Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 07/01/2021 View Wed 06/30/2021 View Tue 06/29/2021 View Mon 06/28/2021 View Sun 06/27/2021 View Sat 06/26/2021 View Fri 06/25/2021
1
2021-07-01 -Land of the Free
There's Something Odd About the NSA's Response to Tucker Carlson's Spying Allegations?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-07-01 02:28|| || Front Page|| [12 views ]  Top

#1 Those who look closely will see something else: that the NSA, while stating that Tucker “has never been an intelligence target,” does not categorically deny having his electronic communications.

Their "target" are his sources.

Carlson very likely has well placed US Government sources. Take away or neutralize his sources and he soon becomes redundant.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-07-01 02:36||   2021-07-01 02:36|| Front Page Top

#2 Defund the NSA.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2021-07-01 13:21||   2021-07-01 13:21|| Front Page Top

#3 Five Eyes targeting someone proximate to Tucker or his sources and then information available on a shared classified system? All the "protections" met and yet, the net effect is indistinguishable from just plain monitoring. And who knows how much the other members in London were helped discern the threat to the UK from within the US that was proximate to Tucker for incidental collection?
Posted by NoMoreBS 2021-07-01 13:53||   2021-07-01 13:53|| Front Page Top

#4 Ref #3: Exactly! I believe the term is.....incidental collection.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-07-01 15:24||   2021-07-01 15:24|| Front Page Top

#5 Ref #3: Exactly! I believe the term is.....incidental collection.

As I understand, once a judge signs your fishing permit, the Two Hops rule comes into play: you are allowed to surveil the target, anyone who talks to the target, PLUS anyone who talks to those guys. As NoMo says "the net effect is indistinguishable from just plain monitoring". All nice and legal.
Posted by SteveS 2021-07-01 15:49||   2021-07-01 15:49|| Front Page Top

#6 Their basic response was "Yeah, and?"
Posted by ed in texas 2021-07-01 19:18||   2021-07-01 19:18|| Front Page Top

23:56 Spusonter Elmusonter5916
23:44 Blossom Snoluck8293
23:36 CrazyFool
23:11 SteveS
22:55 Omath de Medici6305
22:47 Besoeker
22:44 SteveS
22:44 Glomoling Phomogum4161
22:42 SteveS
22:37 Besoeker
22:33 trailing wife
22:32 Besoeker
22:30 trailing wife
22:28 KBK
22:26 SteveS
22:23 Besoeker
22:05 Woodrow
22:03 Woodrow
21:31 Woodrow
20:50 Blossom Snoluck8293
20:31 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:31 Skidmark
20:08 Croque Fliting8030
20:04 CrazyFool









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com