Article

2008-08-21 Home Front: Culture Wars

More problems in Santcuary City by the Bay

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tu3031 2008-08-21 13:15|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 I wonder if the City of San Francisco can be sued. Well, thay probably can be sued but would the Plaintiff win?

Posted by Deacon Blues 2008-08-21 14:32|| 2008-08-21 14:32|| Front Page Top

#2 The city is certainly building up a nice clientele base for a future class action suit for some motivated tort lawyers [will we see Red on Red soon]. Unfortunately, nothing says 'time to alter behavior' like having a massive award slammed upon the offender.

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-08-21 14:35|| 2008-08-21 14:35|| Front Page Top

#3 Justice would see the SF City Council and Major standing right alongsize Cahun as accessories.

Or at least a multi-million dollar lawsuit from the victim for not enforcing Federal laws. Don't they take an oath of office to do so?

Posted by CrazyFool 2008-08-21 15:10|| 2008-08-21 15:10|| Front Page Top

#4 Does San Francisco get any Federal funds and if so why are the checks still being cut?

Posted by rjschwarz 2008-08-21 15:22|| 2008-08-21 15:22|| Front Page Top

#5 SF sued? Shat...it should be placed under marshall law at this point. It's operating outside of all accepted bounds of consitutional law. It is in fact, a rogue state and deserving of the requisite treatment.

Posted by Rex Mundi 2008-08-21 16:15|| 2008-08-21 16:15|| Front Page Top

#6 I think the guy should be put under house arrest in the Mayor's residence - and given a new set of knives.

Al

Posted by Frozen Al 2008-08-21 17:35|| 2008-08-21 17:35|| Front Page Top

#7 #4 - to see why Federal funds are going to San Francisco, look at who represents the city - the Squeaker of the House herself. Any motion to cut off funding for SF would never come to a vote.

Posted by Rambler in California">Rambler in California 2008-08-21 19:09|| 2008-08-21 19:09|| Front Page Top

#8 Legislation is already on the books to do a withholding of certain appropriated monies, but the Departments [even though they're suppose to answer to the Executive and 'obey' the law look out for their own butts] won't because of the same fact - SanFran Nan. Utterly corrupts the basis of legitimate government.

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-08-21 19:54|| 2008-08-21 19:54|| Front Page Top

#9 Or at least a multi-million dollar lawsuit from the victim for not enforcing Federal laws. Don't they take an oath of office to do so?

Well, when they get to the point about defending the Constitution against all enemies, it's a little different there. They interpret the next section, "foreign or domestic" as kind of a pick one or the other kind of statement. My guess is that most of them choose to defend it against "domestic enemies" only, like Marines, people from Ohio, that kind of thing. Foreigners like Uc-Cahun are cool with them.

Posted by Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields 2008-08-21 21:14|| 2008-08-21 21:14|| Front Page Top

#10 If SF is to be sued in Federal court, then it goes eventually to the 9th Circus, and they have friends there.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2008-08-21 22:37|| 2008-08-21 22:37|| Front Page Top

#11 If only the F'g Mayor could be sent to Git-Mo with San-Fran-Nan, Pelosi, and Babs Boxer for LIFE

Posted by Red Dawg">Red Dawg 2008-08-21 23:28|| 2008-08-21 23:28|| Front Page Top

23:57 Waldemar Uneack9263
23:55 Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields
23:54 GDLotA9226
23:49 Waldemar Uneack9263
23:45 JosephMendiola
23:35 JosephMendiola
23:32 JosephMendiola
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:28 Red Dawg
23:27 Woodrow Phaviper9249
23:25 JosephMendiola
23:23 SteveS
23:18 trailing wife
23:17 Steve White
23:12 trailing wife
23:09 newc
22:43 SteveS
22:37 Alaska Paul
22:36 trailing wife
22:31 Pappy
22:26 Alaska Paul
22:24 Iblis
22:20 Barbara Skolaut
22:16 3dc