Article

2007-10-06 Africa Subsaharan

WND : 10 Christians slaughtered over alleged Muhammad cartoon

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2007-10-06 13:18|| || Front Page|| [11142 views ] Top

#1 It is all the fault of the Christians for not renouncing Christianity and following the rules of Allan.

Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore 2007-10-06 13:47|| 2007-10-06 13:47|| Front Page Top

#2 Killing, raping and pillaging all in the name of a child-molesting, murdering, lying, cheating, paranoid-schizophrenic man who had delusions of grandeur?

Posted by anymouse">anymouse 2007-10-06 13:51|| http://theworldsworstblog-really.blogspot.com/]">[http://theworldsworstblog-really.blogspot.com/] 2007-10-06 13:51|| Front Page Top

#3 It appears thatwhenever this sort of anti-Christian violence is conjured upthere needs to be a swift elimination of such disagreeable Moslems immediately thereafter. Take the Muslim inhabitants of Tudun Wada Dankadai and expel them into some unoccupied area while letting them know that any who return will be killed on sight. The only other alternative is simply killing all of them to begin with. A process such as this will guarantee the remaining Muslims are ones that can peaceably coexist with Christians, if indeed such a species of Muslim even exists.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 14:13|| 2007-10-06 14:13|| Front Page Top

#4 What about the alleged cartoon of Muhammad, rumors of which instigated the attacks?

"We suspect that either one of the Muslim students in the school did this to create an excuse for us to be attacked, or that a Muslim fanatic from the town might have done this to spark off a fight among Muslims and Christians," said Bawa. "How could we have done this when Muslim students are always around the mosque day and night because of the Ramadan?"

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 14:15|| 2007-10-06 14:15|| Front Page Top

#5 This is why some sort of harsh measures are required. Unchecked, there will be a pattern of escalating self-inflicted "insults" by Muslims that will be used to justify flat-out genocide against Christians everywhere. This notion has already been proven by the way that Danish cleric Ahmed Abu Laban intentionally inserted incendiary and wholly unrelated images into the set of cartoons published by Jyllands-Posten. The highly inflammatory nature of these falsely attributed images was a major contributor to the worldwide violence that claimed many Christian and Muslim lives alike.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 14:17|| 2007-10-06 14:17|| Front Page Top

#6 How many incidences like this before people realize the only solution?

Posted by mcsegeek1 2007-10-06 14:19|| 2007-10-06 14:19|| Front Page Top

#7 grrrr......incidents

Posted by mcsegeek1 2007-10-06 14:20|| 2007-10-06 14:20|| Front Page Top

#8 This incident is more than likely an extension of this exact same behavior. Only by making it unmistakably clear that such incidents directly result in loss of all property or loss of life will the Muslims be given any pause. The alternative is religious cleansing of all Christians from Muslim lands. We've already seen this in the Palestinian territories, Lebanon, Pakistan and Iraq. It is a persistent and consistent pattern of Muslim behavior. No other proof is required.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 14:20|| 2007-10-06 14:20|| Front Page Top

#9 "If you go around villages, you will see people missing one hand or one foot," explained Rev. Obiora Ike. "Do you think that's the result of an illness? That is the result of sharia law."

Is anyone willing to bet against the fact that a goodly number of those amputees are not Muslims but, instead, Christians? Shari'a law is a crime against humanity and must be eradicated. The West needs to strip all legitimacy from this hideous abuse of human rights and set about making it a source of shame and humiliation for those who practice such a barbarous draconian code.

As with many such outdated penal systems, Japan's savage Tokugawa legal code no longer exists and there is no compelling reason why our modern world must endure the constant predations of such filth as shari'a law. By itself, the blatant misogyny of shari'a is reason enough to ban it from this earth. Examine the remaining portion of this vile garbage posing as law and the need for its elimination becomes overwhelming. Islam must be served clear notice that it no longer has the luxury of lingering in the first millennia of legal jurisprudence. Either it modernizes or the Western world is obliged to dismantle this death cult's claptrap post haste.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 14:21|| 2007-10-06 14:21|| Front Page Top

#10 PS: Apologies to all for the numerous posts. Learned a few more of them pesky key words today, we did.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 14:22|| 2007-10-06 14:22|| Front Page Top

#11 Napalm, GBUs and cluster bombs do a right smart job of setting muslims right on who's the big cheese in these parts. Used judiciously, they can change hearts and minds - or eliminate them, which serves the same purpose.

