Hi there, !
Today Wed 12/27/2006 Tue 12/26/2006 Mon 12/25/2006 Sun 12/24/2006 Sat 12/23/2006 Fri 12/22/2006 Thu 12/21/2006 Archives
Rantburg
533754 articles and 1862103 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 92 articles and 420 comments as of 1:25.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
UN Security Council approves Iran sanctions
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
5 00:00 ed [4] 
16 00:00 Zenster [1] 
9 00:00 gromgoru [1] 
0 [2] 
7 00:00 Captain America [2] 
3 00:00 Zenster [5] 
3 00:00 ed [10] 
2 00:00 Zenster [6] 
17 00:00 phil_b [1] 
11 00:00 wxjames [1] 
7 00:00 Zenster [5] 
0 [1] 
11 00:00 Greremp Uleremp6059 [2] 
1 00:00 Frank G [9] 
0 [8] 
6 00:00 pihkalbadger [1] 
4 00:00 Ptah [3] 
2 00:00 Frank G [2] 
3 00:00 Parabellum [2] 
1 00:00 Jesing Ebbease3087 [13] 
1 00:00 Jackal [1] 
5 00:00 Greremp Uleremp6059 [1] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
5 00:00 SpecOp35 [4]
4 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [7]
6 00:00 Mike [2]
0 [2]
0 [2]
7 00:00 Zenster [4]
3 00:00 CrazyFool [6]
0 [2]
6 00:00 Shipman [2]
7 00:00 Charles [1]
0 [2]
5 00:00 SteveS [1]
11 00:00 Zenster [6]
3 00:00 Phineter Thraviger [1]
0 [8]
0 [5]
0 [5]
1 00:00 Zenster [7]
2 00:00 pihkalbadger [5]
4 00:00 RD [2]
6 00:00 Old Patriot [2]
0 [2]
0 [1]
2 00:00 RD [2]
8 00:00 Zenster [1]
Page 3: Non-WoT
1 00:00 Zenster [1]
0 [3]
9 00:00 Grunter [5]
7 00:00 Greremp Uleremp6059 [2]
4 00:00 mac [1]
4 00:00 3dc [1]
9 00:00 mac [2]
10 00:00 .com [3]
21 00:00 Zenster [2]
4 00:00 Zenster [8]
8 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [1]
6 00:00 Zenster [6]
9 00:00 wxjames [1]
2 00:00 john [2]
0 [2]
1 00:00 wxjames [2]
8 00:00 Zenster [1]
1 00:00 DMFD [1]
7 00:00 Zenster [1]
0 [2]
Page 4: Opinion
0 [2]
5 00:00 wxjames [2]
5 00:00 gromgoru [1]
6 00:00 Zenster [7]
5 00:00 Zenster [9]
1 00:00 trailing wife [4]
0 [2]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
7 00:00 .com [2]
5 00:00 Zenster [1]
0 [2]
0 [2]
2 00:00 Zenster [1]
2 00:00 Ptah [6]
13 00:00 Dave D. [1]
4 00:00 Nimble Spemble [3]
2 00:00 Art [3]
8 00:00 Zenster [3]
0 [1]
0 [1]
5 00:00 Manuel [4]
10 00:00 wxjames [4]
11 00:00 Deacon Blues [3]
1 00:00 Besoeker [8]
4 00:00 Robert Crawford [1]
19 00:00 RD [1]
Afghanistan
Beers and a diva for British troops in Helmand this Christmas
Katherine Jenkins with her 2006 Classical BRIT award for the Album of the Year CAROLS will ring out tomorrow from the bleak Helmand desert as British troops celebrate Christmas far from home.

Katherine Jenkins, 26, the Welsh opera singer, will lead the singing in a morale-boosting visit to the British base of Camp Bastion. “It would make my tour if I got to meet her,” said Captain Giles Barnett, 27, of the Intelligence Corps.
The carol concert, believed to be the first in Helmand, will take place in the main dining hall after the 2,500 troops have tucked into their turkey dinner served by the officers and NCOs in traditional style. They will also be given a special ration of two cans of beer.
I predict curly-toed slippers will skulk about nearby, mandresses will form lil tents, and turbans will tighten.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I haven't been interested in opera, 'til now.
Posted by: Shipman || 12/24/2006 0:08 Comments || Top||

#2  Yea, I thought opera wimmins were old, fat, and screechy.

How could I be so wrong ?
Posted by: Carl in N.H. || 12/24/2006 0:54 Comments || Top||

#3  “It would make my tour if I got to meet her,” said Captain Giles Barnett, 27, of the Intelligence Corps. ....They will also be given a special ration of two cans of beer.
We'll have NONE of that type of culturally offensive activity in our MNC-I sector. Just in time for the holidays, we've also taken steps to shut down AFFES shoulder massage activities in several of our FOB barber shops! Nothing is too good for the soldier, and that's what he'll get.
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 1:22 Comments || Top||

#4  How could I be so wrong ?

'cause you been drooling over the Fat Lady here, that's why.
Posted by: Steve White || 12/24/2006 1:22 Comments || Top||

#5  Ms Jenkins certainly has the lungs for a good ol' Brit ding dong, in every sense of the terminology.

Capt. Barnett deserves a song and a snog from the lovely Welsh Diva. God bless all Coaltion forces in the field fighting the WOT. Thanks always and enjoy those brewskis.
Posted by: JDB || 12/24/2006 3:59 Comments || Top||

#6  you should hear her sing, butterfly's errupt small mammals situp n chirrup n things are right in the world
Posted by: pihkalbadger || 12/24/2006 11:21 Comments || Top||


Africa Horn
NYT: Across Africa, a Sense That U.S. Power Isn’t So Super
NYT polishing its specialty.
By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN - December 24, 2006
MOGADISHU, Somalia -
THE rally was supposed to be against Ethiopia, Somalia’s neighbor and historic archenemy, which in the past few weeks had sent troops streaming across the border in an attempt to check the power of the increasingly powerful Islamists who rule Mogadishu.

But the cheers that shook the stadium (which had no roof, by the way, and was riddled with bullet holes) were about another country, far, far away.

“Down, down U.S.A.!” thousands of Somalis yelled, many of them waving cocked Kalashnikovs. “Slit the throats of the Americans!”

Not exactly soothing words, especially when the passport in your pocket has one of those golden eagles on it.
Purdy skeery, awrighty. And you're just gosh-darn super brave, Jeffy.

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: .com || 12/24/2006 01:33 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Back in the 1970s and 1980s, Mr. Crocker said, there were few other avenues. In those cold war days, he said, sustained, patient, high-level American involvement helped end wars from Angola to Mozambique and helped to bring South Africa’s brutal apartheid system to its knees.

A tidy bid of history re-written there Jeffrey. It was long ago, but I would urge you to study the events a tad deeper. Military aid from the West to South Africa and the bold determination of the... (now nearly defunct SADF) chased Fidel Castro and his merry band of Russian proxies from the continent, ending wars, YES WARS in Mozzie and Angola. I can forward you the statistics on SADF KIA during that long bloody period of you like, it was mandetory national service in those days you know. The SADF or the national police, your choice. Supported by backchannel pleadings and requests for assistance from Washington and Downing Street to South Africa and Rhodesia, many served and many died ending communism, yes communism. The US had just ended a long struggle fighting communism in SE Asia, and as now, public sentiment for involvement in Africa was, well lets just say, not at high levels. Unfortunately, thier patriotism and support of the west availed the Rhodies and the SA's little in the end. They were Dutch Reformed, Methodist, LDS, Lutheran, Pentecostal and Jewish, largely white men and farmers you see. They were and many remain non-multiculturists in a dumbed down world of cultural diversity, colour preference, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), Affirmative Action, and denial. How could they ultimately survive? How will they? Get it right Jeffrey, or don't attempt it please. U.S. Power is still Super!

Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 2:19 Comments || Top||

#2  But, at least, it wasn't in vain Besoeker. It helped create a better world.
“Down, down U.S.A.!” thousands of Somalis yelled, many of them waving cocked Kalashnikovs. “Slit the throats of the Americans!”
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 3:00 Comments || Top||

#3  Indeed it did Grom, indeed it did.
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 3:23 Comments || Top||

#4  Unfortunately, thier patriotism and support of the west availed the Rhodies and the SA's little in the end. They were Dutch Reformed, Methodist, LDS, Lutheran, Pentecostal and Jewish, largely white men and farmers you see. They were and many remain non-multiculturists in a dumbed down world of cultural diversity, colour preference, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), Affirmative Action, and denial. How could they ultimately survive? How will they?

2006, and please have a fearless look partisans at what the Turd Polishers have wrought; welcome to Zimbabwe Bob and his compulsory hell and the arrested South African Jewel in an inexorable decent, soon to join them.

If I am ever put in charge of hell, there won't be a cool NYT editor, columnist and or journalist.
»:-)
Posted by: RD || 12/24/2006 4:21 Comments || Top||

#5  descent
Posted by: RD || 12/24/2006 4:23 Comments || Top||

#6  Don't you mean USDS official, RD?
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 4:58 Comments || Top||

#7  U.S. Department of State,

them first grom, straight to hell!

