Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 02/10/2004 View Mon 02/09/2004 View Sun 02/08/2004 View Sat 02/07/2004 View Fri 02/06/2004 View Thu 02/05/2004 View Wed 02/04/2004
1
2004-02-10 Iraq-Jordan
Apparent Car Bomb At Iraq Police Station , 50 Maybe Dead
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by TS 2004-02-10 7:27:49 AM|| || Front Page|| [11134 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Well,well more casualties because of the coalition forces invasion.There will be a civil war soon because of it. Now that Saddam is gone Al-Queda will move in. Hope Dubya is proud.NOT! When will he realise? Now 50 Iraqis are dead because of coalition mercenaries.Bush etc are all tragedies.
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 8:00:46 AM||   2004-2-10 8:00:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Faisal, that you, hon?
Sadly, this is Muslim on Muslim crime--it will end when Iraqis have had enough of each other dying needlessly and bloodily and decide they all want to work for democracy and each others' rights.
And while there are 50 dead from this bombing, it beats the thousands, if not millions, of dead Iraqis who were murdered by Saddam and his sons are their whim for decades.
Posted by Jennie Taliaferro  2004-2-10 8:08:35 AM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com]  2004-2-10 8:08:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Anonymous, who's fault is is that the Christians in Sudan are enslaved, raped and killed by Muslims?
Who's fault is it that the Buddhists are attacked and killed by muslims in Thailand?
Whos fault the Russians riding the subway are killed by Muslims?
Who's fault the Indoesians are raped and villages and churches burned by Muslims?
What about in Nigeria, who's fault the Christians had tires full of gasoline put around their necks and lit by Muslims?
Please explain how this is all someone elses fault except for the muslims who commit these acts?
Looking forward to your reply.

Posted by TS 2004-2-10 8:09:36 AM||   2004-2-10 8:09:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 TS,hell that is easy Anon/Fizzle will say it's Bush and the Jews of course.

It absolutly blows y ind that with the revelation of 300,000 mass graves,child prisions and rape chabers we still have fools saying gitting rid of Insane Hussien was a bad idea.

"What fools be these'"
Posted by Raptor 2004-2-10 8:32:02 AM||   2004-2-10 8:32:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#5  I never mentioned Sudan etc I was talking about Iraq. Whose fault there was an invasion? Yes you guessed it,the lying tragic leaders of the coalition. And in case you didnt know Saddam was a secular president not a fundamentalist and while yes Saddam did commit atrocities and is rightfully condemned for it,the situation will be worse now you will see in the long term. Anyway look at Sharon he is commiting atrocities
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 8:51:22 AM||   2004-2-10 8:51:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 (Yawn) You're gonna have to do better than that to get me out of bed to respond. How 'bout some "sea of fire" and a glass of juche?
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 9:05:12 AM||   2004-2-10 9:05:12 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Whose fault there was an invasion?

Saddam's -- he violated the ceasefire.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-2-10 9:05:48 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2004-2-10 9:05:48 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Since when is America entitled to tell other nations what to do? Saddam had every right as leader of a sovreign nation to ignore America's hypocritical threats. No one has found Wmds in Iraq, and thats not just me saying it. UN inspectors have said the same.
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 9:29:43 AM||   2004-2-10 9:29:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#9  Never the muslims fault. No,no,no. Even when it's muslims killing muslims, it's always someone else to blame. The earthquake in Iran was probably Bush's fault too.
Posted by Lil Dhimmi 2004-2-10 9:30:59 AM||   2004-2-10 9:30:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Anonymous, yeah and I'm sure you never will mention Sudan either, as you can't blame America or the Jews right?
Whos fault was there an invasion?well, whos fault was there an invasion of Kuwait that started all this in the first place?
Was that Americas fault too?
I'm sure you can come up with a convulted story to blame that one on America too right?
Cmon I know you can!
Oh and Saddam was so secular that he had a quran written in his own blood..yeah no religious fanaticism there.He may not have been a mullah, but he used Islam for power, just like all the other Islamic leaders.
Posted by TS 2004-2-10 9:32:15 AM||   2004-2-10 9:32:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 I'm sure the Kurds are glad Iraq has never had WMD, eh, anonymous coward?
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-2-10 9:41:26 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2004-2-10 9:41:26 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 Accent seems a little thicker today... must be sober.
Posted by Shipman 2004-2-10 9:45:58 AM||   2004-2-10 9:45:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 Yes Saddam used chemical weapons on the kurds. he was wrong to,however just before operation coalition warcrime he obviously did not have these weapons. David Kay for one said there was no evidence of wmds in Iraq. I suppose you think USA and Dubya are a gift to the world?? Never said the earthquake was Bush,s fault.And Saddam was secular he disaproved of islamic fundamentalism and was considered by fundamentalists as an obstacle to the advance of islam.
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 10:14:34 AM||   2004-2-10 10:14:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#14 Anaon - Just 2 questions, are you an American - I mean do you reside in the USA? Did you find it equally disgusting when President Clinton Bombed Iraq in Opperation Desert Fox? If not, why?
Posted by A hippie in Topanga 2004-2-10 10:30:02 AM||   2004-2-10 10:30:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#15 And David Kay also said that Saddam was a greater threat than we had thought. Funny how that part of his presentation is left out of liberal discourse on the issue.
Posted by AF Lady 2004-2-10 10:31:22 AM||   2004-2-10 10:31:22 AM|| Front Page Top

