend financial assistance to Pakistan to fight terrorism, ambassador Asseri was non-committal, saying: "We help in any way we can." He agreed with a questioner that 9/11 terror attacks in the US had brought Pakistan and Saudi Arabia even closer, noting that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were both suffering equally from religious extremism. He repeatedly referred to terrorists as "deviant citizens" with a "hidden agenda."

Sharing his thoughts on the eve of third anniversary of 9/11 attacks, masterminded by Saudi citizen Osama bin Laden, Ambassador Asseri said it was very sad in the world history and it put the Muslim Ummah through a tough test as it faced a vicious campaign against Islam. He said: "Let us hope and pray that the last three years have proved that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. That it is a peaceful religion of love and justice and that even though some Muslims were involved in the 9/11 terrorist activities, 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam and Muslims."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 3:21:27 PM || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Yeah and in an unrelated press release the Drug Barons have vowed to eliminate drug trade and to donate all their money for Rehab Clinics.
Fucking unbelieveable these two fucking countries sowed the wind and now they are gonnah.............
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 18:26 Comments || Top||

#2  maybe they should stop breeding the Jihadi Fuckers in the first place!
Posted by: Anonymous6403 || 09/11/2004 20:13 Comments || Top||

#3  I suspect this has more to do with them seeing the noose tighten on Syria and Iran and starting to figure out who's next.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 09/11/2004 20:16 Comments || Top||

#4  Well noose is what they should get, and this time no one should be fooled by the false promises by these two. It makes me sick.
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 20:46 Comments || Top||

#5  This is like a top breeding kennel saying they'll spay all their bitches and neuter the studs. Arabia and Pakistan are the biggest incubators for terrorists in the world. Any collaboration between them, regardless of its working title, can only be regarded as window dressing.

When every madrassah is burned down and the Saudi royals are all swinging from lamp posts, maybe then I'll believe them.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 21:42 Comments || Top||

#6  Well, Zenster, does this mean you're ready to press the Big Red Button™?
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 21:46 Comments || Top||

#7  Of course tey will fight [Zionist] terror jointly.

"We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own." - Maurice Samuel 'You Gentiles', P. l55 Harcourt, Brace. 1924

"You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war, but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone." - Marclis Eli Ravage, Century Magazine February, 1926

http://politicsandcurrentevents.com
Posted by: UFO || 09/11/2004 21:15 Comments || Top||

#8  Of course tey will fight [Zionist] terror jointly.

"We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own." - Maurice Samuel 'You Gentiles', P. l55 Harcourt, Brace. 1924

"You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war, but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone." - Marclis Eli Ravage, Century Magazine February, 1926

http://politicsandcurrentevents.com
Posted by: UFO || 09/11/2004 21:15 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
The Truth About Our Soldiers: Abuses at Abu Ghraib weren't typical
Opinion Journal piece by James Schlesinger.
Posted by: Steve White || 09/11/2004 4:03:11 PM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Such excesses may have resulted from confusion as to what was permissible.

You mean as to what was human.


Some have seized upon the photos to suggest that torture was condoned. That is simply wrong. The actions of the night shift on Tier 1 were an aberration. The members were off on their own. As one participant admitted: "We did it for the fun of it."

Oh, I see. It is of no importance that the torture happened, because there was no policy encouraging abuse. Never mind the directly issued, then denied, commands.
Because there is no proof of them.


But to date, we have identified some 300 cases of possible abuse, of which fewer than 100 have been confirmed, and a third of those have been at the point of capture. In combat, passions run high.

Of course it is alright that the troops abuse the captives.
They only stormed into thier city, broke into thier homes, and detained them for no reason whatsoever. They should be excused if they caused any damage, because their passions, not the captives', were running high. It is not like they did anything wrong.
Posted by: Gentle || 09/12/2004 8:33 Comments || Top||

#2  Gentle, where you been? Studying?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 09/12/2004 8:37 Comments || Top||

#3  Kinda ^_^
Posted by: Gentle || 09/12/2004 8:39 Comments || Top||

#4  Well, you've been missed, what with the anniversary and all. Lot's of articles about how Islam is going mainstream and we need to be reconciled, that sort of thing. Stop in.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 09/12/2004 12:31 Comments || Top||

#5  hey! How about those Joooos in Beslan, Gentle? Acting like they were Islamists and all....any thoughts?

at all?

ever?
Posted by: Frank G || 09/12/2004 12:36 Comments || Top||

#6  Of course it is alright that the troops abuse the captives. They only stormed into thier city, broke into thier homes, and detained them for no reason whatsoever. They should be excused if they caused any damage, because their passions, not the captives', were running high. It is not like they did anything wrong.

My main concern is for the safety and well being of American troops no matter where they are, and that includes civilian contractors and our spooks. If you can't wrap your head around that concept, then that is just too bad.

