Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 05/06/2008 View Mon 05/05/2008 View Sun 05/04/2008 View Sat 05/03/2008 View Fri 05/02/2008 View Thu 05/01/2008 View Wed 04/30/2008
1
2008-05-06 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Jude Loses $54 M Suit for Pants, Now Sues to be a Judge Again
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bobby 2008-05-06 05:52|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Craaaaazy.
Posted by Sninert Black9312 2008-05-06 08:16||   2008-05-06 08:16|| Front Page Top

#2 Where's the hook this pulls this idiot off the world stage--his 15 minutes were up long ago? The race card will be played in 10, 9, 8, ...
Posted by JohnQC 2008-05-06 10:07||   2008-05-06 10:07|| Front Page Top

#3 Hey! Jude is supposed to be Judge. My bad.
Posted by Bobby 2008-05-06 12:22||   2008-05-06 12:22|| Front Page Top

#4 In other words, no one will hire him so he needs to DEMAND a job from D.C.

He forgot the pony....
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2008-05-06 14:27|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]  2008-05-06 14:27|| Front Page Top

#5 What part of "your appointment is up" don't you understand you stupid POS???????
good thing he can read, else he'd end up in the military.
Posted by USN, Ret. 2008-05-06 14:51||   2008-05-06 14:51|| Front Page Top

#6 Has got to be black. And liberal.
Posted by James Samuel 2008-05-06 14:52||   2008-05-06 14:52|| Front Page Top

#7 Abolish the judicial office! Ridiculous? In early English Common Law, judges were prohibited from making findings of fact; those were left to jurors. Findings of innocence or guilt were based on applying law to juror fact. In the computer age we no longer need judges to do that; case issues are now retrievable by data search and Law Reports routinely record those issues for future reference. In "The Brethren," Bob Woodward reported that few SCOTUS judgments are written by judges. In fact, law firms reported that youthful former Law Clerks had submitted resumes in which they claimed authorship to key SCOTUS findings. High court judges were forced to admit same. While the rest of us wait for retirement on a small pension, SCOTUS parasites retire at full salary. And that often means a handoutof millions.
Posted by Omeatle de Medici7381 2008-05-06 19:37||   2008-05-06 19:37|| Front Page Top

#8 SIGN OF THE APOCALYPSE NUMBER ??? > JUDGES NOW NEED DE FACTO PANTS TO SIT ON TRIAL BENCH???

EEEWWWWW..........Who knew!?
Posted by JosephMendiola 2008-05-06 23:15||   2008-05-06 23:15|| Front Page Top

23:59 trailing wife
23:56 trailing wife
23:52 JosephMendiola
23:51 RD
23:50 rjschwarz
23:48 rjschwarz
23:46 anonymous2u
23:43 trailing wife
23:40 RD
23:37 Frank G
23:23 trailing wife
23:16 trailing wife
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:07 JosephMendiola
23:03 JosephMendiola
22:56 JosephMendiola
22:54 Barbara Skolaut
22:47 Goober Thising2539
22:30 Ebbatle Protector of the Leprechauns7911
22:27 Ebbatle Protector of the Leprechauns7911
22:25 Redneck Jim
22:22 Ebbatle Protector of the Leprechauns7911
22:22 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com