#16 Since when is America entitled to tell other nations what to do? Saddam had every right as leader of a sovreign nation to ignore America's hypocritical threats. No one has found Wmds in Iraq, and thats not just me saying it. UN inspectors have said the same.

Why not? Other nations tell us what to do all the time. Saddam had every right as an autonomous being to ignore our requests, and we had every right under the terms of 1991 ceasefire (under which terms and conditions we refrained from going to Baghdad) to hold him to the conditions agreed upon there.

WMD's were not the only reason we went into Iraq - the anti-American bunch may wish it was, but it wasn't. Restoring American credibility among our enemies (i.e. fear of American power) was much more important - and this has largely been accomplished - note the recent capitulation and diminished rhetoric from countries as diverse as North Korea, Libya, Iran and Syria.
Posted by Zhang Fei  2004-2-10 11:02:36 AM||   2004-2-10 11:02:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#17 Anonymous: I never mentioned Sudan etc I was talking about Iraq. Whose fault there was an invasion?

Of course Anonymous would ignore the Sudan - Muslim atrocities against other religions are acceptable, whereas the American liberation of Iraq isn't. Anonymous's statement that someone was at fault for the invasion assumes that the invasion was wrong - something that we feel to be false. The invasion is not only a good thing from the standpoint of liberating the Iraqis, it will yield strategic dividends for decades to come - this is the campaign that will finally wipe out the disgrace of Vietnam in the minds of our enemies. Iraq will teach America's enemies that they should not expect to prevail even if they manage to inflict large numbers of casualties on US troops. (The aftermath of 9/11, the Afghan and Iraqi campaigns, has already taught our enemies that America will meet them head on in armed confrontation - the Iraq aftermath is showing them that we have the staying power to finish the job).

The implications are far-reaching - for instance, the Chinese have openly said that they believe the deaths of a few thousand sailors would deter the US from intervening in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. The casualties we are taking in Iraq, unfortunate as they are, will cause the Chinese to revise their calculations, and make war over Taiwan less likely.
Posted by Zhang Fei  2004-2-10 11:15:54 AM||   2004-2-10 11:15:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#18 Anonymous sounds just that the goat abuser faisal!

Iraqis died because they were attacked by jihadis - not bush you moroon.

Yes Saddam was secular - but if we had supported him instead of taking him out - you would be whinning that we are supporting a tyrant. Your pathetic - nothing satisfies people (lefties wannabes who take up any cause) like you.
Posted by Dan 2004-2-10 11:18:41 AM||   2004-2-10 11:18:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#19 Saddam did commit atrocities and is rightfully condemned for it,the situation will be worse now you will see in the long term. Anyway look at Sharon he is commiting atrocities

I guess I missed all those mass graves full of Palestinian bodies....
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-2-10 11:40:05 AM||   2004-2-10 11:40:05 AM|| Front Page Top

#20 Anonymous: Now 50 Iraqis are dead because of coalition mercenaries.