As for the prisoners abused at Ghraib: it sucks to be them.
Posted by: badanov || 09/12/2004 12:37 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan/South Asia
Pakistani Islamic leader says Bush exploiting 9/11
This is rich
Pakistan's main opposition leader accused U.S. President George W. Bush on Saturday of using the war on terror for political gain and to pursue an anti-Muslim agenda. Pro-Taliban Islamic leader Fazal-ur-Rehman told a protest rally of a few hundred people that the United States and Bush had used the "sad" day of Sept. 11, 2001 in a "barbaric" way to wage war against Muslims across the world. "Bush is creating fear and insecurity in the minds of American people too, to prolong his rule," said Rehman. "But the American people are now realising that his stance was wrong."
Posted by: TS(vice girl) || 09/11/2004 3:45:28 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  You're either with us or against us!
Posted by: matinum || 09/11/2004 16:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Fazl's looking for the bejewelled turban and has always been against us
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 16:50 Comments || Top||

#3  Fazi needs to FOAD. Fazi better watch his six. We Americans are not in the mood to take his crap. If being popular in "world opinion" (whatever that means) requires us to lay down and take it, "world opinion" can go to hell on the horse they rode in on.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 09/11/2004 17:50 Comments || Top||


Africa: Horn
Darfur Blacks Are Better Off Dead Than Christianized
From Pakistan Today
A prominent Islamic scholar on Friday described Western relief efforts in Darfur as attempts to "Christianise" people in the conflict-torn western region of Sudan. Sheik Youssef al-Qaradawi, an Egyptian cleric with a large following in the Islamic world, also accused the West of plotting to control Sudan, like it has done in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories, by raising the spectre of Islamic terrorism.

Al-Qaradawi, who lives in Qatar, arrived in Sudan late Thursday to meet government officials and rebels involved in the 19-month Darfur conflict, which has killed an estimated 30,000 and driven more than 1 million from their homes. "Sudan has become involved in a plot against the Islamic nation, which is the same plot woven against the nation in Afghanistan, in Iraq (and) in Palestine," al-Qaradawi claimed during a Friday mosque sermon in Khartoum broadcast on state-run TV. .... The cleric also accused the Bush administration of "seeking to create a new domesticated Islam that knows not to say no." ....
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 09/11/2004 10:10:16 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Put this one on the "must whack list"
Posted by: Old Fogey || 09/11/2004 12:07 Comments || Top||

#2  Would you believe that Qaradawi is regarded as a (supposed) moderate?

[crickets]

Didn't think so. Qaradawi should be on a wetwork roster along with al Sadr, abu Hamza, Omar Bakri, Ayatollah Khamenie, mullah Omar and abu Bakar Bashir.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 12:37 Comments || Top||

#3  And some one was telling me that there are still moderates. Is this a moderate motherfucker. Look at his views. He just condemned a whole population to die.
Sick Bastard
Posted by: Fawad || 09/11/2004 21:11 Comments || Top||

#4  There are no moderates, only apathetics.
Posted by: Tom || 09/11/2004 21:16 Comments || Top||


Russia
Beslan School Attackers Exploit Russia Corruption
By DAVID McHUGH, Associated Press Writer
Fri Sep 10, 2:21 AM ET
MOSCOW - The heavily armed militants behind a deadly school raid in southern Russia passed through a region dotted by checkpoints whose chief purpose is to keep violence from spreading outside the breakaway Chechnya region. How did they manage? To many people here, suspicion falls on police corruption that could be crippling Russian attempts to fight terrorists. The school hostage-taking in Beslan and other recent terror attacks illustrate how bribe-taking — particularly in the police and military — provide an opening to terrorists by helping them arm themselves and move around. The military often supplies weapons to the very enemy it seeks to vanquish. For Russians long used to bribing police officers, public housing managers, even nursery school directors, the corruption allegations aren't surprising. Yet outrage over the school attack, which left more than 330 dead, has been fueled by reports suggesting that bribery played a role. First, the 30 attackers got through a region dotted with checkpoints without any apparent problem.
Still no word about any arrests of the checkpoint squads.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 4:24:22 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Home Front: Culture Wars
Kerry Ties Weapons Sales, Terror Worries
EFL - I posted this under "Culture Wars" because America seems to be culturally divided on this issue with respect to our response to terror.
John Kerry linked U.S. assault weapon sales to worries about terrorism Friday and said President Bush was bowing to the National Rifle Association by not pushing to keep alive an expiring ban. If Bush is serious about fighting terrorism, the Democratic presidential candidate said, he world extend the 10-year ban on sales of 19 kinds of semiautomatic assault weapons, due to expire on Monday. "In the al-Qaida manual on terror, they were telling people to go out and buy assault weapons, to come to America and buy assault weapons," Kerry said. "Every law enforcement officer in America doesn't want us selling assault weapons in the streets of America," Kerry said. "But George Bush, he says, `Well, I'm for that."'

