Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 03/12/2009 View Wed 03/11/2009 View Tue 03/10/2009 View Mon 03/09/2009 View Sat 03/07/2009 View Fri 03/06/2009 View Thu 03/05/2009
1
2009-03-12 China-Japan-Koreas
Destroyer now escorting ship involved in US-China incident
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tu3031 2009-03-12 09:45|| || Front Page|| [11135 views ]  Top

#1 The battle of ideas behind China's naval agression.

By James Kraska and Brian Wilson

China’s bold and dangerous maneuvers against the USNS Impeccable, a U.S. Navy military survey vessel, which was operating about 120 km from the island of Hainan in the East China Sea is the latest salvo in China’s ongoing campaign to upset traditional notions of freedom of navigation in order to deny access to its coastal waters, or littorals, by foreign warships, and aircraft. The event marks the first test of the Obama administration regarding China’s efforts to reshape the international law of the sea.

Following the Cold War, the littorals have emerged as the primary maritime battleground for peace and stability. International law, as reflected in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, recognizes that all states enjoy the right to conduct military activities throughout the near shore environment -- generally beyond the 12 nautical mile (nm) territorial sea and extending out to 200 nm (one nm = 1.85 km). This coastal zone is the primary operating area for “Seabasing,” amphibious, expeditionary, and littoral operations, and generally encompasses the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of a coastal state, a special resource zone created by the Law of the Sea. Although coastal states have exclusive rights to exploit natural resources in the zone, they cannot claim a security interest in the area, agreed Shen Dingli, director of the Center of American Studies at Shanghai’s Fudan University. Regardless, China wants to exert control that extends beyond its economic interests, creating the potential for conflict with the U.S. Navy. Dingli stated, “China considers that international law only allows innocent passage for military vessels [in the EEZ], not activities that could be considered to have a military purpose.”

Chinese sailors getting drenched by fire hoses while harassing a U.S. Navy ship might make a great headline,, but the real fight is going on much more quietly on land. China has recently begun to engage in a resourceful legal warfare, or “lawfare” strategy to deny access to its coastal seas to warships and aircraft of the United States, Japan, and other countries in the region. This strategy, which was set forth in a recent Chinese defense white paper, proposed the“gradual extension of strategic depth for offshore defensive operations,” and for “enhancing [Chinese] capabilities in integrated maritime operations and nuclear counterattacks.”

A 2007 Department of Defense report to Congress on China’s military power explains that Chinese strategists have taken an increasing interest in international law as an instrument to deter adversaries prior to combat. Through an orchestrated program of scholarly articles and symposia, China is working to shape international opinion in favor of a distorted interpretation of the Law of the Sea by shifting scholarly views and national perspectives away from long-accepted norms of freedom of navigation and toward interpretations of increased coastal state sovereign authority. By doing so, China is misreading the law of the sea.

The United States should ensure navigational freedom and littoral access as a cornerstone of world maritime security. The U.S. Navy has spent hundreds of millions on building a new generation of high-tech Littoral Combat Ships and implementing “Seabasing” amphibious warfare tactics to effectively operate in the coastal zone—capability that is undermined by restrictive interpretations of the law. But all this planning will be for naught if China continues to advance on the battlefield of international law. The United States would be on a far stronger footing at diplomatic summits and military-to-military meetings if it joined the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention. To ensure the right of U.S. vessels to enjoy unhindered global mobility, the United States should continue resisting excessive coastal state maritime claims through diplomacy and operational challenges.
Posted by tu3031 2009-03-12 10:07||   2009-03-12 10:07|| Front Page Top

#2 A simple question: Why isn't the Impeccable armed. Given the kind of violence that has been visited on US intelligence ships since the 60's, they should be more heavily armed rather than less.

Posted by Frozen Al 2009-03-12 11:17||   2009-03-12 11:17|| Front Page Top

#3 I'm impressed with having the Chung-Hoon escort the intel ship. Sounds like an adult was on duty at the White House.
Posted by Steve White 2009-03-12 11:20||   2009-03-12 11:20|| Front Page Top

#4 Yeah - China has opened Confucious Institiutes everywhere these days. They are tools of Chinese foreign policy, and seek to influence thought. They're probably going to work, too.
Posted by gromky 2009-03-12 12:48||   2009-03-12 12:48|| Front Page Top

#5 Doesn't China pull this kind of stunt for each new president? 8 years ago, it was with an intel P-3. Same area too.
Posted by Minister of funny walks 2009-03-12 14:15||   2009-03-12 14:15|| Front Page Top

#6 A simple question: Why isn't the Impeccable armed.

Because it's crewed by Civillians.
Posted by Redneck Jim">Redneck Jim  2009-03-12 15:35||   2009-03-12 15:35|| Front Page Top

#7 More specifically, the operating crew are civilian contract personnel; the technicians generally are Civil Service. USNS means that it is an auxiliary ship, a non-combatant.
Posted by Pappy 2009-03-12 21:17||   2009-03-12 21:17|| Front Page Top

#8 DRUDGEREPORT > US WARSHIPS HEADED FOR SDOUTH CHINA SEA AFTER NAVAL STANDOFF [The Bammmer orders in USN Armed Escorts for USS IMPECCABLE].

Also, PRAVDA > AMERICA's NEXT CATASTROPHE IS BREWING JUST SOUTH OF ITS [Texas/Tehas, SW] BORDERS[MEXICO in the process of TOTAL COLLAPSE]???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2009-03-12 23:25||   2009-03-12 23:25|| Front Page Top

#9 CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > POSTER = CHINA'S PLAN SHOULD START SENDING SPY SHIPS TO GUAM AND HAWAII.

Also, STARS-N-STRIPES/MVARIETY > AMERICAN DREAN ENDS TO GUAM RUMOR FOR IRAQIS. Things getting so bad in America = Amerika, rumors have begun that Iraqis + Muslims seeking work will be sent to Guam.

* Lest we fergit, PAN-ASIAN ISLAMIST MILIT-TERR THREAT + GLOBAL-SOLAR WARMING INDUCED "EARTH/LAND CHANGES" [e.g. Indonesia-Sumatran HI-MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES] > result in ETHNIC DIASPORAS = MIGRATIONS TO NEW LANDS, espec to CONUS-NORAM via GUAM + OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDS, potentially destabilizing and disrupting TRADITIONAL LOCAL STATUS QUOS = ESTABLISHED ORDERS.

And so it begins ........
Posted by JosephMendiola 2009-03-12 23:52||   2009-03-12 23:52|| Front Page Top

23:52 JosephMendiola
23:33 JosephMendiola
23:25 JosephMendiola
23:03 trailing wife
23:00 trailing wife
22:59 trailing wife
22:23 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:22 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:19 Red Dawg
22:05 Red Dawg
22:04 mojo
21:38 Anonymoose
21:35 Anonymoose
21:34 Red Dawg
21:31 DMFD
21:29 DMFD
21:19 DMFD
21:17 Pappy
21:09 john frum
21:08 ed
21:07 phil_b
21:06 Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division
21:05 Bright Pebbles the flatulent
21:03 phil_b









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com