Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 09/18/2005 View Sat 09/17/2005 View Fri 09/16/2005 View Thu 09/15/2005 View Wed 09/14/2005 View Tue 09/13/2005 View Mon 09/12/2005
1
2005-09-18 China-Japan-Koreas
Japan's new opposition leader seeks to revise pacifist constitution
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by phil_b 2005-09-18 03:56|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 To me this has the sound of someone like John Kerry coming out sounding like a hawk right after having been whipped, campaigning on a dove platform.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-09-18 11:41||   2005-09-18 11:41|| Front Page Top

#2 ...US-imposed constitution.

It was not imposed. From pbs.org no less:

After marathon negotiations in early March, Japanese officials accepted the American draft with only minor revisions. General Whitney's comment at the outset -- "if the cabinet [is] unable to prepare a suitable and acceptable draft.... General MacArthur [is] prepared to lay this statement of principle directly before the people" -- probably helped. Emperor Hirohito, chagrined at having lost so much power but grateful that the throne had been retained, issued an "imperial rescript" endorsing the draft. That fall, after the Japanese people had voted overwhelmingly for candidates who backed the new consitution, Hirohito himself promulgated it before the Diet (Japanese Parliament). Although it ignored his own role in its birth, General MacArthur's message to the nation offered a pretty fair assessment: "The adoption of this liberal charter, together with other progressive measures enacted by the Diet, lays a very solid foundation for the new Japan."

The Japanese people supported the constitution then and have so for almost 60 years. It is not a "US-imposed constitution". US-authored? Yes, but Japanese adopted and adhered to since. It is a legitimate geoverning document despite the author's egregious insinuation.
Posted by Zpaz 2005-09-18 14:56||   2005-09-18 14:56|| Front Page Top

#3 You better revise it dude, china is going to have to be dealt with at some point and you will need more than a toll free number to the white house to do that.
Posted by Crick Elmuger1423 2005-09-18 23:34||   2005-09-18 23:34|| Front Page Top

23:49 .com
23:41 bigjim-ky
23:41 3dc
23:41 .com
23:39 GK
23:38 3dc
23:37 Crick Elmuger1423
23:34 Crick Elmuger1423
23:33 GK
23:32 Crick Elmuger1423
23:27 BH
23:26 .com
23:25 Crick Elmuger1423
23:13 Crick Elmuger1423
23:12 Anonymoose
23:11 True German Ally
23:11 Crick Elmuger1423
23:09 True German Ally
23:06 anon1
23:03 trailing wife
23:01 thibaud (aka lex)
23:00 trailing wife
22:56 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
22:48 .com









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com