Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/10/2012 View Wed 05/09/2012 View Tue 05/08/2012 View Mon 05/07/2012 View Sun 05/06/2012 View Sat 05/05/2012 View Fri 05/04/2012
2012-05-10 --Tech & Moderator Notes
To Ban Or Not To Ban?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2012-05-10 13:09|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [514 views ]  Top

#1 I keep going back and forth on this. Consider, for example, banning racial epithets. Sounds like the decent thing to do, but there are problems. The new words start to take on the meaning of the banned words. Also, you get a slippery slope leading to political correctness (social Marxism). So maybe it isn't such a good idea after all?

Flag burning is another example. Best suggestion, BTW, I have ever heard for this issue: accept the idea that symbolic speech is speech, and give that speech a legal meaning. In this case, define the burning of a US flag as an affirmative statement rescinding your US citizenship.

Anyway, I think Orwell was onto something with Newspeak, but at the same time I wonder if changing words really does change ideas in the long run. Don't know.
Posted by Iblis 2012-05-10 14:06||   2012-05-10 14:06|| Front Page Top

#2 Not ban, but declare it's members outlaws (no protection from the state).
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2012-05-10 23:32||   2012-05-10 23:32|| Front Page Top

23:57 canalzone
23:32 Bright Pebbles
23:12 trailing wife
21:48 Pappy
21:29 Bright Pebbles
20:52 Frank G
20:37 Frank G
19:15 American Delight
18:47 Bobby
18:25 Rjschwarz
18:23 Gabby Cussworth
18:18 Gabby Cussworth
18:11 Gabby Cussworth
18:06 trailing wife
18:04 trailing wife
17:34 Procopius2k
16:58 Mizzou Mafia
16:56 Steve White
16:54 Gruth McGurque5303
16:28 Gruth McGurque5303
16:11 DarthVader
15:09 g(r)omgoru
14:59 AlanC
14:59 Besoeker

Search WWW Search