Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 12/12/2009 View Fri 12/11/2009 View Thu 12/10/2009 View Wed 12/09/2009 View Tue 12/08/2009 View Mon 12/07/2009 View Sun 12/06/2009
1
2009-12-12 Home Front: Culture Wars
House Ban on Acorn Grants Is Ruled Unconstitutional
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2009-12-12 13:40|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 The court ruled that the resolution amounted to a "bill of attainder," a legislative determination of guilt without trial, because it specifically punishes one group.

Charles I is laughing in his grave. The royal judiciary has just taken back the power of the purse won in the English Civil War. There is no entitlement to the public treasury other than that determined by the legislative branch. It is not a bill of attainder taking money away as punishment, as in forfeiture, but the withholding of money that belongs to the people. The Founding Fathers would have impeached this judge before the week was out if this was attempted in their time.
Posted by Procopius2k 2009-12-12 02:05||   2009-12-12 02:05|| Front Page Top

#2 So it is legal for the government to turn the money spigot on but illegal to turn it off once it is turned on.

Look at this from the opposite perspective:

It is legal for government to take money from us to give to someone but illegal for them to let us keep our money once they have started taking it from us.

THAT right there is a telling commentary of the unsustainable idiotic philosophy of the left.


Posted by crosspatch 2009-12-12 02:48||   2009-12-12 02:48|| Front Page Top

#3 interesting legal theory, that Congress cannot single out a group for punishment, but they can and often do single out a group for gain and benefit? Some are more equal than others?
Posted by NoMoreBS  2009-12-12 06:23||   2009-12-12 06:23|| Front Page Top

#4 Does that mean that earmarks - which often benefit a single group - are unconsitutional as well?

My.... my....
Posted by CrazyFool 2009-12-12 06:40||   2009-12-12 06:40|| Front Page Top

#5 Another Clinton appointee. Federal judgeships - the gift that keeps on giving.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2009-12-12 08:28|| http://timurileng.blogspot.com  2009-12-12 08:28|| Front Page Top

11:13 Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division
11:00 Thing From Snowy Mountain
10:30 Rambler in Virginia
10:21 Barbara Skolaut
10:19 Barbara Skolaut
10:18 notascrename
10:06 Procopius2k
10:06 Barbara Skolaut
10:02 notascrename
09:58 Thing From Snowy Mountain
09:40 Besoeker
09:34 SR-71
09:02 rjschwarz
08:57 rjschwarz
08:56 3rd World Minister
08:54 rjschwarz
08:28 Zhang Fei
08:18 dorf56
08:14 Thor Shosing9682
08:05 Thor Shosing9682
07:37 Thor Shosing9682
07:36 crosspatch
07:23 Northern Cousin
07:19 746









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com