#4
The SAN and BLM have historical differences and grievances reaching back thousands of years. If left unchecked, the more advanced and warlike SAN will eventually destroy the BLM or force them into remote exile. We must locate moderates within the BLM, provide them advanced arms and training to ensure peace and stability is achieved.
While neither group is a direct threat to us and the natural inclination is non-involvement, providing a 'standoff' scenario will lead to the peaceful integration of the groups and foster the desired global utopian end state.
The risk of getting drug into the SAN-BLM conflict directly is assessed as minimal.
#5
Shows how ineffectual hecwould be as an executive. Just stand there and let two trolls take over then cut things short. Trolls win and are encouraged.
Posted by: regular joe ||
08/09/2015 13:49 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Notice that both Bernie and now Megan Kelly are being attacked by black surrogates. Bernie is a threat to the Beest, and Trump is the only way, through triangulation, that the Beest can win the next presidential. Hildy has given all the assurances that you can imagine that the gravy train/special needs requirements of that constituency will be met, and her loss portends a reduction in all the government goodies ...
#10
I want to disagree with NoMoreBS because Occams razor says Trump is just an egotist and Black Lives matter are going after headlines and low hanging fruit but my gut says there might be something there.
#11
Hildy has given all the assurances that you can imagine that the gravy train/special needs requirements of that constituency will be met, and her loss portends a reduction in all the government goodies ...
Not sure on the "assurances" part, but Mr. Sanders' base is much different than that of Ms. Rodham-Clinton. The former tends to be white, young, technical or college-age, etc. The ones Mr. Obama won with.
The latter are essentially the Democratic political base, plus the money-changers.
[WASHINGTONPOST] Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has ended his relationship with Roger Stone, his longest-serving political adviser and a controversial consultant, and says that he is moving quickly to surround himself "only with the best people" as his 2016 campaign deals with a wave of criticism over disparaging remarks the GOP front-runner made Friday on CNN about Fox News Channel anchor Megyn Kelly.
Dismissing calls for him to leave the race, Trump, in a series of phone interviews with The Washington Post, said he firmly believes he can capture the White House without the support of the Republican establishment, which has grown increasingly hostile toward the real-estate mogul. He cited his support among frustrated members of the GOP's base as well the "millions of people everywhere" who are unhappy with the political class as his coalition.
Posted by: Fred ||
08/09/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11124 views]
Top|| File under:
[OBSERVER] In a letter sent to the U.S. State Department and just filed today with U.S. federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, the counsel for Cheryl Mills wrote: "Ms. Mills does not believe that she has paper copies of potential records in her possession. Following our production on August 10, 2015 [of the defense counsel's version of the electronic records], we have instructed her to delete any and all electronic records in her possession. "
That is a far stretch from a statement by Ms. Mills under penalty of perjury, and she and her lawyers are planning to delete the emails Judge Sullivan wants produced?
Judicial Watch has made an emergency filing in Judge Sullivan's court to stop the further destruction of evidence of what may very well be assorted criminal conduct and violations of numerous federal laws.
This all just surfaced in State Department's status report filed today in response to Judge Sullivan's order. Yesterday evening, State finally produced some correspondence between it and Hillary's right and left hands--Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. It has not produced its correspondence with Mrs. Clinton, and it is now clear that Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills plan to thumb their noses at the Judge and the State Department.
No one is "cooperating," despite their empty rhetoric to the contrary. The correspondence that has been produced verifies that the State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else. It allowed Mrs. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and it kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible.
It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Mrs. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts.
Posted by: Fred ||
08/09/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11130 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
One would hope that Cheryl Mills unending illegal acts to defend the Clintons would eventually bite her in her smarmy ass. Black is the new Orange would be a good start
Posted by: Frank G on the road ||
08/09/2015 0:32 Comments ||
Top||
#2
I'm not a lawyer, but isn't destruction of potential evidence illegal? (Not that doing something illegal would stop anyone on the Clinton team.)
