Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 09/21/2003 View Sat 09/20/2003 View Fri 09/19/2003 View Thu 09/18/2003 View Wed 09/17/2003 View Tue 09/16/2003 View Mon 09/15/2003
1
2003-09-21 Home Front
Boeing Asks for Cooperation on War Tech
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2003-09-21 12:38:46 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 [rant mode]
Can you say "friendly fire"? How about "missing in action"? Or "intense firefight, need immediate reinforcement"? I knew you could...

Where's Bobby Inman when you really need him?

The need for this is so painfully obvious, from an American's (not to mention a programmer's) point of view, that one has to wonder why it isn't being rammed down their throats instead of watching the def con's pussy-foot around. With top-down Pentagon buy-in to the idea, it is easy to resolve the tech issues - 99% of the time it is the politics of the corp asshats (the management) that is the sticking point / monkeywrench, that prevents cooperative collaboration, not the technology.

We do this everyday on the job in civilian sector. It can be done if the Pentagon will play dictator, instead of hooker, in these situations. I recognize the complexity (yes, I do), but it is far from insurmountable.

If this follows form, historically, the biggest obstacle to successful cooperation will be the Navy. If I was The Prez, I'd kidnap Bobby Ray Inman (Current location: Bobby R. Inman, Lyndon B. Johnson professor of national policy at the University of Texas at Austin, has been named chair of the Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science Advisory Board) and hand him the job. He knows where every body is buried and, in particular, which Admirals are worth their salt and which are future Wesley Clarkes. He would have the power to "retire" (read: fire) anyone who didn't salute cooperation and then perform to spec in the process - in all of the services.

The missing ingredient is the will to do it. The motivation is continued Gov't contracts. So Do It, already.
[/rant mode]

It's 2200 hrs, do you where your units are?

JCS & Service Head Buy-in: Check!
Integrated battlefield: Check!
Coordination of forces: Check!
Reduce blue-on-blue engagements: Check!
Simplify SAR support: Check!
Cancel uncooperative Contractors: Check!

Doh!
Posted by .com 2003-9-21 1:56:15 AM||   2003-9-21 1:56:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Just make sure that when we do the programming it doesn't get sent off shore to India or Pakistan. This is the latest cost cutting craze in corporate America that has no regard for the rotten code produced or the security holes it creates, just the bottom line.
Posted by Douglas De Bono  2003-9-21 7:14:36 AM|| [http://www.douglasdebono.com]  2003-9-21 7:14:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 .com is exactly right about upper management and their agendas and egos: Get the Pointy haired bosses out of the way, and the Dilberts will do just fine.

However, we ALREADY have a pretty good inter-computer communications network protocol, designed to ride out a nuclear attack: Boeing went the right way in picking the internet protocols. Unless they have to decide on a Mil-spec Ethernet plug (requiring 20 full turns of the screw ring before the pins engage electrically), we consumers would benefit from selective improvements on the base algorithms, like maybe working in the bluetooth handshaking specs, so that devices can check in and out of the network more quickly and flawlessly.

Then again, given the higher calibre of US troops, perhaps the ability to work in the field with grunts is no longer a guarantee that it'll work in the consumer field. Then again, the reverse may be true.
Posted by Ptah  2003-9-21 9:06:58 PM|| [http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2003-9-21 9:06:58 PM|| Front Page Top

08:39 Anonymous
00:03 Dr. Jal Hampson
00:03 Alaska Paul
23:49 Bomb-a-rama
23:46 DANEgerus
23:14 typical lefty
23:11 Fred
22:27 Dan Darling
22:14 Rafael
21:40 Frank G
21:24 Aris Katsaris
21:17 Ptah
21:10 Steve White
21:06 Ptah
21:06 Aris Katsaris
21:01 Matt
21:00 Aris Katsaris
20:58 Anonymous
20:44 Super Hose
20:44 Old Patriot
20:41 Super Hose
20:36 Old Patriot
20:27 Bomb-a-rama
20:24 Bomb-a-rama









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com