Article

2023-07-28 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-

Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Dmitry Kosyrev

[RIA] If The Washington Post admits that this is a failure, then it is a failure. Its author could start the funeral of the global struggle for climate with the story of how in Sweden they encroached on the sacred: they tied Greta Thunberg and fined her so that she would not get out without asking for a demonstration to save the planet. They took a little, about 144 dollars in kroons, but who could have imagined this even a year ago? And the truth is, things are changing. However, the author of the newspaper looks more broadly, at Europe as a whole. And he says: if this whole multi-year campaign called the “green agenda” fails there, then the campaign needs to be changed.

Continued from Page 4

Okay, another world where, for some reason, economic growth and all sorts of national interests are considered the main goal. But Europe, with its almost universal dominance of social democrats and other greens! And yet, even in Germany , writes the Washington author (himself a great climate change advocate), even in this ideally green country there has been a revolt. And not only because of the EU directive to get rid of cars with a gasoline engine by 2035 (and this is a blow to Germany). The scandal arose when the local greens had actually banned the Germans from heating rural houses with boilers. When you are frozen in your fortress house, it is already too much. And the Greens decided to postpone this grandiose initiative for the time being.

And in the Netherlands, there was a riot - the agricultural industry rebelled there, which they want to deprive of nitrogen fertilizers, even a new party was created on a wave of anger. Yes, if someone does not know: the green agenda suggests that all human activity spoils the climate on the planet, because it heats it up beyond measure. And nitrogen fertilizers are bad, and the use of oil and gas is bad. But here in Norway they decided to open 19 new oil and gas fields - the Russians are to blame, because of which the demand for this fuel has sharply increased, and why not make money on it.

So, even Europe rebelled. Why? If you dig deeper into this story, you will see that it has one very instructive component. After all, it is not surprising that normal people began to oppose attempts to freeze them, deprive them of food and much more. What is surprising is how they were initially forced to submit to this very green idea.

The answer is simple: science in the form of a club. The fact is that the concept of human harm to the climate was one of the first two or three global brainwashing campaigns (all started in earnest in the 90s), where the idea of \u200b\u200b"so says the science". True, for this, in all cases, it was necessary to create our own, through and through false "science" and crush the real one, but if we are talking about big money and big plans, then nothing is impossible. Well, already in our century there is no such brainwashing campaign that would not have acquired its own pseudoscientific base.

So, green science began to burst at the seams. One example: a book by Judith Curry, a famous American climatologist and author of 30 other works, has just been published. And in it, Judith tells how crazy this whole idea is that human activity is changing the climate, and if so, then this activity should be strangled by the whole world.

The book is called "earthquake" (in scientific circles) because Judith was one of the founders of computer modeling, which predicted all sorts of global weather disasters. At first she did not accept objections. But back in 2009, a little trouble happened to her: Climategate, a hacker hacking into the correspondence of other climatologists who were giggling with each other, what nonsense they were doing, but they were paying ...

And today this woman is destroying the building she once built - with knowledge of the matter and in detail explaining that it is climate phenomena that belong to the category of unpredictable and not subject to modeling. A computer can only give out a scenario, and several possible catastrophes at once, but over the past 4.6 million years, our planet has shown all sorts of surprises: volcanic eruptions, the growth of mountain ranges, several cycles of destruction of the biological environment ... And the idea that a person can influence this, to science has nothing to do with it.

At the same time, Judith reminds us once again about the technologies of all these disgusting campaigns - the organizers will certainly transfer them to the world level, that is, for example, to the UN . Today, the UN structure called IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a viper's nest, where they hold on to the very fake "climate science" and declare all those who disagree as enemies and charlatans.

We recently talked about how a similar campaign broke down in the US (also with its own "science") - about racism. And here again. What is common here? But our commentator from The Washington Post suggests: this is not how it was necessary to "fight for the climate." It was not necessary to intimidate people, it was not necessary to morally, and then physically crush them. And now it is necessary to present the problem as something positive, requiring interesting technological solutions. Well, people don't like to be afraid, you know? They are.

Posted by badanov 2023-07-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11128 views ] Top

08:38 Gleng Whaick2262
08:35 Gleng Whaick2262
08:35 Gleng Whaick2262
08:33 Gleng Whaick2262
08:32 Gleng Whaick2262
08:31 Gleng Whaick2262
08:28 Gleng Whaick2262
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1
07:18 trailing wife
07:14 Richard Aubrey
07:10 NN2N1
07:09 Besoeker
07:03 NN2N1