Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/10/2013 View Tue 04/09/2013 View Mon 04/08/2013 View Sun 04/07/2013 View Sat 04/06/2013 View Fri 04/05/2013 View Thu 04/04/2013
1
2013-04-10 China-Japan-Koreas
ROK raises surveillance status to monitor NK missile launch
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2013-04-10 00:00|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 Ima guessing that the result of this whole fiasco is that the ROK and the US have not been so militarily and politically united at any other time since the Korean War. (Not to mention getting the Japanese onboard too.) Is this really what the Chinese wanted? Inscrutable.

Posted by Dopey Sinatra9196 2013-04-10 16:33||   2013-04-10 16:33|| Front Page Top

#2 As things stand on the Korean Peninsula, IMO the only way for formal Inter-Korean Reunification to take place is iff both NOKOR + SOKOR have potent Nuke Arsenals [+ SSSHHHHH by extens also JAPAN], as complemented by US-led GMD-TMD.

US-LED SPACE STRIKE = US-LED SPACE DEFENSE. Instead of "Offensive Strike" versus "Defensive Strike', lets all be good Politicos + label both as "Active Defense" or "Limited Offense'.

THE PROB IS THAT "POST-US', "MAHANIST", "FUTURE WORLD #1" MAINLAND CHINA WILL LIKELY SEE THE BILATERAL NUCLEARIZATION OF THE KOREAN PENINSULA AS MORE EVIDENCE OF US INTENT TO ISOLATE + CONTAIN CHINA WIDIN ITS LIMITED HISTORICAL PARAMETERS.

'TIS A MAJOR OR SERIOUS PICKLE - OH YEAH, YOU BETCHA!

Again, unless China is made willing to delay or alter its anti-US "Manifest Destiny", a US-China confrontation + mil conflict in East Asia or Asia-Pacific before Year 2050 is all but absolut inevitable. EITHER CHINA CONCEDES, OR THE US MUST CONCEDE.

IFF NOT, BY DEFINITION "OUT THE WINDOW" THERE GOETHS THE US BELIEF THAT THERE WILL BE NO MORE MAJOR OR WORLD WARS THRU 2050 IFF NOT THE REST OF THE 21ST CENTURY.

[US WOMEN-IN-COMBAT-VS-PLA here].
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-04-10 20:25||   2013-04-10 20:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Clearly women should serve in combat because NAKTONG II, PUSAN PERIMETER II, CHOSIN RESERVOIR II, HEARTBREAK RIDGE II, PORK CHOP HILL II, MIG ALLEY II, ETC. BATTLES is absolutely positively categorically undeniably ... ... good asymmetric OWG-NWO = UNO "Peacekeeping"???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-04-10 20:30||   2013-04-10 20:30|| Front Page Top

23:57 JosephMendiola
23:39 retired LOE
23:23 USN, Ret.
22:48 Skidmark
22:21 texhooey
22:09 Bright Pebbles
22:08 Frank G
22:07 Frank G
22:05 Pappy
22:05 Bright Pebbles
21:34 Frank G
21:06 Bright Pebbles
21:04 Bright Pebbles
21:03 ed in texas
20:38 GolfBravoUSMC
20:32 JosephMendiola
20:30 JosephMendiola
20:25 JosephMendiola
20:09 JosephMendiola
20:01 JosephMendiola
19:54 swksvolFF
19:48 DepotGuy
19:46 JosephMendiola
19:19 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com