Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 04/01/2019 View Sun 03/31/2019 View Sat 03/30/2019 View Fri 03/29/2019 View Thu 03/28/2019 View Wed 03/27/2019 View Tue 03/26/2019
1
2019-04-01 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Judge tosses Trump executive order, restores Obama drilling ban
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2019-04-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11137 views ]  Top

#1 So all Trump has to do to make his executive orders as secure as an act of Congress is to just include words saying that the orders are to extend indefinitely, right?
Posted by gorb 2019-04-01 01:55||   2019-04-01 01:55|| Front Page Top

#2 It only works for the Lightbringer
Posted by Frank G 2019-04-01 06:46||   2019-04-01 06:46|| Front Page Top

#3 Andrew Jackson to John Marshall: Let's see you enforce the law.
Posted by SR-71 2019-04-01 07:27||   2019-04-01 07:27|| Front Page Top

#4 i believe besoeker calle this one
Posted by chris 2019-04-01 07:35||   2019-04-01 07:35|| Front Page Top

#5 Any rational reason why judges sit for life? They're just hacks like the rest of the political class. How dare they call this a republic.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-04-01 07:38||   2019-04-01 07:38|| Front Page Top

#6 Black robed tyrant strikes again.
Posted by DarthVader 2019-04-01 08:29||   2019-04-01 08:29|| Front Page Top

#7 If we had a real party, we could remove these wanna be tyrants.
Posted by Silentbrick 2019-04-01 10:02||   2019-04-01 10:02|| Front Page Top

#8 
No. We do not threaten Americans, even in the passive voice.
Posted by Angeth Elmomotle6502 2019-04-01 10:09||   2019-04-01 10:09|| Front Page Top

#9 Presidents have the power under a federal law to remove certain lands from development but cannot revoke those removals, Gleason said.

If there was a precedent for this, she should've mentioned it; otherwise its reversal is a layup for Trump.
Posted by Raj 2019-04-01 10:27||   2019-04-01 10:27|| Front Page Top

#10 Congress is considered 'sovereign' which means that the current Congress can never restrict what a future Congress might do. Can't imagine any rationale for saying that principle does not also apply to presidents.
Posted by Iblis 2019-04-01 12:43||   2019-04-01 12:43|| Front Page Top

#11 This one is going to get dumped on appeal - except for the problem that the appeals court is the 9th Circus. Obama appointee, naturally.

The reasoning is exceptionally stupid, that a president has the power to do A, but not the power to un-do A, via executive branch powers under the Constitution.

Let's see them hold this up for something Trump does the next time a Demo is in office. Guaranteed it doesn't work.

This is just another imperial judge.

Posted by Injun Bucket8891 2019-04-01 22:44||   2019-04-01 22:44|| Front Page Top

23:08 Raj
22:47 Injun Bucket8891
22:44 Injun Bucket8891
22:36 Injun Bucket8891
22:35 Injun Bucket8891
22:25 Injun Bucket8891
22:24 Injun Bucket8891
22:21 Injun Bucket8891
21:43 bbrewer126
21:40 bbrewer126
21:37 Procopius2k
20:00 Glenmore
19:34 rammer
19:14 Frank G
19:09 Raj
18:56 Bobby
18:53 Bobby
18:53 Angoluse Snoter7633
18:52 rjschwarz
18:52 Rambler in Virginia
18:51 Angoluse Snoter7633
18:50 Silentbrick
18:49 Angoluse Snoter7633
18:49 Silentbrick









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com