I guess he means anti-coalition mercenaries (i.e. al Qaeda). 50 Iraqi dead on a given day isn't a particularly high number by Saddam's standards (even if we don't count the Iraqi losses from the invasions of Iran and Kuwait). Saddam is estimated to have killed 300,000 Iraqis during his 20+ year reign. That comes to about 40 dead a day, every single day. Even if we lump the Iraqis who are killed while attacking US troops in with the daily Iraqi-on-Iraqi body count, it doesn't come anywhere close to 40 a day. Another distinction here is that Saddam specialized in having his opponents' family members raped ond tortured (male or female alike) before putting them to death. The US is neither deliberately targeting bystanders nor inflicting torture and rape upon them. The Iraqi body count is nowhere near Saddam's standards. I fail to see how conditions in Iraq today and conditions under Saddam are remotely comparable.
Posted by Zhang Fei  2004-2-10 11:43:12 AM||   2004-2-10 11:43:12 AM|| Front Page Top

#21 Apparent Car Bomb At Iraq Police Station , 50 Maybe Dead

This is very much a case of you snooze, you lose. Ever since 9/11, police precinct HQ's in a lot of areas have been walled off with barriers, to avert the kind of thing that just happened in Iraq. Iraqi police, who are operating in a combat zone, should have been doubly cautious. (And it's not a matter of not having resources - all it takes is some concrete blocks at both ends of the street - you can always set up a work team to put barriers in place).
Posted by Zhang Fei  2004-2-10 11:51:20 AM||   2004-2-10 11:51:20 AM|| Front Page Top

#22 "Since when is America entitled to tell other nations what to do?"

-17 violations of '91 peace treaty in 12 years = we can do whatever the fuck we please. Enough said.
Posted by Jarhead 2004-2-10 11:58:10 AM||   2004-2-10 11:58:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#23 TS,

Don't ya know who's fault it is? It's the JOOOOOOSSSS ;)
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 11:59:23 AM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 11:59:23 AM|| Front Page Top

#24 I had a hinkling the Dubya fan club would reply. Yes I very much disapprove of Desert Fox. I do not support Al-Queda.Sharon's army kills palestinians tortures them and demolishes their homes.Jenin. Ramallah siege. GWB is not the worlds president so no way should he tell other nations what to do.
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 12:06:24 PM||   2004-2-10 12:06:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#25 anon,

"tortures them"... really? evidence/proof? Or you just slandering?

You keep avoiding the question about you're nationality? US, European, Middle East, other?
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 12:13:11 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 12:13:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#26 Nationality if you must know Australian.Proof of torture try reading on the internet, newspapers and books its all there.I suppose you think I made it up
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 12:20:59 PM||   2004-2-10 12:20:59 PM|| Front Page Top

#27 anon,

I don't think you made it up. I just think you heard it from a subjective unreliable source and bought it hook line and sinker. I've read plenty of accounts about how Jenin was all lies (later admitted by the pals), faked funerals where the people got up out of the coffins and walked around, faked crying and yelling for photo ops, etc...

But even with all the lies coming out about israeli atrocities that are later debunked (though they get little press when they are) I've not read any on torture... got a link?
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 12:36:34 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 12:36:34 PM|| Front Page Top

#28 The Paleos consider it torture cos the JOOOOSSS are next door.
Posted by Anonymous2U 2004-2-10 12:38:53 PM||   2004-2-10 12:38:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#29 Oh, and I see W's eeevvvviiiilllll plan is working, they're killing each other so they won't be occupied killing us.
Posted by Anonymous2U 2004-2-10 12:39:58 PM||   2004-2-10 12:39:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#30 I still feel a good plan is to take on Iran, occupy Saudi Arabia, let the Israelis handle Syria. At least then we will haves some of the terrosists at arms length. One thing I noticed no one has ever brought up but you know it is possible that the IRAQ invasion was a tactical invasion to be in position for whatever comes our way. I certainly hope we keep a large contingent there far into the future. A little bully policy works with cowards and thugs. But that's my opinion.
Posted by dataman1 2004-2-10 12:51:02 PM||   2004-2-10 12:51:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#31 G'Day Anon: You keep harping about Bush as the world's president. Perhaps you've forgotten that those were UN resolutions that Sammy chose to ignore. When the UN failed to follow through on their own resolutions, the US led a COALITION of non-cowardly nations to enforce those same resolutions. It' really very simple. You make it sound as if you really care about the long suffering Iraqi people when in reality, your position shows that you could give a rat's ass how they live and how they die. Was it Saddam's good side that led to children..toddlers even, being raped and then dismembered alive in front of their parents? Was it his good side that demanded then that those same body parts be fed to dogs?
Posted by Rex Mundi 2004-2-10 1:00:55 PM||   2004-2-10 1:00:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#32 "it will end when Iraqis have had enough of each other dying needlessly and bloodily and decide they all want to work for democracy and each others' rights."

