Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 11/07/2005 View Sun 11/06/2005 View Sat 11/05/2005 View Fri 11/04/2005 View Thu 11/03/2005 View Wed 11/02/2005 View Tue 11/01/2005
1
2005-11-07 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Federal Judge Pulls Plug On Pledge
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2005-11-07 13:21|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Ninth Circus again.
But those bozos are getting reduced to Calif. and Hawaii. Next time around just Berkley.
Posted by 3dc 2005-11-07 13:58||   2005-11-07 13:58|| Front Page Top

#2 Ninth Circus again.

It all starts with that Newdow jerk.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-11-07 14:32||   2005-11-07 14:32|| Front Page Top

#3 Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional?

What the hell will those dickwads come up with next? I guess the statue of liberty is unconstitutional too.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2005-11-07 14:37||   2005-11-07 14:37|| Front Page Top

#4 No doubt these asshats would find the consitution itself unconsitutional.....
Posted by CrazyFool 2005-11-07 14:41||   2005-11-07 14:41|| Front Page Top

#5 Funny, I don't remember being coerced to say the pledge, I remember inventing my own words, or saying blah, blah, blah from time to time and somehow avoided any repurcusions at all.

This has nothing to do with establishing a religion and everything to do with an athiests crusade.
Posted by rjschwarz (no T!) 2005-11-07 14:56||   2005-11-07 14:56|| Front Page Top

#6 They'd be furious. And that's exactly what goes on against atheists.

Are all atheists furious over the "under god" reference or is it just small vocal group of a minority of the population? I'm inclined to say just remove the quote and move on but there appears to be an agenda here that goes beyond what is on the surface. As far as I can tell there hasn't been any persecution of atheists. Last time I checked the consititution doesn't grant "Freedom from religion".
Posted by DepotGuy 2005-11-07 15:12||   2005-11-07 15:12|| Front Page Top

#7 You be the judge:

Is the 9th Circuit eligible for prime time Bosnian grenade tossing?

Yes ______ No _______
Posted by Besoeker 2005-11-07 15:17||   2005-11-07 15:17|| Front Page Top

#8 The 9th Circuit is the poster child for the Congress abrogating its responsilities under said Constitution. Checks and Balances means that Congress need not pass new legislation or amendments. It means that sometime you remove the judges from the bench. The number of overturns of the 9th Circuit should have been justification alone for the removal of a couple of robe wearers. Some members of the Judiciary certainly believe they’re entitled to abuse their office, so its well long past time that they be shown the door to some professorship at the law colleges and not further federal employment.
Posted by Whash Unick6318 2005-11-07 16:39||   2005-11-07 16:39|| Front Page Top

#9 

Does Newdow own a horse? Maybe Don Corleone could pay him a visit.
Posted by BigEd 2005-11-07 16:53||   2005-11-07 16:53|| Front Page Top

#10 Are all atheists furious over the "under god" reference...

Not this one.
Posted by Raj 2005-11-07 17:15||   2005-11-07 17:15|| Front Page Top

#11 The 9th Jerkoffit Court again. Let's get the baddest, boldest conversative associate justices on the SCOTUS as soon as possible, while there is still time.
Posted by Captain America 2005-11-07 18:13||   2005-11-07 18:13|| Front Page Top

#12 About time to move the offices of the 9th Circuit to the Aleutians.
Posted by DMFD 2005-11-07 18:53||   2005-11-07 18:53|| Front Page Top

#13 Actually this wasn't the 9th Circus it was just a lower District Court judge here in NoCal. Doubtless the 9th Circus will soon affirm the decision though. A more interesting slant (to me anyway) to which no one pays any attention: Newdow and his ilk sued several school districts and the educational establishment isn't exactly a bastion of conservatism, particularly here in California. Having lefty school districts defending the Pledge is a bit like letting the fox guard the henhouse, no?
Posted by AzCat 2005-11-07 19:23||   2005-11-07 19:23|| Front Page Top

#14 The 9th Jerkoffit Court

Rendition

Posted by Red Dog 2005-11-07 21:12||   2005-11-07 21:12|| Front Page Top

#15 Say it with me loud and clear, people:

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says that CONGRESS shall make no law establishing religion....

Unless Congress passed a law requiring the Pledge be said in schools, IT'S NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Send these clown judges back to school and teach them how to READ ENGLISH.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2005-11-07 23:28|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]  2005-11-07 23:28|| Front Page Top

#16 "I plead alignment to the flakes
of the untitled snakes of a merry cow
and to the Republicans for which they scam,
one nacho underpants,
with licorice and jugs of wine for owls"
Posted by Bart Simpson 2005-11-07 23:44||   2005-11-07 23:44|| Front Page Top

00:00 jules 2
23:44 Bart Simpson
23:38 GrandpappysWP
23:31 Barbara Skolaut
23:28 Barbara Skolaut
23:26 Frank G
23:25 Frank G
23:24 Pappy
23:21 Barbara Skolaut
23:17 DMFD
23:16 Bomb-a-rama
23:04 Frank G
22:58 Mike Kozlowski
22:55 USN Ret.
22:50 ed
22:49 Elmenter Snineque1852
22:42 Besoeker
22:33 Besoeker
22:33 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
22:30 Frank G
22:29 Frank G
22:27 Besoeker
22:26 Bomb-a-rama
22:23 Phil









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com