Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 06/19/2007 View Mon 06/18/2007 View Sun 06/17/2007 View Sat 06/16/2007 View Fri 06/15/2007 View Thu 06/14/2007 View Wed 06/13/2007
1
2007-06-19 Home Front: Politix
Fred Thompson: Reading Harry Reid
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by OldSpook 2007-06-19 03:09|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top
 File under: Iraqi Insurgency 

#1 We going to declare the the Rantburg Candidate for President someday?

Count me in!
Posted by Pat Paulsen 2007-06-19 07:12||   2007-06-19 07:12|| Front Page Top

#2 I love his commentary but that is the easy part. What's his plan on immigration, Social Security, foreign policy, and domestic issues? I like his comments but I need something behind those words.
Posted by Cyber Sarge 2007-06-19 07:41||   2007-06-19 07:41|| Front Page Top

#3 As a foreign Rantburgian I am 100% with Thompson for whatever that is worth. Yes, the policy specifics are not there (yet) but I believe it is far more important that the next President - whoever that turns out to be - understands the problem. Fred Thompson is the only (potential) candidate who qualifies on that score; even Guiliani sounds wet to me at times.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-06-19 09:08||   2007-06-19 09:08|| Front Page Top

#4 Reid is guilty of sedition and treason, since his comments are aimed at hurting the US during a time of war and aids and helps the enemy. He should be charged, tried and shot.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2007-06-19 09:52||   2007-06-19 09:52|| Front Page Top

#5 Excalibur has it about right.

Specific policies are important up to a point. BUT, it's character and principles that count most.

Specific policies are subject to the art of the possible in politics. You won't get exactly what you want.

What counts is that the President is pushing in the right direction.

Additionally, and most important, is that character and principle is what informs the response to those unforseen situations that didn't come up during the election. Think about 9/11, what were the things that counted most?

Character and principle. That's why even Demonrats in the early days were quietly saying that they were glad Bush beat AlGore.
Posted by AlanC">AlanC  2007-06-19 10:01||   2007-06-19 10:01|| Front Page Top

#6 Thompson is definitely getting my attention.
Posted by Xenophon 2007-06-19 10:29||   2007-06-19 10:29|| Front Page Top

#7 Looks to me like he'd be another "Great Communicator"

As Ronald Regan was often called.
Posted by Bobby 2007-06-19 13:13||   2007-06-19 13:13|| Front Page Top

#8 Sorry Vader, firing squad is only available via military sentencing. We could always have him in inhale next to a perspiring Michael Moore.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2007-06-19 13:47||   2007-06-19 13:47|| Front Page Top

#9 I'll settle for a hanging then.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2007-06-19 14:12||   2007-06-19 14:12|| Front Page Top

#10 Try my blog for info on fred

Coloradoansforthompson.blogspot.com

Also look at fredthompsonfaq.com
Use the Fredipedia link and read thhe FAQs

There is plenty on immigration - border and enforcemnt first, government - smaller and federaism, judges - constitutional federalism, 2nd amendment means what it says and is idividual right, mexico - needs to clean up and not export their problems to us, war on terror - win it, war in iraq - we made mistakes let's fix them and win it. He also outlined the looming threat China imposes that everyone else ignores, etc.

Ask me and I probably have a thompson quote that covers it.
Posted by OldSpook 2007-06-19 14:27||   2007-06-19 14:27|| Front Page Top

#11 Will one of you Thompson fans explain why he voted for the McCain/Feingold bill ?
Maybe Fred is just a populist who says what you want to hear. He reminds me of Bush who is now America's number one turncoat.
Posted by wxjames 2007-06-19 16:14||   2007-06-19 16:14|| Front Page Top

#12 The McCain/Feingold bill on campagain spending vote is the least of my worries when it comes to his decision making abilities.

I don't hear anyone saying it like Fred Thompson and I think he has a better grasp on the dangers and illogical memes that everyone's ignoring.

He's the type of guy I really believe would support the troops and make America stronger.

As for Bush, he's a lousy speaker and manager of public opinion.
Posted by Criling Fillmore7165 2007-06-19 16:56||   2007-06-19 16:56|| Front Page Top

#13 I saw an interview he gave recently in that he expresses regret in voting for it. He said it had turned into one of the worst mistakes in finance reform in a long time.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2007-06-19 17:34||   2007-06-19 17:34|| Front Page Top

#14 So far Thompson's the man--and he's not even running yet!
Posted by Mac 2007-06-19 19:08||   2007-06-19 19:08|| Front Page Top

#15 wxjames, he backed McCain Feingold because of this:

"There are problems with people giving politicians large sums of money and then asking them to pass legislation," Mr. Thompson says.

Conceding that McCain-Feingold hasn't worked as intended, and is being riddled with new loopholes, he throws his hands open in exasperation. "I'm not prepared to go there yet, but I wonder if we shouldn't just take off the limits and have full disclosure with harsh penalties for not reporting everything on the Internet immediately."


HANNITY: You were one of 11 Republicans who supported McCain-Feingold. A lot of conservatives are angry at that. Do you still support it? Was it the right decision, in retrospect?

THOMPSON: Part of it was, and part of it wasn't. The part that I came to town to change was the increasing amounts of money being given to politicians. The Clintons showed us how to use soft money in ways that people up until recently thought was against the law. And more and more large donations flowed into the parties and to the candidates.

He now says it didn't work out as planned and we should scrap it, let anybody donate anything to anyone, as long as it is reported and available immediately on the internet.

Also - he was quoted if you did that as a businessman, gave someone money then went to them for business on a contract or a bid, you'd be thrown in jail.

So yeah, he voted for it, but for all the right reasons - and apparently he has the good sense to learn from his errors. Unlike Bush.
Posted by OldSpook 2007-06-19 23:01||   2007-06-19 23:01|| Front Page Top

23:41 Gary and the Samoyeds
23:33 ed
23:31 Bright Pebbles
23:23 Bright Pebbles
23:18 Zenster
23:15 Super Hose
23:15 ed
23:09 ed
23:05 Super Hose
23:03 3dc
23:03 OldSpook
23:01 OldSpook
22:58 Super Hose
22:53 Super Hose
22:50 ed
22:34 Super Hose
22:26 Super Hose
22:20 Pappy
22:18 Zenster
22:10 Zenster
22:04 Zenster
21:54 Pappy
21:53 Shieldwolf
21:52 Poison Reverse









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com