»:-)
Posted by: RD || 12/24/2006 5:12 Comments || Top||

#8  Why are we going over this again? For those of you who haven't yet got the message, read Kim DuToit's Let Africa Sink. Personally, I don't give a flying if everyone on the whole continent dies of AIDS, gunfire, malaria or the galloping crud. They aren't worth the bones of one American Marine, to paraphrase Lord Salisbury. Screw the lot of them.
Posted by: mac || 12/24/2006 5:23 Comments || Top||

#9  Amen Mac.
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 5:34 Comments || Top||

#10  I talked to some phony refugees from Somalia. They all support the Islamofascist dictatorship. They should support them from close range.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550 || 12/24/2006 5:50 Comments || Top||

#11  The whole article is a schoolyard taunt aimed at getting Uncle Sam to increase his Africa aid budget. (They're reduced to panhandling and getting table scraps from the Chinese* and they don't like it). Ain't gonna happen.

* The Chinese? The same losers who lost more people from famines in the 20th century than all of Africa?
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 12/24/2006 5:56 Comments || Top||

#12  Why are we going over this again? For those of you who haven't yet got the message, read Kim DuToit's Let Africa Sink. Personally, I don't give a flying if everyone on the whole continent dies of AIDS, gunfire, malaria or the galloping crud. They aren't worth the bones of one American Marine, to paraphrase Lord Salisbury. Screw the lot of them.

New visitors read RB everyday. plus due diligence demands we must counteract the avalanche of perpetual lies...

Kim du Toit
May 26, 2002, Let Africa Sink
thanks mac.
Posted by: RD || 12/24/2006 6:41 Comments || Top||

#13  Already read it and have to agree. Nothing short of a massive die-off is going to help Africa climb out of its stoneage barbarity. Tribalism keeps bashing its head against twenty-first century reality. I had my fill of it years ago.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 6:55 Comments || Top||

#14  And, just why, are we importing these same Somalis into Minnesota ? They're the same scum who were gun sexing with AK's a year or so ago. Think they've changed ?
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/24/2006 12:06 Comments || Top||

#15  And, just why, are we importing these same Somalis into Minnesota ?

Blame the MultiCulti's in the Immigration Dept. They're importing the dregs of the African continent and elsewhere.

Where we see blight and devastation, they see communities that need the government to take care of them. Job security for the Socialists...and votes.
Posted by: Greremp Uleremp6059 || 12/24/2006 13:46 Comments || Top||

#16  We don't want these goat buggerers for Allen! It's just the Hennepin county liberals that are drawing them here in droves. The rest of Minnesota isn't exposed to these pathetic lazy (yes they are, check the welfare numbers) islamics.

By the way thank you BJ Clinton.
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/24/2006 14:20 Comments || Top||

#17  to its (the USA's) current support for Ethiopia, which is taking sides in Somalia’s internal politics.

They are supporting the UN created and recognized government. Of course this doesn't fit the NYT's geopolitics as a morality play view of the world and so gets ignored.
Posted by: phil_b || 12/24/2006 15:44 Comments || Top||


Somalia: PM says Islamists lost in the clashes
(SomaliNet) Somali’s Prime Minister Ali Mohamed Gedi called on Islamic Courts Union to stop the war and come on the negotiation table casting all the prospects of the current clashes on the Islamists.

The premier made the statement on Saturday in news conference held at Baidao city, the base of interim government. He denied the Islamist claim that they are within 10 km to Baidoa as baseless and fabrication saying the reality is that they faced huge casualties in the fronts. Gedi confirmed that several foreign insurgents were killed in the clashes. He accused the Islamic Courts of conducting terror attacks targeting the government base, Baidoa.

“Justifying for the Ethiopian troops that training the government forces, the so called Islamists declared that after seven days they will attack Baidoa,” said Gedi in his press confertence.

He said, to prevent peace initiatives, the Islamic Courts coincided their attack on the visit by the European commissioner for development and aid Louis Michel. “On behalf of the transitional federal government, I am very sorry that young Somalis were forced or misled to join what they termed as jihad,” said Mr. Gedi. “I don’t know where the Islam stated that Muslim person should launch Jihad on another innocent Muslim,”

He said since the creation of the TFG, it was avoiding to fuel war in the country and was working on the peace and the reconciliation among Somalis and how society would be out of the long-standing crisis. “The government welcomed the civil uprising against warlords in Mogadishu six months ago and offered a peace dialogue with the Islamic Courts Union reaching ceasefire agreement but the ICU itself backed away the truce after it raided key towns of southern Somalia,” Gedi said adding “the Islamic Courts again singed an agreement with the government in the second round of talks in Khartoum, Sudan over to stop all hostile actions and attacks on towns but they failed to obey that and captured the southern port city of Kismayo where they burnt the Somalia flag and opened fire on protestors in the streets of Kismayo.”

Gedi said the Islamists put more pressure on the people in Mogadishu who earlier gave support to their struggle against the warlords. They stopped women who feed about80% of the population from doing business. “As you are aware of, the courts oppressed the public living in the area they captured, for instance the ICU put blocks on the freedom of speech; they banned the sessions of the NGOs and human rights activists; apparently they killed several Somali youths as they were watching soccer matches,” said Gedi in the press conference.

He said the Islamists were the ones who were behind the killing of number of government members and declared Jihad on the federal institutionsnotably, the ICU was responsible of killing the former minister of constitutional and federalism Abdalla Derow Isaaq. “They had attempted to assassinate the president of Somalia Abdulahi Yusuf by committing suicide attacks in Baidoa and also carried out another bomb explosion at Baidoa main entrance killing innocents, Gedi added.

As widely known, the Islamist militia imposed sanction on the people in Bay and Bakol regions in southwest of Somalia by cutting off the commercial access to these regions from the capital making the life more difficulty, he said. The premier said that Islamists put conditions before the peace talks in Khartoum and rejected to go to the negotiation table. Mr. Gedi sent his condolence to all the Somali relatives that lost their beloved ones in the clashes. He called for the parents of the misled children to the fighting to reconsider what he called ‘the non-exist Jihad declared by the so-called power hungry Islamic Courts’.

Gedi made it clear that ICU brought international criminals or terrorists to destabilize the country. “Their aim is to only make Somalia base of terror attack against the interests of westerns in horn of Africa region,” he said.
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:11 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Britain
British Army saves by topping up tanks with chip oil
OUT of the frying pan into the firefight. British troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and other military bases around the world are to be told to recycle used cooking oil as fuel for military vehicles.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said it was planning the move on environmental grounds. However, others have pointed out that the MoD is trying to cut costs wherever possible to fund Britain’s two conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The new plan may enable precious diesel to be bulked out with cleaned-up chip oil and other waste.

In addition, the recycled material could be sold on the domestic heating market.

British army bases produce huge volumes of oil from frying food and under the proposals announced last week in a Commons written answer, this would no longer be poured away.

Instead, it would be siphoned off, filtered and re-used, possibly fuelling vehicles such as armoured Land Rovers and Warriors.

Derek Twigg, a junior defence minister, said the MoD hoped to recycle used oils from mess kitchens for use in biodiesel, which is usually combined with ordinary fuel before being used in engines.

John “Lofty” Wiseman, a former soldier in the SAS and author of the bestselling SAS Urban Survival Handbook, welcomed the proposals.

“These days everyone wants to be green so it doesn’t surprise me that they are planning this,” he said.

“The thing is, the MoD has to pay for disposing of oils wherever it goes. It costs a lot, so it makes sense to recycle it. I think it’s a great idea. The lads won’t mind doing it — we’re used to recycling stuff in the army.”

Trials for the scheme are under way.

The move to bulk out fuel with waste oils comes as the MoD is trying to cut costs.

Leaked MoD documents quoted by Jane’s Defence Weekly suggest the ministry faces a £870m overspend for the period 2009-12.
Chip oil? Probably loaded with trans fats. Smells like ... victory.
Posted by: mrp || 12/24/2006 13:27 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  All fun and games, till someone develops a fish and chip seeking missile.
Posted by: DMFD || 12/24/2006 15:04 Comments || Top||

#2  I guess they thought they'd try it just for the Halibut.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 15:29 Comments || Top||

#3  The Fried French Forces pioneered this in WW2.
Posted by: Grunter || 12/24/2006 23:04 Comments || Top||

#4  Hmm... does this include bacon oil and the rendering of pork fat?
Posted by: CrazyFool || 12/24/2006 23:22 Comments || Top||

#5  This smells fishy.
Posted by: ed || 12/24/2006 23:47 Comments || Top||


British Admiral: 'tinpot' armed services
Britain's beleaguered Armed Forces are in danger of being turned by the Government into a "tinpot gendarmerie" incapable of defending UK interests, according to one of the country's top military figures.

Defence cuts and financial infighting at the Ministry of Defence are threatening Britain's status as a world power, said Admiral Sir Alan West in a blistering attack on Labour's defence policy.

In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, he said the Government was risking the future security of British interests by reshaping the armed forces to wage long-term "anti-terror" campaigns in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

Sir Alan, 58, said the MoD was behaving "like these tinpot countries" that fail to invest in major equipment programmes, and spend defence budgets on running rather than developing their armed forces. "That way is a recipe for disaster for a defence force that has to do all the things that Britain may have to do in the next 50 years," he said.