seeing as how they haven't tired in the last 2,000++ years or so...that's not very encouraging.
Posted by B 2004-2-10 1:07:16 PM||   2004-2-10 1:07:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#33 How can you say jenin never happened????? Are you mad??? Everyone has a good side including Saddam including you. Because Saddam commited evil deeds doesnt mean he didnt commit good ones too. Such as the literacy program in 1977.He modernized Iraq. No one is good always are you? Try to be less one dimensional in your thinking.I have a feeling in my waters it may be too hard for you but try
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 1:32:07 PM||   2004-2-10 1:32:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#34 Dude, you're f*(^in' hilarious! "Even Hitler loved his dog."
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 1:37:22 PM||   2004-2-10 1:37:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#35 Oh shit! I think I just ended this thread! :)
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 1:39:18 PM||   2004-2-10 1:39:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#36 You are clutching at spanners with that argument. But you would say something like that. What I say is true and you can't hack it.
Posted by Antiwar 2004-2-10 1:42:36 PM||   2004-2-10 1:42:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#37 I have a feeling in my waters it may be too hard for you but try Kul Wahad! What is this...Dune? Well Anon, the odor of your postings do carry a certain...how shall I say....richness?
Posted by Rex Mundi 2004-2-10 1:45:01 PM||   2004-2-10 1:45:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#38 Well well. looky here. Anon troll has finally come out of the closet as 'Antiwar'. Figures. All dogma....no brains. When ya can't think for yourself, it's comfy to hide behind a political platform.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2004-2-10 1:50:47 PM||   2004-2-10 1:50:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#39 Hack it? Dude we're too busy laughing our asses off at your ignorance. Lemme give ya some links for your Jenin, here and here for example.
Posted by Valentine 2004-2-10 2:06:01 PM||   2004-2-10 2:06:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#40 Allrightythen.... We all have the potential for good and evil. The type of person we are depends on the path that we follow. I would argue that Saddam chose the wrong one (power at any cost)and he paid the price; just as if I decided to become an unprincipled, political windsock I would be in the Democratic primary right now. What price for your soul?
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 2:07:16 PM||   2004-2-10 2:07:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#41 Anon/Antiwar said: How can you say jenin never happened?????

Simple, it was proven over and over again that the 'massacre' never happened. Put down the bong and open your eyes! How f*cking stupid are you anyways? You haven't said a single thing that is even remotely true. You are nothing but a lying piece pig shit. You might be able to have your ignorant friends believe your lies, but not here. You really should just try to learn the truth about what is going on. It's obvious you are an ignorant fool.
Posted by Swiggles 2004-2-10 2:14:11 PM||   2004-2-10 2:14:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#42 Jenin is true. You denying it doesnt change it. I expect you are a holocaust denier too.What kind of sick bastard are you?? I didnt expect someone called whitecollar redneck to be a democrat.The KKK maybe or Dubya supporter.
Posted by Antiwar 2004-2-10 2:16:32 PM||   2004-2-10 2:16:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#43 anon,

"How can you say jenin never happened????? "

um.... simple. Because it didn't. The pals admitted they lied. What you didn't get that news in the socialist worker?
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 2:19:24 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 2:19:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#44 antiwar,
holysh-t! Did you just compare the holocaust to jenin? My god are you totally f-cked up beyod all redemption! How pathetic to see...
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 2:22:39 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 2:22:39 PM|| Front Page Top

#45 btw, my favorite part about the jenin bs was the anti-semetic reporters writing about how it was the worst atrocity in decades bla bla bla which even if it had been true is an over the top ridiculous statement that screams "I hate jews!". Then on top of that they all had to retract because they bought the lies the pals sold them... yeah great reporting dumbasses. Hmmm I wonder how that noble outlet the BBC is doing regarding he Gilligan fiasco... another bastion of leftist propogana lie rag media.
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 2:27:24 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 2:27:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#46 (Yawn) "KKK maybe or Dubya supporter"

