Article

2009-07-01 China-Japan-Koreas

U.S. Against Resumption of S.Korean Nuclear Energy Program

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2009-07-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 But North Korea's nuclear weapon program is A-OK with the Obama Administration right? And the spread of nuclear weapons to terrorist states is just fine with Big-OH.

I swear - there isn't a totalitarian, brutal Dictator Obama isn't in love with. Not a single one.

Posted by CrazyFool 2009-07-01 01:12|| 2009-07-01 01:12|| Front Page Top

#2 Yhea Ya Name serves ya right

#1 But North Korea's nuclear weapon program is A-OK with the Obama Administration right? And the spread of nuclear weapons to terrorist states is just fine with Big-OH.

ARMS RACE IS FINE BY YOU I SEE DIP$%&*

I swear - there isn't a totalitarian, brutal Dictator Obama isn't in love with. Not a single one.
Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-07-01 01:12

Posted by Play4Keeps 2009-07-01 02:00|| 2009-07-01 02:00|| Front Page Top

#3 All things considered, Play4, there are worse things than a nuclear arms race (which this isn't, at least not yet). Conceding the race to your psychopathic enemy is worse, unless you are one of the old 'Better Red than dead' folks from the sixties.

Posted by Glenmore 2009-07-01 07:02|| 2009-07-01 07:02|| Front Page Top

#4 It's clear countries determined enough to do so are able to acquire nuclear raw materials, and those determined enough to get proper scientists trained -- or purchased -- along with sub rosa purchases of refining equipment. Especially countries like Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. We all seem to think Japan could assemble a working device on very short notice, but has not because they've thus far trusted America to handle such things on their behalf, and it seems likely Taiwan and South Korea have not embarked on that path for the same reason. However, after the positions enunciated by President Obamaa over the past few days, what odds Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan continue to remain sanguine that America will actively protect them at the moment they should come to need protection that extends beyond speeches and stern letters to the appropriate foreign minister?

Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife 2009-07-01 08:06|| 2009-07-01 08:06|| Front Page Top

#5 Obama is the best guarantee Japan S Korea and Taiwan will go nuclear. Anticipating when Europe's #1 Love Interest withdraws American nuclear guarantees for NATO.

Posted by ed 2009-07-01 08:54|| 2009-07-01 08:54|| Front Page Top

#6 I was attempting to show the contrast between Obama's apparent support for North Korea's Nuclear weapons development (and exportation of nuclear tech) and his objection to the south even reprocessing fuel (which Japan, another non-nuclear-armed country, does already).

Like the contrast between his strong support of a wanna-be dictator and his limp d-k 'support' of the people of Iran.

There are worse things then a Nuclear arms race. Having your freedoms stripped away from being under the gun of a nuclear armed Psycho is one. Being on the receiving end of a nuclear attack is another. Kimmie is both desperate enough and Obama whimpy enough that the north might feel that they could get away with either option.

Posted by CrazyFool 2009-07-01 09:36|| 2009-07-01 09:36|| Front Page Top

23:25 CrazyFool
23:18 Old Patriot
22:59 tipover
22:41 Procopius2k
22:37 Frank G
22:35 Frank G
22:29 Frank G
22:26 Play4Keeps
22:12 SteveS
22:11 WTF
22:08 Gabby
21:37 no mo uro
21:36 Broadhead6
21:28 badanov
20:51 Frank G
20:50 JosephMendiola
20:49 Skunky Glins 5***
20:48 Pappy
20:46 Atomic Conspiracy
20:42 JosephMendiola
20:41 Pappy
20:41 JosephMendiola
20:23 Angeash Mussolini9154
20:11 Broadhead6