In 10 years' time, the threat facing the UK could be something "far more dangerous than terrorism in central Asia". He added: "All we could be left with is an Armed Forces that is effectively a gendarmerie. And I suppose we would retire to our island and hope that no one gets to us."

Sir Alan's comments follow recent criticisms of Government treatment of the Army from General Sir Richard Dannatt and General Sir Mike Jackson, the present and former heads of the Army respectively.

The latest attack comes amid speculation that the MoD is about to delay or even cancel its "Carrier Strike" programme to build two aircraft carriers by 2015.

Sir Alan, who retired as head of the Royal Navy this year, said he now feared that the £3.5 billion he had ring-fenced for the project was under threat from MoD officials trying to "undermine the programme" so that the money could be used elsewhere in the cash-strapped department.

He said: "The carrier programme is the jewel in the crown of the strategic defence review. Yet there are officials within the MoD who are casting lascivious looks at it. There is no doubt that the rats are out there having a nibble. If Britain wants to remain a world power and to operate with a deal of freedom around the world, these two carriers are vital."

Sir Alan also criticised the Army for not "going through the pain" of addressing its own financial problems in the way the Navy had done over the past few years. He described the Army's attitude towards cost-cutting as "atrocious" and accused senior officers of attempting to "raid" the Forces' overall equipment budget in an effort to solve its own financial problems.
Posted by: mrp || 12/24/2006 10:16 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Not just Britain; IIUC, french armed forces are mostly operational around an hardcore of "projection forces" (marines, special operations command, a few alpine and dragon units) used as a foreign policy tool, think "africa", while the army by itself is not really able to fill its national defense role due to underfunding and lack of proper personel.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/24/2006 10:28 Comments || Top||

#2  Does Britain have the budget to support two carriers? Functional, working carriers, I mean.
Posted by: SteveS || 12/24/2006 10:31 Comments || Top||

#3  Yes. The question is does it have the will.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 12/24/2006 10:41 Comments || Top||

#4  It seems that Britain could actually *save* money if it created a bunch of military field training camps, rounded up its unemployed hoodies, ASBOs, chavs and hooligans, and sent them there for some training under the paternal eye of Ghurka NCOs.

Not only would they empty out a lot of their jails and slums, but instead of paying unemployment, they would pay a low military wage. Large tents instead of ghetto housing.

The emphasis could be on discipline training and "conservation and improvement" projects, under military discipline. If they showed improvement and a good attitude, they might even become eligible for regular military service.

Last but not least, everyone, especially new immigrants, would qualify for participation in this new programme.

Which would undoubtedly mean a LOT fewer immigrants to Britain.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 12/24/2006 11:09 Comments || Top||

#5  This is what happens when the socialist/communist/democrats take over a government. The down turn occurred here during the duration of Blow Job's term. It will begin again on Jan.4. And, we'll be in real deep shit if Hildebeest ascends to the throne in Jan 2009.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/24/2006 12:12 Comments || Top||

#6  'Moose, I read through the comments section last week in the Sun newspaper about why so many Britons are leaving Britain. There were 28 pages of comments! No. 1 Complaint: too many immigrants, most of whom had no desire to assimilate. No. 2 Complaint: taxes too high. No. 3 Complaint: tax money spent to fund and aid the non-assimilating immigrants and the yobs and chavs. No. 4 Complaint: crime through the roof and no effective police worthy of the name.

It truly sounded like most of the people writing didn't feel like Britain was their country anymore; somewhere since the end of Thatcher's government it had started heading down a multiculti slope leading to the cesspit and they saw the change picking up pace with every passing day. Bitter, bitter people, and I believe with good reason.
Posted by: mac || 12/24/2006 14:17 Comments || Top||

#7  somewhere since the end of Thatcher's government it had started heading down a multiculti slope leading to the cesspit

Margaret Thatcher was a truly great leader, but unlike Ronald Reagan, she only cared about the social and economical battleground in her struggle against the Forces Of Progress.

The cultural and societal (does this word even exists in english?) fields were left wide open for the marxists, gramscists, and assorted memetic warriors, and they changed british society as deeply as they did in other european countries, even while Thatcher reformed the economical structures (and ironically salvaged the UK, allowing the left not to be blamed for its past and inherent mismanagement).

Ronald Reagan, on the other hand, was a product of a real conservative intellectual trend dating back to the 50's IIUC, and he was a really coherent, deep and well-thought ideologist himself, a far cry from the simpleton portrait made of him by the Enlightened Elites.

Thus, the "Culture war" (IE the relentless assault againt the western civilization by the Forces Of Progress) is still being fought in the USA, but it has been lost in Europe, including the UK.

My 0.02.

Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/24/2006 15:14 Comments || Top||

#8  Well, they wanted their armed forces to be able to integrate with the Europeans, so they need to be just as worthless.
Posted by: Jackal || 12/24/2006 20:17 Comments || Top||

#9  That's hardly new
"Money spent on an Army or Fleet
Is homicidal lunacy. . . ."
Kipling Natural Theology
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 21:11 Comments || Top||


UK: Roman Catholic Bishop of Rochester urges ban on veils in public
Ban veils in public, says Asian bishop
Muslim women should be banned from wearing the veil, to improve security and cohesion in Britain, the Church of England's only Asian bishop has said.

The Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, Bishop of Rochester, urged the Government to introduce legislation that would force Muslims to remove the veil when they are at work or travelling.

In an outspoken attack on the custom of Muslim women to cover their faces, the Pakistani-born bishop said that the Islamic community needed to make greater efforts to integrate into British society.

"It is fine if they want to wear the veil in private, but there are occasions in public life when it is inappropriate for them to wear it," he said.

His call for new laws to control the wearing of the veil in public comes only days after it was revealed that Mustaf Jama, the Somali suspected of murdering WPc Sharon Beshenivsky, is thought to have fled the country by dressing in the niqab, which covers the whole face except the eyes.

"Given that we are facing an unprecedented security situation, legislation needs to be introduced that allows officials to remove the veil," the bishop told The Sunday Telegraph.

His comments will reignite the row which began in October after Jack Straw revealed that he asked Muslim women to remove the niqab before meetings in his Blackburn constituency.

Bishop Nazir-Ali, whose father converted from Islam to Catholicism, said that the legislation should not just cover airports, but should extend to all areas of travel where an identity needs to be established, such as tube and train stations and ports. He said that the possible failure of airline staff to challenge Jama was symptomatic of people being "too worried about offending Muslims".

Laws should also be given to employers and boards of trustees to demand that the veil is not worn at work, he said.

Aishah Azmi, a Muslim teaching assistant, took her school to an employment tribunal after it suspended her for refusing to remove her veil. She was awarded £1,100 for "injury to her feelings", but her claim of religious discrimination was rejected.

The bishop argued, however, that the introduction of new laws would not improve cohesion unless the Muslim community steps up its efforts to integrate.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/24/2006 03:39 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under:

#1  We don't allow Aztec religious cannibalism; why allow Muslim veiling?
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550 || 12/24/2006 5:40 Comments || Top||

#2  Bishop Nazir-Ali is to be commended for his brave stance regarding Muslim conduct in Britain. His scathing article from November 5th bears a second posting:
Bishop attacks 'victim' Muslims

THE Church of England’s only Asian bishop, whose father converted from Islam, has criticised many Muslims for their “dual psychology”, in which they desire both “victimhood and domination”. In the most outspoken critique of Muslims by a church leader, Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester, said that because of this view it would never be possible to satisfy all their demands. “Their complaint often boils down to the position that it is always right to intervene when Muslims are victims, as in Bosnia or Kosovo, and always wrong when the Muslims are the oppressors or terrorists, as with the Taliban or in Iraq,” said Nazir-Ali. “Given the world view that has given rise to such grievances, there can never be sufficient appeasement and new demands will continue to be made

The failure to counter such beliefs meant that radical Islam had flourished in Britain, spread by extremist imams indoctrinating children for up to four hours a day, he said. Nazir-Ali added that rigorous checks, from which the government had retreated in face of Muslims’ protests, should be imposed to ensure that arriving clerics were committed to the British way of life. “Characteristic British values have developed from the Christian faith and its vision of personal and common good,” said the bishop in an interview with The Sunday Times. “After they were clarified by the enlightenment they became the bedrock of our modern political life. These values need to be recovered to help us to inculcate the virtues of generosity, loyalty, moderation and love.” Nazir-Ali, who was born in Pakistan and whose father converted from Islam to Catholicism, said radical Islam was being taught in mosque schools across Britain. “While radical teaching may not be happening everywhere, its presence is felt across the country. It affects all Muslims,” he said.

