Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 10/19/2009 View Sun 10/18/2009 View Sat 10/17/2009 View Fri 10/16/2009 View Thu 10/15/2009 View Wed 10/14/2009 View Tue 10/13/2009
1
2009-10-19 Home Front: Politix
Treating the Elderly Like Spoiled Brats
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2009-10-19 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Its not easy being/getting older. Betcha the (opinion) writer is a meer yoot! Seriously, the aches and pains which stop being occassional and start being constant do bring a sense of selfishness to the scene. I am 61 and on long term disability leave from my school teaching position due to a (near total) disintigration of the heel in my left foot. So what happens, I was in the middle of a cross walk two weeks ago and get slammed by a car in my right leg and foot. Un erringly, the vehicle in question was a delapidated 15 year old Pontiac - not an "E" model Mercedes. Also unerringly, the driver was destitute, devoid of both insurance and license. Last, the driver in question was not born in our once great nation - I will leave ethnicity to your imagination. Hint: Tucson is 50 miles north of Mexico Lindo.
Now i have quantitatively more aches and pains - so don't get all in a hissy fit over seniors scoring $250 from the Big "O". I'd gladly turn in the money for a decrease in aches and pains. I couldn't be a spoiled brat if I wanted to - my four step-children amply fit/fill that role.
Posted by borgboy 2009-10-19 01:03||   2009-10-19 01:03|| Front Page Top

#2 They vote. Voters get the payola.
Posted by gromky 2009-10-19 02:31|| ]">[ ]  2009-10-19 02:31|| Front Page Top

#3 borgboy, while getting old is not for sissies,it should not automatically entitle you to a government handout. I am not getting a raise this year, and probably won't get one next year.
By the way, I am 61 also.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia">Rambler in Virginia  2009-10-19 06:50||   2009-10-19 06:50|| Front Page Top

#4 I've always had a problem with cost of living increases as they are divorced from the source from which the funding comes. If the average worker is not getting a COLA, his/her taxes [either directly or indirectly by inflating the monetary supply] have to be raised to cover the cost of the COLA for those who do. So the worker not only gets hammered by inflating prices in the economy diminishing their buying power, the worker also gets tagged further by an additional reduction created though the tax obligation to cover the COLA. A Value of Wages Index rather than a COLA would put both parties in the same economic boat. If wages aren't going up, then COLA won't go up. Maybe that would encourage those who receive to be interested in the status of the community as a whole rather than their own 'special interest'.
Posted by Procopius2k 2009-10-19 09:06||   2009-10-19 09:06|| Front Page Top

#5 I've been encouraging the various daughters, trailing and otherwise, to have at least four children apiece, so my grandchildren's tax burden is divided into smaller fractions. I know I'm not likely to get anything anyway -- I'm 48 -- but the tax burden on the young is only going to get worse. If I recall correctly, Medicare/Medicaid are already bankrupt, and Social Security will cross that line in a few years, barring painful changes.
Posted by trailing wife 2009-10-19 09:35||   2009-10-19 09:35|| Front Page Top

#6 I'm 67/retired...Obama can take his $250 idea and stuff it...It fixes NOTHING...
Posted by crazyhorse 2009-10-19 11:30||   2009-10-19 11:30|| Front Page Top

#7 I'd be happy if they'd just pay me back for all the money they've been sucking out of my paycheck all these years...with interest if you don't mind.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2009-10-19 12:08||   2009-10-19 12:08|| Front Page Top

#8 I know this is not a popular solution, as no one likes taxes, but it only seems logical these days: means testing. Just because millionaires and billionaires have paid into the system (modestly, only up to $104,000 income is taxable)they shouldn't get a monthly check. Many people live on only their SS check, never having made enough to stash away much, and putting Grandma out on the street if the kids aren't willing or able to take her in, isn't an acceptable alternative. They could also raise the limit on taxable income so those making good salaries subsidize the elderly more. We need the safety net but the same DC party assh*les have raided the trustfund to balance the Clinton budget and even LBJ used it to pay for Viet Nam. They just got caught in the market crash.
Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2009-10-19 12:52||   2009-10-19 12:52|| Front Page Top

#9 I just hope all of you who are retired or nearing retirement have your 401k and other investments tied up in CDs, money market funds and other low-risk categories, not highly volatile instruments like stocks! A stock-heavy portfolio is only good when you're younger and your investments have time to recover from downtimes before you need the funds.
Posted by Dar">Dar  2009-10-19 13:02||   2009-10-19 13:02|| Front Page Top

#10 I assume that means testing is why I won't get anything, Lumpy Elmoluck5091. It's an easy, fairly invisible step. Easier than raising the retirement age or reducing benefits, both of which will no doubt happen eventually (sorry, borgboy), and probably sooner rather than later, given that this administration is determined to send the national debt to 80% of GDP.
Posted by trailing wife 2009-10-19 13:10||   2009-10-19 13:10|| Front Page Top

#11 Am I the youngest person here? I'm 46.
Posted by Hellfish 2009-10-19 13:54||   2009-10-19 13:54|| Front Page Top

#12 At some point the Federal government should make it legal for those over 65 (or whatever) to legally do drugs (sold by the Feds of course). The old hippies would then spend their savings and help the budget issues while at the same time drastically cutting their own lives short and solving a number of health care issues.
Posted by rjschwarz 2009-10-19 13:58||   2009-10-19 13:58|| Front Page Top

#13 Nope, Hellfish, but not by much (42).
Posted by Cornsilk Blondie 2009-10-19 15:08||   2009-10-19 15:08|| Front Page Top

#14 What I don't understand is that we've got disinflation coupled with a devaluing dollar. How the hell does that happen? Is it that every other currency is just deflating faster than us?

