Article

2005-10-10 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Clomonter Gruter7860 2005-10-10 15:03|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 The difference is the British knew the advantages of Pax Britania (control of the seas and free trade) would continue under the American Flag. It might hurt the pride but the sealanes would remain open.

The US can't pass the buck to anyone.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-10-10 17:17|| 2005-10-10 17:17|| Front Page Top

#2 advantages of Pax Britania (control of the seas and free trade)

You're confused Pax had nothing to do with it.

Posted by Shipman 2005-10-10 17:48|| 2005-10-10 17:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Ick. I reject the comparison.

And no, I would disagree that those who foresaw the collapse of the Empire were wrong. Britain had no real ability to dominate India or several other parts of its Empire anymore. By their efforts to make those places profitable to Britain, they gave them to tools to make themselves independent. While those places did inherit their British *way*, they were too great to be kept as subordinate states.

Ironically, this set the stage for the model of the next dominant power, the United States. To make it a principal to *not* annex other nations, but to set them up to run themselves, then leave, conserving much of itself in the process. Once the US left a place, leaving it in better shape, with a few exceptions, it could return home and restore its strength.

To turn the comparison on its head, one could say that the Empire died of a thousand cuts, trying to keep up a hundred "Vietnams" of its own around the world. The US may get cut once as it involves itself around the world, but then it withdrawls to heal its wound, before going forth again.

And the US, like Britain, also leaves its *way* in its wake, those other countries often adopting and keeping a better form of government, a wiser public policy, and a more open economy.

Certainly the US expends much treasure to do this, as did Britain before it, but the US does not loot those nations it has invested, it offers them fair trade, and relies on itself to create new treasure.

And while Britain held to the idea of mercantilism, that owning specie, gold and silver, meant that it had power in the world; the US has evolved, not eliminated, the concept.

US mercantilism is that not only are goods, but are services, to be accounted for in determining who is the strongest, and not just in static quantities, but in their *dynamic* use.

A (virtual) dollar bill in circulation anywhere in the world is used for more purposes, in more transactions, by far than any other currency. By dint of its being used, it actually creates a stronger US economy.

Finally, I would point out the most amusing error in the article at all. The assumption that our self-appointed elites are *actually* our elites.

What blue-Staters dominate the debate? Do liberals infest our military? Does the democrat party control Washington as it did in the time of "old Frank"? Are the media elite in ascendency?

It is not the US that is collapsing, it is those who deride the US and call for its collapse.

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-10-10 23:28|| 2005-10-10 23:28|| Front Page Top

#4 Pax Britania was not the Empire but the Peace of created because of the overwhelming seapower of the Empire just as the Pax Romana was the peace and stability created by the Romans when they dominated.

I think that my comments are correct. The empire was enabled by the Pax Britania and could have continued under the Pax Americana had the British wished to devote the blood and treasure to doing it.

The US has no empire. We have unquestionably created a Pax Americana so the only Apples to Apples comparisons have to be along those lines.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-10-10 23:34|| 2005-10-10 23:34|| Front Page Top

00:00 Zenster
00:00 Red Dog
23:47 .com
23:44 .com
23:43 Jackal
23:39 .com
23:35 Edward Yee
23:34 rjschwarz
23:28 Anonymoose
23:27 3dc
23:17 Sobiesky
23:01 Angomonter Grinert5825
22:54 Alaska Paul
22:38 JosephMendiola
22:34 Anonymoose
22:33 madtom
22:31 JosephMendiola
22:31 JosephMendiola
22:29 Pappy
22:27 ed
22:22 Sheling Grirt5866 AKA tipper
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:10 JosephMendiola
21:58 Stephen