Article

2010-01-09 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Ahmadinejad urges unity, vigilance among Muslims

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2010-01-09 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11129 views ] Top
File under: Govt of Iran

#1 FREEREPUBLIC > NORTH AMERICAN MUSLIMS ISSUE FATWA [Attack agz USA, Canada is an attack agz fellow Muslims + Islam].

Posted by JosephMendiola 2010-01-09 01:31|| 2010-01-09 01:31|| Front Page Top

#2 personally, I think Moslems unity and Vigilance et al is right up there with a diabetic's
demand for "more do-nuts".

But say, just hypotehtically, that ALL the Moslems DID get behind one pointed stick and all lined up unified and vigilant to the tune of total ha ha.?

What would happen then.? Well, Fwance would promise them anything and I think most of the EUrorweenies would fold like pasta in the microwave...but they dont have a military anyway so they could try oral sex and see if that worked.

If the United States was faced with a united Caliphate we would simply figure its end game time and fry them systematically. A city at a time until we ran out of cities.

But, thankfully, the average Moslem is going to just sit there whining in the majority and leave it to the stooges like the latest ball bag bomber to crispy critter his fatherhood in 11F.

Osama is dead and Iraq is in the bag. Afghanistan will is getting added value and Barbie and Ken are down at the Mall. Skinny is in the White House.

And if you dont have a Victory Garden you are missing a nutritious bet. September of 2016 is my guess. Feast of Trumpets?
Then we keep up the killing until 2025. Somebody in a collateral Hashemite in Jordan can have Mecca and a few perks when the war is over.

Posted by Angleton9 2010-01-09 08:18|| 2010-01-09 08:18|| Front Page Top

#3 Hasn't 'Muslim Unity' historically been called for when the one calling for it is in serious trouble?

Posted by Mullah Richard 2010-01-09 08:32|| 2010-01-09 08:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Wars are always over someday. This war will be no different. Somebody is going to win and when they do the war will be over. And somebody is going to lose...and when they do we can drink Beer in Mecca and nobody is gonna say peep.

Do you see Mecca ruling the world? I dont. China isnt going to go easy and the United States has fried citys and whole populations before...its my guess we are quite capable of doing it again.

If we dont the Chinese will, the Arabs arent going to keep the Black stuff...somebody IS going to get it. The Arabs cant hold onto it and they are all expendable in the end game.

There is going to be a War. Somebody is going to win it. This stuff we see at present wont just putter along forever...it will hit the wall about 2016. Allah is going to regret He EVER got up in the morning. Bombs over Tokyo ( did I spell that right?) Maybe its spelled Mecca.

I know its not PC to talk about killing a LOT of people. Its not "nice". Decent people dont say things like that. Verdun and the Somme. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Belsen-Bergen and Mattau and Auschwittz.

More tea?

Angleton9 dear, please stick to one nym per thread. It will enable your eloquence to be properly appreciated, and will keep me from getting too nervous. Thanks ever so! and I'd love some tea. Milk, no sugar, if you don't mind. :-)

Posted by Harcourt Slaitch3988 2010-01-09 08:34|| 2010-01-09 08:34|| Front Page Top

#5 This war has been going on for 1300 years. There is only one way it will end. When is the question.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2010-01-09 09:34|| 2010-01-09 09:34|| Front Page Top

#6 I know its not PC to talk about killing a LOT of people. Its not "nice". Decent people dont say things like that.

And all too often it's advocated by those who will have no skin in the game, or would soil themselves if they did.

Not to say that it might not be necessary. Professionals know that. Professionals also know it ain't the solution to every situation.

Verdun and the Somme.

The result of applying 19th century tactics with 20th century technology, resulting in trench warfare.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

And Cologne and Dresden. Note that they didn't happen early in the war.

Belsen-Bergen and Mattau and Auschwittz.

Those were 'political' not 'combat'.

More tea?

No thank you. I drink coffee - a bad habit acquired during all too many mid-watches. (nice thing about the dark tho - you don't have to see the bodies and body-parts...)

Posted by Pappy 2010-01-09 09:47|| 2010-01-09 09:47|| Front Page Top

#7 The Muslim Conundrum: Its most easily identifiable enemies are its practitioners....

Posted by Uncle Phester 2010-01-09 17:03|| 2010-01-09 17:03|| Front Page Top

23:10 USN, Ret.
23:10 Fred
23:02 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:54 Frank G
22:51 Play4Keeps
22:50 ed
22:46 USN, Ret.
22:42 ed
22:39 Chereting Snetch4156
22:31 trailing wife
22:28 Pappy
22:19 49 Pan
22:19 notascrename
22:16 Redneck Jim
22:15 Bright Pebbles
22:06 crosspatch
22:01 Redneck Jim
21:59 Redneck Jim
21:58 Redneck Jim
21:52 Barbara Skolaut
21:52 Redneck Jim
21:50 Redneck Jim
21:46 Redneck Jim
21:43 Barbara Skolaut