Article

2004-06-01 International-UN-NGOs

Senator John McCain Writes "In Praise of Do-Gooders"

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-06-01 6:07:37 AM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Yes thank you Mr Hindsight.

Posted by Bill Nelson 2004-06-01 8:27:11 AM|| 2004-06-01 8:27:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 How many Red Cross packages did McCain get while he was a POW? How hard did the Red Cross work to get them to him?

Contrast this with Dershowitz's questioning the utility of the GC in the modern world.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-06-01 10:59:21 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2004-06-01 10:59:21 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I posted an extensive fisking of this op-ed to Rantburg last night, but apparently it never took. McCain spectacularly conflates unrelated issues (utility of of GC, self-discrediting behavior of the ICRC) in his defense of the "do-gooders." He completely inverts the significance of the recent breach of confidentiality by the ICRC. There's a very disturbing and important issue here, and McCain misses it completely.

Posted by Verlaine 2004-06-01 11:32:02 AM|| 2004-06-01 11:32:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 It is critical to realize that the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions do not endanger American soldiers, they protect them. Our soldiers enter battle with the knowledge that should they be taken prisoner, there are laws intended to protect them and impartial international observers to inquire after them. Americaâs observance of the Geneva Conventions and our support for the ICRC in part determine the willingness of other nations to do the same.

What is up with this guy? If I didn't know who he was, I'd be seriously questioning his sanity.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-06-01 2:30:23 PM|| 2004-06-01 2:30:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 McCain is right about the INTENT of the Conventions, but it is less clear that they will be observed by the terror networks, except in selected instances where the PR value is deemed sufficiently high.

I think we do need to set standards for ourselves and keep to them no matter how tempting it is to cut corners. That is at the heart of all military discipline in an army of free men and women. It's why the West Point corps of cadets enforces its honor code so stringently:

A cadet will not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do.

Top cadets - even senior corps leaders close to graduation - have been kicked out of the Point for what some might consider minor infractions of this rule - lying about being out of their rooms after lights-out, for instance.

Why? Because cadets who cut corners on this will cut corners in torturing a captive to try to save the lives of their soldiers. In the short run, this may seem defensible; in the longer run, it deeply undercuts morale and discipline in and out of battle.

Having said that, I too am disturbed by what seems like increasing politicization of the ICRC.

Posted by rkb 2004-06-01 3:49:25 PM|| 2004-06-01 3:49:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 The Dershowitz article that RC posted in #3 is well worth reading.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-06-02 2:41:47 AM|| 2004-06-02 2:41:47 AM|| Front Page Top

16:03 M. Murcek
11:30 Halfass Pete
10:37 Halfass Pete
17:30 Victory Now Please
14:29 Victory Now Please
09:01 Victory Now Please
15:27 Victory Now Please
10:50 Victory Now Please
15:55 Victory Now Please
17:14 Faisal
11:09 growler
07:42 Anonymous5089
04:02 gromky
02:41 Mike Sylwester
01:46 Aris Katsaris
01:44 Anonymous2U
00:51 .com
00:43 rex
00:22 .com
00:19 .com
00:15 gromky
00:09 Quana
00:00 Zenster
23:56 Quana