Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 05/15/2011 View Sat 05/14/2011 View Fri 05/13/2011 View Thu 05/12/2011 View Wed 05/11/2011 View Tue 05/10/2011 View Mon 05/09/2011
1
2011-05-15 Home Front: Politix
Fed Pensions Targeted in Debt-Reduction Talks
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bobby 2011-05-15 08:16|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Republicans have proposed saving more than $120 billion over the next decade by requiring the civilian workforce to contribute more toward retirement — a plan that would effectively impose an immediate 5 percent pay cut on more than 2 million federal employees. President Obama’s bipartisan fiscal commission has also endorsed the idea, calling the federal system “out of line” with the private sector.

I don't see this happening in an election year with the Democrats at the helm. The federal unions are the ONE's biggest supporters. He ain't gonna bite the hands that feed him in an election year. Look at the opposition to Walker's attempts to fix the budget in Wisconsin.

Just for example, a list of federal unions: Government Unions

We've got the usual suspects such as SEIU and AFGE at work.

Posted by JohnQC 2011-05-15 10:24||   2011-05-15 10:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Paste link into your browser:

www.opm.gov/lmr/html/unions.asp
Posted by JohnQC 2011-05-15 10:37||   2011-05-15 10:37|| Front Page Top

#3 It would be sad if this were to badly hurt the many GS 5s, 7s, 9s. A lot of these folk work pretty hard. It would be better to stagger it so that up to $40k/yr there would be no increase in required contribution and above $80k, the full 5% would kick in.
Posted by Lord Garth 2011-05-15 18:40||   2011-05-15 18:40|| Front Page Top

#4 Technically they're already cutting pensions as the last two years have seen no government rigged Cost of Living increase claiming there is no inflation. That's already saved the Treasury the equivalent of what they're looking for. They need to tie any such increase to an index of average salary/pay increases in the general public rather than inflation as we're all in the same boat, so to speak. Don't ask those generating the revenue to suffer a double impact of inflation and mandatory CoL increases to the pensioners.
Posted by Procopius2k 2011-05-15 19:00||   2011-05-15 19:00|| Front Page Top

#5 The fewer government workers, the fewer pensions needed. How much of what the Federal and State governments is necessary ion our lives? I believe few non-government employed citizens would even notice if 50%, both civil and military service, were laid off.
Posted by Zebulon Thranter9685 2011-05-15 19:24||   2011-05-15 19:24|| Front Page Top

#6 EXCELLENT angle to Obama's unsustainable spending. Blew his and his comrades retirement. Lets see how that plays out in DC.
Posted by Black Bart Sperert2436 2011-05-15 22:33||   2011-05-15 22:33|| Front Page Top

23:52 European Conservative
23:31 tipper
23:06 Spique Hatfield8822
23:01 Spique Hatfield8822
22:52 Zhang Fei
22:50 JosephMendiola
22:44 JosephMendiola
22:42 Spique Hatfield8822
22:35 JosephMendiola
22:33 Black Bart Sperert2436
22:32 European Conservative
22:30 JosephMendiola
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:25 Grunter
22:20 tipper
22:16 Barbara Skolaut
22:10 JosephMendiola
21:51 European Conservative
21:40 Mike Kozlowski
21:28 phil_b
21:27 European Conservative
20:39 phil_b
20:24 phil_b
20:15 tipper









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com