Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/20/2005 View Sat 11/19/2005 View Fri 11/18/2005 View Thu 11/17/2005 View Wed 11/16/2005 View Tue 11/15/2005 View Mon 11/14/2005
1
2005-11-20 Europe
The Sphinx and the curious case of the Iron Lady's H-bomb
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-11-20 13:44|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 The 4 nuclear submarines were SSNs not SSBNs as such only torpedo armament at time (tomhawks still not oprerational and sold to the British) . Now England could have sended a Polaris down there just in case
Posted by Unetch Flinetch3868 2005-11-20 14:35||   2005-11-20 14:35|| Front Page Top

#2 it might have been a good idea to *warn the russians* and used a sea-launched non-nuclear warhead against certain run-ways.

Nothing says, "we can step up our response", like that.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2005-11-20 15:21||   2005-11-20 15:21|| Front Page Top

#3 100% merde formidable
Posted by Dawg 2005-11-20 16:46||   2005-11-20 16:46|| Front Page Top

#4 LOL, did a good trick on the Exocets 'eh? Right. Most British losses were from iron bombs dropped by well trained Argentine pilots. If the bombs had been properly fused it would have been much worse. You gotta figure that any country that cranks out 3 Formula 1 champs is going to have some pretty good pilots.
Posted by Shipman 2005-11-20 17:43||   2005-11-20 17:43|| Front Page Top

#5 Public fuzziness over the distinction between nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed submarines is a long-time staple of lefty anti-military propaganda. This basic story, that the UK sent a "nuclear sub" to threaten the Argies with atomic weapons, has been around a long time.

Back in the 80s, the Greenpeace goebbelists went a step further and conflated all submarines with nuclear-powered ones, listing all submarine losses since World War 2 as "nuclear accidents" even though the great majority of these involved diesel-electric subs. One exception, a unique one, involved a conventionally powered but nuclear armed sub. This was the Soviet "Golf" class boat that sank in the Pacific in 1968 and was partially (?) raised by the US in the famous "Project Jennifer" of the early 1970s.
Posted by Angaper Unomock1970 2005-11-20 18:16||   2005-11-20 18:16|| Front Page Top

#6 And all but two of the nuclear boats lying on the sea bed are the products of socialist engineering.
Posted by Cheaderhead 2005-11-20 19:00||   2005-11-20 19:00|| Front Page Top

#7 To the tune of Tomorrow Belongs to Me, from Cabaret:

Our soldiers are many,
Our missles French-sent.
They're Exocet artillery!
What does it matter our rifles are bent?
The Falklands belong to me!

They'll all pledge allegiance
To our puffed-up swells,
Or else they will hang from a tree!
With nameless prisoners
In numberless cells,
The Falklands belong to me!

Our soldiers will fight hard,
They will not sleep.
They'll fight undistractedly!
For it is so boring
To torture a sheep,
The Falklands belong,
—The Malvinas belong,
The Falklands belong to me!
Posted by Eric Jablow">Eric Jablow  2005-11-20 20:42||   2005-11-20 20:42|| Front Page Top

23:53 DMFD
23:50 C-Low
23:49 DMFD
23:46 Rafael
23:42 .com
23:33 Zenster
23:21 Zenster
23:10 2b
23:05 John Q. Citizen
23:00 Edward Yee
22:55 John Q. Citizen
22:53 Justrand
22:49 Ptah
22:42 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
22:41 Eric
22:39 Long Hair Republican
22:30 Monsieur Moonbat
22:28 Zenster
22:23 2b
22:19 John Q. Citizen
22:15 BillH
22:11 John Q. Citizen
22:03 JosephMendiola
21:58 3dc









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com