Sharpen your wits and lose the trite uberleft perjoratives.
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 2:34:36 PM||   2004-2-10 2:34:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#47 I am not antisemitic anti zionist yes. In case you are not aware many jews are antizionist too.Re jenin just look at the internet you will find lots of proof with pictures.
Posted by Antiwar 2004-2-10 2:38:13 PM||   2004-2-10 2:38:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#48 Wow, antiwar... you really are clueless aren't you? Do you ignore all facts that oppose your worldview? What part of Arafat's admission that on 50 someodd palestinians died and not the 500+ they were claiming did you miss? What part of his admission that they were fighters and not civilians and they died in a triumphant "victory" over Israel where they killed 23 israeli soldiers did you miss? What part of the UN report that debunked the whole massacre bs did you miss? What part of every news outlet including the guardian admitting they jumped to conclusions did you miss? Get a clue you and maybe a paper too...
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 2:41:20 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 2:41:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#49 I am not antisemitic anti zionist yes.

"As a matter of fact some of my best friends are semites and zionists"

Ooooooo, this thread is going to set new Rantburgian length records.

Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 2:44:16 PM||   2004-2-10 2:44:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#50 So you think its ok for 50 people to be killed???? You didnt mention the injured I expect they don't matter to you. Or the homes demolished by the zionist (yes Ive said it)army.
Posted by Antiwar 2004-2-10 2:52:22 PM||   2004-2-10 2:52:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#51  Destroy a bus, get your home destroyed. Seems fair to me:)
Posted by Lil Dhimmi 2004-2-10 2:56:29 PM||   2004-2-10 2:56:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#52 They were 50 someodd fighters, not civilians. So yes, it's OK they got splattered.
Posted by Steve YAO 2004-2-10 2:57:07 PM||   2004-2-10 2:57:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#53 First of all don't you see the inherit ridiculousness in caling something a massacre when 50 people die on one side at 23 on the other. That's more of a close battle, don't ya think?

Second it was proven first and then admitted to after by Arafat that the 50 pals who died were fighters, not civilians. The last estimate I saw was that their were 3 civilian deaths.

Regarding the homes being destroyed they were the homes of suicide bombers that killed dozens of civilians in Israel and they were the homes from which the militats were firing at the israeli army from. Now you can argue all you want about them having the right to fire at israeli military forces coming into their town but Israel has the perfect right to fire back. And if Israel was 1/10th as brutal as you jokers keep fooling yourselves that it is then they would have just used bombers and leveled the place instead of going house to house to avoide civilian casualties and in the process losing 23 of their own.

Why are you one sided... why do you attack Israel so much if your "antiwar"? Or does antiwar not include being against targetting and murdering civilians... only against attacking sodiers? Hmmm I guess that would make sense and explain why I've been so confused by anti-war people's stances all these years...
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 3:00:19 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 3:00:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#54 I don't have the link to prove it, though it would be easy to verify, but international agencies, most notably HRW, put deathtoll at Jenin at... 52-56, and they emphasized that while israeli used indiscriminate force, the paleo used civilians as weapons courriers, human shield, scouts,... go to HRW.org ans search. You'll also have to remember that israeli troops casualties were in the 20-25 range. I'm a froggy, I get my news from the most anti-israeli mediacracy in the whole west, with propaganda movies about "Jeningrad" shown on tv and in festivals while debunking documentaries are deliberately ignored by public terriblevision, and I never had the feeling Jenin was anything else than a fierce if localized urban battle. of course, that doesn't stop the paleos from winning the infowar, and having their side of the story propaged by fools like my fellow anon/antiwar.
But, hey, even when speaking about Iraq, it's good to blame the jews. Jenin, my ass; antiwar, if you're serious, you're a fool, otherwise, you're cynical and blinded by ideology.
Posted by Anonymous 2004-2-10 3:03:27 PM||   2004-2-10 3:03:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#55 "civilians as weapons courriers, human shield, scouts"

HRW doesn't even make sense if that's what they claim. Weapons couriers, human shields and scouts are by definition not civilians. They are enemy combatants. How can you be a civilian weapons courier?!?
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 3:09:25 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 3:09:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#56 Jews are not meant to have a nation now.They have to wait until the messiah comes since according to judaism he is not jesus they are still waiting.They are meant to live in peace among the nations in which they are dispersed by until the redemption.This is from a rabbi Iam not just saying it.
Posted by Antiwar 2004-2-10 3:21:27 PM||   2004-2-10 3:21:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#57  This is getting better all the time. :)
Posted by Lil Dhimmi 2004-2-10 3:23:45 PM||   2004-2-10 3:23:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#58 Why don't you get your lazy ass out of the house...go down and enlist and be a man if that is possible. It would do you some good. Hell you may even learn something real.
Posted by dataman1 2004-2-10 3:29:40 PM||   2004-2-10 3:29:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#59 Antiwar,

