Expect discovery of boxes and boxes of disenfranchised inner city votes.
[BLOOMBERG] Trump focused on Stein, not Clinton, in a response. "The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton ... former first lady, former secretary of state, former presidential candidate, sometimes described by her supporters as the smartest woman in the world, usually described by the rest of us as a crook... herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ’We must accept this result and then look to the future,"’ he said in a statement.
Kellyanne Conway, who was Trump’s campaign manager and is now a senior adviser, was less conciliatory. "What a pack of sore losers," she said in a statement. "After asking Mr. Trump and his team a million times on the trail, ’Will HE accept the election results?’ it turns out Team Hillary and their new BFF Jill Stein can’t accept reality." So y'see, it ain't the Dems sore loserin', it's just an interested third party who thinks she mighta been the one to take the swing states..
"Rather than adhere to the tradition of graciously conceding and wishing the winner well, they’ve opted to waste millions of dollars and dismiss the democratic process. The people have spoken. Time to listen up. #YesYourPresident," Conway said.
[EXPRESS.CO.UK] The shock move to reassess results in Wisconsin follows the filing of a petition to the state’s elections organiser by two groups, one of which backed US Green Party Presidential candidate Jill Stein. Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Michael Haas said: "The Commission is preparing to move forward with a statewide recount of votes for President of the United States, as requested by these candidates."
[DailyWire] Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein is raising money to call for a recount in three states: Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. She said that it was necessary due to "reported hacks into voter and party databases and individual email accounts are causing many Americans to wonder if our election results are reliable." A Wisconsin recount request was filed on Friday.
However, it appears that Stein's efforts to obtain a recount are nothing more than a scam. Here are seven reasons why.
1. There is no evidence that the election results weren't reliable. As the Daily Wire has explained, there is nothing to suggest that the electronic voting machines were hacked. Donald Trump's advantage over Hillary Clinton in electronic voting was a result of demographics, not a hack, and Michigan's ballots were all paper. The entire premise for Stein's recount is false. Continued at link.
Posted by: Fred ||
11/27/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11129 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
The only thing the Democrats excel at is complaining about every fucking thing under the sun. Useless bastards.
#2
As easy as it is to dismiss this crap a farce, it is a serious attack on our Constitutional form of government. Gives more uninformed people an excuse to get out to their $15.00/hr job of protesting.
If these fires cannot be efficiently put out, it will result in a serious inability of Mr. Trump to govern appropriately.
#7
Is the Opposition Plan B to paralyze the incoming Trump administration, and its Republican Congressional majorities, for as much of the first year as possible? Any legislation passed in the mid-term years being much easier to sabotage...
#8
Rescind Trump's promise not to prosecute Hillary.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
11/27/2016 11:28 Comments ||
Top||
#9
I was talking to a friend and she mentioned that "her" side would have an opportunity to rise up and overturn this.
I said, "Just remember which side has the guns and the vets and the training."
She snobbishly replied, "We have angry women. Don't underestimate what an angry woman can do."
"Well, if you can continue to move and be angry after I put 3 rounds through your chest you are a better person than I."
She stopped and looked aghast. "That is SO mean!"
"Don't you understand? That is what a Civil War is. If it comes between protecting the constitutional process while protecting my rights and taking friends and family's lives, I'll defend the constitution to the end.
If you aren't willing to look down a rifle sight at people you care about and pull the trigger, you have no fucking business talking about a civil war."
After talking to several lefties just like her, they seem to be convinced if they just have a march, chant slogans and cry then people will just roll over and let them do it. And people have, for decades. I don't think they realize that we are backed into a corner and will do anything to protect what few rights we have left.
That naivete may very well be the thing that stumbles us into civil war.
#12
This is another example of the Republicans' callous disregard for the voting rights of deceased individuals.
Posted by: Matt ||
11/27/2016 12:35 Comments ||
Top||
#13
But Darth, you will hesitate before shooting a women and an acquaintance --- judging by the extensive documentation of actions of people just like her from Russia to Kampuchea, she will not.
#14
Easy to dismiss as a hail Mary, but keep in mind that Democrats are very, very good at litigating election results. They have a plan here, and the Clintons have nothing to lose.
#15
Trump should have a wolfpack of attorneys ready to go. I would think that PA, especially, would be pretty damn hard to reverse, given Trump's 70,000 vote edge there. But when the Dem's are prepared to lie, and their MFM shills are willing to swear to it, who knows? My personal opinion is that this is probably just more lefty psyops and fundraising than a realistic attempt to change the results. And if you needed any more evidence that HRC is mentally unbalanced and unfit for office, here it is.
#17
This woman will squat in the WH and they will have to drag her sorry ass out while she is clutching the drapes and the silverware is falling out of her pant's suit pockets.
#18
Grom, while I haven't faced that scenario, I seriously doubt I would hesitate. If we have gotten to that stage, I have made peace with my decision and the only thing left is to make the grass grow.
#21
The Electoral College meets to vote on 19 December 2016. If the votes from MI, WI and PA are still under recount, Trump will have less than the requisite 270 to be declared the winner and the election will move, as ordained by the Constitution to the House for President and Senate for Vice President. Trump/Pense will win but the Dems will get a chance to claim a totally political act by the Republicans, usurping the will of the people and hamdstringing the administration from the start. It is a vile, deceitful, political sabotage act by people who only know the quest for power and would destroy the nation to achieve it!
#22
@#14: The Clintons have everything to lose and are therefore only happy to see Dr. Rocks press this "case."
I surmise that Mr. Trump is not amused and, once the foolishness passes, will begin to dismantle the Arkansas Mafia one lie at a time.
In the meantime, my questions are:
1. How have the voting machines/records been archived since the election was called?
2. Who, if anyone, has had access to said machines/records since election day? Are all visits verifiable?
3. Is Sandy Burger still hanging around?
#25
I find it interesting that Jill Stein who has no possible way to win is working on Hillary's behalf in this. Bought off like Sanders, and apparently like most lefties once the price is determined.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
Hillary Clinton