I was never that good at math, but I've got the feeling I'm inverting a value somewhere.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2009-10-19 15:15|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2009-10-19 15:15|| Front Page Top

#15 Rampant inflation will soon solve your delima.
Posted by bman">bman  2009-10-19 15:36||   2009-10-19 15:36|| Front Page Top

#16 When the U.S. catches cold, the rest of the world gets Swine Flu, Mitch. As far as I can tell, we won't even know where the bottom is until the real estate derivatives unwind on the one hand, and the Democrats stop passing economy-changing bills on the other (health care, cap & trade, etc.).
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2009-10-19 15:49||   2009-10-19 15:49|| Front Page Top

#17 Daniel Patrick Moynahan, who was, and may God have mercy on his soul, the only Democrat I ever trusted, once stated right after he retired from the Senate, that the SS system could be fixed by cutting the tie to the CPI and using some other more realistic indicator as a COLA. He admitted that the SS was a wreck due to the faulty indicators that were being used to increase benefits.
D P Moynahan was the only person in the entire government who understood SS and all of its machinations completely and when he retired and died, there is no one left to publically voice a viable and logical critique of the system.
There has been no one since who can talk knowledgibly about it.
Posted by James Carville 2009-10-19 17:05||   2009-10-19 17:05|| Front Page Top

#18 #6 I'm 67/retired...Obama can take his $250 idea and stuff it...It fixes NOTHING...
Posted by crazyhorse 2009-10-19


He can 'stuff' my $250. as well. That's a whopping $500. up his worthless a**.
Posted by Besoeker 2009-10-19 18:10||   2009-10-19 18:10|| Front Page Top

#19 I think that there has to be a combination of means testing, an increase in the eligible age and a new much more strict COLA mechanism if SS is going to survive in any form.
Posted by Remoteman 2009-10-19 19:09||   2009-10-19 19:09|| Front Page Top

#20 Hellfish & Cornsilk,
Congratulations on being so precocious - it typically takes longer to accumulate the knowledge and wisdom to properly appreciate Rantburg.
Posted by Glenmore 2009-10-19 19:22||   2009-10-19 19:22|| Front Page Top

#21 I'm old enough to remember when there was no COLA for SocSec and there was a debate in congress each year about how much to increase payments. Part of the argument for the COLA was to get the whores out from under the responsibility for the deficit and to keep the increases under control. But back then some elderly were eating dog food.

While I suspect the dog food stories were overly dramatic, there was much poverty amongst the elderly. Those times are returning. The socialized medicine Obama is installing will be used to gut Medicare more each year. I fully anticipate means testing for SocSec and for the floor to increase at COLA + 1. Within 25 years, there will be stories about the elderly eating dog food, but they'll just be boomers and the war will only be recently over, so no one will really care.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2009-10-19 19:49||   2009-10-19 19:49|| Front Page Top

#22 I'm 50, so older than HF and CB, but I have the wisdom and self restraint of a 17 yr old, so that counts for sumpthin
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2009-10-19 20:02||   2009-10-19 20:02|| Front Page Top

#23 50? Really? I'd always thought of you as 17.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2009-10-19 20:28||   2009-10-19 20:28|| Front Page Top

#24 D P Moynahan was the only person in the entire government who understood SS and all of its machinations completely

Interesting. I'm curious, though, and wonder if he rejected his own check. I know of only one politician who has done just that - and he's a Republican.
Posted by Woozle Uneter9007 2009-10-19 20:35||   2009-10-19 20:35|| Front Page Top

#25 *hugs* NS
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2009-10-19 21:05||   2009-10-19 21:05|| Front Page Top

23:35 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
23:32 USN, Ret.
23:29 GirlThursday
23:25 trailing wife
23:22 USN, Ret.
23:20 USN, Ret.
22:51 Jumbo Slinerong5015
22:49 Procopius2k
22:44 Jumbo Slinerong5015
22:27 Zhang Fei
22:12 crosspatch
22:09 Skunky Glins****
22:07 Anonymoose
21:52 gromky
21:45 JosephMendiola
21:42 Chief
21:30 JosephMendiola
21:29 JosephMendiola
21:25 JosephMendiola
21:21 JosephMendiola
21:17 JosephMendiola
21:16 Anonymoose
21:14 trailing wife
21:13 Woozle Uneter9007









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com