Article

2006-11-10 Afghanistan

NATO raid kills up to 22 34 Taleban in Afghan south

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2006-11-10 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I guess there is an endless supply of blood sacrifice to allan. Apparently almost 100 confirmed killed...and we know the taliwhackers drag all of the dead bodies and wounded they can out.

Posted by anymouse">anymouse 2006-11-10 01:02|| 2006-11-10 01:02|| Front Page Top

#2 Who is funding the Talibunnies?

I suspect our old friends the Saudis with the help of Paki ISI.

When will Bush confront Saudi re their use of funding terrorist whether in Iraq or Afghanistan????

Posted by Cheregum Crelet7867 2006-11-10 05:53|| 2006-11-10 05:53|| Front Page Top

#3 President Bush was never going to confront Saudi Arabia until the oil supply from Iraq was certain. Europe and the rest of the world are much more dependent on Saudi oil than is the US, which gets the majority of it's supply from Canada, Mexico and Venezuela.

Posted by trailing wife 2006-11-10 07:24|| 2006-11-10 07:24|| Front Page Top

#4 Reflections on two quotes:

"Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 Taliban and three policemen dead in the latest violence in Afghanistan, officials said on Thursday."

Correction: "Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 ~~Taliban~~ village idiot dimwits from Pakistan, who have nothing better to do with their dickless, sexless lives but to follow their Saudi-funded, Madrassa instructor's admonitions to go wage Jihad in the name of Allan."

"Who is funding the Talibunnies?

I suspect our old friends the Saudis with the help of Paki ISI.

When will Bush confront Saudi re their use of funding terrorist whether in Iraq or Afghanistan????"
Posted by: Cheregum Crelet7867

Good guess. Answer to your question about when Wally Cleaver ... err, I mean Bush will go after the shitcan of radical Islam, that is the Saudi Magic Kingdom ... Never! And that perhaps explains why his party took a thumping. Americans want a victory, not a useless slog. When confronted by that option, they'll opt out, even if the long term consequences are dire. Remember, we're a divided peopl that yearn to a return of BS. On Election Day, we got it and will have it for the next tow years.

Posted by Lancasters Over Dresden 2006-11-10 08:50|| http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com]">[http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com] 2006-11-10 08:50|| Front Page Top

#5 Time to upgrade cluster bombs with depleted uranium for maximum BETTY CROCKERCRAT annoyance value. Build the things in a sweat shop of a smokey factory in the middle of a clear cut olde growth forrest in Oregon.

Posted by Shipman 2006-11-10 08:50|| 2006-11-10 08:50|| Front Page Top

#6 Correction to a correction:

Correction: "Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 Taliban village idiot dimwits from Pakistan, who have nothing better to do with their dickless, sexless lives but to follow their Saudi-funded, Madrassa instructor's admonitions to go wage Jihad in the name of Allan, *very dead*."

Posted by Lancasters Over Dresden 2006-11-10 08:51|| http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com]">[http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com] 2006-11-10 08:51|| Front Page Top

#7 Ugh!

Remember, we're a divided people that yearn to a return to BS. On Election Day, we got it and will have it for the next two years.

Posted by Lancasters Over Dresden 2006-11-10 08:53|| http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com]">[http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com] 2006-11-10 08:53|| Front Page Top

#8 LOD

This statement doesn't quite make sense,

"When confronted by that option, ..".

Do you mean instaed,

"When confronted by that AS THE ONLY option THAT THEY WILL GET,.."

or something like it???

Posted by Uliling Wheatch6879 2006-11-10 13:58|| 2006-11-10 13:58|| Front Page Top

#9 Yep. That's it. We didn't really have much of an option, did we? Much as I hate to day it, but there are some times when Michael Savage is right.

Posted by Lancasters Over Dresden 2006-11-10 21:47|| http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com]">[http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com] 2006-11-10 21:47|| Front Page Top

23:58 trailing wife
23:56 rjschwarz
23:52 mrp
23:52 JosephMendiola
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:50 trailing wife
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:40 JosephMendiola
23:35 JosephMendiola
23:35 C-Low
23:29 Threger Angegum9602
23:28 JosephMendiola
23:20 JosephMendiola
22:56 .com
22:48 .com
22:44 Frank G
22:43 Kilowattkid
22:39 Lanny Ddub
22:36 Frank G
22:29 Frank G
22:27 Frank G
22:23 Frank G
22:22 Alaska Paul
22:22 Zenster