Article

2010-11-22 Home Front: Politix

Top political scientist: U.S. voters are 'pretty damn stupid'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2010-11-22 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11134 views ] Top

#1 I vote the way I vote because, when I do, I feel like I'm kicking assholes like this right in the balls.

Posted by tu3031 2010-11-22 00:26|| 2010-11-22 00:26|| Front Page Top

#2 Then color me dumb, assh*le. Dumb like a fox.

"smart voters support things like high-speed rail and higher taxes for the rich"

Smart?

I do not think that word means what you think it means.

By all means, though, feel free to waste your money on boondoggles like high-speed rail. Just keep your goddam hands off my hard-earned money.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut 2010-11-22 00:27|| 2010-11-22 00:27|| Front Page Top

#3 In just the past few months, his insights have appeared in articles in

I think you misspelled bullshit....

OTOH - the american voter did elect Obama....

Posted by CrazyFool 2010-11-22 00:36|| 2010-11-22 00:36|| Front Page Top

#4 At least one of the best & brightest knows why Obama won.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-11-22 00:37|| 2010-11-22 00:37|| Front Page Top

#5 What was his first clue?

Posted by Private Eye 2010-11-22 00:44|| 2010-11-22 00:44|| Front Page Top

#6 'They're pretty damn stupid.'

I prefer ignorant.

Posted by gorb 2010-11-22 00:45|| 2010-11-22 00:45|| Front Page Top

#7 "Lueders says he asked Franklin why "the public seemed to vote against its own interests and stated desires, for instance by electing candidates who'll drive up the deficit..."

As others say, it seemed pretty stupid for US voters to elect Obama with his socialist inclinations, clear to anyone who bothered to look... but then journos bent over backwards to enfeeble the minds of the US electorate and convince them to back the pig in a poke. Ignorant, or misinformed certainly are better terms.

Posted by Bulldog 2010-11-22 02:04|| 2010-11-22 02:04|| Front Page Top

#8 Franklin's reply on Ann Althouse.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2010-11-22 02:05|| 2010-11-22 02:05|| Front Page Top

#9 Just another "What's Wrong with Kansas?" dips*&t.

Posted by whitecollar redneck 2010-11-22 07:51|| 2010-11-22 07:51|| Front Page Top

#10 I wonder if it even occurs to people like this that his comments make them look even more out of touch and elitist?

Posted by DarthVader 2010-11-22 08:30|| 2010-11-22 08:30|| Front Page Top

#11 'They're pretty damn stupid.'

I believe the bumper sticker's next line is

'Thank a unionized teacher'

Posted by Procopius2k 2010-11-22 08:33|| 2010-11-22 08:33|| Front Page Top

#12 I just love this from dip-sticks "rebuttal"...

point I was making, which I've made numerous times before, was that voters embraced Ron Johnson before they knew much about him.

Gee Frankie baby, did you make the same comments after the Obamanation won? Talk about "ignorant" voters electing someone before they knew anything about him..........

Posted by Alan Cramer 2010-11-22 10:36|| 2010-11-22 10:36|| Front Page Top

#13 May be, Chauncey - but we ain't stupid enough to think politics is a science. So we got THAT goin' for us...

Posted by mojo 2010-11-22 11:28|| 2010-11-22 11:28|| Front Page Top

#14 Such education, such poverty of mind. The very IDEA that someone might not agree with them doesn't even occur. The slant of questions like "candidates who'll drive up the deficit with fiscally reckless giveaways to the rich" isn't even questioned - and why so? Everyone speaks like this.

Posted by gromky 2010-11-22 12:30|| 2010-11-22 12:30|| Front Page Top

#15 Hold on people, hold on. In all fairness to Professor Franklin, he said this about his interview by journalist and alleged human being Bill Lueders:

...I wish what I said next had also been quoted. I went on to say that despite not knowing the details of Johnson's policy positions, the voters did NOT make a mistake in choosing Johnson as the more conservative candidate and certain to be more favorable to cutting government. That was indeed the correct connection by an angry electorate, even if the details were quite vague.

Voter's often act on little information and can be astonishingly unaware of things one might consider "facts". A post-election Pew poll finds less than half (46%) know the GOP won only the House but not the Senate. And at times voters appear to vote for candidates who are likely to take positions at odds with the voter's interests.

But in the Johnson-Feingold race, I think despite lack of details about Johnson, a majority of Wisconsin voter's picked the guy they wanted, and for basically the right reason. Dems may be astonished at the rejection of a favorite son, but in making this choice I think voter's properly expressed their preferences and matched them to the right candidate.

So I wish I had phrased this differently but that's my bad, no one else's. But I do not agree with the conclusion that voter's were "stupid" to pick Johnson over Feingold. In fact I believe a majority got the Senator they wanted, and that is always good for a republic.

So, in reality, what we have is the publisher of an "alternative weekly" tailoring the comments of a respected political scientist to support his views by using some creative omission. While Prof. Franklin said - and admitted he said - something stupid, he didn't say everything it would seem like he said from the article in the Isthmus.

Translation: yet another new low for the left.

Posted by Secret Master 2010-11-22 14:29|| 2010-11-22 14:29|| Front Page Top

#16 "yet another new low for the left"

There'll always be another 'new low' for them, SM - they keep a fleet of backhoes on retainer to ensure it.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut 2010-11-22 18:50|| 2010-11-22 18:50|| Front Page Top

#17 "Stupid" like foxes we are.

Posted by Besoeker 2010-11-22 18:52|| 2010-11-22 18:52|| Front Page Top

#18 D *** NG IT, CLEARLY THE FUTURE OWG MIGHTY USSA = OWG WEAK USRoA GLOBAL SSR + CPUS NEEDS A POLITBURO + PRESIDIUM, ETC. TO SAVE IT FROM IMPLOSION LIKE THE USSR DID!

Posted by JosephMendiola 2010-11-22 22:39|| 2010-11-22 22:39|| Front Page Top

23:02 Muggsy Glink
22:49 Bunyip
22:49 gorb
22:45 tu3031
22:45 Swamp Blondie
22:39 JosephMendiola
22:33 JosephMendiola
22:32 gorb
22:28 Muggsy Glink
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:23 JosephMendiola
22:23 Grunter
22:17 rammer
22:01 Private Eye
22:00 Private Eye
21:59 JosephMendiola
21:58 Broadhead6
21:38 European Conservative
21:32 Frank G
21:17 Private Eye
21:10 Pappy
21:09 Thing From Snowy Mountain
21:05 tu3031
21:05 Frank G