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia ||
08/09/2015 10:58 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Can't believe a judge hasn't warned her of obstruction of justice collusion and other charges that she would be instantly guilty of if she destroyed the emails. Also the fact that the emails went through multiple servers to get to the recipients so other copies are available.
#4
"Following our production on August 10, 2015 [of the defense counsel's version of the electronic records], we have instructed her to delete any and all electronic records in her possession. "
The Counsel for Cheryl Mills should get some serious warnings as well. How in the hell can you justify ordering someone to delete evidence even if you don't think it is needed anymore?
[WASHINGTONPOST] Donald Trump may top the polls in the contest for the Republican presidential nomination, but this week's debate was a reminder that the party has able rivals who eventually could take him down -- and who also could mount a stiff challenge to Hillary Rodham Clinton ... sometimes described as The Liberatress of Libya and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Charles Evans Hughes ... in the general election.
Trump performed in typical style Thursday in the two-hour debate -- the same style that has helped him blow past the other candidates. But as the campaigns broke camp here Friday morning, the smiles on the faces of other candidates' advisers told the fuller story of what happened on the stage at the Quicken Loans Arena.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred ||
08/09/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Yep, keep focused on the Beltway. Let the little people take over 3/4 of the state governments, then watch the excitement when they read the small print in the contract.
#2
One is Rubio, who declared forcefully early in the debate that he would present the starkest future-vs.-past contrast to Clinton. Another is Kasich, this year's version of the compassionate conservative.
Gotta love how the Post tries to pick the Reps candidates for them.
Bush, who was less forceful on the stage than some of the others, lacks the freshness of Kasich or Rubio or Walker. But his more moderate views on immigration, his desire to expand the GOP coalition and his experience give Democrats pause.
"Don't throw us in that briar Bush, Republicans!"
Walker makes the case for himself as a fresh face, a Washington outsider and a results-oriented politician. He has been a divisive
Translation: "effective".
If he can be trusted on scamnesty--a big if--then Walker is my top choice.
[Free Bacon] President Champ's wedding ring was "noticeably missing" from his left hand on Sunday, according to a White House pool report. Find the stupid man in this photo.
Champ, who was at Camp David in Maryland on Sunday, arrived back at the White House and was photographed by the Associated Press without a ring on his hand. He was playing golf earlier in the day to celebrate his birthday, which comes this Tuesday.
Champ's ring, however, was off his finger long before he stepped on the course. He was photographed on Friday signing highway funding legislation and was not wearing his ring. Part of the Iranian deal? Bad Mandela memorial juju? Title Pawn? Personal request of Reggie Love ?
#3
I'm looking for Joe Biden in the photo but I don't see him.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
08/09/2015 15:12 Comments ||
Top||
#4
I think they are smart enough to keep the ring for appearance sake (or truly use the fact to steal a few news cycles away from bad news) no matter what. I suspect there is a more mundane explanation for this. I suspect red meat to keep the truther types frothing.
[Washington Examineer] A controversial Clinton adviser who faced penalties for conflicts of interests under President Bill Clinton was still assisting Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, despite the fact that his consulting firm was engaged in commercial activities in countries where she worked, emails show.
Sandy Berger, who gained notoriety when he stole classified documents from the National Archives prior to testimony before the 9/11 Commission, had Hillary Clinton's personal email address and emailed her about Israel, Pakistan and terrorism in 2009. Yes, 'that' Sandy Berger. Berger's consulting firm, the Albright Stonebridge Group, has engaged in business in more than 100 countries around the world, according to its website. If it manufactures nothing, has a global reach, no visible Business Development section, a seemingly unlimited budget, and strong Foggy Bottom linkages.... you may be correct in your assessment.
It has worked extensively in the Middle East, an area that Berger sought to assist Hillary Clinton on during her State Department tenure. Obviously not a core competency, appears his "assistance" had little to do with OPSEC.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[WASHINGTONPOST] Donald Trump may top the polls in the contest for the Republican presidential nomination, but this week's debate was a reminder that the party has able rivals who eventually could take him down -- and who also could mount a stiff challenge to 