“The two main causes of the present situation [rising extremism] are fundamentalist imams and material on the internet.” He proposed to filter out imams who might whip up extremism: “They must be vetted for appropriate qualifications, they must have a reasonable knowledge of the English language and they must take part in a recognised process of learning about British life and culture.” The government, after lobbying from Muslim groups, retreated from proposals to toughen entry requirements put forward by David Blunkett, the former home secretary, two years ago. Plans to require foreign clerics to sit a test on British civic values a year after arriving were cancelled along with the introduction of a requirement to speak English to conversational level. Nazir-Ali also criticised women wearing veils that cover the whole face. Tony Blair called the full veil a “mark of separation”, but Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, said any curbs on wearing it would be “politically dangerous”.

Nazir–Ali drew attention to a “huge increase” in the wearing of Muslim dress in Egypt, Malaysia and Pakistan, saying that in Britain there were circumstances where the full veil should not be worn: “I can see nothing in Islam that prescribes the wearing of a full-face veil. In the supermarket those at the cash tills need to be recognised. Teaching is another context in which society requires recognition and identification.” Nazir-Ali, 57, was born a Catholic in Karachi, converted to Protestantism and was received into the Church of Pakistan at 20. He settled in Britain in the 1980s and became the youngest bishop in the world at 35. Muhammad Abdul Bari, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said his comments were not “very helpful for community relationships”.


Risking considerable public ire, Rev. Nazir-Ali has even seen fit to rip Prince Charles for his repeated conciliatory gestures towards Islam.
Michael Nazir Ali: - Prince Charles cannot defend every faith

May 27th 2006 Biishop Michael Nazir Ali has argued that the basis of British society, from the monarchy to its laws, was “Christian constitutionally”. “All our values come ultimately from the Bible,” he told BBC radio. “People of other faiths recognise this and they are not often the ones asking for a multi-faith mish-mash. They recognise the value of Britain being a Christian country,” he said. He has complained that the Church had come under increasing pressure to convert chapels in places such as prisons and hospitals into neutral venues that could be used by people of all faiths.

As the future titular head of the Church of England, Prince Charles has said he would like to be known as “Defender of Faith” rather than “Defender of the Faith.” Bishop Nazir-Ali took issue with the heir to the throne, saying: “The coronation service is such that whoever takes the oaths actually takes oaths to defend the Christian faith.” “You can’t defend every faith because there are very serious differences among them,” he added.

This courageous man needs all the help he can get. It is patently clear that he understands the need for Western countries to make themselves distinctly incompatible with fundamentalist Muslim practices. This is lesson that many other nations have yet to learn, America included.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 6:12 Comments || Top||


Archdruid Blasts War in Iraq
The U.S.-led coalition's "shortsightedness and ignorance" in Iraq have endangered the lives of Christians across the Middle East, the Archbishop of Canterbury said in a scathing commentary Saturday. Christians are now seen as "supporters of the crusading West" - making them the target of attacks by Islamic radicals and forcing many to flee their homelands, wrote Rowan Williams, the Anglican spiritual leader, in a commentary in The London Times.

In an interview with the British Broadcasting Corp. on Saturday, Williams said the situation for Christians in Iraq is worse than it was when Saddam Hussein was in power. Williams, who was on a Christmas pilgrimage to the Holy Land with other British church leaders, has been an outspoken critic of the war.

A statement by Foreign Office said Britain's Middle East policies were not to blame for the plight of Iraqi and Middle Eastern Christian communities. Instead, the government said, Christians and moderate Muslims were both the victims the "intolerant extremism of people who want to cause pain and suffering and chaos."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The Archbishop also wrote that some Israeli policies have hurt traditional Christian communities

At least the man is through (so many get distracted from the real enemy by the temporary phenomenon of Bushitler)
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 5:13 Comments || Top||

#2  The ArchDruid also added that the west and particularely Bush were also to be blamed for the fact that 10% of the population of Europe is now fast breeding devout muslims and that European christianity is a vanishing thing with a predicted survival horizon of less than 30 years.

The ArchBishopBiggot also recommended to all devout christians to learn arabic and purchase bourkas, Keffiyahs, and prayer rugs, commenting: "you may never know when one of these may become handy..."
These exciting news where brought to you by Muhammed Abu Mahmud, a journalist accompanying the entourage of the Holy ArchBiggot on his sacred pilgrimage to Mecca.
Posted by: Elder of Zion || 12/24/2006 6:21 Comments || Top||

#3  ...Muslims who understand their own history and want to live in a lively, varied culture...

Yeah, we keep them over by the unicorns and leprechauns, asshole.
Posted by: Parabellum || 12/24/2006 13:13 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
N.Korea says it is not afraid of war after impasse
North Korea's official media blamed the United States on Saturday for an impasse in talks aimed at ending Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program and said it was not afraid of war. Five days of talks among the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States ended on Friday with the envoys failing even to agree a date for the next round.

The U.N. imposed sanctions on North Korea after it conducted its first nuclear test in October but North Korean officials had focused at the talks on trying to get separate U.S. financial curbs lifted, envoys said. North Korean delegate Kim Kye-gwan said Pyongyang had rejected pressure from the United States to end its nuclear program and accept inspections of its nuclear facilities. "We decisively opposed this and told the U.S. side to further study our proposal," Kim was quoted as saying. In a separate official report, North Korea said: "Sanctions and pressure will never work on the DPRK (North Korea)."

"The revolutionary armed forces of the DPRK want peace but they are not afraid of war. They will never allow anyone to infringe upon the sovereignty and dignity of their country even a bit," the report on its KCNA news agency said.
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I suppose if I lived under Kim's regime, I wouldn't be too afraid of death, either.
Posted by: Jackal || 12/24/2006 0:07 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
Border Patrol agent fatally shoots rock-throwing man
This is stupid, Darwinian, and a boggle. All at once. YJCMTSU.
YUMA, Ariz. -- A U.S. Border Patrol agent fatally shot a man who was throwing rocks at officers from the Mexican side of the border late Saturday, officials said.

The incident began after agents spotted a suspicious vehicle near the Andrade Port of Entry west of the California-Arizona border, just north of the international border and alongside the Colorado River.

The driver fled and then tried to swim across a pond along the river in an effort to return to Mexico, the agency said in a press release.

But the man began to struggle to stay afloat and agents threw him a flotation device and began to try to rescue him. Several people on the other side of the border then began throwing rocks at the agents, and one officer was struck in the head.

The officer then shot at a man who was getting ready to throw another rock, the Border Patrol said. Mexican authorities took the man to a hospital, where he died.

Attacks on Border Patrol agents have become more common in recent years, and this year agents say they're seeing smugglers become even more violent as more federal resources make crossing into the U.S. ever more difficult.

Smugglers are throwing softball-sized rocks, hunks of concrete and whole bricks at agents, either out of frustration or to try to get authorities to back off.
How long until the Border Service is sued and this guy put up on charges, ya think?
Posted by: .com || 12/24/2006 01:26 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  He has probably already been arrested.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/24/2006 1:58 Comments || Top||

#2  "...and this year agents say they're seeing smugglers become even more violent as more federal resources make crossing into the U.S. ever more difficult."
Really? More difficult?
Posted by: Jan || 12/24/2006 3:12 Comments || Top||

#3  Smugglers are throwing softball-sized rocks, hunks of concrete and whole bricks at agents

Remains me of Intifada I.
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 5:02 Comments || Top||

#4  Gun those Mex sons of whores down right where they stand, and give the officer who shot them a medal. The Mexes need to get this message loud and clear: if you pick up a weapon and aim it at a U.S. peace officer, you better be prepared to die because you sure as Hell are going to.
Posted by: mac || 12/24/2006 5:25 Comments || Top||

#5  Goliath was unavailable to comment upon the dangers of rock throwing.
Posted by: Spolunter Grins4865 || 12/24/2006 10:54 Comments || Top||

#6  How long until the Border Service is sued and this guy put up on charges, ya think?

The illegals won't waste their money. He gets to ask for a jury trial.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 12/24/2006 10:58 Comments || Top||

#7  tell that to Ramos and Compean

If Bush doesn't pardon them we'll have an open border
Posted by: Frank G || 12/24/2006 11:30 Comments || Top||

#8  Bush wants an open border. So complete silence. This is truly outrageous that men on duty , doing the correct thing in every way, are to be sent to prison. We should be marching in the streets demanding this wrong to be righted. You hardly hear mention of this. It's truly criminal.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/24/2006 12:22 Comments || Top||

#9  i wish I could have been on the jury.
Posted by: 49 Pan || 12/24/2006 12:25 Comments || Top||

#10  So the left feels we shouldchange their names from border patrol to welcome illeagals and terrorists committee.
Posted by: 49 Pan || 12/24/2006 12:28 Comments || Top||

#11  We have uncovered the Bush-American. An American by birth who believes in open borders. Not to be confused with a patriot.
Posted by: wxjames || 12/24/2006 15:02 Comments || Top||


Feds obstructed investigation of Islamic ties to OKC bombing

No, it's not the AP, but it is WND
Federal officials were "outrageously obstructive" during a congressional probe examining possible Islamic terrorist and foreign ties to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, according to a congressman who disclosed to WND some of the highlights of a subcommittee report scheduled for release next week. "The public would be outraged if they knew the extent of obstruction, or lack of cooperation, that has been given to this investigation," said Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., who led the probe as chairman of the International Relations' Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

One example was the Justice Department's handling of a lead Rohrabacher received from an independent investigator concerning a Muslim figure with suspected ties to the Oklahoma City bombing whose name curiously shows up on the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the 1993 World Trade Center attack. The New York City bombing was attributed to Muslim terrorists connected to al-Qaida.