Faced with an incident like Beslan there are some in America that believe that gun control would have prevented the terrorist attack through denying weapons to the butchers. Others in America believe that the terrorists would have been unlikely to stage an attack in the midst of a well-armed populace. Personally, I think that the attack could have been accomplished even if every Ossetian household had an AK. I also believe, though, that wolves prefer to prey on sheep and avoid cougars.
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 2:55:59 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Assault weapons. Why do they hate us?
Posted by: Crikey || 09/11/2004 17:36 Comments || Top||

#2  "In the al-Qaida manual on terror, they were telling people to go out and buy assault weapons, to come to America and buy assault weapons,"

Oh, yeah, right Jawn. Assault weapons are sooooooooooooo hard to acquire in those lovely shithole countries where Al-Qaida hangs out. Must be why everybody in the Middle East walks around with an AK and/or RPG.
What a friggin idiot!
Posted by: tu3031 || 09/11/2004 21:51 Comments || Top||


Russia
Moscow: Little Suicide Bomber's show cancelled for 9/11
EFL - maybe a venue in Gaza is available
A Russian's plans for a September 11 anniversary "terror concert", starring a female singer dressed as a suicide bomber, were thwarted on Thursday when outrage in the wake of the Beslan school massacre led to its cancellation.
No, really? Why would anyone make that connection?
A fierce-looking girl clad in a burqa-style black dress - dubbed the "Stupid Slut" "Little Suicide Bomber" by the media - was to sing about Muslim hardships on Saturday, three years since the plane attacks on US cities that killed around 3,000 people. Tickets to the show were made to look like plane tickets, the Izvestia daily said. "The concert has been cancelled... Who in his right mind would agree to stage it after all that has happened in Russia?" said a spokesperson for the venue, the House of Unions Hall.
Someone not in their right mind, of course.
Ivan Shapovalov, the impresario behind the pop duo Tatu whose lesbian schoolgirl image courted controversy, said he cared little about what Russians might think about his show which he called the "terror concert". "If people are scared by a woman wearing a black headscarf, that means they are sick themselves," he told Izvestia.
I dunno, I just bet Ivan would be a tad concerned if cornered by a Black Widow.
Shapovalov did not confirm the concert had been cancelled. "The venue organisers have not told us about the cancellation. We don't know what's going on. They didn't even let us rehearse," an aide said.
What's to rehearse?
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 1:37:37 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I say let them go ahead and stage the concert, but only on the condition that no police protection or private security is made available. Same goes for any paramedics or ambulances too.

Sick, twisted f&%ks.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 2:26 Comments || Top||

#2  "...Who in his right mind would agree to stage it after all that has happened in Russia?" said a spokesperson for the venue, the House of Unions Hall.

Who "in their right mind" would stage it AFTER 9/11 and on 9/11. Damn Russian oxygen thieves.

Posted by: 98zulu || 09/11/2004 3:53 Comments || Top||

#3  The guy's the fellow behind Tatu? That's no mark of intelligence, folks. I mean, how smart do you have to be to realize that people would want to look at two hot girls who act like they're lesbians?
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 09/11/2004 10:29 Comments || Top||

#4  I thought I was the only one...
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 10:55 Comments || Top||

#5  Come stage the event anywhere here in the US save parts of the westcoast and new england and guaranteed they will be attacked not only by protesters but also the police there to protect them. Make these sh*ts performers little blood smears on a stage.
Posted by: darkCircle || 09/11/2004 11:25 Comments || Top||

#6  Frank and RC, thanks for the tip. Wow -- I mean, hmmmm.

Yep, I'd hit 'em both.
Posted by: Steve White || 09/11/2004 15:11 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
PA warns against removing Arafat
EFL
With Israeli officials saying Yasser Arafat's expulsion from Ramallah is "closer then ever," the Palestinian Authority warned the Israeli government yesterday against carrying out any action that would harm the Palestinian leader. Hassan Abu Lebda, the PA Cabinet secretary general, said any Israeli action against Arafat "would be a crazy step that would certainly lead to the collapse of the peace process in the Middle East." Lebda called on the representatives of the Quartet — the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations — to meet in New York to discuss Israeli threats to deport Arafat.
[...]
I'd agree that Israel shouldn't remove Yasser. It would be to Israel's disadvantage. With the senile old terrorist in control, the Paleos are self-destructing as a rapid rate. With somebody else in charge, it's doubtful they'd turn away from terrorism as a way of life, but possible they'd become more effective at implementing it. Better to leave the old man in place, sitting in his rubble pile...
Helps the popcorn concession if some splinter Paleo group does the honors ...
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 1:40:52 AM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "step that would certainly lead to the collapse of the peace process in the Middle East"

Can someone elucidate whadda fcuk is he talking about? What peace proccess? Did I miss something?