I'm getting very tired of muslim arrogance. Nuking the entire MME would be justice well served, as far as I'm concerned. I might have a slight twinge of conscience about killing 1.3 billion people, but the next bit of extremism by those remaining will end that quickly enough.

Posted by Old Patriot">Old Patriot 2007-10-06 14:36|| http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/]">[http://oldpatriot.blogspot.com/] 2007-10-06 14:36|| Front Page Top

#12 Islam is a threat to humanity. It is a death cult and needs to be treated as such.

And ruthlessly eliminated.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2007-10-06 14:50|| 2007-10-06 14:50|| Front Page Top

#13 Awaits squeals of "genocide" from the usual suspects ...

[crickets]

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 15:03|| 2007-10-06 15:03|| Front Page Top

#14 It's Ramadan, should we expect anything less?

Posted by Rex Mundi 2007-10-06 15:04|| 2007-10-06 15:04|| Front Page Top

#15 I think George W Bush should go there and explain to the Christians that Islam is a religion of Peace and its all their (the Christian's)fault.

Posted by CrazyFool 2007-10-06 15:36|| 2007-10-06 15:36|| Front Page Top

#16 Awaits squeals of "genocide" from the usual suspects ...

It's like beating a dog that pisses on the carpet. After a while, you still have urine-soaked carpets, and the dog considers the beating as a form of attention.

Posted by Pappy 2007-10-06 15:51|| 2007-10-06 15:51|| Front Page Top

#17 Pappy, from your comments am I supposed to believe that you condone selective enforcement?

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 16:17|| 2007-10-06 16:17|| Front Page Top

#18 Alt F5 is working pretty well. All I see is a list of odd posters.

Genocidal maniacs is one sub-directory.

Posted by Thomas Woof 2007-10-06 18:18|| 2007-10-06 18:18|| Front Page Top

#19 Sorry I'm late. Genocide!

It is clear that there are large groups of Muslims who must be at least sequestered. And I don't count my Muslim friends here in Pennsylvania among them.

Christian minorities among Muslims in non-secular countries are targets, plain and simple. Christian organizations would do well to help the Christian minorities relocate to the civilized world. If we can all agree on that, it will be easier for Zenster to have his genocide later if necessary. Kind of like Israel pulling out of Gaza.

Posted by Darrell 2007-10-06 18:23|| 2007-10-06 18:23|| Front Page Top

#20 The insanity and ingrained viciousness of Islam has come to be accepted without judgment as its followers plumb new depths of depravity.

In a more rational world the idea that Muslims would murder due to the provocation a mere *cartoon* provides would be seen as an outrage demanding fierce retaliation.

Posted by Grumenk Philalzabod0723 2007-10-06 19:01|| 2007-10-06 19:01|| Front Page Top

#21 In a more rational world the idea that Muslims would murder due to the provocation a mere *cartoon* provides would be seen as an outrage demanding fierce retaliation.

I could not agree with you more, GP7023. Obviously, others in this thread feel even stonger about this than you or myself. Unsubstantiated allegations notwithstanding, I continue hoping a credible deterrent to Islamic terrorism exists that does not require genocide. For instance, targetted killings of Islam's clerical, academic and financial elite presents itself as a possibility. My own hopes aside, there seems little likelyhood that anything short of a Muslim holocaust will dissuade Islam from its current course. I doubt that any of these repeatedly stated positions will interfere with the intellectual bankruptcy that others engage in when they continue to accuse me of advocating genocide without a single cite or quote to back their slander. So be it.

