Article

2018-04-27 Government

Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Bill Shielding Mueller

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2018-04-27 02:30|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 I recall a bill passed by Congress, it prohibited President Andrew Johnson from firing any member of his (disloyal) Cabinet. He fired one. This was the basis of the subsequent impeachment proceedings. Can you say Deep State boys and girls. Make your agents above the law and accountability.

Posted by Procopius2k 2018-04-27 07:39|| 2018-04-27 07:39|| Front Page Top

#2 Don't fire Mueller, just zero out his budget. Should be an easy sidestep.

Posted by Raj 2018-04-27 07:48|| 2018-04-27 07:48|| Front Page Top

#3 I've been astounded by the Mueller whateveryoucallit and the lack of accomplishing anything in over a year. He has traveled all over the world looking for leads. It almost makes me think that maybe it was an intended sham. A sop for the left to chew on and think important things were being done whereas little was being done.

Posted by JohnQC 2018-04-27 08:41|| 2018-04-27 08:41|| Front Page Top

#4 Yes #2. I have also thought this was an excellent way to deal with this waste of time and money.

Posted by Dale 2018-04-27 08:44|| 2018-04-27 08:44|| Front Page Top

#5 Indict all of Mueller's underlings for "Collusion to Commit [fill in the blank]", do a pre-dawn raid on them, and then leave Mueller to twist in the breeze. If Mueller wants to play Gestapo then oblige him.

Posted by magpie 2018-04-27 11:07|| 2018-04-27 11:07|| Front Page Top

#6 Unconstitutional showboating

Posted by Frank G 2018-04-27 12:45|| 2018-04-27 12:45|| Front Page Top

#7 If Mueller is doing such a great job, why does he need protection?

Posted by Roth LaDoad 2018-04-27 14:24|| 2018-04-27 14:24|| Front Page Top

#8 This is not Constitutional, and none of you idiots should be "Lawmakers"

Posted by newc 2018-04-27 16:23|| 2018-04-27 16:23|| Front Page Top

#9 As said above, the guy has examined EVERYTHING.
As a contrarian I wonder if the empty bucket isn't really full, and this shield is the final ploy in a long shell game.

I think a role as the President's special investigator is pending.

Posted by Skidmark 2018-04-27 19:03|| 2018-04-27 19:03|| Front Page Top

22:49 Procopius2k
22:18 Richard Aubrey
22:14 DooDahMan
22:11 TzSenator
22:11 Anguper Hupomosing9418
21:44 3dc
21:35 DooDahMan
21:34 3dc
20:17 Waldemar and Company9786
20:12 Blackbeard Bumble5724
20:09 Blackbeard Bumble5724
20:01 Airandee
19:53 Sgt.D.T.
19:48 swksvolFF
19:07 Frank G
19:03 Skidmark
18:54 Skidmark
18:50 Frank G
18:49 Skidmark
18:49 Frank G
18:46 Frank G
18:45 Frank G
18:43 Skidmark
18:42 Besoeker