Why bother to expel Arafish? So he can do mischief somewhere else? If they mean "permanent expulsion" Saroman style, that would be something I can fully support.
Posted by: Zarathustra || 09/11/2004 5:29 Comments || Top||

#2  expel him..... to where?
Posted by: Anonymous6394 || 09/11/2004 13:37 Comments || Top||

#3  Where? Why "the city of light", of course!
Hello Suha Baby!
Posted by: tu3031 || 09/11/2004 13:41 Comments || Top||

#4  "Israeli action against Arafat "would be a crazy step that would certainly lead to the collapse of the peace process in the Middle East..."

No, the dethroning of terrorist politicians carrying out the ruination of a people would improve the chances of the peace process.

"What peace process? Did I miss something?"

Z-didn't ya get the memo? ;)
Posted by: jules 2 || 09/11/2004 13:50 Comments || Top||

#5  bet the one protesting shifting the fish to Paris the loudest would be Suha!
Posted by: Frank G || 09/11/2004 13:57 Comments || Top||

#6  #2 expel him..... to where?

Let me put this as politely as possible. After a few cups of coffee this morning, I feel the urge to "expel" something myself.
Posted by: Zenster || 09/11/2004 14:06 Comments || Top||

#7  Well there you have it; the Palestinian "leadership" has a bit of a problem with Arafart, yet they object when the idea of removing the old fossil is mentioned. Conclusive evidence, IMO, that the Palestinians are simply insane.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 09/11/2004 17:51 Comments || Top||

#8  The Arafish is like the Japanese at Truk Island or Rabaul in WW2. They were surrounded and neutralized, and left to wither on the vine. Same with Arafish. He has nothing to do but to work down his in-basket and deal with the Imfamous Red Folder. Besides, the big player against Israel is Hizb'allah (Iran proxie) and al Qaeda is starting to make its presence known.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 09/11/2004 23:19 Comments || Top||


Mirror of Vietnam?: Leftist Israelis encourage Hamas
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 01:43 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:


Afghanistan/South Asia
US cable reveals 1998 contact with Mullah Omar
Reclusive Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar told an American diplomat in a rare conversation that the August 1998 U.S. strikes against Afghanistan would lead to increased terrorism, according to a recently declassified document released on Friday. "Omar warned that the strikes would be counterproductive to the U.S. They could spark more, not less, terrorist attacks. And they would further increase Islamic solidarity against the U.S.," the State Department cable said.

It was written on Aug. 22, 1998, by Michael Malinowski, then a State Department official who dealt with Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. The cable was released by The National Security Archive, a nongovernment research institute that collects and publishes declassified documents. Omar surprised Malinowski by coming on the phone during a conversation the American diplomat was having with a Taliban aide. It was the first known contact between the Taliban leader and a U.S. government official, the document said. The conversation occurred just days after U.S. cruise missile strikes on suspected al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan in reprisal for the Aug. 7 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa, which killed 224 people.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Dan Darling || 09/11/2004 1:50:24 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Africa: North
Bush Lifts Minor Sanctions on Libya
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 00:25 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Another interesting artcle had an update on the situations with Somalia as well as Libya. Post 9/11, New Hope Seen for Two African Trouble Spots
Posted by: Super Hose || 09/11/2004 0:34 Comments || Top||

#2  In the vernacular of the Old West...Qadhafi is "still shooting straight by the hip", and "W" can appreciate that. Nice move by the Adminstration in "tossin tha bonz"!
Posted by: smn || 09/11/2004 0:44 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
87[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Sat 2004-09-11
  Blast, Mushroom Cloud Reported in N. Korea
Fri 2004-09-10
  Toe tag for al-Houthi
Thu 2004-09-09
  Australian embassy boomed in Jakarta
Wed 2004-09-08
  Russia Offers $10 Million for Chechen Rebels
Tue 2004-09-07
  Putin rejects talks with child killers
Mon 2004-09-06
  GSPC appoints new supremo
Sun 2004-09-05
  Izzat Ibrahim jugged? (Apparently not...)
Sat 2004-09-04
  Russia seals off North Ossetia
Fri 2004-09-03
  Hostage school stormed by Russian forces
Thu 2004-09-02
  16 dead so far in North Ossetia stand-off
Wed 2004-09-01
  200 kiddies hostage in Beslan
Tue 2004-08-31
  Booms in Moscow, Jerusalem
Mon 2004-08-30
  Chechen boom babes were roommates
Sun 2004-08-29
  Boom Kills 9 Children, 1 Adult in Afghan School
Sat 2004-08-28
  437 arrested in Islamabad crackdown


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.221.53.209
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (23)    Non-WoT (24)    Opinion (1)    Local News (4)    (0)