Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/28/2021 View Wed 10/27/2021 View Tue 10/26/2021 View Mon 10/25/2021 View Sun 10/24/2021 View Sat 10/23/2021 View Fri 10/22/2021
1
2021-10-28 China-Japan-Koreas
Taiwan admits presence of US troops
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2021-10-28 08:45|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Falklands redux
Posted by Procopius2k 2021-10-28 14:02||   2021-10-28 14:02|| Front Page Top

#2 Spengler opined the following before this was news:
Nonetheless, a war over Taiwan remains a significant risk during the next several years. If Washington stations troops on the island, as former National Security Adviser John Bolton urges, or takes other steps to establish Taiwan’s sovereignty, China probably will seize the island.

What might ensue is depicted in the novel 2034 by former Pacific Command chief John Stavridis and Elliot Ackerman: A nuclear exchange that erases a few Chinese and American cities with no victor.
Posted by Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2021-10-28 15:00||   2021-10-28 15:00|| Front Page Top

#3 Falklands redux

Somebody please tell Pres. Magoo that
Xi =/= Galtieri
PLA =/= Argentine navy
Posted by Merrick Ferret 2021-10-28 15:19||   2021-10-28 15:19|| Front Page Top

#4 Do the US troops serve a a tripwire to deter China, or does their presence up the ante and force China to go big when they make their move?

The best thing for China is to win Taiwan without fighting through territorial salami-slicing, buying up politicians, and military threats. If things do jump off, keeping the US out of the game would be a huge help.

It may be that the Chinese do the math and decide that their advantage will never be greater, so let's do it now. Just like Japan back in the 1940s. Given the current Chinese focus on unrestricted war against both civilian and military targets, I'd expect a lot of damage to CONUS in order to keep us busy at home and out of the South China Sea. Hey, didn't someone test a port-destroying weapon the other day?
Posted by SteveS 2021-10-28 17:39||   2021-10-28 17:39|| Front Page Top

#5 ^ No, that was a CA law against freighters loitering to unload cargo, no trucks older than 2011, ...
Oh, wait, nevermind
Posted by Frank G 2021-10-28 20:45||   2021-10-28 20:45|| Front Page Top

22:03 Frank G
21:19 Merrick Ferret
21:18 Procopius2k
20:49 Frank G
20:48 Frank G
20:45 Frank G
20:36 Sporong Noodleman3554
19:59 magpie
19:29 Procopius2k
19:06 AlmostAnonymous5839
18:36 Bobby
18:15 Bobby
18:12 Bobby
18:11 Merrick Ferret
18:10 Jise Elmeang4932
18:10 Rambler in Virginia
18:01 Skidmark
17:59 Besoeker
17:57 Skidmark
17:52 crazyhorse
17:50 Skidmark
17:47 Skidmark
17:45 Percy Flotle3938
17:45 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com