Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 01/09/2022 View Sat 01/08/2022 View Fri 01/07/2022 View Thu 01/06/2022 View Wed 01/05/2022 View Tue 01/04/2022 View Mon 01/03/2022
1
2022-01-09 Science & Technology
New study of Pfizer's COVID vaccine has some disturbing findings
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-01-09 02:44|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [316 views ]  Top

#1 Additional Pfizer research data arriving in 75 years.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-01-09 02:47||   2022-01-09 02:47|| Front Page Top

#2 I am anti vaccine. But the writer of this article is fataly bad at understanding math.
Posted by flash91 2022-01-09 03:40||   2022-01-09 03:40|| Front Page Top

#3 When the CDC and the FDA said it would take 75 years to produce the files, it was a big red flag to me
I took the booster on the strong advice of my oncologist
I was in bed with a number of side effects, such as, elevated pulse rates into the 150 range, severe headaches, shortness of breath and fatigue
Reading these papers makes me wonder why they rolled these monsters out and why they didn’t withdraw them
I read somewhere that over 458,000 worldwide have died from vaccine related side effects and those have been lumped in with the COVID deaths
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2022-01-09 10:37||   2022-01-09 10:37|| Front Page Top

#4 It's not truly a vaccine. It's actually a super-risky gene therapy that teaches the body to manufacture spike proteins. This means that its effects are much riskier and much less predictable than a normal vaccine.

For public health policy, the big problem is that the risk-benefit calculus varies enormously by age. Young people are at almost zero risk from COVID but are at great risk of myocarditis from the vaccine.

If we had followed the Great Barrington Declaration doctors' wise approach and focused our efforts on the elderly, we would have been far better off in every way.

This self-inflicted catastrophe has destroyed public confidence in the medical profession and shown our political class to be power-mad idiots who blindly follow each other's worst instincts without any regard for data, evidence or logic.
Posted by Merrick Ferret 2022-01-09 11:14||   2022-01-09 11:14|| Front Page Top

#5 @3
Funny how they can kick out and give EUA in a couple of months but they have to peacemeal that data over 75 years because of the "undue burden" to review the data. I have to site Biden, "c'mon, man".

@1
Did you see where a fed judge told the FDA they were full of s**t and ordered to kick out 55,000 pages per month?
Posted by Ebbeper Omoluger3320 2022-01-09 11:40||   2022-01-09 11:40|| Front Page Top

#6 AfterPfiser, my resting heart beat went from 60 to 40 and stayed there for almost 6 weeks. I developed AFIB and blood clots in the heart. 10 months later I am starting to feel and think better. Send shots to Aidan if we can’t nuke them!
Posted by Gpa Cooky 2022-01-09 13:48||   2022-01-09 13:48|| Front Page Top

#7 This is basic stuff - absolute vs relative risk. Pfizer plays the same numbers game with Lipitor marketing.

What's really interesting is that the study group of 18,000 individuals had a less than 1% case rate while the general population was more like 15%.
Posted by Angstrom 2022-01-09 16:38||   2022-01-09 16:38|| Front Page Top

#8 Also, for giggles, look at Maddy de Garay. 12 year girl in the Pfizer kids trial. Had a stroke. She's 13 now in a wheelchair with a feeding tube. Pfizer wrote up the adverse event as "stomach upset."
Posted by Angstrom 2022-01-09 16:41||   2022-01-09 16:41|| Front Page Top

#9 Selling a product with zero ramifications.

You should expect lies in the sales pitch.
Posted by flash91 2022-01-09 17:21||   2022-01-09 17:21|| Front Page Top

#10 So, it's less "If it saves just one life," and more "We have to destroy the village to save it."
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-01-09 17:24||   2022-01-09 17:24|| Front Page Top

#11 I'm not anti-vaccine but I'm drifting in that direction more and more. The missus and I have both had two Moderna jabs plus the booster. However, we both probably will get no future jabs. The more this Washington circus goes on, the more distrust is fostered. There is a total lack of transparency regarding anything coming out of D.C. These people are dishonest and have no regard for the American people.
Posted by JohnQC 2022-01-09 17:25||   2022-01-09 17:25|| Front Page Top

#12 There are a growing number of studies (in the vicinity of 1000)all debunking the safety of these "vaccines". The Media's compliant silence on the allegations against Pfizer's testing practices is truly impressive. Is it any wonder that more and more people (just not seemingly here in NZ)are beginning to awaken from the governmental induced fear coma?
Posted by JakTheRipper 2022-01-09 22:50||   2022-01-09 22:50|| Front Page Top

#13 Vaxxed were 20 times less likely to be infected.

"Actual risk reduction" doesn't make any sense.
Posted by KBK 2022-01-09 23:25||   2022-01-09 23:25|| Front Page Top

#14 Nobel Prize winner Dr. Luc Montagnier:
"It would be irrational, legally indefensible and contrary to the public interest for government to mandate vaccines absent any evidence that the vaccines are effective in stopping the spread of the pathogen they target. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening here...."
Posted by Merrick Ferret 2022-01-09 23:32||   2022-01-09 23:32|| Front Page Top

23:55 Phavimble Pholurong2922
23:32 Merrick Ferret
23:31 KBK
23:26 KBK
23:25 KBK
23:20 KBK
23:19 KBK
22:50 JakTheRipper
21:10 trailing wife
20:44 Merrick Ferret
20:32 Frank G
19:58 Silentbrick
19:53 Merrick Ferret
19:49 badanov
19:44 Merrick Ferret
19:43 magpie
19:41 Merrick Ferret
19:41 Bangkok Billy
19:40 M. Murcek
19:39 jefe101
19:37 The Walking Unvaxed
19:31 Merrick Ferret
19:28 I spit on you aka black is a form of dirt
19:21 Merrick Ferret
Merry-Go-Blog










Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com