Article

2020-11-21 Home Front: Politix

MI Secretary of State Benson: ‘No Legal Avenue’ for Two Republicans to Rescind Certification Vote; Doxxer Wanted to ‘Illegally Vote‘ in KY, SC

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by trailing wife 2020-11-21 08:47|| || Front Page|| [8 views ] Top

#1 Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D) said Thursday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s "Live" that there was "no legal avenue" for two members of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers to reverse their votes.

Bull.

Posted by JohnQC 2020-11-21 11:26|| 2020-11-21 11:26|| Front Page Top

#2 Maybe the Secretary never had a class concerning 'under duress' and the legal validity of statements done under such conditions.

Posted by Procopius2k 2020-11-21 11:41|| 2020-11-21 11:41|| Front Page Top

#3 So, and not suggesting it but just as an example, but its Ok for someone to hold a gun to the Secretary's head and force her to declare the election void.
Or is there 'No Legal Avenue' only for Republicans?

Posted by CrazyFool 2020-11-21 13:01|| 2020-11-21 13:01|| Front Page Top

#4 Now this repulsive little thug is encouraging attacks on Monica Palmer:

On Thursday night, Powell told host Laura Ingraham that Staebler’s attack did not stop with the Zoom video. She alleged that Staebler also used his social media platform to “repeatedly dox” her by posting her home phone number, home address and email address online, and “encouraged people to stop by” her house to express their anger.

Posted by Snusons B. Hayes1557 2020-11-21 13:19|| 2020-11-21 13:19|| Front Page Top

#5 From UpCounsel.com

There are other situations under which a contract may be said to have been signed under duress. If a person is forced to sign a contract at gunpoint, that would obviously be a case of signing under duress. However, any type of threat or other cause of stress that one party puts on another party may be considered duress; a physical weapon is not required.

Contracts can only be legally signed under a party's free will. Any type of coercion is considered duress if it allows one person to take advantage of another. Modification of a contract may also be done under duress.

The determination of duress is not whether or not the threat truly exists, but whether or not the person honestly believed that it did. However, a party can only claim duress if the other party in the contract was the one who caused the duress.

Say what you want about Newsom, at least he is a straight up liar.

These people are bugwits.

Posted by swksvolFF 2020-11-21 14:44|| 2020-11-21 14:44|| Front Page Top

#6 Their "agreement" was obtained under threat; it's invalid. You can't hold a gun to a person's head, have them sign a contract, then argue the contract was voluntarily entered.

Posted by Rob Crawford 2020-11-21 23:37|| 2020-11-21 23:37|| Front Page Top

23:37 Rob Crawford
23:36 Rob Crawford
22:44 James
22:14 trailing wife
22:07 swksvolFF
21:58 Kofi Glinelet8745
21:24 Matt
21:11 SteveS
20:59 JohnQC
20:59 SteveS
20:58 Lowspark
20:50 swksvolFF
20:45 SteveS
19:59 CrazyFool
19:54 Sheque Flereting6003
19:50 Sheque Flereting6003
19:27 Old Patriot
19:12 Jan
18:55 jpal
18:41 Regular joe
18:20 NN2N1
18:16 NN2N1
18:02 Clem
17:53 daniel