The report will document a series of correspondence between the subcommittee team and Justice officials that concluded with a refusal to turn over information about the suspect – for no apparently legitimate reason, according to Rohrabacher. "This may well reflect the way the Justice Department deals with legislative branch investigations in general, which is very disappointing," Rohrabacher told WND. "In this case, however, we're talking about the investigation of the mass murder of 168 Americans and how that relates to the threat we face today from al-Qaida, and we find that to be rather alarming."

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Jackal || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  How about Congress concentrating their efforts on the FUTURE! McVeigh and his partner were sadly misguided wingnuts. I doubt he would have ever had anything to do with Al Qaida. And no, McVeigh did not design Saddam's mobile biochemical labs either. NEXXXXXXXXXXT !
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 1:07 Comments || Top||

#2  I don't buy an al Quaeda connection with Nichols & McVeigh, but I do agree that there are parts of the story that have been suppressed, and I haven't figured out why. I do find it plausible that there was some kind of collaboration between our domestic nutballs and Muslim - perhaps even Saddamist - nutballs, though certainly nothing has ever been proven. Kind of too bad McVeigh or Nichols couldn't have been remanded to Jordan or Egypt or such for a little questioning, but it would clearly have been illegal and unconstitutional. Neither of those guys were the sharpest knives in the drawer, which makes me wonder if someone was 'running' them.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/24/2006 1:35 Comments || Top||

#3  I'm strongly suspicious of conspiracy theories, and given what we face now, focusing on the future rather than the past is a good point. But I read The Third Terrorist years ago, and found it to be disturbingly credible. Davis was a local OKC TV reporter in 1995, one of the first to arrive on the scene (so not an outsider who came along later), and her assertions are meticulously documented. One WND article may not be persuasive, but the whole book certainly is. Read it before you make up your mind!
Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 1:56 Comments || Top||

#4  excuse my ignorance from the other side of the pond, but wern't these backward nutjob militia types. kkk loving, executive governtment hating neo fascists? Can't really see them welcoming the mad mullahs with open arms.
Posted by: pihkalbadger || 12/24/2006 9:04 Comments || Top||

#5  they were conservative-talk-radio-listening gun-owning Republicans. Billy Jeff Clinton said so
Posted by: Frank G || 12/24/2006 9:06 Comments || Top||

#6  They were anti-government nutjobs all right, but in that weird space where far left and far right meet, much like European extremists.

This is particularly true of McVeigh, who was a Desert Storm vet and came to feel sorry for the poor Iraqis. Davis reports information that suggests he was working with Iraqi agents of Saddam in OKC. Nichols, on the other hand, just wanted explosives expertise wherever he could get it, and he is alleged to have found it in Ramzi Yousef in the Philippines. Davis reports that phone records show LOTS of suspicious calls supporting this.

However, Davis doesn't claim to have established these connections conclusively; rather, her major beef is that the Clinton administration was so obsessed with cracking down on right-wing extremists (e.g., Waco, Ruby Ridge) that these possibilities were actively ignored. I think it's plausible.
Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 9:17 Comments || Top||

#7  ...and given what we face now, focusing on the future rather than the past is a good point.

But, isn't our failure to learn and retain the lessons of the past (near & distant) a major contributor to why we find ourselves in such dire straights today?
Posted by: Greremp Uleremp6059 || 12/24/2006 10:54 Comments || Top||

#8  GU6059, yes. More to the point, Davis tracked down a very interesting fact. She traced the steps of Nichols' and McVeigh's Arab associates, and found that the resided for a time at a motel in Norman, OK, in 1995. Turns out it was the same motel where two of the 9/11 hijackers stayed five years later, while attending flight school in Norman, OK.

Quite a coincidence, or they knew each other, raising the possibility that one or more 9/11 cells could have been broken up had the FBI pursued the Arab/Muslim angle, rather than every klucker within a 500-mile radius.
Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 11:45 Comments || Top||

#9  This was the classic muzzie bombing. Just like Khobar Towers. McVeigh was a dumb f**k who carried out the deed. Nichols is the key. He should be sweated until he squawks. He's the bag man going to Phillipines to meet with muzzies there. I think the Davis woman has documented that Iraqi agents were in Oklahoma City for months before this event. Clinton had to cover this up. He just had the NYC bombing. I think details are well known by FBI, and maybe another reason to go after Saddass.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/24/2006 12:29 Comments || Top||

#10  This has Slick Willy's dirty fingers all over it. That donk asshole was and is too much the coward to take a stand for anything but a Lewinski.
Why would anybody ever vote for a donk again ?
Posted by: wxjames || 12/24/2006 15:13 Comments || Top||

#11  More to the point, Davis tracked down a very interesting fact.

Oh man. Our Government needs a real house cleaning. Soon, I think.
Posted by: Greremp Uleremp6059 || 12/24/2006 21:07 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Democracy? Half of Pakistanis not sure
People in South Asia overwhelmingly support democracy, except in Pakistan, where about half the respondents in a survey have said democratic or non-democratic form of government made no difference to them.

Sri Lanka emerged as the country where democracy was most popular, while India was third after Bangladesh in terms of the percentage of people expressing support for the democratic system in the study 'State of Democracy in South Asia'.

"The people not only approve of democratic arrangements, they find it suitable for their own contexts. Seven out of eight responses in the region, higher than in East Asia, held that democracy was 'suitable' or 'very suitable' for their own country," the report said.

The study found that the citizens of South Asia do not simply like democracy; they prefer it over authoritarian rule.

"With the exception of Pakistan, about two-third of those who responded preferred democracy over any other form of government," the report said.

For every one response that endorses dictatorship, there are six that prefer democracy, which compares favourably with the ratio obtained in East Asia, Latin America and post-Soviet era countries of Europe.

However, about a quarter in other countries and half the respondents in Pakistan said democratic or non-democratic form of government made no difference to them.

Also, there is majority support for army rule in Pakistan and Bangladesh, the two countries in the region with a record of army rule.

"The idea that the country should be governed by the army was endorsed by six out of every ten responses in Pakistan and Bangladesh," said the report prepared by CSDS in collaboration with the International Institute of Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm and Department of Sociology, Oxford University.

The least support for army rule is in India, the report said, adding the higher the education, the lower the support for the army.

The survey was conducted in five countries in South Asia -- Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

"The world since 9/11 has seen the rise of another hypothesis of 'disconnect' between Islam and democracy. South Asia is home to over a quarter of the global Muslim population. Muslims are either the majority or a significant minority in all the five countries of this region," the report said.

"Thus, if the citizens in this region support democracy, this would have implications beyond South Asia," it added.
Posted by: john || 12/24/2006 08:09 || Comments || Link || [10 views] Top|| File under:

#1  If they asked Pakistanis about top priorities, I'm sure "killing infidels" would handily beat "democracy".
Posted by: DMFD || 12/24/2006 15:09 Comments || Top||

#2  The poll should have asked the Paks if they support Osama bin Laden for Caliph, that would put them in perspective wrt the rest of humanity.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/24/2006 23:02 Comments || Top||

#3  July 14, 2005 Pew Global Survey: In Pakistan, however, a narrow majority (51%) places some measure of confidence in bin Laden, a slight increase from 45% in 2003. And in Jordan, support for the Al Qaeda leader has risen over the last two years from 55% to a current 60%, including 25% who say they have a lot of confidence in him.
Posted by: ed || 12/24/2006 23:40 Comments || Top||


Jirga to discuss 'serious issues' in Miranshah
The 45-member tribal jirga that negotiated the September 5 North Waziristan peace accord will visit Miranshah to discuss “some serious issues” with pro-Taliban militant leaders, sources told Daily Times.
"What kind of issues?"
"Serious issues!"

The decision was made as Governor Ali Jan Orakzai chaired a meeting to review the three-month-old peace deal in North Waziristan. “The governor directed the jirga members to visit North Waziristan and carry out a detailed review of the state of affairs and remove bottlenecks, if any, for ensuring complete success in this regard,” a handout quoted Orakzai as saying to the jirga members at Governor’s House.

The meeting took place a day after an attack on an official vehicle near Miranshah in which a tribal cop was killed. It also comes amidst growing criticism of the accord in the western media.

A tribal who participated in the meeting told Daily Times that the governor invited the jirga members’ views on another jirga that President Pervez Musharraf and his Afghan counterpart Hamid Karzai agreed upon in Washington in late September. “We were of the opinion that the proposed jirga would be useless if it does not talk to the Taliban,” he said, requesting anonymity.

The governor was told that without talking to the Taliban and negotiating a ceasefire before the jirga, all efforts would “go to waste” because “a jirga means talking to both sides in the presence of a ceasefire,” the jirga member said.

Official sources said that the government was concerned at a number of incidents and told the jirga members to take up “these violations” of the accord with the militant leaders.

