Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 07/31/2006 View Sun 07/30/2006 View Sat 07/29/2006 View Fri 07/28/2006 View Thu 07/27/2006 View Wed 07/26/2006 View Tue 07/25/2006
1
2006-07-31 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The Next Steps With Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ryuge 2006-07-31 06:48|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 This HK article takes me back to the Nixon administration, where nobody accused the President of "irresolution." The Carter years had Cubans fighting in Africa. Then the Reagan Presidency yielded 8 good years. Wish he was still here.
Posted by Snease Shaiting3550 2006-07-31 08:05||   2006-07-31 08:05|| Front Page Top

#2 I liked Reagan too. However, I wish he had responded to the Marine barracks bombing hard.
Posted by JohnQC 2006-07-31 10:32||   2006-07-31 10:32|| Front Page Top

#3 And then what? There was still a Soviet Union then and defeating them was more important at that time. Now that they're gone, everybody's got more latitude, especially Hezb'Allah. So now we need to respond.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-07-31 10:42||   2006-07-31 10:42|| Front Page Top

#4  And then what? There was still a Soviet Union then and defeating them was more important at that time. Now that they're gone, everybody's got more latitude, especially Hezb'Allah. So now we need to respond.

Exactly. Sometimes, you have no choice but to deal with one menace at time. We had to ally with Stalin to beat Hitler, and we allied with Mao to defeat the USSR.

Sometimes the only reward for successfully dealing with one menace is to have the opportunity to deal with a new one.

Of course this all points to another moonbat contradiction. The same people who are urging us to "reach out" and be multilateralist also like to moan and groan about "blowback".

Never mind that the "blowback" was the result of previous "multilateralism".

Never mind that present day "multilateralism" could lead to future "blowback".
Posted by charger 2006-07-31 15:00||   2006-07-31 15:00|| Front Page Top

00:22 JosephMendiola
23:59 Cliter Hupunter6941
23:47 ed
23:39 Clerert Uneamp2772
23:27 ed
23:25 Cliter Hupunter6941
23:16 2b
23:04 trailing wife
23:03 3dc
22:59 Jules in the Hinterlands
22:58 Frank G
22:57 ed
22:53 Glains Threrese9277
22:47 Clerert Uneamp2772
22:45 Jackal
22:42 3dc
22:40 leroidavid
22:30 OregonGuy
22:30 Thoth
22:26 Barbara Skolaut
22:26 Pappy
22:19 6
22:18 FeralCat
22:16 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com