Old Patriot, while I cannot agree with what you suggest, there is no way possible for me to wholly condemn it either. Islam's incessant atrocities continue to erode my personal opposition to first use of nuclear weapons against the MME (Muslim Middle East). I truly wish Western political leadership had the moral fiber to initiate a campaign of targetted killings. Instead, all of us are treated to the spectacle of our personal liberty being surrendered to the most savage and barbaric death cult in history. Our bipartisan leadership voluntarily abdicating so many centuries of hard-won progress is a crime that rivals those of Islam itself.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 20:04|| 2007-10-06 20:04|| Front Page Top

#22 Pappy, from your comments am I supposed to believe that you condone selective enforcement?

It means that I've given up on those who advocate 'final solutions' without knowing what it portends, or who do but will be mysteriously 'away from the table' when the bill come due.

It means that I've given up on the Kinder Kriegers: the child warriors who clamor loudly for action and bombs and the iron fist but who will never do the heavy lifting, nor mop up the blood and bits of flesh afterwards.

It means that I've given up on those who look at the 'rant' in Rantburg as a substitute for intellectual activity, research, and plain common sense.

It means that I have marines and corpsmen that take a higher priority, than dealing with Rantburg's growing cadre of LGF-commenter wannabees. I'll moderate Rantburg, hunt down the trolls, and post on occasion. But I won't comment when you and your ilk post your unthinking rote.

You'll continue to 'piss on the carpet' regardless. So to hell with it.

Posted by Pappy 2007-10-06 20:23|| 2007-10-06 20:23|| Front Page Top

#23 Thank you for responding, Pappy. Do you disagree that a campaign of targetted killings against Islam's elite could achieve major strides in our battle against Islam? Are you willing to dismiss the fact that I have been advocating this from the very earliest times I began posting at Rantburg? Do you deny that, with many of my earliest posts here at Rantburg, I have sought to identify some sort of credible deterrent against Islamic terrorism? Do you refuse to accept that all of these efforts upon my part represent a direct attempt TO AVOID THE GENOCIDE OF A MUSLIM HOLOCAUST?

I do not desire our troops to bear the responsibility of gunning down whole villages of Muslims. I do not wish to impose the moral burden upon our military leadership of instigating a massive nuclear attack against the MME (Muslim Middle East). If you do not feel these statements are in earnest, please show where I have EVER indicated otherwise.

I will maintain that our current war on global terrorism is marinally adequate at best. Especially so, in light of the political spinelessness being demonstrated here at home. I will maintain that such an unwillingness to more forcefully address Islam's adamant hostility to all things Western represents a dire threat to civilization.

Finally, Pappy, knowing fully well you could give a hot damn about my own personal approbation, I will nonetheless express appreciation for your willingness to engage this topic in a meaningful manner. The vast majority of those who oppose my positions do so with strawman arguments, lies, slander, distortions or whatever they choose to substitute for valid debate. You do not resort to such cheap shots and have my admiration for it.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 20:43|| 2007-10-06 20:43|| Front Page Top

#24 Can Fred install a macroscript filter?

Posted by WhoWonFlorida? 2007-10-06 21:14|| 2007-10-06 21:14|| Front Page Top

#25 Ooooh, look at that. A strangely familiar comment by someone without the testicular endowment to include an email addy or use a more recognizable 'nym for the occasion. Boy howdy, what a persuasive debating technique.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 21:48|| 2007-10-06 21:48|| Front Page Top

#26 Pappy doesn't need your approval IMHO

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2007-10-06 21:57|| 2007-10-06 21:57|| Front Page Top

#27 Roger that, Frank.

Posted by lotp 2007-10-06 22:01|| 2007-10-06 22:01|| Front Page Top

#28 Pappy doesn't need your approval IMHO

Frank, what part of "knowing fully well you could give a hot damn about my own personal approbation", don't you understand? You, too, LOTP.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 22:51|| 2007-10-06 22:51|| Front Page Top

#29 Pappy's right IMO that you continue to piss on the carpet Zen.

