Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/13/2010 View Fri 02/12/2010 View Thu 02/11/2010 View Wed 02/10/2010 View Tue 02/09/2010 View Mon 02/08/2010 View Sun 02/07/2010
1
2010-02-13 Home Front: Politix
Theodore Dalrymple on Ayn Rand
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by mom 2010-02-13 15:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 This has been said before by others, but not in two sentences:

America could take Rand out of Russia, but not Russia out of Rand. Her work properly belongs to the history of Russian, not American, literatureĀ—and nineteenth-century Russian literature at that.
Posted by Pappy 2010-02-13 19:05||   2010-02-13 19:05|| Front Page Top

#2 Most peoplr fall in love with the pristine and stark ideals of Rand in their youth. Then the real world hits, and they outgrow her hostile edges, and realize that helping your neighbor is sometimes needed, and that altruism is a good thing so long as its truly voluntary, and religion is not the enemy of reason.

Eh, its been said before and far better. Rand is necessary, but not sufficient.
Posted by OldSpook 2010-02-13 19:38||   2010-02-13 19:38|| Front Page Top

#3 ... altruism is a good thing so long as its truly voluntary ....

It's been some years since I've read her but I never did manage to glean a prohibition on purely voluntary altruism from Rand. My recollection is that her characters typically noted that purely voluntary altruistic acts were just fine and dandy but [insert long diatribe here] whatever act was at hand was not purely altruistic but was rather being forced upon the actor.

There's been an odd amount of criticism of Rand from both the left and right in recent months. She just seems to keep popping up which is rather odd if her ideas are as thoroughly flawed as her critics believe them to be.
Posted by Injun Thraviting6891 2010-02-13 21:22||   2010-02-13 21:22|| Front Page Top

#4 The author of the article seems like an empty windbag. The author tart words against Rand for being hardened and uppity, should take into account that "disclaiming against pride is not always a sign of humility" and that he probably never has never lived through some of the travails Rand did. Much like Machiavelli, Rand is both admired and despised, and thrown on the trash heap when convenient. She is epic and will remain so.
Posted by Marilyn Thrineper8949 2010-02-13 22:16||   2010-02-13 22:16|| Front Page Top

#5 Sheis epic and will remain so.

Right up there with L. Ron Hubbard.
Posted by Pappy 2010-02-13 23:20||   2010-02-13 23:20|| Front Page Top

#6 Hey L. Ron is fuhshizzle the king!
Posted by Marilyn Thrineper8949 2010-02-13 23:32||   2010-02-13 23:32|| Front Page Top

23:32 Marilyn Thrineper8949
23:24 746
23:21 Frank G
23:20 Pappy
23:18 trailing wife
23:13 746
23:10 rjschwarz
22:54 Mitch H.
22:45 Frank G
22:25 tipper
22:20 Marilyn Thrineper8949
22:17 Gomez Threter7450
22:16 Marilyn Thrineper8949
22:11 notascrename
22:00 tipper
21:51 49 Pan
21:51 Procopius2k
21:36 Unavick the Kid7772
21:35 49 Pan
21:28  abu do you love
21:22 Injun Thraviting6891
21:10 Old Patriot
21:06 Ebbugum Oppressor of the Danes8943
21:00 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com