Shah Zaman, spokesman for the FATA Civil Secretariat, said that the jirga would leave for North Waziristan on Sunday (today) to “review and assess the situation” with other parties to the accord. “This jirga facilitates both sides and its job is to take one side’s complaints to the other party and vice versa,” he told Daily Times. He stopped short of saying that the government had complaints against the militants in connection with the implementation of the peace deal.
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [9 views] Top|| File under:

#1  like "is it OK to use a sidearm motion to whip the chattel lil woman, or must you use an overhand motion?"
Posted by: Frank G || 12/24/2006 8:17 Comments || Top||


Iraq
Bush ponders £10bn New Deal to create jobs in Iraq
The White House is expected to announce a reconstruction package for Iraq as part of a plan for a “surge” of up to 30,000 troops into Baghdad when President George W Bush unveils America’s new strategy next month.

Bush is being urged to give up to $10 billion (£5.1 billion) to Iraq as part of a “New Deal” that would create work for unemployed Iraqis, following the model of President Franklin D Roosevelt during the 1930s depression.

At the Pentagon, the joint chiefs of staff are insisting on reconstruction funds as part of a package of political and economic measures to accompany the armed forces. They fear the extra troops will be wasted and more lives lost if Bush relies purely on the military to pacify Iraq, according to sources close to General Peter Schoomaker, the army chief of staff.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: .com || 12/24/2006 08:59 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Let these MF'ers get to work and get oil onto the market. American taxpayers should not be funding any f**king thing in that hellhole. They should have monthly income on par with the Saoodis. If they had any sense at all. They don't.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/24/2006 12:34 Comments || Top||

#2  This is a superb idea from a military point of view, and something we should have done right at the onset of the occupation. The same with Afghanistan.

The core focus should be on creating small businesses, since they are the largest employers in modern economies. Employed people not only don't want to be troublemakers, they don't want troublemakers around them. They quickly become supporters of the status quo no matter what the status quo is.

It has long been recognized by organized crime syndicates, street gangs, and revolutionary organizations that economic prosperity and business are by far their worst enemies. They seek to fight and undermine them at all costs.

If properly organized, "ground-level" minimum wage employment is first selected on how it will make *new* jobs. For example, hiring lots of men to clear fields of rock and build rock fences, dig canals, and make other unskilled preparations, prior to converting the land into farmland. Once they are done, they move on, and other people are employed in running the new farm.

For about $1Bn, the US could have several hundred thousand Afghans working, earning money, and supporting their families. This seed money would in just a few years, end up with Afghanistan producing several billion dollars of GDP--exactly what they need to support themselves and their national defenses.

The acid test of this program will be how the money is directed. If it is used to create big business in Iraq, it will be thrown down a rat hole. If small business, it will strongly work.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 12/24/2006 13:32 Comments || Top||

#3  Except what would have been the cost, anonymoose, for newly created businesses having been targeted for 5 years+? We build then reconstruct how many times for the Iraqis? And how will you ask US taxpayers to fund dozens of buildings be rebuilt when they can be taken down again by populace-supported armed militas?
Posted by: Jules || 12/24/2006 13:58 Comments || Top||

#4  Loan them the bucks against future oil sales. They have the income. We've no need to be spending this kind of wealth on these ingrates. We've done enough already. Anyone who thinks otherwise is out of their mind. I'm tired or trying to "reconstruct" a cesspool. The Iraqis will kickstart their own economy when they're finally serious about ending the internecine slaughter and getting on with business.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 14:17 Comments || Top||

#5  and until they do kickstart it keep the clock running on the interest on this 10B and some of the other money spent so far.
Posted by: jds || 12/24/2006 14:31 Comments || Top||

#6  I expect the Democrats to whine and holler about all the "poor" people in the United States who need reparations, the sad Katrina peeps, the welfare folks, the abortion clinics, etc. etc. etc.
Posted by: Captain America || 12/24/2006 18:31 Comments || Top||

#7  Oh, I forgot, the underfunded whinos in San Fran

Why, George Marshall will be turning in his grave.
Posted by: Captain America || 12/24/2006 18:33 Comments || Top||


Sistani Balks at Plan for Iraq
A U.S.-backed plan to form a political coalition of Iraq's Shiites, Sunni Arabs and Kurds - a glimmer of hope in a nation torn by sectarian violence - failed to win the crucial support of the top Shiite cleric Saturday. Lawmakers who presented the plan to Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani in the holy city of Najaf said they were told the unity of Shiites, who have the largest bloc in parliament, had to come first.

By shunning the coalition plan, al-Sistani sought to unite the Shiite's fractured 130-member United Iraqi Alliance. But his decision - which carries great weight with the country's Shiite majority - significantly weakens American hopes for a national unity government and strengthens the hand of the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Al-Sistani's decision may not doom the proposed coalition, but it significantly reduces the it's chances. "There are obstacles in the face of forming this coalition, because al-Sistani does not support it," said Hassan al-Suneid, a top aide to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

An official close to al-Sistani, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to talk to the media, said the cleric "will not bless nor support any new bloc or front. He only supports the unity of the Shiites."

The proposed coalition - which would not have included al-Sadr's supporters - could have isolated the militant cleric, commander of a militia army blamed for many sectarian attacks. Those attacks continued Saturday, as police in Baghdad said they discovered 47 bodies — apparent victims of violence between Sunni and Shiites.
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Couldn't quiet make that final leap into the 17th Century.
Posted by: Shipman || 12/24/2006 0:11 Comments || Top||

#2  Surprise metter
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 3:13 Comments || Top||

#3  Iraq probably won't get well until they ban all religious figures from holding any sort of government office. Just a guess.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 3:19 Comments || Top||

#4  I hope al-sistani lives long enough to smell the fetid breath from tater's decayed mouth taunting him for this foolishness just before the latter gives the order to his men to eliminate the former.
Posted by: Ptah || 12/24/2006 21:08 Comments || Top||


Gates reports to Bush on Iraq findings
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, just back from a trip to Iraq, met with President George W. Bush at the Camp David presidential retreat, the White House said, adding that all options remained on the table. Gates was to report to Bush on his talks with Iraqi leaders, in which he discussed ways to step up US assistance to secure violence-torn Baghdad. "The president is leaving all options on the table on the way forward," Blain Rethmeier, a White House spokesman, said in a statement.

Joining Bush and Gates in the meeting in Maryland were Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, national security adviser Stephen Hadley and Hadley's deputy Jack Crouch, Rethmeier said. Gates's report comes as the Bush administration is plotting some change in Iraq policy, expected to be announced next month. Bush is under intense political pressure for an overhaul of his Iraq policy, following the rout of his Republican Party in legislative elections, rock-bottom public approval of his management of the Iraq war and mounting US combat deaths.
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Mr. President, please listen to your generals (now that they appear to be free to speak), not some slippery Klingon master. Senator Daschle's comments of 1991 below:

“Well, let bygones be bygones. Iran-Contra was a terrible thing, but maybe he’s reformed.” Daschle, Senator Daschle, back in ’91, said, “We can’t afford to take the chance that a fellow who has deliberately trimmed intelligence and taken liberties with the truth will reform.”
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 4:58 Comments || Top||

#2  great, besoeker, quote your hero, Daschle. Tom "deeply disappointed" Thumb D-Asshole never met an intelligence or military budget he didn't want to cut and also obstructed every effort to rebuild. If Gates pissed of Daschle, I take that as a plus
Posted by: Frank G || 12/24/2006 8:21 Comments || Top||


US generals agree to troop surge in Iraq
LOS ANGELES - Top US military commanders in Iraq have decided to recommend a “surge” of fresh American combat forces, eliminating one of the last remaining hurdles to proposals being considered by President George W. Bush, The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday. Citing an unnamed defence official, ...
... of course, they just can't ever be named ...
... the newspaper said the approval of a troop increase plan by top Iraq commanders, including General George Casey and Lieutenant General Raymond Odierno, comes days before Bush unveils a new course for Iraq.

The recommendation by the commanders in Iraq is significant because Bush has placed prime importance on their advice, the report said.

The US command in Iraq decided to recommend an increase of troops several days ago, prior to meetings in Baghdad this week with Defence Secretary Robert Gates, according to The Times. The defence official said commanders have not determined the exact number of extra troops they will request, the report said.

Military officers have debated an increase of about 20,000, about five extra combat brigades, The Times said. But while some officers think five extra brigades would be difficult to muster, others believe more troops will be required, the paper reported.
Posted by: Steve White || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Now that Rumsfeld is gone......Top US military commanders in Iraq have bravely decided to urgently request recommend a “surge” of fresh American combat forces, eliminating one of the last remaining hurdles to proposals being....
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 1:14 Comments || Top||

#2  So all those plans and programs that were put in place now have to the revised to suit the morality-political play in Washington. That means logisitical support and positioning of resources, security requirements for material transport, budget support requirements for operations [remember that request for additional monies for the war effort submitted last week is now crap as costs to support not just the extra troops but their operations just killed those old numbers], etc. etc. etc. are now in the air. Any real planners out there? Just as you get some hold of the natural aspect of chaos that conflict is, the pols come in an throw even more chaos into the situation. This is a push, not a pull requirement.
Posted by: Uniter Angomonter3858 || 12/24/2006 8:34 Comments || Top||

#3  With the money that is being spend here now, you could build one of these for every city in the United States over the population of 20,000 and provide free lifetime residential fees and carts to everyone:

http://www.jellesen.dk/masters/web/course.html
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 8:43 Comments || Top||

#4  The link doesn't works, Besoeker.
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/24/2006 18:39 Comments || Top||

#5  Augusta National Golf Club
Posted by: Greremp Uleremp6059 || 12/24/2006 20:45 Comments || Top||


Olde Tyme Religion
Wiccan Lawsuit's Goal: Acceptance
That they fight for my country to preserve Freedom is good enough for me. Accepted.