I'm not speaking as a mod or for the site but as an individual: I'm getting more than a little tired of your constant, hostile challenges to anyone who doesn't step up to your keyboard bloodthirstiness.

If you have to incessantly challenge, maybe you should do it to others rather than to Pappy, who himself was wounded in combat in the Gulf and who works with Marines and Navy corpsmen up close and personal in this war. While you man a high volume keyboard.

He took time this time to respond. I won't bother doing it when you challenge me. I have loved ones, colleagues and close friends in theater. I've buried students of mine and friends over the last few years. I have loved ones and colleagues who would have to execute any attacks we make in Iran or elsewhere, bear any moral burdens from split second, life and death decisions, risk their lives.

That's a service they've taken on willingly and freely. But it's not one you have the right to demand they give in response to your black and white perceptions about the world.

My husband served during the cold war and our daughter and to a lesser degree I helped pay the price of that. Close family members of mine were in the missile silos and in command headquarters in the 80s, prime targets all for nuclear annihilation - and in a couple cases the cost to them was crumbling marriages and kids who moved with their moms to another state. I have had family members risk their lives in every war this country has engaged in since the 1940s. I've made smaller sacrifices myself in order to contribute to the GWOT.

And I'll be damned if I'll be lectured via this site on whether or not I'm sufficiently committed to defending our civilization and our way of life against the particular threat we happen to face today.

That's the first and last rant you will ever get from me on these topics.

Posted by lotp 2007-10-06 23:14|| 2007-10-06 23:14|| Front Page Top

#30 I'm getting more than a little tired of your constant, hostile challenges to anyone who doesn't step up to your keyboard bloodthirstiness.

My "bloodthirstiness" certainly explains why I continue to solicit any and all possible ways of avoiding a Muslim holocaust.

If you have to incessantly challenge, maybe you should do it to others rather than to Pappy, who himself was wounded in combat in the Gulf and who works with Marines and Navy corpsmen up close and personal in this war.

Perish the thought that my personal respect for Pappy and his honorable replies to my posts go unnoticed.

He took time this time to respond.

And I did my best to show some genuine appreciation for it. More than you have done when I've provided verifiable input that happened to contradict your own personal world-view.

That's a service they've taken on willingly and freely. But it's not one you have the right to demand they give in response to your black and white perceptions about the world.

Where do I "demand"? I seek some definite resolution. Let there be no doubt, but you're totally off base in thinking that I refuse to accept any other alternative. Why the hell else would I continue to openly solicit varying opinions and differing viewpoints?

My husband served during the cold war and our daughter and to a lesser degree I helped pay the price of that.

And I've paid a significant price riding Silicon Valley's economic boom-bust cycles all the while contributing to the Stealth Bomber, Space Shuttle and other defense programs.

Close family members of mine were in the missile silos and in command headquarters in the 80s, prime targets all for nuclear annihilation

And Silicon Valley isn't a prime target?

And I'll be damned if I'll be lectured via this site on whether or not I'm sufficiently committed to defending our civilization and our way of life against the particular threat we happen to face today.

Pray tell, when have I EVER questioned your commitment to the GWoT? All of us have something that we can bring to the table. The moment I forget that, I'll bow the hell out of here. Until then, I'll only ask that you please do not participate in the slander that goes on against me. To that extent, you have not specifically done so. Yet, you have also ignored direct refutations by me to positions you've held and, like it or not, that has not set well with me.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-06 23:33|| 2007-10-06 23:33|| Front Page Top

23:57 Zenster
23:54 Zenster
23:50 Zenster
23:50 Classer
23:41 Zenster
23:38 Zenster
23:33 Zenster
23:29 Old Patriot
23:17 Zenster
23:17 Old Patriot
23:14 lotp
23:09 Zenster
23:07 Zenster
23:07 Glenmore
23:02 Zenster
23:00 Woozle Ulish3488
22:58 Redneck Jim
22:58 Zenster
22:55 Zenster
22:52 trailing wife
22:51 Zenster
22:47 lotp
22:35 Zenster
22:30 ed