Is this really you saying this garbage or did someone hijack your name? If it's you... then you're obviously a maniac...
Posted by Damn_Proud_American  2004-2-10 3:32:05 PM|| [http://brighterfuture.blogspot.com]  2004-2-10 3:32:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#60 It's amazing what falls out when you grab someone by the ankles and shake long enough.
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-2-10 3:39:03 PM||   2004-2-10 3:39:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#61 G'Day Faisal Murat Anonymous! We really appreciated the Australian SAS Lads help during OIF. Worked with them pretty close during some security missions in Kuwait and Iraq while I was there. Plus the Aussie Army have got vastly superior field rations over our MRE's. Yep Anon, the Ole' Snake-Eaters from Down Under did a smashing job in hunting down quite a few Cock-Sucker-Heads(TM)and rebuilding what Sammy had broke over the last 25 or so years. God Bless the "Roo Crew"!!
Posted by Bodyguard 2004-2-10 3:41:56 PM||   2004-2-10 3:41:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#62 BTW Anon, after reading some of your postings, I think you might want to consider grammar lessons, (Blah-Blah-Blah Comma space next thought xxxxxx...)and perhaps a little less Vegamite on your toast in the morning.
Posted by Bodyguard 2004-2-10 4:00:57 PM||   2004-2-10 4:00:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#63  Where did he go?
Posted by Lil Dhimmi 2004-2-10 4:13:17 PM||   2004-2-10 4:13:17 PM|| Front Page Top

#64 Antiwar: Here is a link from the BBC of all places debunking that Jenin was a massacre. Please read then link to the some of the articles that prove Jenin was a massacre, which you keep claiming are all over the internet.
Posted by 11A5S 2004-2-10 4:18:51 PM||   2004-2-10 4:18:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#65 Just some mind numbing questions I'm sure one for Antiwar et al. who make the USA thir home and despise it so much.
a) Have you ever had any pride whatsoever in your country the USA?
b) Have you ever saluted (school don't count) an American Flag
c) Have you ever waved or raised an American Flag in honor?
d) Do you know what the American Flag represents?
Posted by dataman1 2004-2-10 4:37:28 PM||   2004-2-10 4:37:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#66  American Flag in Iraq anyone?
Posted by Bodyguard 2004-2-10 5:10:14 PM||   2004-2-10 5:10:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#67 www.rantburg.com/default.asp?D=4/19/2003
Posted by Bodyguard 2004-2-10 5:11:22 PM||   2004-2-10 5:11:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#68 Yep on the bases we keep there long after the election in IRAQ.
Posted by dataman1 2004-2-10 5:12:35 PM||   2004-2-10 5:12:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#69 Everyone has a good side including Saddam including you. Because Saddam commited evil deeds doesnt mean he didnt commit good ones too. ... No one is good always are you? Try to be less one dimensional in your thinking.

This says it all. This guy (anon) is seriously fucked up.
Posted by Rafael 2004-2-10 5:42:37 PM||   2004-2-10 5:42:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#70 You've known me as Napoleon VII.... but I'm really ANTIPASTO!
Jews are not meant to have a nation now.They have to wait until the messiah
This hammer could be one of the weird fundy Kibutz guiz.... more likely a Deanie Greenie.
Posted by AntiPasto 2004-2-10 6:29:42 PM||   2004-2-10 6:29:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#71 44!
Posted by AntiPasto 2004-2-10 6:30:26 PM||   2004-2-10 6:30:26 PM|| Front Page Top

07:37 B
07:30 B
00:26 Lucky
00:02 Mr. Davis
23:58 Mr. Davis
23:44 Hyper
23:03 ruprecht
22:59 ruprecht
22:35 Quana
22:21 whitecollar redneck
22:11 4thInfVet
22:08 Vic
21:46 Vic
21:43 Anonymous
21:32 N Guard
21:31 GK
21:31 tu3031
21:23 Tibor
21:21 Valentine
21:17 Valentine
21:15 Pappy
21:10 4thInfVet
21:10 Barbara Skolaut
21:05 Alaska Paul









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com