Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/07/2004 View Tue 04/06/2004 View Mon 04/05/2004 View Sat 04/03/2004 View Fri 04/02/2004 View Thu 04/01/2004 View Wed 03/31/2004
1
2004-04-07 Iraq-Jordan
Sadr's thugs took NYT journalist prisoner
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-04-07 11:51:09 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 What do you bet this reporter'll be another Yvonne?
Posted by Steve from Relto 2004-04-07 12:05:51 PM||   2004-04-07 12:05:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 "It was God who finished Saddam, not the Americans,"

Yeah, all those tanks were God's.

BTW -- I suspect they released the reporters once they were sure they were NYT. After all, they're all on the same side, aren't they?
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-04-07 12:24:23 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2004-04-07 12:24:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 After all, they're all on the same side, aren't they?

RC -- you beat me to it. I was just going to say that.
Posted by Infidel Bob  2004-04-07 12:46:08 PM||   2004-04-07 12:46:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 I'm glad that Burns got out of the situation, since he seems to be just about the only mainstream reporter in Iraq who consistently focuses on the facts rather than promoting some some agenda.

It's still surprising to me that he works for the NYTimes -- but I'll read any article he writers, in spite of that.
Posted by snellenr  2004-04-07 12:51:19 PM||   2004-04-07 12:51:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 RC and Infidel Bob, if John Burns is one of the reporters indetified in the story, remember that he is one of the good guys (read, "not suffering from cranio-rectal compaction").

Burns is the one who broke the story last year on how many (most?) of the major media reporters in Baghdad sucked up to Hussein's regime to get stories.
Posted by Carl in N.H 2004-04-07 1:46:08 PM||   2004-04-07 1:46:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 I guess there's an exception in every bunch, but I still think the jihadis freed them because they're NYT.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-04-07 2:03:21 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2004-04-07 2:03:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 I don't know...there is something about this story that sounds a bit unrealistic to me. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it just doesn't sound quite right.
Posted by B 2004-04-07 2:59:04 PM||   2004-04-07 2:59:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 I'm trying to figure out if this incident is the same thing as the reported capture of unnamed foreign journalists that hit the air in the last few hours or not. What do y'all think?
Posted by Mitch H.  2004-04-07 3:16:53 PM|| [http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2004-04-07 3:16:53 PM|| Front Page Top

19:40 cingold
13:20 Dcreeper
12:47 Dcreeper
00:22 ex-lib
21:53 FED UP
15:01 Dcreeper
14:04 ex-lib
12:55 Dcreeper
10:08 ex-lib
07:09 Shipman
02:31 Dcreeper
01:53 .com
01:30 Super Hose
01:18 Super Hose
01:11 Mark Espinola
00:50 Zenster
00:45 ex-lib
00:37 Anonymous2U
00:11 ZoGg
23:59 GK
23:50 Phil Fraering
23:44 RWV
23:18 Not Mike Moore
23:15 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com