Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/18/2019 View Thu 10/17/2019 View Wed 10/16/2019 View Tue 10/15/2019 View Mon 10/14/2019 View Sun 10/13/2019 View Sat 10/12/2019
2019-10-18 -Land of the Free
Judge Finds Serious ‘Disconnect' in ATF's Classification of AR-15 Lower Receivers as ‘Firearms'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-10-18 04:58|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [6486 views ]  Top

#1 More detail from TTAG:

BTW__ I submitted an earlier article on this from TTAG a few days ago but it apparently didn't pass the Mods's' sniff test...along with several others in the past week or so, tho, I'll admit the toilet paper one was a bit over the top....8)
Posted by Mercutio 2019-10-18 08:50||   2019-10-18 08:50|| Front Page Top

#2 Apologize for your difficulties Merc. We don't have the luxury of deleting submissions. If it even looks close to newsworthy, it's posted, sometimes shortened a bit, but posted.

Keep posting and let us know if you have difficulty.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-10-18 08:58||   2019-10-18 08:58|| Front Page Top

#3 About 16 million AR-15s are in civilian hands with the law as it stands now. I have a hard time believing any effort to jigger the existing law will result in anything that would look like an improvement from a pro Second Amendment point of view.
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-10-18 11:10||   2019-10-18 11:10|| Front Page Top

#4 Will do, B.
Posted by Mercutio 2019-10-18 13:11||   2019-10-18 13:11|| Front Page Top

#5 I submitted an earlier article on this from TTAG a few days ago

Is this the article you’re referring to, Mercutio?

I will delete articles in the hopper that are duplicates, are missing URLs if I’m too busy to search the internet for the article, are outside of Rantburg’s areas of interest, or are overly excited rather than factual.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-10-18 14:19||   2019-10-18 14:19|| Front Page Top

#6 Duh. uh-huh.
Now what about my toilet paper screed?
Posted by Mercutio 2019-10-18 21:37||   2019-10-18 21:37|| Front Page Top

#7 A search reveals your Charmin post was published here, Mercutio. Really stupid people who deserve to be mocked — while they were fussing they did not look into the fact that Procter & Gamble has been responsibly managing forests for paper manufacture for almost a century. And really, recycled paper toilet paper is only one small step above the Soviet stuff. Still, the nice thing about a capitalist economy is that those who want recycled can sand their bottoms while we who are willing to be comfortable have other choices available.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-10-18 22:07||   2019-10-18 22:07|| Front Page Top

23:59 Captain Hupinesh4743
23:45 newc
23:37 JohnQC
23:09 james
23:08 SteveS
23:06 james
23:06 bbrewer126
22:58 james
22:46 james
22:38 trailing wife
22:35 bbrewer126
22:31 bbrewer126
22:28 bbrewer126
22:07 trailing wife
21:37 Mercutio
20:56 Procopius2k
20:29 Fat Bob Javish1936
20:27 Vernal Hatrick
20:11 SteveS
20:01 SteveS
19:17 Dron66046
17:57 g(r)omgoru
17:31 rjschwarz
17:27 rjschwarz

Search WWW Search