Wait, they don't hurt no fluffy ducks, bunnies, puppies, kittens, or purdy trees, do they?
H'okay, I'm in.
Posted by: .com || 12/24/2006 11:46 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  As a Christian I have no problem with this - in fact, I support it fully. If they served our country and are buried with Veterans honors they should have whatever symbol represents their religious beliefs - they've earned it.

Wicca itself: I have numerous issues with, but they are all strictly theological. I have no concern about Wiccans and potentially divided loyalties as citizens. Islam, on the other hand...
Posted by: xbalanke || 12/24/2006 12:54 Comments || Top||

#2  Actually the suit is whether to put a pentacle on the tombstone. Given that this is also a symbol of devil worship, I can understand the government's position. Most religions have multiple symbols to identify themselves. PErhaps the Wiccans can select another symbol.

Al
Posted by: frozen al || 12/24/2006 14:19 Comments || Top||

#3  My mom's a Wicaan (a Wiccan Republican, heh). The pentacle has the star pointed up, and symbolizes protection. Devil worship has the star pointed down. Perhaps people could pause from their wigging out long enough to notice the distinction.

However, suing people is definitely not the best path to acceptance.
Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 14:54 Comments || Top||

#4  Point up vs point down is a pretty subtle distinction. Rather like noticing which way the arms on a swastika point. The whole idea of a symbol is quick recognition. Maybe they should use an ice cream cone. Everyone likes ice cream.

As for the other points (heh):
Preseving freedom - good
Suing for acceptance - not so good.
Posted by: SteveS || 12/24/2006 15:27 Comments || Top||

#5  SteveS, I'd considered that, but is the difference between a pentacle (point-up) vs. pentagram (point-down) any more subtle than the Star of David having six points instead of five? I'd say no, it's just more common.

At the same time, I consider something my dad said to me as a teenager, when I was in that spiked-purple-hair, nose-ring, black-leather phase: "shit, kid, if you don't want people staring at you, don't dress like that."

I thought, "fuck you." But he had a good point. :)
Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 15:45 Comments || Top||

#6  Technically, it is the interior pentagon within the pentangle that should be pointing upwards in order to create the "good" pentagram. An inverted pentangle is what creates this. Wiccans use the un-inverted pentangle which actually could be construed as being engaged in devil worship by exacting individuals.

I have been to Wiccan covens and they are, for the most part, harmless. I just happen to view it as another massively layered pantheon that does not necessarily elucidate or articulate with great clarity about the human spirit itself. My own perception is that it represents a pleasing escape from more rigidly patriarchal forms of established religion while cloaking itself in remnants of historical references that give it an air of authenticity. One might as well believe in the the Greek or Roman mythologies for that matter.

That said, it is a relatively harmless practice and certainly not worthy of censure unlike another ideology that gets a lot more electronic ink around here. As to Wiccanism, the current "religion" that is being practiced was manufactured out of whole cloth using ancient symbology by Gerald Gardner back in the early to mid 1900s.

Wicca is a Neopagan religion and a religious movement found in various countries throughout the world. It was first popularised in 1954 by a British civil servant named Gerald Gardner[1] after the British Witchcraft Act was repealed. He claimed that the religion, of which he was an initiate, was a modern survival of an old witchcraft religion, which had existed in secret for hundreds of years, originating in the pre-Christian Paganism of Europe. Wicca is thus sometimes referred to as the Old Religion. The veracity of Gardner's claims cannot be independently proven, and it is thought that written Wiccan theology began to be compiled no earlier than the 1920s. Various related Wiccan traditions have since evolved, or been adapted from, the form established by Gardner, which came to be called Gardnerian Wicca. These other traditions of Wicca each have distinctive beliefs, rituals, and practices. Many traditions of Wicca remain secretive and require that members be initiated. There is also a movement of Eclectic or Solitary Wiccans who do not believe that any doctrine or traditional initiation is necessary in order to practice Wicca.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 16:22 Comments || Top||

#7  Old Time Religion

Chorus:

Give me that old time religion (3x)
And that's good enough for me


We will pray to Aphrodite
Even tho' she's rather flighty
And they say she wears no nightie
And that's good enough for me


We will pray with those Egyptians
Build pyramids to put our crypts in
Cover subways with inscriptions
And that's good enough for me


O-old Odin we will follow
And in fighting we will wallow
Til we wind up in Valhalla
And that's good enough for me


Let me follow dear old Buddha
For there is nobody cuter
He comes in plaster, wood or pewter
And that's good enough for me


We will pray with Zarathustra
Pray just like we useta
I'm a Zarathustra booster
And that's good enough for me


We will pray with those old Druids
They drink fermented fluids
Waltzing naked thru the woo-ids
And that's good enough for me


Hare Krishna gets a laugh on
When he sees me dressed in saffron
With my hair that's only half on
And that's good enough for me


I'll arise at early morning
When the sun gives me the warning
That the solar age is dawning
And that's good enough for me
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 16:43 Comments || Top||

#8  Sounds about right to me, Zen. But I'm not about to lecture my mom about her spirtuality. She's still finding herself after a brutal divorce and a horrible car accident, and nature makes her feel better. That's the result I want, and I'm not real particular about how she gets there.

I agree that Wicca is flaky, but lots of women in her demographic have turned to Wicca because it gives them a framework within which to heal from serious emotional trauma. It's easy to make fun of, until it's your own mother. Wiccans have their reasons, and Jesus isn't always the answer.

I wear the pentacle she gave me, beause it's meaningful to her. Occasionally I remind her of the Old Testament justice that's sure to be meted out, and that Muslims slaughter pagans first. She'll come around -- it just takes time.

Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 17:03 Comments || Top||

#9  Nice work there, ex-JAG, in recovering from the spiked hair phase.
Posted by: mac || 12/24/2006 17:07 Comments || Top||

#10  Aw, mac, the spike-haired kid is still in there. I just traded in the black eyeliner and hairspray for a law degree and guns, LOL. ;)
Posted by: exJAG || 12/24/2006 17:13 Comments || Top||

#11  I agree that Wicca is flaky, but lots of women in her demographic have turned to Wicca because it gives them a framework within which to heal from serious emotional trauma. It's easy to make fun of, until it's your own mother. Wiccans have their reasons, and Jesus isn't always the answer.

I'm not so much making fun of Wiccanism as pointing out how it, often as not, merely exchanges one elaborate set of rituals for another. My own feeling is that the human spirit is of such unusual depth and clarity that it doesn't take much window dressing to really clutter up the screens. Another term for this is "spiritual materialism", or the inability to relenquish entrenched modes of worship and ritual.

That cluttering effect of excessive nomenclature and process can misdirect or divert focus upon what really matters, which is simple goodness, integrity and a sense of honor.

If Wiccanism is helping your mother recover from emotional and physical trauma, more power to her. We each of us must find our own path towards human perfection and peaceful community.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 17:22 Comments || Top||

#12  If a Wiccan wins national office, what do they swear on?
Posted by: JohnQC || 12/24/2006 19:17 Comments || Top||

#13  ask Icerigger
Posted by: Frank G || 12/24/2006 19:19 Comments || Top||

#14  I really don't have much respect for wiccans, but what the heck. They're Americans, too, and should have whatever they want if they make the ultimate sacrifice for the nation. Heck, the upside-down pentacle types are very lovable, but I'd still trust one them over a crescent.
Posted by: Jackal || 12/24/2006 20:22 Comments || Top||

#15  Jackal, the islamic crescent is actually stylized horns.
Posted by: twobyfour || 12/24/2006 20:44 Comments || Top||

#16  As to Wiccanism, the current "religion" that is being practiced was manufactured out of whole cloth using ancient symbology by Gerald Gardner back in the early to mid 1900s.

For the sake of intellectual honesty, the exact same thing can be said for the Hare Krishna sect cult. This group was started with the exclusive purpose of taking young acolytes (or more mature fools), absorbing any material assets they might have, feeding them incredibly cheap and questionably nutritious vegetarian fare in order to have them work for free selling heavily marked up crappy quality incense and dubious over priced quasi-religious tomes at airports or on street corners while the more attractive recruits were directed into the arms of higher-ups and their not-so-tender mercies.

It was only after decades of operation that the Krishnas received any sort of validating affiliation with another more reputable Hindu organization.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 21:02 Comments || Top||


Sri Lanka
India rules out direct intervention in Lanka
Rejecting the concept of Tamil Eelam advocated by LTTE, India yesterday favoured a solution to the ethnic problem in Sri Lanka within the territorial integrity and constitutional framework while meeting the legitimate aspirations of Tamils.

External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee ruled out any direct Indian intervention in Sri Lanka to resolve the ethnic crisis in the island nation. “We have no intention of directly intervening in Sri Lanka,” he told reporters after inaugurating the All India Passport Officers meeting here. At the same time, the legitimate aspirations of ethnic groups, especially of Tamils had to be met, he said. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh yesterday voiced India’s concern over the deteriorating situation in Sri Lanka at a path-breaking meeting with a group of Tamil MPs from the island nation who are supportive of the Tamil Tigers.

Speaking outside Manmohan Singh’s office, R Sampanthan, who led the five-member Tamil National Alliance (TNA) team, quoted the Prime Minister as saying that India was “very concerned about the denial of human rights” to the Tamil community in Sri Lanka.

Sampanthan also quoted Manmohan Singh as saying: “India is committed to a peaceful solution (of the conflict) in a manner acceptable to the Tamil speaking people. This message has been clearly conveyed to Sri Lanka on more than one occasion”.

The TNA leader added: “He (Manmohan Singh) assured us that India will continue to make every effort to see that Tamils get their self respect and dignity”.

Sampanthan described the 45-minute meeting, also attended by National Security Adviser M K Narayanan and Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon, as one “of tremendous significance” and said that it “will have significant impact on the coming future”. “We look forward to the Indian government taking appropriate action for the security of the Tamil people,” Sampathan told reporters. Manmohan Singh, Sampanthan said, also expressed dismay over moves to break into two the island’s north-eastern province that was merged into one following the 1987 India-Sri Lanka accord.

“He was very concerned about that... It will cause immense harm... There must be a political resolution to the crisis.” Yesterday’s meeting is the first high-profile one between an Indian Prime Minister and any Tamil group sympathetic to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which New Delhi outlawed in 1992.

It took place two days after the TNA delegation had similar discussions with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi, whose DMK party is a key member of the country’s ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA).
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 09:33 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Refuses to Cease Uranium Enrichment
"Nope, nope, won't do that, nosiree. Nope."
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/24/2006 08:11 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Sanctions have been voted. Who enforces the sanctions--not the UN. What is the next gambit?
Posted by: JohnQC || 12/24/2006 9:40 Comments || Top||

#2  16 more sets of sanctions to be violated.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 12/24/2006 9:42 Comments || Top||

#3  16 more sets of sanctions to be violated.

But wait, there's MORE!

Then comes the Oil for Food Nukes program.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 18:40 Comments || Top||


Iran's silenced students strike back
AS PROTESTS broke out at a prestigious Tehran university, cutting short a speech by president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Babak Zamanian could only watch from afar. He was on crutches, having been clubbed by supporters of the president and had his foot run over by a motorcycle during a less publicised student demonstration a few days earlier.

But the significance of the confrontation earlier this month was easy to grasp, even from a distance, said Zamanian, a leader of a student political group. The student movement, which planned the 1979 seizure of the United States embassy from the same university, Amir Kabir, is reawakening from its recent slumber and may even be spearheading a widespread resistance against Ahmadinejad. This time the catalysts were academic and personal freedom.

"It is not that simple to break up a president's speech," said Alireza Siassirad, a former student political organiser, explaining that an event of that magnitude takes meticulous planning. "I think what happened at Amir Kabir is a very important and dangerous sign. Students are definitely becoming active again."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Seafarious || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [8 views] Top|| File under:


Gist of U.N. resolution on Iran
(Kyodo) - The following is the gist of a draft resolution on Iran the U.N. Security Council unanimously approved Saturday for its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment.

The Security Council requires all states to:
-- act under Article 41 of Chapter 7 of U.N. Charter.

-- take necessary measures to prevent transfer of all items which could contribute to Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile development programs.

-- freeze immediately financial assets owned by Iranian individuals or entities abroad.
The council also:
-- calls on all states to exercise vigilance on entry into or transit through their territories of 12 individuals, including Iranian government officials, and those related to 10 entities.

-- decides to establish a sanctions committee and requests within 60 days a report from the IAEA chief on whether Iran has established full suspension of all enrichment activities.

-- shall suspend implementation of measures if Iran suspends all enrichment activities and shall adopt further appropriate measures if Iran does not comply with the resolution.
Posted by: Fred || 12/24/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [13 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Merry Fucking Xmas!
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087 || 12/24/2006 23:16 Comments || Top||


Terror Networks
Report: English Channel Tunnel a Terror Target
The tunnel beneath the English Channel that connects Britain to France is a Christmas terror target of Islamic terrorists, according to a report published Sunday.

The plot, which was first uncovered by the United States CIA and passed along to the French intelligence service on Dec. 19, is aimed at the heavy rush of holiday travel, according to the report in the Sunday Observer. While there are currently no specific details, what is known comes from a secret report to the French government on terror threat levels.

U.S. security sources told The Observer the threat was "sky high."

Click here to read the original Observer story.

In reaction, British and French officials have continually checked the security system protecting the 31-mile tunnel. The French warn the threat level remains high. British security forces will remain on high alert throughout the holiday season.

French sources said the plan was formulated in Pakistan and is being directed from there. The terror plotters are believed to possibly be Britons of Pakistani descent, said the sources.
So, the French confirmed it. Interesting. Musta come from one of those evil illegal surveillance programs - which will prolly be shut down soon after Jan 20, 07. Better that they should succeed, rather than impinge upon imaginary privacy rights when a tool gets a call from his Quetta controller.

Officials report a higher number of Europeans are using the tunnel to head home for the holidays as fog continues to affect flights to and from Britain.

The report also mentions a possible Al Qaeda plan to attack an unidentified European country between September 2006 and April 2007, a plan orchestrated from Syria and Iran.
Posted by: .com || 12/24/2006 00:38 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I could have published a report like this about 1 or 2 years ago.......of course it is a possible target...
Posted by: Ulens Phineck4959 || 12/24/2006 4:47 Comments || Top||

#2  Nice bicycle! Orville please meet Wilber. Wilber, please meet Orville, oh ... you already know one another?
Posted by: Besoeker || 12/24/2006 5:00 Comments || Top||

#3  Somehow, the West needs to come up with a reprisal target list for any attacks against major landmarks and facilities. Nail the Chunnel, kiss Kargh Island goodbye. Something of that sort. Islam needs to be read the riot act in a big way. I really don't care if we nail Shiite property over Sunni atrocities or vice versa, we just need to begin sharing our pain at every opportunity these shits give us.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 6:51 Comments || Top||

#4  one quibble...the story describes "Islamic terrorists". I believe in fact that it is the Calvinists who kicking up all this dust! Could even be those pesky Quakers again (oatmeal does that to ya, ya know?)
Posted by: Justrand || 12/24/2006 10:00 Comments || Top||

#5  The report also mentions a possible Al Qaeda plan to attack an unidentified European country between September 2006 and April 2007, a plan orchestrated from Syria and Iran.

But how can that be?? The Iraq Study Group said Syria and Iran would be our partners in establishing peace in the middle east.
Posted by: DMFD || 12/24/2006 10:09 Comments || Top||

#6  I really don't care if we nail Shiite property over Sunni atrocities or vice versa,...

BRILLIANT! When the Shi'ite commit an atrocity, pimp slap the Sunni, and vice versa. They'll keep each other in line.
Posted by: Greremp Uleremp6059 || 12/24/2006 21:00 Comments || Top||

#7  When the Shi'ite commit an atrocity, pimp slap the Sunni, and vice versa. They'll keep each other in line.

This is why I so strongly advocate what Mrs. Davis once recommended;

Put every Muslim majority nation on notice that all of them will be held accountable for any further Islamist atrocities. Let them scramble amongst themselves to avert pending disaster. It would be more than a little amusing to watch these rogue bastards fall all over each other attempting to interdict the terrorist filth they've worked so hard to breed up.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/24/2006 21:34 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
92[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Sun 2006-12-24
  UN Security Council approves Iran sanctions
Sat 2006-12-23
  Somali provisional govt, Islamic courts do battle
Fri 2006-12-22
  War is on in Somalia!
Thu 2006-12-21
  Turkmenbashi croaks; World one megalomaniac lighter
Wed 2006-12-20
  Yet another Hamas-Fatah ceasefire
Tue 2006-12-19
  James Ujaama nabbed in Belize
Mon 2006-12-18
  Palestinian Clashes Kill 2; Presidential Compound Hit
Sun 2006-12-17
  Abbas Calls for Early Palestinian Vote
Sat 2006-12-16
  Street clashes spread in Gaza
Fri 2006-12-15
  Paleos shoot up Haniyeh convoy
Thu 2006-12-14
  Brammertz finds 'significant links' in Lebanon killings
Wed 2006-12-13
  Arab League seeks end to Leb crisis
Tue 2006-12-12
  Hamas gunnies kill three little sons of Abbas aide in Gaza
Mon 2006-12-11
  Talabani lashes out at 'dangerous' Baker report
Sun 2006-12-10
  Lahoud refuses to endorse Hariri tribunal accord


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.188.20.56
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (25)    Non-WoT (20)    Opinion (7)    Local News (18)    (0)